Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Health and Fitness > Coronavirus and travel
Reload this Page >

COVID-19: Lounge thread for thoughts, concerns and questions

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Mar 11, 2020, 10:13 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: Ocn Vw 1K
In order to reduce noise in the Coronavirus / Covid-19 : general fact-based reporting thread, and to create a central place to invite any member to ask a basic question about the impact of COVID-19 on travel, your moderators have decided to open this separate "lounge" thread for related discussion that isn't strictly fact-based reporting.
Any member who can provide a constructive, helpful answer to a question; or post constructively in reply to a member's point-of-view, is welcome to post.

All FT rules apply, including avoiding personalized, snarky, political, other off-topic, commercial, and repeatedly disruptive content.

Discussion of general economic impacts of Covid-19 belongs in the OMNI forum, not here.
Discussion and critique of political/government actions to aid the economy or which is far more political than related to COVID-19 is for the OMNI/PR forum, not here.

This is a protocol for posting adopted by the forum Moderator team:Please follow this protocol, based on FlyerTalk Rules and long-standing FlyerTalk best practices. Doing so will help keep the thread open, and allow our moderator team to aid members, rather than having to resort to discipline.

Constructive, respectful posts, views, opinions, questions, and replies, related to the topic are welcome. Avoid commenting on members personally, or posting off-topic or political messages.

While respectful disagreement of a posted view is allowed, dont call-out posters to prove their points. FlyerTalk has never required discussion standards at the level of a Ph.D. dissertation defense, or a trial court witness cross-examination.

After a reasonable exchange of views on a point, please yield the floor so that others may bring up different topics, questions or points.

Especially important in this time of pandemic, when normal life and travel have been upended: please take regular breaks from the thread.
Please stay healthy,

your FT Coronavirus and Travel Moderator Team.








Print Wikipost

COVID-19: Lounge thread for thoughts, concerns and questions

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 8, 2020 | 11:19 am
  #211  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Virginia City Highlands
Programs: Nothing anymore after 20 years
Posts: 7,190
BBC's article about situation in Italy. If below quote is not a wake up call, I don't know what else should be:

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-51787238

The health system is under immense strain in Lombardy, a northern region of 10 million people, where people are being treated in hospital corridors.

Last edited by invisible; Mar 8, 2020 at 11:50 am
invisible is offline  
Old Mar 8, 2020 | 11:49 am
  #212  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Virginia City Highlands
Programs: Nothing anymore after 20 years
Posts: 7,190
If you are surprised why Japan currently has much lower number of cases, here is one explanation posted in Japan forum:

Originally Posted by acregal
My wife works for a Japanese company (number 2 in the field in Japan) and they have been told in no uncertain terms that if they test positive for coronavirus, it will disrupt numerous projects at the company and cause a lot of trouble, which will then be reflected in their evaluation - so basically people have been ordered to not be tested. Working from home isn't allowed and all business trips are still on.
invisible is offline  
Old Mar 8, 2020 | 11:53 am
  #213  
All eyes on you!
5 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Europe
Posts: 234
Originally Posted by invisible
So question - how many cases do we need to have to calculate average discharge time with 95% of confidence? 100? 1000? 5000?

Magnitudes greater than 5000 people though for any decent degree of confidence. Equally changes in care protocols as time progresses and we understand the disease more may change the figure a fair bit...

I think a bit lower down from your comment there's a post from nk15 which shows the difference between South Korea, Wuhan Princess and Chinese data samples on death rates. This shows you how diverse the death rate range can be- from 0.7% to 2.3% dependent on where it was caught. This illustrates the difficulty in estimating at the current stage.

Last edited by enemigo; Mar 8, 2020 at 11:54 am Reason: Added quote
enemigo is offline  
Old Mar 8, 2020 | 12:19 pm
  #214  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 11,690
Originally Posted by Silver Fox
At SFO yesterday someone had a sneezing fit in the boarding area. You would have thought someone had opened up with an AR-15. Quite what people will do for drama after this is worrying to me.
I would have been one of those avoiding the sneeze - even if Covid-19 is not going on. People don't cover up when they sneeze, use their hands to cover up, etc. I think it is good that people are aware.

I flew about 2 weeks ago, the UA non-rev employee next to me coughed from time to time the entire flight and had no mask on. I hope people will be more aware now and be considerate enough to consider a mask when they cough. With allergy season coming up, this is going to be interesting.
username is offline  
Old Mar 8, 2020 | 12:20 pm
  #215  
1M
40 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Hawai'i Nei
Programs: Au: HA, UA, Marriott, Hilton; GE
Posts: 7,800
Originally Posted by bobbytables
thats complete speculation.
As is the idea that travel restrictions are ineffective.
747FC is offline  
Old Mar 8, 2020 | 12:26 pm
  #216  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Programs: Top Tier with all 3 alliances
Posts: 19,525
Originally Posted by Temedar
Italy's death rate as derived from today's numbers is just under 5%
They added almost new 1500 cases today, this is picking up, despite their previous measures, which explains the new measures...
nk15 is online now  
Old Mar 8, 2020 | 12:41 pm
  #217  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS
Posts: 15,027
What happened to the notion of TRIAGE? Was it tossed out of the window??
Dieuwer is offline  
Old Mar 8, 2020 | 12:48 pm
  #218  
x2y
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 60
Does anyone know if Violet Water would be effective to wipe down plane seats? Would Clorox wipes be a better choice?

