"Baywatch" Actress and Playmate Felt "Singled Out" for Scan
Dec 10, 2010 | 7:53 am
#16
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,964
The good news is that Baywatch is such a big thing in Europe (still for some people) that this has hit the various European news agencies as well.
I have heard many times and reported here before TSOs saying completely inappropriate things at the checkpoint, often in attempt at humour. They were things which should be kept inside the head not outside the mouth.
A few years ago at JFK we were traveling with a very good looking friend, and one TSA agent said out loud he would like to get her hands on those babies for a search before he realized he said it out loud. Several other times I've witnessed them, as a good friend use to say, "Miss a good opportunity to keep their mouths shut".
When they release the video maybe we'll be able to read their lips, but right now based on personal experience over the years, I totally believe he said it.
When they release the video maybe we'll be able to read their lips, but right now based on personal experience over the years, I totally believe he said it.
Dec 10, 2010 | 12:19 pm
#17
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
The good news is that Baywatch is such a big thing in Europe (still for some people) that this has hit the various European news agencies as well.
I have heard many times and reported here before TSOs saying completely inappropriate things at the checkpoint, often in attempt at humour. They were things which should be kept inside the head not outside the mouth.
I have heard many times and reported here before TSOs saying completely inappropriate things at the checkpoint, often in attempt at humour. They were things which should be kept inside the head not outside the mouth.
Dec 10, 2010 | 4:45 pm
#18
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 161
The inappropriate comments from TSOs could be the saving grace for travelers . . . at least in California. In order for sexual assault charges to be brought, there must be evidence of a "lascivious" intent. The comments we're hearing about might just be enough. (Obviously, everything else has to fall into place as well: the one making the comment must also be the one doing the touching OR must be shown to be acting in concert with the one doing the touching.) Still, it's a start.
Dec 10, 2010 | 4:59 pm
#19
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,051
If nothing else, the odd agent who misses a good opportunity to keep his mouth shut opens a window on what is thought but NOT said by lots of his colleagues.
And don't forget that these methods also allow women agents a chance to do things they wouldn't dream in a civilized society (anyone remember when we all lived in one?)
And don't forget that these methods also allow women agents a chance to do things they wouldn't dream in a civilized society (anyone remember when we all lived in one?)
Dec 10, 2010 | 8:24 pm
#20
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Dec 10, 2010 | 11:11 pm
#21
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 13
I'm not sure what "fat cow" you are referring to, but removal of shoes is now optional. If you do elect to remove them, you must NOT place them in a bin (as in the past) but instead put them directly on the belt isolated from any other items.
Dec 10, 2010 | 11:45 pm
#22
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The Sunshine State
Programs: Deltaworst Peon Level, TSA "Layer 21 Club", NW WP RIP
Posts: 11,372
However, wasn't that "Don't touch my junk" recording made in CA? Is the local DA after him for illegal recording?
Dec 11, 2010 | 12:51 pm
#23
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: FLL & PIT
Programs: Marriott Platinum for Life.
Posts: 1,235
As for the "fat cow", I said the one dressed in the black and white dress.
.
Last edited by trvlr64; Dec 11, 2010 at 1:01 pm
Dec 11, 2010 | 3:10 pm
#25
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Programs: UA/CO(1K-PLT), AA(PLT), QR, EK, Marriott(PLT), Hilton(DMND)
Posts: 9,538
"A few bad apples"
(Attractive) work colleague has on more than one occasion been selected proactively for the nude-o-scope prior to reaching the front of the security line.
I often avoid it just by hanging back, waiting to go through until someone is already in the machine.
But this woman at work gets picked with several people still in front of her, the smurf is doing a solid for his buddy watching the images.
And there's not a darned thing she or any of us can meaningfully do about it in the immediate term.
(Attractive) work colleague has on more than one occasion been selected proactively for the nude-o-scope prior to reaching the front of the security line.
I often avoid it just by hanging back, waiting to go through until someone is already in the machine.
But this woman at work gets picked with several people still in front of her, the smurf is doing a solid for his buddy watching the images.
And there's not a darned thing she or any of us can meaningfully do about it in the immediate term.
Dec 11, 2010 | 3:54 pm
#26
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,542
If he announced he was recording it would be legal. One-party or two-party applies to who must know about the recording.
Dec 11, 2010 | 3:57 pm
#27
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 60
In an airport, which is a public place with no expectation of privacy, there are no such concerns. The "Don't touch my junk" recording was taken in California as well.
Dec 12, 2010 | 11:00 pm
#29
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,360
Don't you remember what that moron Napolitano told us last November? In short, she said, if you do not like the security enhancements, don't fly.
Real smart of her! Then again, she is not very bright.
-
Dec 13, 2010 | 2:47 am
#30
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Stockholm
Programs: Various
Posts: 3,573
