Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Qantas | Frequent Flyer
Reload this Page >

QF 32 - Engine Exploded? (General discussion of the events)

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

QF 32 - Engine Exploded? (General discussion of the events)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 5, 2010, 4:08 am
  #181  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,605
Originally Posted by number_6
That is my point exactly -- they are covered for tickets issued within the EU. But the EU regulation does not apply to non-EU flights of EU-operating carriers; otherwise QF MEL-SYD would be covered by the EU regulation (and it clearly is not!).
Actually people returning from the UK are covered by the EU rules - not just people whose tickets were issued in the EU.

In this specific case all passengers who were on the flight from London are covered, but those who joined at Singapore aren't.
alanR is offline  
Old Nov 5, 2010, 4:08 am
  #182  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Portland OR Double Emerald (QF and AA), DL PM/MM, Starwood Plat
Posts: 19,589
Originally Posted by QF32
Really?? What about the SQ birds that have had C checks without any problems? One problem and the whole check program is called into question? I guess after QF74 we should question 744 checks as well.


why not? have you got some facts you want to share with us? Also what happened to the 9th A380?
I guess the better question is why RR service directives issued months ago calling for engine inspections were not implemented yet -- until there was a catastrophic failure. Perhaps cost is causing safety to be compromised, with inspections postponed until they are more convenient and cost-effective ... until there is an incident. RR and the airlines have a lot to answer for, and the regulatory bodies have to re-evaluate how much leeway to allow airlines in their day to day operations.

As you point out, this is not the first serious problem, and it won't be the last. The process for ensuring airplane safety has been compromised, with incidents like QF74 and even the QF oxygen cylinder incident (which has not been fully understood/explained to date). QF is far better than average; this is a budding airline industry problem. The predictive model being used for maintenance is becoming incongruent with actual results; something has to change.

Has the 9th A380 been engined yet? My info is no. Perhaps you have better data?
number_6 is offline  
Old Nov 5, 2010, 4:27 am
  #183  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Melbourne
Programs: ►QFWP/LTG►VA WP►HyattExpl.►HiltonGold►ALL Silver
Posts: 21,997
Originally Posted by number_6
That is my point exactly -- they are covered for tickets issued within the EU. But the EU regulation does not apply to non-EU flights of EU-operating carriers; otherwise QF MEL-SYD would be covered by the EU regulation (and it clearly is not!).
You use of the word tickets in this manner is incorrect - they are covered for all journeys departing from an EU port. It does not matter if the ticket was issued in London, Paris, Sydney, Chicago or Timbuktu!

Last edited by serfty; Nov 5, 2010 at 12:48 pm
serfty is offline  
Old Nov 5, 2010, 4:28 am
  #184  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cairns
Programs: QFF Gold, Velocity, *Alliance
Posts: 285
Qantas and RR engines

Qantas and RR have been close for a long time. It is interesting that in view of this long term relationship, the CEO indicated very early that QF32 was a RR problem/issue.


"The Qantas aircraft is powered by the Rolls-Royce Trent 900 engine, which is the market leader on the airframe, having been selected by ten of the 13 Airbus A380 operators and securing nearly a 60 per cent share of the firm and option orders.

For Rolls-Royce, the arrival of the Trent 900-powered A380 also marks the latest stage of a long and close relationship with the airline. Tony Davis, Regional Director for Rolls-Royce in Australia said: Qantas is an iconic carrier. Almost 30 years ago the first Rolls-Royce powered Boeing 747 arrived and they were to become the backbone of the Qantas long-haul fleet. The A380 is the successor to the 747 in the Qantas stable and if we are to have the same close relationship going forward then this new long-haul aircraft and its Trent 900 engine are central to the partnership.

Qantas has the largest single airline order with Boeing for 787s and the second largest A380 order in place with Airbus.

The airline currently operates a fleet of 44 Rolls-Royce powered aircraft, the latest of which to arrive is the new Trent 900-powered A380. The airline has 20 Trent-powered A380s on order and has signed a TotalCare agreement with Rolls-Royce for the management of the Trent 900s in the fleet".

