Community
Wiki Posts
Search

RTW Deals on SQ

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 23, 2008, 2:28 pm
  #46  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA GGL
Posts: 677
There is a fare on Expertflyer from SIN, but I can not find one from HKG (only the normal Star Alliance fares).
Irish lad is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2008, 8:17 pm
  #47  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: People's Republic of HotTubistan
Posts: 1,408
Sq Rtw

North American telephone sales people -- who are outsourced to India -- generally do not know about or understand these SQ RTW fares. You may have to argue with them to get them to even find the fare, much less get the rules straight. Or, work it through an SQ office or PPS desk.

In First, it's FEZSQ. No mileage limits or requirements; no minimum stay requirement; no minimum stopover requirement. NO backtracking: you cannot go through SIN to DPS, then back through SIN to SFO, for example.

Booking class is A: no good in Suites on the A380....
Bitterroot is offline  
Old Apr 28, 2008, 1:01 am
  #48  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: YVR
Programs: ACSEMM QRGold SPGLifetimePlat FairmontPlat HyattD AMEXCenturion SerenaPlat TalkBoard Founding Member
Posts: 8,963
Ya, the 1 time through SIN makes an all SQ RTW pretty tough.

I'm doing (double dashes are not SQ, my own arrangements):

YVR--LAX-TPE-SIN-ZRH--FRA-JFK--YYZ--YVR
Dorian is offline  
Old Apr 28, 2008, 9:43 am
  #49  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: People's Republic of HotTubistan
Posts: 1,408
I do exactly what you do, Dorian: just buy separate tickets or take the train in Europe to close gaps, get to/from Indonesia or Malaysia, etc. Still lots cheaper than *A RTW in First.

The prohibition on A class in suites may turn out to be a pain if A-380s take over more 744 routes. On the other hand, the suites fly empty most of the time on some routes (SYD - SIN) so mebbe they'll relent.

Finally, perhaps Guy Betsy could show us the rules for the FEZSQ fare (hint, hint)? here's why I ask: CEZSQ isn't valid on 21/22 and 37/38. But if there's no such restriction in the rule for the FEZSQ fare, you could buy that, accept the voluntary downgrade, use the non-stops, and it's still cheaper than buying back-to-back regular C or J tickets from EWR to SIN, and again from SIN to LAX.
Bitterroot is offline  
Old Apr 28, 2008, 10:39 am
  #50  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: YVR
Programs: Aeroplan Former E
Posts: 1,022
Originally Posted by Bitterroot
In First, it's FEZSQ. No mileage limits or requirements; no minimum stay requirement; no minimum stopover requirement. NO backtracking: you cannot go through SIN to DPS, then back through SIN to SFO, for example.
By backtracking, does this include transits through SIN as well? IE: YVR-CPT via SIN, and then CPT-FRA (again via SIN)? If so, it makes SQ RTW difficult to use since so many of their flights use SIN as the hub.
Jalinth is offline  
Old Apr 28, 2008, 11:12 am
  #51  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: People's Republic of HotTubistan
Posts: 1,408
Backtracking

Yup -- that's exactly what the restriction means: you cannot transit SIN twice on the same itinerary, even if you're just connecting.

I have been through that discussion with managers at SQ several times, and the application of the no-backtracking provision is applied very consistently, so it's not a 'fone-sales person's mis-interpretation of policy.

That's certainly one reason the basic fare is low. It may also be a reason so few SQ telephone sales reps know about the fares: they may not get that many inquiries. Even the senior ticket agent at the San Francisco ticket office had to look it up -- I told her where to find it -- last time I was in the office.

If it's a North American ticket, the only thing you can do at SIN is acquire another RT ticket from SIN to XXX and back -- either by buying it separately, or by redeeming KrisFlyer miles.
Bitterroot is offline  
Old Apr 28, 2008, 7:19 pm
  #52  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Programs: Virgin Flying Club Gold, American Airlines Advantage Gold
Posts: 28
Originally Posted by Jalinth
By backtracking, does this include transits through SIN as well? IE: YVR-CPT via SIN, and then CPT-FRA (again via SIN)? If so, it makes SQ RTW difficult to use since so many of their flights use SIN as the hub.
If you are trying to get to CPT, the SQ/VS RTW ticket works very well though it is more expensive.
jbytheway is offline  
Old Apr 29, 2008, 4:03 am
  #53  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: YVR
Programs: ACSEMM QRGold SPGLifetimePlat FairmontPlat HyattD AMEXCenturion SerenaPlat TalkBoard Founding Member
Posts: 8,963
Originally Posted by Bitterroot
I do exactly what you do, Dorian: just buy separate tickets or take the train in Europe to close gaps, get to/from Indonesia or Malaysia, etc. Still lots cheaper than *A RTW in First.

