Beautiful Images...Just Because
#2216
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Programs: MR LT Titanium, AA LT PLT, UA SLV, Avis PreferredPlus, HH Gold, Hertz PC, National Executive, etc.
Posts: 31,670

This reminded me of how dim the eclipse actually is - ISO3200 and wide open, but still 0.4s exposure, so some blur. And manual focus, as even contract detect focus in Live View couldn't lock on. Manual focus at an effective 900mm is a challenge. I'd need something like a huge 400/2.8 or 600/4 and a newer body with better high ISO performance to do much better. Or a telescope mount...
Last edited by CPRich; Feb 9, 2019 at 3:40 pm
#2217
Moderator, OneWorld




Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: SEA
Programs: RAA RIP; AA ExEXP
Posts: 12,521
This reminded me of how dim the eclipse actually is - ISO3200 and wide open, but still 0.4s exposure, so some blur. And manual focus as even contract detect focus in Live View couldn't lock on. Manual focus at an effective 900mm is a challenge. I'd need something like a huge 400/2.8 or 600/4 and a newer body with better high ISO performance to do much better. Or a telescope mount...
#2218




Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SORT OF HOMELESS
Programs: 14 years AA exp, but no more; & 1MM+, QR-PLT (ow EMD) MR-LTT, HH Gold
Posts: 8,104

This reminded me of how dim the eclipse actually is - ISO3200 and wide open, but still 0.4s exposure, so some blur. And manual focus as even contract detect focus in Live View couldn't lock on. Manual focus at an effective 900mm is a challenge. I'd need something like a huge 400/2.8 or 600/4 and a newer body with better high ISO performance to do much better. Or a telescope mount...
My BOLD. Some DSLR has on camera noise reduction setting for astrophotography. Plus post process to further reduce noise. Your image is very good in that department.
#2220
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Programs: MR LT Titanium, AA LT PLT, UA SLV, Avis PreferredPlus, HH Gold, Hertz PC, National Executive, etc.
Posts: 31,670
I've used in-camera long-exposure NR for star trails - 30s and longer exposures, but haven't seen that type of noise for sub-second exposures. Lightroom does wonders - the raw images are pretty ugly....
















