T2, T3 and now T1?
#17
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SIN
Programs: TK-G | Accor P | SQ-G | Marriott T
Posts: 3,831
That's what happened this time too. Confusing for passengers, and irritating for those meeting passengers.
How difficult is it to decide that flights to/from XXX will always leave/arrive at a given terminal as with most other airlines?
Or is this a Changi airport problem?
How difficult is it to decide that flights to/from XXX will always leave/arrive at a given terminal as with most other airlines?
Or is this a Changi airport problem?
I do believe in gate D41, there will be ground staff who is direct you toward T2. I think D41 will be definitely shorter walk to T2 immigration compare if you arrive in any E or F gate.
The flight will be marked arrived in T2 and you should officially get out from T2
#18
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Singapore
Programs: A3 Gold, SQ Gold, AT Gold, Accor Silver, HHonors Diamond, I Prefer Elite, DISCOVERY Titanium
Posts: 472
That's what happened this time too. Confusing for passengers, and irritating for those meeting passengers.
How difficult is it to decide that flights to/from XXX will always leave/arrive at a given terminal as with most other airlines?
Or is this a Changi airport problem?
How difficult is it to decide that flights to/from XXX will always leave/arrive at a given terminal as with most other airlines?
Or is this a Changi airport problem?
1) did the ground staff waited for disembarkation door? do believe they give a CLEAR direction where to go.
2) providing flights number could be easiest. if i remember correctly there are more than 20-30 display screen across the 3 terminal for arrival flight information.
3) Maybe you dont have any check in luggage that's why you no need to go Terminal 2 that's could be a reason why you head to terminal 1 where you missed the person who you are to meet.
as long as you are not arrive at at F60 you should consider yourself lucky (AS NON-CIP).
#19
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SIN
Programs: TK-G | Accor P | SQ-G | Marriott T
Posts: 3,831
Or, even better, why don't all SQ flights just use the same terminal? Connecting at SIN is such a hassle - arriving at an outlying A gate and departing from an outlying E gate... There may be Skytrains, but schlepping through the shopping mall that is T3 - even the schlep from the lounge to the far B gates is a complete pain. I'd go as far as to say it's worse than BKK...
#20
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,413
Once when I was in Singapore there was some discussion of the new T3 and I understood that it was some sort of government policy that SQ was not allowed to take over all of the nice new terminal. I think there was a sense that it wouldn't look good to use public money in a way that seemed to favor SQ or even for the benefit of SQ rather than the general public citizens/taxpayers.
#21
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA Gold (and other non-status plastic)
Posts: 1,889
At SIN, if your gate allocation is unlucky, it can be a 30 minute walk or longer - hardly optimal on a 45 minute connection. And there is no way of getting from the A gates/lounges to the B gates at Changi without the 15 minute obstacle course through the T3 shopping mall - no travellators or Skytrain to help you here (why not?)
If 90% of BA can fit into LHR T5, then SQ can fit in any terminal at SIN
#22
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: New York, NY, USA
Posts: 12,482
BTW, how did you book a 45 minutes connection at Changi? MCT is either 50 minutes or an hour, depending your flight numbers.
Last edited by TerryK; May 28, 2012 at 5:21 pm Reason: grammar
#23
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA Gold (and other non-status plastic)
Posts: 1,889
#24
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX DM
Posts: 1,140
No offense, IMHO there wasn't any confusion should occur.
1) did the ground staff waited for disembarkation door? do believe they give a CLEAR direction where to go.
2) providing flights number could be easiest. if i remember correctly there are more than 20-30 display screen across the 3 terminal for arrival flight information.
3) Maybe you dont have any check in luggage that's why you no need to go Terminal 2 that's could be a reason why you head to terminal 1 where you missed the person who you are to meet.
as long as you are not arrive at at F60 you should consider yourself lucky (AS NON-CIP).
1) did the ground staff waited for disembarkation door? do believe they give a CLEAR direction where to go.
2) providing flights number could be easiest. if i remember correctly there are more than 20-30 display screen across the 3 terminal for arrival flight information.
3) Maybe you dont have any check in luggage that's why you no need to go Terminal 2 that's could be a reason why you head to terminal 1 where you missed the person who you are to meet.
as long as you are not arrive at at F60 you should consider yourself lucky (AS NON-CIP).
You can keep saying "it's really very simple" but it doesn't alter the fact that the need to have ground staff giving directions to disembarking passengers is making work where none should be needed.
#25
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Singapore
Programs: QF LTG, SQ EGTP, Bonvoy LTG
Posts: 4,847
End of A to end of E. Looks like 30 minutes to me (plus waiting and travelling time on the Skytrain)
And I'm sure, for the vast majority it wouldn't take 15 mins to get from the SK lounge in T2 (ie the E sign on the map ) to F37. I'd say most could do it in 10, some in less (5 if flight is closing!).
