Why doesn't UA use OAK (anymore)?
#1
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist



Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston
Programs: UA Plat, Marriott Plat
Posts: 13,319
Why doesn't UA use OAK (anymore)?
https://www.flightaware.com/live/fli...855Z/KORD/KOAK is the last one I see.
Last edited by WineCountryUA; Apr 20, 2026 at 3:09 pm Reason: Created a separate disccusion thread
#2




Join Date: Apr 2010
Programs: AA EP, UA 1K/MM, WoH Globalist, HH Diamond
Posts: 3,784
Even the charters and diversions there dried up after 2024.
https://www.flightaware.com/live/fli...855Z/KORD/KOAK is the last one I see.
https://www.flightaware.com/live/fli...855Z/KORD/KOAK is the last one I see.
#3



Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: SFO
Programs: AA EXP, UA Plat, Hyatt Glob, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Plat
Posts: 6,162
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Saipan, MP 96950 USA (Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands = the CNMI)
Programs: UA Silver, Hilton Silver. Life: UA .60 MM, United & Admirals Clubs (spousal), Marriott Platinum
Posts: 17,919
FAA bans parallel approaches at SFO indefinitely -- Impact on UA?
If flight volume out of SFO is substantially limited, is there a possibility UA would resume service out of OAK for origin and destination (O&D) traffic?
If flight volume out of SFO is substantially limited, is there a possibility UA would resume service out of OAK for origin and destination (O&D) traffic?
Last edited by SPN Lifer; Apr 20, 2026 at 3:44 pm
#5




Join Date: Sep 2022
Programs: United Mileage Plus
Posts: 1,665
Nobody who lives along the Peninsula or Marin wants to fly in and out of OAK.
I wonder what percentage of East Bay and Contra Costa residents would fly out of OAK instead of SFO.
Hell a lot of people who live near SJC probably are flying out of SFO than SJC except for maybe short regional direct flights.
I wonder what percentage of East Bay and Contra Costa residents would fly out of OAK instead of SFO.
Hell a lot of people who live near SJC probably are flying out of SFO than SJC except for maybe short regional direct flights.
#6
Moderator: United Airlines




Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA LT Plat 2MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 72,929
So UA is not going to reopen it OAK operations (there is just not the O/D demand for that). It may consider increase SJC (as the SF Bay area population center moves further south).
And to the further East, SMF can be an option for some.
There was talk years ago of using Hamilton Field in the North Bay but local resistance (Marin Country) killed that.
Last edited by WineCountryUA; Apr 18, 2026 at 11:25 am Reason: Hamilton Field / SMF
#7




Join Date: Apr 2010
Programs: AA EP, UA 1K/MM, WoH Globalist, HH Diamond
Posts: 3,784
For one UA already has an operation there (albeit small) and right now nothing in OAK.
Secondly San Mateo + Santa Clara + San Francisco counties have roughly 3.5M residents, whereas Alameda + Contra Costa is roughly 2.8M. And add the further outlying counties like Marin, Sonoma, and Santa Cruz and SFO+SJC are more desirable for a larger chunk of Bay Area than OAK would be.
#8
Flyertalk Evangelist, Moderator: United Airlines MileagePlus


Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: MSP
Programs: DL DM, UA Nostalgist, Global Entry; +others wherever miles/points are found
Posts: 16,093
Sure, but primarily because there aren't flights out of OAK or SJC (speaking as someone who never actually lived closest to SFO of the Bay Area airports).
#9


Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA
Programs: UA 1K, Marriott Platinum, Hilton Gold
Posts: 464
I usually do 2-4 trips a year from OAK (all on WN now, but previously on AS as well); otherwise its mostly UA from SFO.
#10



Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Bay Area - East Bay
Programs: UA 1k, AS 75k, Marriott Platinum, Hyatt Explorist
Posts: 712
Nobody who lives along the Peninsula or Marin wants to fly in and out of OAK.
I wonder what percentage of East Bay and Contra Costa residents would fly out of OAK instead of SFO.
Hell a lot of people who live near SJC probably are flying out of SFO than SJC except for maybe short regional direct flights.
I wonder what percentage of East Bay and Contra Costa residents would fly out of OAK instead of SFO.
Hell a lot of people who live near SJC probably are flying out of SFO than SJC except for maybe short regional direct flights.
Edit: I specify geographically because despite the distance being equal, it takes quite a bit longer to get to OAK because of traffic patterns. OAK has the best parking situation of the 3 airports though, so still desireable.
#11




Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Bay Area, California
Programs: Alaska Atmos Titanium, Bonvoy Platinum, Recovering United 1K
Posts: 599
#12
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 71,715
#13


Join Date: Jan 2005
Programs: SQ, QF, UA, CO, DL
Posts: 3,831
As for bringing back OAK service, does anyone know how the traffic flows work for O&D there? UA would need a number of daily flights to bring a station back. OAK is dominated by WN which is a double edged sword, the airport benefits from a lot of short haul, low priced flights but is less attractive to the larger network carriers as a result. For the longer flights it seems most are OK making the hike to SFO.
#14



Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,749
I would think if there is a need to shift/add capacity, SJC would be a better fit.
For one UA already has an operation there (albeit small) and right now nothing in OAK.
Secondly San Mateo + Santa Clara + San Francisco counties have roughly 3.5M residents, whereas Alameda + Contra Costa is roughly 2.8M. And add the further outlying counties like Marin, Sonoma, and Santa Cruz and SFO+SJC are more desirable for a larger chunk of Bay Area than OAK would be.
For one UA already has an operation there (albeit small) and right now nothing in OAK.
Secondly San Mateo + Santa Clara + San Francisco counties have roughly 3.5M residents, whereas Alameda + Contra Costa is roughly 2.8M. And add the further outlying counties like Marin, Sonoma, and Santa Cruz and SFO+SJC are more desirable for a larger chunk of Bay Area than OAK would be.
#15




Join Date: Apr 2010
Programs: AA EP, UA 1K/MM, WoH Globalist, HH Diamond
Posts: 3,784
There are a variety of reasons OAK has struggled recently, but it is the most centrally-located and most convenient airport for the largest population in the area. The airport notes this in every press release. Corporate demand is higher on peninsula and south bay, but population is not.
Given how 880/580 is always jammed up, not sure how you could say it is convenient for Easy Bay residents, let alone for those on the peninsula. And population wise, there are more people living in SF/Peninsula (SF, SM, SC counties).


