More Virtual Strip Search backlash
May 20, 2009 | 6:08 am
#31
Suspended
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,953
May 20, 2009 | 6:25 am
#32
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 221
, otherwise I'd shoot them an email.
May 20, 2009 | 7:56 am
#33
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 72,280
May 20, 2009 | 9:52 am
#34
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 252
I guess the "optional" option that TSA wilfully consented to is the NSFW one.
Last edited by Mr. Gel-pack; May 20, 2009 at 10:20 am Reason: typo
May 20, 2009 | 12:41 pm
#36
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Wherever liberty is threatened
Programs: TSA Disparager Silver
Posts: 314
Maybe that's why Bob delete-o-meters my posts. I didn't save what I posted for your deleted posts thread, but I think I described the angle of the dangle in the second CNN image as slightly below horizontal. I went on to say that if they degraded the image enough to make its genital imaging non-pornographic, then it wouldn't be useful enough for screening.
I guess the "optional" option that TSA wilfully consented to is the NSFW one.
I guess the "optional" option that TSA wilfully consented to is the NSFW one.
May 20, 2009 | 12:46 pm
#37
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Wherever liberty is threatened
Programs: TSA Disparager Silver
Posts: 314
Blogdad Bob is getting a little testy, not liking that people are accusing the TSOs of being child pornographers and threatening them with arrest.
Wait until he sees my most recent comment where I remind him that since TSOs are liable to arrest for child pornography the rest of the TSA is liable for conspiracy to commit or aiding and abetting. That might have Bob himself sweating bullets.
Wait until he sees my most recent comment where I remind him that since TSOs are liable to arrest for child pornography the rest of the TSA is liable for conspiracy to commit or aiding and abetting. That might have Bob himself sweating bullets.
May 20, 2009 | 1:08 pm
#38
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Somewhere near BWI
Programs: DL DM, HH Dia, SPG Gold, MR Plat, Hertz PC
Posts: 3,654
I have decided (and just posted such on PV) that I am going to do the following:
- Make a large stack of 8.5" x 11" copies of the released WBI images
- Carry them in my laptop bag, in a dedicated folder labeled "Confidential - Strip Search Evidence" in metal foil
- Use them as educational media anytime I witness someone being forced, or volunteering, to go through the MMW
May 20, 2009 | 1:49 pm
#39
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Dallas, TX, AA 3MM EXP, WN
Posts: 1,808
May 20, 2009 | 2:02 pm
#40
Suspended
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 418
Blogdad Bob is getting a little testy, not liking that people are accusing the TSOs of being child pornographers and threatening them with arrest.
Wait until he sees my most recent comment where I remind him that since TSOs are liable to arrest for child pornography the rest of the TSA is liable for conspiracy to commit or aiding and abetting. That might have Bob himself sweating bullets.
Wait until he sees my most recent comment where I remind him that since TSOs are liable to arrest for child pornography the rest of the TSA is liable for conspiracy to commit or aiding and abetting. That might have Bob himself sweating bullets.
May 20, 2009 | 2:14 pm
#41
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,986
I just submitted a post to PV that all concerned should contact Whitehouse.gov click the contact us button and ask why the President is allowing TSA to Strip Search children.
Enough questions like that might get some attention.
And make no mistake, it is the President who is allowing this to happen, even if he is not aware of what the rogue TSA agency is up to.
May 20, 2009 | 2:17 pm
#42
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,986
Should create quiet a stir at the checkpoint.
May 20, 2009 | 4:00 pm
#45
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,006
The huge difference between that picture and the one that the TSA released is just scary.
Shirt idea. Have the man "pointing" to a picture of Nappy. Caption "I'm with stupid"