More Virtual Strip Search backlash
May 20, 2009 | 4:08 pm
#46
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,725
May 20, 2009 | 5:02 pm
#47
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,195
Blogdad Bob is getting a little testy, not liking that people are accusing the TSOs of being child pornographers and threatening them with arrest.
Wait until he sees my most recent comment where I remind him that since TSOs are liable to arrest for child pornography the rest of the TSA is liable for conspiracy to commit or aiding and abetting. That might have Bob himself sweating bullets.
Wait until he sees my most recent comment where I remind him that since TSOs are liable to arrest for child pornography the rest of the TSA is liable for conspiracy to commit or aiding and abetting. That might have Bob himself sweating bullets.
May 20, 2009 | 5:08 pm
#48
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Wherever liberty is threatened
Programs: TSA Disparager Silver
Posts: 314
May 20, 2009 | 5:20 pm
#49
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Programs: UA/CO(1K-PLT), AA(PLT), QR, EK, Marriott(PLT), Hilton(DMND)
Posts: 9,538
Blogdad Bob is getting a little testy, not liking that people are accusing the TSOs of being child pornographers and threatening them with arrest.
Wait until he sees my most recent comment where I remind him that since TSOs are liable to arrest for child pornography the rest of the TSA is liable for conspiracy to commit or aiding and abetting. That might have Bob himself sweating bullets.
Wait until he sees my most recent comment where I remind him that since TSOs are liable to arrest for child pornography the rest of the TSA is liable for conspiracy to commit or aiding and abetting. That might have Bob himself sweating bullets.
May 20, 2009 | 5:23 pm
#50
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: washington dc
Programs: ual, aa, hertz, starwood, hilton
Posts: 398
Would it be correct to infer from your comments, TSSCreenerRon, that it is a criminal offense punishable by prison time, to state one's opinion at a TSA checkpoint that "[screeners] are liable to arrest for child pornography the rest of the TSA is liable for conspiracy to commit or aiding and abetting"?
May 20, 2009 | 5:26 pm
#51
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: washington dc
Programs: ual, aa, hertz, starwood, hilton
Posts: 398
That's weird, PhlyingRPh. PV is paid for with government funds. Where do they get off censoring a statement that is not salacious or generally offensive? It's not like it's somebody's private blog.
May 20, 2009 | 5:32 pm
#52
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,987
I've asked that question several times.
Government sponsored, Tax Payer funded and a government employee violating his oath to defend the Constitution.
Do they get to pick and choose which parts they will defend?
Seems Blogdad Bob should be dismissed for cause.
May 20, 2009 | 5:43 pm
#53
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Programs: UA/CO(1K-PLT), AA(PLT), QR, EK, Marriott(PLT), Hilton(DMND)
Posts: 9,538
May 20, 2009 | 9:21 pm
#54
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,972
Would it be correct to infer from your comments, TSSCreenerRon, that it is a criminal offense punishable by prison time, to state one's opinion at a TSA checkpoint that "[screeners] are liable to arrest for child pornography the rest of the TSA is liable for conspiracy to commit or aiding and abetting"?
And he's not alone.
May 22, 2009 | 1:29 pm
#57
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The Sunshine State
Programs: Deltaworst Peon Level, TSA "Layer 21 Club", NW WP RIP
Posts: 11,372
Now where do I put my tinfoil hat?
Evolution Lurker Alert! Paid gumment spinners from the Ministry of Propaganda are reading FT on taxpayer time! 
Posted May 20, 2:02 PM on, where else, FT:
From the "Will Children Be Screened" spin thread comments over at PV:
"Bob said...
Ha. The FT folks think I'm having a breakdown. Actually, I'm sitting here with a nice cup of coffee and I've got my i-Pod set to play all Antonio Carlos Jobim songs. Life is grand. I just need a beach and some palm trees.
Bob
EoS Blog Team
May 20, 2009 4:16 PM"
Oh, Hi Blogdad Bob. Welcome to FT. Where some think you are always close to a "sonny beach."
Say, it's Friday afternoon, why aren't you posting a MMW scan picture of a naked cute little puppy? 
Posted May 20, 2:02 PM on, where else, FT:
"Bob said...
Ha. The FT folks think I'm having a breakdown. Actually, I'm sitting here with a nice cup of coffee and I've got my i-Pod set to play all Antonio Carlos Jobim songs. Life is grand. I just need a beach and some palm trees.
Bob
EoS Blog Team
May 20, 2009 4:16 PM"
Oh, Hi Blogdad Bob. Welcome to FT. Where some think you are always close to a "sonny beach."
Say, it's Friday afternoon, why aren't you posting a MMW scan picture of a naked cute little puppy?
May 22, 2009 | 2:08 pm
#59
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Wherever liberty is threatened
Programs: TSA Disparager Silver
Posts: 314
Evolution Lurker Alert! Paid gumment spinners from the Ministry of Propaganda are reading FT on taxpayer time!
Posted May 20, 2:02 PM on, where else, FT:
From the "Will Children Be Screened" spin thread comments over at PV:
"Bob said...
Ha. The FT folks think I'm having a breakdown. Actually, I'm sitting here with a nice cup of coffee and I've got my i-Pod set to play all Antonio Carlos Jobim songs. Life is grand. I just need a beach and some palm trees.
Bob
EoS Blog Team
May 20, 2009 4:16 PM"
Oh, Hi Blogdad Bob. Welcome to FT. Where some think you are always close to a "sonny beach." Say, it's Friday afternoon, why aren't you posting a MMW scan picture of a naked cute little puppy?
Posted May 20, 2:02 PM on, where else, FT:
From the "Will Children Be Screened" spin thread comments over at PV:
"Bob said...
Ha. The FT folks think I'm having a breakdown. Actually, I'm sitting here with a nice cup of coffee and I've got my i-Pod set to play all Antonio Carlos Jobim songs. Life is grand. I just need a beach and some palm trees.
Bob
EoS Blog Team
May 20, 2009 4:16 PM"
Oh, Hi Blogdad Bob. Welcome to FT. Where some think you are always close to a "sonny beach."
Say, it's Friday afternoon, why aren't you posting a MMW scan picture of a naked cute little puppy? Knowing the TOS of FT, Blogdad Bob signed on as a member so that we could not describe him the way he so richly deserves. Even though he's made less than 10 posts, all of them when he was new to FT, and hasn't posted once since then, we cannot flame him to a well deserved crisp because he is a member of FT.
May 22, 2009 | 2:09 pm
#60
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Wherever liberty is threatened
Programs: TSA Disparager Silver
Posts: 314
Ron...?