Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Why doesn't UA use OAK (anymore)?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 17, 2026 | 4:59 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston
Programs: UA Plat, Marriott Plat
Posts: 13,319
Why doesn't UA use OAK (anymore)?

Originally Posted by SPN Lifer
This is the United Airlines (UA) subforum, and UA hasn't flown to Oakland (OAK) in years.
Even the charters and diversions there dried up after 2024.

https://www.flightaware.com/live/fli...855Z/KORD/KOAK is the last one I see.

Last edited by WineCountryUA; Apr 20, 2026 at 3:09 pm Reason: Created a separate disccusion thread
mduell is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2026 | 5:41 pm
  #2  
30 Countries Visited
60 Nights
3M
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Programs: AA EP, UA 1K/MM, WoH Globalist, HH Diamond
Posts: 3,784
Originally Posted by SPN Lifer
This is the United Airlines (UA) subforum, and UA hasn't flown to Oakland (OAK) in years.

The joke is on you!
Originally Posted by mduell
Even the charters and diversions there dried up after 2024.

https://www.flightaware.com/live/fli...855Z/KORD/KOAK is the last one I see.
Traffic at OAK has dropped substantially from their peak of about 13.6M back in 2018 and even post COVID they never fully recovered from that high and peaked at around 11.2M ibut then started a decline to around 9.2M in the past few years.
Infinite1K is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2026 | 8:29 pm
  #3  
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: SFO
Programs: AA EXP, UA Plat, Hyatt Glob, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Plat
Posts: 6,162
Originally Posted by Infinite1K
Traffic at OAK has dropped substantially
Well sure, with airlines like UA (and everyone else except basically WN) reduce and eventually stop service all together.
econ is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2026 | 3:29 am
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Saipan, MP 96950 USA (Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands = the CNMI)
Programs: UA Silver, Hilton Silver. Life: UA .60 MM, United & Admirals Clubs (spousal), Marriott Platinum
Posts: 17,919
FAA bans parallel approaches at SFO indefinitely -- Impact on UA?

If flight volume out of SFO is substantially limited, is there a possibility UA would resume service out of OAK for origin and destination (O&D) traffic?

Last edited by SPN Lifer; Apr 20, 2026 at 3:44 pm
SPN Lifer is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2026 | 3:54 am
  #5  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Programs: United Mileage Plus
Posts: 1,665
Nobody who lives along the Peninsula or Marin wants to fly in and out of OAK.

I wonder what percentage of East Bay and Contra Costa residents would fly out of OAK instead of SFO.

Hell a lot of people who live near SJC probably are flying out of SFO than SJC except for maybe short regional direct flights.
Wyfind likes this.
frappant is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2026 | 11:15 am
  #6  
Moderator: United Airlines
2M
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA LT Plat 2MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 72,929
Originally Posted by SPN Lifer
FAA bans parallel approaches at SFO indefinitely -- Impact on UA?

If flight volume out of SFO is substantially limited, is there a possibility UA would resume service out of OAK for origin and destination (O&D) traffic?
As has been covered more than once, this restriction only impacts SFO at the very peak times and with a little load leveling the impact is minimal. It does limit the growth potential. With technology advances the restriction may be able to be lifted at SFO.

So UA is not going to reopen it OAK operations (there is just not the O/D demand for that). It may consider increase SJC (as the SF Bay area population center moves further south).

And to the further East, SMF can be an option for some.

There was talk years ago of using Hamilton Field in the North Bay but local resistance (Marin Country) killed that.

Last edited by WineCountryUA; Apr 18, 2026 at 11:25 am Reason: Hamilton Field / SMF
WineCountryUA is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2026 | 11:47 am
  #7  
30 Countries Visited
60 Nights
3M
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Programs: AA EP, UA 1K/MM, WoH Globalist, HH Diamond
Posts: 3,784
Originally Posted by SPN Lifer
FAA bans parallel approaches at SFO indefinitely -- Impact on UA?

If flight volume out of SFO is substantially limited, is there a possibility UA would resume service out of OAK for origin and destination (O&D) traffic?
I would think if there is a need to shift/add capacity, SJC would be a better fit.

For one UA already has an operation there (albeit small) and right now nothing in OAK.

Secondly San Mateo + Santa Clara + San Francisco counties have roughly 3.5M residents, whereas Alameda + Contra Costa is roughly 2.8M. And add the further outlying counties like Marin, Sonoma, and Santa Cruz and SFO+SJC are more desirable for a larger chunk of Bay Area than OAK would be.
Infinite1K is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2026 | 1:00 pm
  #8  
Flyertalk Evangelist, Moderator: United Airlines MileagePlus
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: MSP
Programs: DL DM, UA Nostalgist, Global Entry; +others wherever miles/points are found
Posts: 16,093
Originally Posted by frappant
I wonder what percentage of East Bay and Contra Costa residents would fly out of OAK instead of SFO.