http://www.rolls-royce.com/civil/cus...heart_soul.jsp
orac is offline  
Old Nov 5, 2010, 4:33 am
  #185  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,605
Originally Posted by orac
Qantas and RR have been close for a long time. It is interesting that in view of this long term relationship, the CEO indicated very early that QF32 was a RR problem/issue.
As I said earlier, it sounds like panic by the CEO. And he better be proven right in his statement as otherwise he's going to spend a lot of time in UK courts having his backside sued from here to eternity
alanR is offline  
Old Nov 5, 2010, 4:33 am
  #186  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: LPI
Programs: SK *B (?)
Posts: 362
Originally Posted by Catweazle
Do you think there's any chance that the A380 might be gone for good, like the Concorde, because of this?
Oh, come on. These things happen now and then:

http://www.ntsb.gov/pressrel/2010/100527b.html

They are serious incidents, but let's not blow it out of proportion just because *this* particular incident was picked up by the media.
lnixon is offline  
Old Nov 5, 2010, 4:58 am
  #187  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Programs: Qantas FF Platinum OW Emerald
Posts: 118
Originally Posted by number_6
I guess the better question is why RR service directives issued months ago calling for engine inspections were not implemented yet -- until there was a catastrophic failure. Perhaps cost is causing safety to be compromised, with inspections postponed until they are more convenient and cost-effective ... until there is an incident. RR and the airlines have a lot to answer for, and the regulatory bodies have to re-evaluate how much leeway to allow airlines in their day to day operations.

As you point out, this is not the first serious problem, and it won't be the last. The process for ensuring airplane safety has been compromised, with incidents like QF74 and even the QF oxygen cylinder incident (which has not been fully understood/explained to date). QF is far better than average; this is a budding airline industry problem. The predictive model being used for maintenance is becoming incongruent with actual results; something has to change.

Has the 9th A380 been engined yet? My info is no. Perhaps you have better data?
Airbus here in Sydney are gearing up to receive 3 in very quick succession. I don't think this event will slow down delivery. Believe me its very impressive what these guys here do.

As you note the AD is probably the big question - if this event relates to the AD then there will be some serious questions asked, but as yet we don't know. We also don't know what inspections had been done prior. Like all other events, lessons will be learnt which will make flying even more safe.
QF32 is offline  
Old Nov 5, 2010, 5:00 am
  #188  
Moderator: British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Programs: Battleaxe Alliance
Posts: 22,128
Originally Posted by alanR
... otherwise he's going to spend a lot of time in UK courts having his backside sued from here to eternity
I would say that's pretty unlikely given how much money QF spends with RR. They'll probably just as him to retract it in some form or another.
LTN Phobia is offline  
Old Nov 5, 2010, 5:17 am
  #189  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,605
Originally Posted by LTN Phobia
I would say that's pretty unlikely given how much money QF spends with RR. They'll probably just as him to retract it in some form or another.
Which is why I said his backside. CEOs come and go - jittery ones go quicker.
alanR is offline  
Old Nov 5, 2010, 5:51 am
  #190  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,919
I don't think the CEO at RR are sleeping well if at all at the moment..... they have just settled for a huge sum with Celebrity Cruises for their Marine engines in the M Class ships and now this disaster......
moeve is offline  
Old Nov 5, 2010, 6:27 am
  #191  
Moderator: British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Programs: Battleaxe Alliance
Posts: 22,128
Originally Posted by alanR
Which is why I said his backside. CEOs come and go - jittery ones go quicker.
Ah, OK, sorry my inattention!
I think there are quite a few people at QF who wouldn't mind seeing the back(side) of AJ.
LTN Phobia is offline  
Old Nov 5, 2010, 7:09 am
  #192  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,605
Originally Posted by LTN Phobia
Ah, OK, sorry my inattention!
I think there are quite a few people at QF who wouldn't mind seeing the back(side) of AJ.
What is it about the airline industry and employing gob-shites like him - I wonder if he went to the same school as Michael O'Leary & Willie Walsh?
alanR is offline  
Old Nov 5, 2010, 8:33 am
  #193  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: PDX
Posts: 988
If you are flying sometime next week, how do we find out whether the A380 is now a B747 or something else. Expert flyer is not updated with any changes.
WrLdTrvLnIndian is offline  
Old Nov 5, 2010, 8:35 am
  #194  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Programs: BA Gold, IC Platinum Royal Ambassador
Posts: 699
The BBC and SMH are saying that QF6 (744) returned to Singapore due to an engine problem.
ba273 is offline  
Old Nov 5, 2010, 8:38 am
  #195  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,919
Something isn't adding up here according to a newsstream ANOTHER QF has had to return to Singapore due to engine trouble - this time it is a 747.

I don't normally tend to conspiracy theories but I am starting to wonder now.....

Last edited by moeve; Nov 5, 2010 at 9:02 am
moeve is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.