Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Luxury Hotels and Travel
Reload this Page >

WSJ: Luxury Chain Cuts the Flowers, Sends Out Wash at Some Hotels

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

WSJ: Luxury Chain Cuts the Flowers, Sends Out Wash at Some Hotels

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 6, 2010 | 10:05 am
  #16  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Europe
Programs: UA:1K MM, AF:FB-Platinum; QR: PC Platinum, FI: Saga Gold
Posts: 3,174
Things are indeed changing at FS. I recall a story I was told last year that had Isadore visiting one of his properties and complaining about the amount/freshness of flowers in public areas. The manager responded that revenues were down 20 percent. Isadore's reply: "Are you aiming for 30 percent?" And that was about half a year ago.
Braniff is offline  
Old Jun 6, 2010 | 10:14 am
  #17  
Senior Moderator; Moderator, Flyertalk Cares
2M
50 Countries Visited
100 Nights
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Fulltime travel/mostly Europe
Programs: UA 1.7 MM;; Accor & Marriott Pt; Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 17,922
I'm also noticing more permanent art pieces or small fresh flower displays (multiple vases with one or two stems in them so little skill in arranging needed) replacing large fresh flower arrangements at premium properties. Another cut seems to be replacing cloth hand towels in public areas of hotels with woven paper towels. There are definitely staffing cuts during overnight periods. Where calls within or from outside the properties would normally be answered quickly, I'm finding it might take 10 rings for the phone to be answered at midnight.

Last edited by l etoile; Jun 6, 2010 at 10:20 am
l etoile is offline  
Old Jun 6, 2010 | 8:22 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,944
Do these luxury hotels generate a positive cash-flow? Are owners just over-leverage on these properties?
Shangri-La is offline  
Old Jun 6, 2010 | 10:34 pm
  #19  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 13
Originally Posted by Shangri-La
Do these luxury hotels generate a positive cash-flow? Are owners just over-leverage on these properties?
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/luxur...arn-money.html
Radical is offline  
Old Jun 6, 2010 | 11:37 pm
  #20  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,944
D'oh! Forgot about that thread.
Shangri-La is offline  
Old Jun 7, 2010 | 7:15 pm
  #21  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Chicago
Programs: United 1K, American EXP & 3 Million Miler, Hyatt Globalist & Marriott Ambassador Elite
Posts: 2,387
Frankly, I understand owners looking to cut back. But when it comes to customer facing actitives or closing restaurants, bars, etc., small things add up and eventual it is no longer 5 star.
mktozd is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2010 | 2:13 pm
  #22  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Programs: AC SE 2MM, too many others
Posts: 1,419
Originally Posted by Kagehitokiri
ah. indeed.

millenium partners owns >
FS - miami, san francisco
RC - battery park, boston, georgetown, washington

interesting it seems RC washington club is open this summer for once, although dove mountain closed club after taking bookings.. IIRC this is something RC did pre crisis. perhaps post marriott? considering how long marriott has owned, seems most of the marriott comments here are since crisis started in fall 2007.
Having completed a recent stay at the RC Georgetown, where they closed the only restaurant in the hotel in the mornings in favour of a stripped down lobby service and had minimal staff (but still paid top dollar for a suite), I think I would agree with Sharp - I am reluctant to pay for stripped down 5 star.
grumbler is offline  
Old Jun 9, 2010 | 10:34 am
  #23  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Home
Programs: Virgin FC, Qantas, Golden Circle, Sofitel, Hyatt, Starwood, Nectar, and my Tesco Club Card
Posts: 1,773
Originally Posted by grumbler
Having completed a recent stay at the RC Georgetown, where they closed the only restaurant in the hotel in the mornings in favour of a stripped down lobby service and had minimal staff (but still paid top dollar for a suite), I think I would agree with Sharp - I am reluctant to pay for stripped down 5 star.
There comes a point, and having the only restaurant closed in the morning for breakfast IMO would be a good example IMO, where you have to ask if they are misleading their customers as to the facilities on offer.

If one were stopping on a cheap 3* package stay at the Costa Del Wherever and found advertised facilities closed many in the UK would be beating a path to their local trading standards department.