Hell a lot of people who live near SJC probably are flying out of SFO than SJC except for maybe short regional direct flights.
Sure, but primarily because there aren't flights out of OAK or SJC (speaking as someone who never actually lived closest to SFO of the Bay Area airports).
findark is online now  
Old Apr 18, 2026 | 2:29 pm
  #9  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA
Programs: UA 1K, Marriott Platinum, Hilton Gold
Posts: 464
Originally Posted by frappant
Nobody who lives along the Peninsula or Marin wants to fly in and out of OAK.
I may be an outlier Marin resident, but I actually do not mind flying out of OAK at all when flight schedules (and prices) make sense. Travel time is similar to or faster and parking is cheaper than SFO. I do live North of 580, so I suppose that may be the reason.

I usually do 2-4 trips a year from OAK (all on WN now, but previously on AS as well); otherwise its mostly UA from SFO.
epi231 is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2026 | 4:00 pm
  #10  
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
5 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Bay Area - East Bay
Programs: UA 1k, AS 75k, Marriott Platinum, Hyatt Explorist
Posts: 712
Originally Posted by frappant
Nobody who lives along the Peninsula or Marin wants to fly in and out of OAK.

I wonder what percentage of East Bay and Contra Costa residents would fly out of OAK instead of SFO.

Hell a lot of people who live near SJC probably are flying out of SFO than SJC except for maybe short regional direct flights.
I live about half way (geographically) between SJC and OAK and I fly out of SFO 95% of the time purely for flight availability reasons. If there were a greater selection of direct flights out of OAK and SJC I would take those in a heartbeat

Edit: I specify geographically because despite the distance being equal, it takes quite a bit longer to get to OAK because of traffic patterns. OAK has the best parking situation of the 3 airports though, so still desireable.
zymm is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2026 | 2:01 am
  #11  
30 Countries Visited
2M
All eyes on you!
5 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Bay Area, California
Programs: Alaska Atmos Titanium, Bonvoy Platinum, Recovering United 1K
Posts: 599
Originally Posted by SPN Lifer
This is the United Airlines (UA) subforum, and UA hasn't flown to Oakland (OAK) in years.

The joke is on you!
whoosh!
cpworld is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2026 | 10:25 am
  #12  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
1M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 71,715
Originally Posted by WineCountryUA
There was talk years ago of using Hamilton Field in the North Bay but local resistance (Marin Country) killed that.
It wasnt just local resistance. Hamilton is located on land that has subsided, with much of area sitting 5 to 15 feet below sea level, which is why a large portion was converted into a tidal wetlands restoration project. It is also part of the broader Bay Area subsidence, where land is sinking due to soil compaction and groundwater extraction.
halls120 is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2026 | 9:17 pm
  #13  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Programs: SQ, QF, UA, CO, DL
Posts: 3,831
Originally Posted by SPN Lifer
FAA bans parallel approaches at SFO indefinitely -- Impact on UA?

If flight volume out of SFO is substantially limited, is there a possibility UA would resume service out of OAK for origin and destination (O&D) traffic?
I had two domestic flights into SFO delayed recently by more than an hour due to "ATC reductions". Anyone planning to connect in SFO needs to allow plenty of buffer. I was OK.

As for bringing back OAK service, does anyone know how the traffic flows work for O&D there? UA would need a number of daily flights to bring a station back. OAK is dominated by WN which is a double edged sword, the airport benefits from a lot of short haul, low priced flights but is less attractive to the larger network carriers as a result. For the longer flights it seems most are OK making the hike to SFO.
Wyfind likes this.
uanj is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2026 | 10:23 am
  #14  
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,749
Originally Posted by Infinite1K
I would think if there is a need to shift/add capacity, SJC would be a better fit.

For one UA already has an operation there (albeit small) and right now nothing in OAK.

Secondly San Mateo + Santa Clara + San Francisco counties have roughly 3.5M residents, whereas Alameda + Contra Costa is roughly 2.8M. And add the further outlying counties like Marin, Sonoma, and Santa Cruz and SFO+SJC are more desirable for a larger chunk of Bay Area than OAK would be.
There are a variety of reasons OAK has struggled recently, but it is the most centrally-located and most convenient airport for the largest population in the area. The airport notes this in every press release. Corporate demand is higher on peninsula and south bay, but population is not.
ucdtim17 is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2026 | 10:57 am
  #15  
30 Countries Visited
60 Nights
3M
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Programs: AA EP, UA 1K/MM, WoH Globalist, HH Diamond
Posts: 3,784
Originally Posted by ucdtim17
There are a variety of reasons OAK has struggled recently, but it is the most centrally-located and most convenient airport for the largest population in the area. The airport notes this in every press release. Corporate demand is higher on peninsula and south bay, but population is not.
What are the variety of reasons?

Given how 880/580 is always jammed up, not sure how you could say it is convenient for Easy Bay residents, let alone for those on the peninsula. And population wise, there are more people living in SF/Peninsula (SF, SM, SC counties).
Infinite1K is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.