There is no Purell or rubbing alcohol available.

The violet water:
Brand name: Crusellas
Ingredients : SDA Alcohol 40B, Water, Fragrance, FD&C Violet 2, FD&C Red 40)

The Clorox wipes are on the EPA list of disinfectants for COVID-19, referenced in this CDC document:
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019...infection.html

I'd be grateful for any insights.
x2y is offline  
Old Mar 8, 2020 | 12:58 pm
  #219  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Programs: Top Tier with all 3 alliances
Posts: 19,525
Originally Posted by trueblu
……...
Although I agree that we don't know the denominator of true infected, Diamond Princess is the best 'contained' point outbreak we have: the demographics are skewed, to be fair, since it was a much older than average population. But the number of asymptomatic individuals appears to be ~50%, it _may_ be a bit higher with a younger demographic, but I think the mortality rate is going to be well above 0.2%, and could well be 1% or even slightly higher, and that is under optimal care scenarios. The hospitalization rate is the biggest concern, as I and others have said all along: this has serious implications for _all cause mortality_. And I don't think this rate will be under 3%, which is just too high for us to cope with.
……………………………………...
Closing shot: disappointed that the Cruise industry really believes enhanced screening can prevent further outbreaks, especially since we know full well that half of those infected won't have a fever, and even 15% of those coming to medical attention won't have a cough,.....
Assuming that the bolded is true, that roughly 50% (and perhaps a bit more) of the infected appear asymptomatic (and assuming that everyone on WP got tested), we could extrapolate from that and estimate that we may be potentially missing around 50% of those "in the wild" who are infected, because they are asymptomatic. Then, this suggests we could just double the denominator to more accurately and conservatively approximate infected cases, or just divide the fatality ratios (CFRs) by two.
nk15 is online now  
Old Mar 8, 2020 | 1:09 pm
  #220  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 11,690
This popped up on my Youtube feed this morning:

Originally Posted by notquiteaff
It would be helpful if you could add a brief summary of the video or some sort of explanation what it’s about and why I should watch it. Thanks.
Doctor talks about both the "we don't have a problem" and "we are in big trouble" sides and is kind of entertaining. (Not sure how informative for those who are pretty aware already.)

Last edited by username; Mar 8, 2020 at 1:28 pm
username is offline  
Old Mar 8, 2020 | 1:15 pm
  #221  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Pacific Northwest
Programs: UA Gold 1MM, AS Plat, AA EP, Bonvoy Plat, Hilton Dia, Hyatt Glob, IHG Plat, ...
Posts: 21,435
Originally Posted by username
This popped up on my Youtube feed this morning:
It would be helpful if you could add a brief summary of the video or some sort of explanation what it’s about and why I should watch it. Thanks.
notquiteaff is offline  
Old Mar 8, 2020 | 1:38 pm
  #222  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wesley Chapel, FL
Programs: American Airlines
Posts: 31,464
Originally Posted by x2y
Does anyone know if Violet Water would be effective to wipe down plane seats? Would Clorox wipes be a better choice?

There is no Purell or rubbing alcohol available.

The violet water:
Brand name: Crusellas
Ingredients : SDA Alcohol 40B, Water, Fragrance, FD&C Violet 2, FD&C Red 40)

The Clorox wipes are on the EPA list of disinfectants for COVID-19, referenced in this CDC document:
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019...infection.html

I'd be grateful for any insights.
All I've read is the alcohol % needs to be at least 60.
enviroian is offline  
Old Mar 8, 2020 | 1:47 pm
  #223  
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Wisconsin
Programs: Hilton Diamond, Delta PM
Posts: 330
Violet water is a cologne, not a disinfectant. I'm going to go with an emphatic no it would not be effective. And because it is a cologne/fragrance, using it is probably more likely to impact allergies of other passengers, causing them to sneeze. Please don't do this.
LizGross144 is offline  
Old Mar 8, 2020 | 1:56 pm
  #224  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 11,690
I have some questions:

1 - while it is not meaningful, I wonder if there are numbers on how many tests are done in the US (i.e. not just the confirmed cases)

2 - in other parts of the world, they are doing multiple tests to be sure. Depending on how someone swabbed and when during the infection, tests can come back negative for those infected. Is the US just doing 1 test and call it good? If multiple tests are done, how does that affect the "tests done" number?
username is offline  
Old Mar 8, 2020 | 2:41 pm
  #225  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Pacific Northwest
Programs: UA Gold 1MM, AS Plat, AA EP, Bonvoy Plat, Hilton Dia, Hyatt Glob, IHG Plat, ...
Posts: 21,435
Originally Posted by username
I have some questions:

1 - while it is not meaningful, I wonder if there are numbers on how many tests are done in the US (i.e. not just the confirmed cases)

2 - in other parts of the world, they are doing multiple tests to be sure. Depending on how someone swabbed and when during the infection, tests can come back negative for those infected. Is the US just doing 1 test and call it good? If multiple tests are done, how does that affect the "tests done" number?

1.I believe the CDC stopped releasing the number of tests performed several days ago.

2. according to news reports, 2+tests per person. E.g., https://us.cnn.com/2020/03/08/politi...rus/index.html

However, federal officials still are not giving a number of how many people have been tested. Each person has at least two tests given to them to determine if they have the virus -- a nose swab and a mouth swab.
notquiteaff is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.