The prohibition on A class in suites may turn out to be a pain if A-380s take over more 744 routes. On the other hand, the suites fly empty most of the time on some routes (SYD - SIN) so mebbe they'll relent.

Finally, perhaps Guy Betsy could show us the rules for the FEZSQ fare (hint, hint)? here's why I ask: CEZSQ isn't valid on 21/22 and 37/38. But if there's no such restriction in the rule for the FEZSQ fare, you could buy that, accept the voluntary downgrade, use the non-stops, and it's still cheaper than buying back-to-back regular C or J tickets from EWR to SIN, and again from SIN to LAX.

I am flying SQ F RTW....but am not 21/22 nor 37/38.
Dorian is offline  
Old Apr 29, 2008, 4:45 pm
  #54  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: YVR
Programs: Aeroplan Former E
Posts: 1,022
Originally Posted by jbytheway
If you are trying to get to CPT, the SQ/VS RTW ticket works very well though it is more expensive.
I was planning more of a YVR-ICN-KUL-FRA-JFK routing and hoped I could "throw-in" at least one more stop. But the "single pass through SIN" is a problem even for KUL. I think that a policy of one stop (or stopover) and one transit through SIN would make this RTW much more workable.
Jalinth is offline  
Old Apr 29, 2008, 9:27 pm
  #55  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: YVR
Programs: ACSEMM QRGold SPGLifetimePlat FairmontPlat HyattD AMEXCenturion SerenaPlat TalkBoard Founding Member
Posts: 8,963
I suggest using Jetstar for shorter trips from SIN to overcome the single SIN transit on SQ only RTW's.
Dorian is offline  
Old Apr 30, 2008, 7:38 am
  #56  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,548
Is EWR-SIN considered via the Pacific or Atlantic for RTW purpose?
broadwayboy is offline  
Old Apr 30, 2008, 9:33 am
  #57  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Don't know....
Programs: BA LTG, SQ TPPS, CX DMP, AA EXP, Bonvoy LTT, ALL PLT, Hilton DM
Posts: 4,011
Has anyone tried issuing the ticket ex-IAH? My agent is telling me SQ doesn't allow ex-IAH only JFK going east bound. Can anyone confirm that?

Thanks.
bagold is offline  
Old Apr 30, 2008, 10:15 am
  #58  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Little dot in Asia
Programs: AA-EP, TK-*G, HL-DM, HY-GLO, MR-LTP
Posts: 25,932
Originally Posted by bagold
Has anyone tried issuing the ticket ex-IAH? My agent is telling me SQ doesn't allow ex-IAH only JFK going east bound. Can anyone confirm that?

Thanks.
You have to create an itinerary first and get your agent to send to SQ for verification. As its on the 77W, chances are that it will cost more $.
Guy Betsy is offline  
Old Apr 30, 2008, 12:04 pm
  #59  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: People's Republic of HotTubistan
Posts: 1,408
Bagold:

It wouldn't cost more in First -- there's no surcharge on the SIN-SFO 77W in first, only in C and Y.

There's surely at least a US$600 surcharge in C -- if the fare's even valid from IAH.

If no one else finds out the story on IAH origins in the next day or so, I'll see if I can get a straight answer....
Bitterroot is offline  
Old Apr 30, 2008, 1:49 pm
  #60  
Moderator, Hilton Honors
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: on a short leash
Programs: some
Posts: 71,422
Originally Posted by broadwayboy
Is EWR-SIN considered via the Pacific or Atlantic for RTW purpose?
On the *A RTW, SIN-EWR vv is trans-pacific (rule 4E) along with YYZ-NRT/HKG/PEK/PVG/ICN, SIN-LAX/EWR, BKK-JFK.
Kiwi Flyer is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.