I notice from the RC Georgetown website they are advertising that their restaurant is open for breakfast.
Kettering Northants QC is offline  
Old Jun 9, 2010 | 10:42 am
  #24  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: London
Programs: BA, VS, HH, IHG, MB, MR
Posts: 27,211
Ironically, the antiquated UK star rating system (which allows scruffy dives to get 5-stars because they tick all the boxes) does protect you from this, since cutting 24-hour room service would automatically ban you from 5-stars, as would plenty of other things.
Raffles is offline  
Old Jun 9, 2010 | 10:48 am
  #25  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Home
Programs: Virgin FC, Qantas, Golden Circle, Sofitel, Hyatt, Starwood, Nectar, and my Tesco Club Card
Posts: 1,773
Originally Posted by Raffles
Ironically, the antiquated UK star rating system (which allows scruffy dives to get 5-stars because they tick all the boxes) does protect you from this, since cutting 24-hour room service would automatically ban you from 5-stars, as would plenty of other things.
In all fairness to the UK system, in many countries there is usually nothing to stop a hotel calling itself a 5 star hotel (or even 6 star hotel) purely on the whim of the marketing department
Kettering Northants QC is offline  
Old Jun 9, 2010 | 11:19 am
  #26  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: IAD/DCA
Posts: 31,871
these are the only "official" im aware of >
Originally Posted by Kagehitokiri
Star/Diamond listings
http://honeymoons.about.com/od/mobil...estaurants.htm
http://honeymoons.about.com/od/aaa5d...ond_Hotels.htm
http://www.theaa.com/travel/basicsea...age=placesstay (search in UK/IE and sort by rating)
http://www.qualmark.co.nz/index.jsp (NZ ratings from 1>5 Stars, top 7 properties are rated "Exclusive")
there do seem to be a lot more AA 5* than i recall...

by food 'stars' >

- 2 5* - berkeley, le manoir aux quat saisons
- 7 4* - whatley manor, merrion, chester grosvenor, connaught, pennyhill park hotel, MO london, gleneagles
- 12 3* - glenapp castle, inverlochy castle hotel, isle of eriska, chewton glen, k club, old course hotel, longueville manor hotel, browns, royal garden hotel, claridges, halkin, lucknam park hotel
- 10 2* - goring, seaham hall hotel, prestonfield, turnberry resort, dorchester, lanesborough, stafford london kempinski, landmark london, jumeirah carlton, ritz london
- 5 1* - milestone, FS canary wharf, FS hampshire, athaenum, one aldwych
- 4 0* - no 41, vineyard at stockcross, cliveden country house, capital

***

qualmark is now 5 exclusive and 4 pending

***

http://www.theaa.com/travel/accommod...s_grading.html
http://www.qualmark.co.nz/exclusive.php
http://www.qualmark.co.nz/about_us.php

Originally Posted by Kagehitokiri
http://travel.aol.com/travel-ideas/a...avdynlprim0674
Bjorn Hanson, a former PricewaterhouseCoopers hotel analyst told USA Today that more hotels won this year than usual because both AAA and Forbes are letting their inspectors be more flexible. However, Hanson also told the publication that AAA and Forbes offer "a more consistent basis for comparison" when compared to travel website such as TripAdvisor.com.


Originally Posted by Non-NonRev
As a point of reference, here are the Forbes (nee Mobil) Travel Guide's rating criteria:

http://static.howstuffworks.com/pdf/...ia-12-2008.pdf

Last edited by Kagehitokiri; Jun 9, 2010 at 11:29 am
Kagehitokiri is offline  
Old Jun 9, 2010 | 2:19 pm
  #27  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ravens Country
Programs: UA-1K, Marriott-Gold, SPG-Gold, IC RA/Plat, Amtrak Select
Posts: 3,887
I sure hope FS does not go the club route. I like that most FS hotels do not have clubs and treat all guests with equal level of service. This is why when on business i stay at FS vs vacation where I would stay at the RC as the Club is almost and extention of ones room
Benny8444 is offline  
Old Jun 10, 2010 | 10:20 am
  #28  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: FLL -> Where The Boyars Are
Programs: AA EXP 1.7 M, Hilton Gold, Hertz 5*, AARP Sophomore, 14-time Croix de Candlestick
Posts: 18,669
Originally Posted by mktozd
This would be an interesting model and to some extent, I feel that Ritz practices this with their club floors versus regular floors. Four Seasons doesn't have a lot of properties with club floor that I can think of off hand, other that Maui.
Marriott is following this model with their soon-to-open JW Marriott Marquis - the same building will contain a so-called "private hotel", the Beaux Arts, which will have 44 rooms and suites equipped with cherry-wood floors, Bang & Olufson televisions and sound systems, etc. A Daniel Boulud restaurant and an Illy coffee bar will also be offered.
Non-NonRev is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.