And as for buses, really? I absolutely loath getting off a plane and onto a crammed bus with poor-to no aircon. It may work OK for those wanting to get from F60 to B10, but what about the passengers who need to get to F59? They would have to catch a bus to some central point, find there way up some stairs and make their way back to F59. Can't please all the people all of the time.
Also, for comparison once I was 25 mins late in HKG leaving only 35 mins to connect and upon deplaning I was handed a BP a later flight, not my original one. And this was needed, as it took 15mins to pass through security at the transfer point, and still involved lots of walking. Same situation also happened in SIN and made my original flight no problems. I think everyone is overlooking the time consuming central transfer point add both waiting and walking time. (although perhaps in HKG, it would have been quicker to take a longer walk to one of the more outlying transfer points).
Last edited by lokijuh; May 29, 2012 at 9:58 am
#26
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SIN
Programs: TK-G | Accor P | SQ-G | Marriott T
Posts: 3,831
At SIN, if your gate allocation is unlucky, it can be a 30 minute walk or longer - hardly optimal on a 45 minute connection. And there is no way of getting from the A gates/lounges to the B gates at Changi without the 15 minute obstacle course through the T3 shopping mall - no travellators or Skytrain to help you here (why not?)
If you complaining that the connecting in SIN because SQ operated in 2 terminal, I can tell you that, if you are unlucky, even within T2 you can end up walking at least 10-15 min, if you say arrive at gate F60 and connecting to E8 or E28. It happened to me once, supposed to schedule to depart from F60 and last minute SQ decided to swap aircraft and the new aircraft was at gate E6!
I occasionally depart from the very far end of gate A in T3, which is like A16-18. I walk few time, I think it is like 15 min walk and there is travelator. There is also train to bring you there.
If this is too much hassle for you try to connect in HKG. I once arrive on gate 60-ish and depart from gate 3 or 4! And what I did not know in HKG the train is only go in one direction. In arrival from bigger number gate to lower number gate (toward immigration) and in departure level from small number to bigger number (away from immigration). If you miss this, try to walk from one end to another end! I did walk from the Wing lounge (which is just behind immigration) near gate 1-4 to catch a flight at gate 60ish. It like 20ish min walk and I walked very fast as I always missed my flight and I run out of breath when I sat down in the plane!
#27
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SIN
Programs: TK-G | Accor P | SQ-G | Marriott T
Posts: 3,831
Yes, there were ground staff waiting at the door to direct everyone to T2. But quite a lot of passengers hesitated - after all right ahead of them was the way out to immigration and customs. So the natural thought is "why are we being asked to go somewhere else".
You can keep saying "it's really very simple" but it doesn't alter the fact that the need to have ground staff giving directions to disembarking passengers is making work where none should be needed.
You can keep saying "it's really very simple" but it doesn't alter the fact that the need to have ground staff giving directions to disembarking passengers is making work where none should be needed.
Even in "normal" arrival, there will still be some ground staff to tell you the direction to arrival area
#28
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NYC/CEB
Posts: 391
If this is too much hassle for you try to connect in HKG. I once arrive on gate 60-ish and depart from gate 3 or 4! And what I did not know in HKG the train is only go in one direction. In arrival from bigger number gate to lower number gate (toward immigration) and in departure level from small number to bigger number (away from immigration). If you miss this, try to walk from one end to another end! I did walk from the Wing lounge (which is just behind immigration) near gate 1-4 to catch a flight at gate 60ish. It like 20ish min walk and I walked very fast as I always missed my flight and I run out of breath when I sat down in the plane!
#29
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA Gold (and other non-status plastic)
Posts: 1,889
I absolutely loath getting off a plane and onto a crammed bus with poor-to no aircon.
...
Also, for comparison once I was 25 mins late in HKG leaving only 35 mins to connect and upon deplaning I was handed a BP a later flight, not my original one
...
Same situation also happened in SIN and made my original flight no problems.
...
Also, for comparison once I was 25 mins late in HKG leaving only 35 mins to connect and upon deplaning I was handed a BP a later flight, not my original one
...
Same situation also happened in SIN and made my original flight no problems.
Last year, when I was 35 mins late on a 60 hour transit (in C class), SQ provided a buggy to take me from the B gate to the B Skytrain, presuming that I could then make my own way from there to the F gate for my connection. I was also told that my luggage would not make my flight. I refused, and requested a BP for a later flight... (Hmmm, let me think... 2 hours in the SKL, or 2 hours waiting by the carousel at KUL)
Hey, look, I'm not saying that SIN is not a perfectly adequate airport, I am just making the point that there are some other more pleasant airports to make connections in, and it would be far more convenient if SQ was in one terminal (and the *G lounges had a toilet and shower in them...)
Let's face it, SQ - nice in the air, rubbish on the ground...
#30
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX DM
Posts: 1,140