Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Behavior of Passengers on 1549

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 7:30 am
  #16  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: somewhere in F, hopefully
Posts: 670
Originally Posted by Paolo01
I think that we are making much ado about nothing. What got those pax safely onto their rescue ships was the calm and orderly egress without hysteria, after a controlled landing in the HUDSON river. If upon all violent motion stopping and the overwing doors being opened and the FA announcing that it was time to start deplaning, I really have no issue with someone pulling there bag stored underneath their seat out or even an overhead if it does not incite a riot or hinder deplaning. Now that bag may not make it all the way to rescue, but if having a carry on bag deflect the hysteria that could easily come with shock and being separated from one belongings, then I would say the seconds it would take to reach under your seat and grab your laptop bag is well worth it.

People do strange things when they are in shock. How you treat a person in shock is OFTEN the difference between life and death in traumatic situations. Sorry, but if some obnoxions lady went for the rear door, was stopped by the FA's. redirected up front and she grabbed her bag along the way, that is small potatos. If that is going to calm her down and get her safely off of the aircraft then YOU would be the idiot to try and spout some FAA reg at her and endanger all of the other PAX. Once on the liferaft or whatever, if there is on other room for additional PAX, then you may need to toss a carry on overboard, but until then, big deal. Get on with the business of helping others.
As a medical professional, I can assure you that someone in a state of physical and/or emotional shock would not be able to get up and retrieve their luggage from the OHB. These kinds of actions can cost precious seconds, and lives, including the offending pax. I wouldn't hesitate to take action.
sunnyjl is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 7:52 am
  #17  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: west of DFW airport
Programs: AA LT Gold 1.9 MM flying my way to LT PLAT
Posts: 11,074
yes, absolutely!

Originally Posted by sunnyjl
As a medical professional, I can assure you that someone in a state of physical and/or emotional shock would not be able to get up and retrieve their luggage from the OHB. These kinds of actions can cost precious seconds, and lives, including the offending pax. I wouldn't hesitate to take action.
You are as right as rain on this.
oldpenny16 is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 8:18 am
  #18  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: NJ
Programs: Retired-CO Former Long-time Plat, Now a Kettle, Hilton Gold (Thanks AMEX)
Posts: 475
Originally Posted by sunnyjl
As a medical professional, I can assure you that someone in a state of physical and/or emotional shock would not be able to get up and retrieve their luggage from the OHB. These kinds of actions can cost precious seconds, and lives, including the offending pax. I wouldn't hesitate to take action.
Bolding mine.

3 extra seconds X 150 pax = 7.5 minutes!! I don't want to be on the end of that line in a burning plane.
GoGiants is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 9:47 am
  #19  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: IAD, DCA, SAN
Programs: UA 1K, Hertz PC, AMEX PLAT
Posts: 1,236
Originally Posted by sunnyjl
As a medical professional, I can assure you that someone in a state of physical and/or emotional shock would not be able to get up and retrieve their luggage from the OHB. These kinds of actions can cost precious seconds, and lives, including the offending pax. I wouldn't hesitate to take action.
I am NOT questioning your medical qualifications but I absolutely disagree with this statement. When a person is in shock, they default to all sorts of ingrained training or even habits. I have seen soldiers with severed limbs leave a MEDIVAC area because they realized a piece of their gear was still unaccounted for in a destroyed vehicle. I do not know how to explain that medically other than to say that they were in shock. I AM NOT A DOCTOR, so you may dismiss this as medically impossible.

For a civilian i would say that surviving an airplane mishap might create a similar state of shock. Just my opinion and not a medical one.
Paolo01 is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 11:45 am
  #20  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: somewhere in F, hopefully
Posts: 670
Originally Posted by Paolo01
I am NOT questioning your medical qualifications but I absolutely disagree with this statement. When a person is in shock, they default to all sorts of ingrained training or even habits. I have seen soldiers with severed limbs leave a MEDIVAC area because they realized a piece of their gear was still unaccounted for in a destroyed vehicle. I do not know how to explain that medically other than to say that they were in shock. I AM NOT A DOCTOR, so you may dismiss this as medically impossible.

For a civilian i would say that surviving an airplane mishap might create a similar state of shock. Just my opinion and not a medical one.
In that case, you're probably talking about blood loss, which could lead to disorientation from the resulting hypotension. Not the same thing.

At any rate, as far as the luggage lady, I stand by my statement that I would let her have it.
sunnyjl is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 12:16 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,704
Originally Posted by sunnyjl
In that case, you're probably talking about blood loss, which could lead to disorientation from the resulting hypotension. Not the same thing.

At any rate, as far as the luggage lady, I stand by my statement that I would let her have it.
I believe you two are confusing medical shock with the common vernacular of "being in shock", which is generally being under the influence of adrenaline.

Or maybe I'm 100% wrong here. That happens a lot.
law dawg is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 12:29 pm
  #22  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: IAD, DCA, SAN
Programs: UA 1K, Hertz PC, AMEX PLAT
Posts: 1,236
Originally Posted by law dawg
I believe you two are confusing medical shock with the common vernacular of "being in shock", which is generally being under the influence of adrenaline.

Or maybe I'm 100% wrong here. That happens a lot.
I do not want to get in an argument about this with Sunnyjl. I don't know what kind of MD they are or what kind of experience with traumatic injury or traumatic brain injuries they may have. Their statement is just not validated by the injuries I have seen and worked on in a trauma environment. Concussions and shock do very strange things to the human body. I was only trying to say that I would not put it past somebody who was in shock to be overly concerned about their belongings on any other seemingly minutia detail. I know that is a slippery slope because perhaps the passenger in question was just being a PIA. Having dealt with what in my non medical opinion were people experiencing shock, instead of "letting them have it", I'd let them carry their silly bag to the wing and then deal with it once the dust settled. I would not try and get in a rational argument with someone expeiencing any form of shock and I certainly would not try and get physical with somebody experiencing shock. Just not a smart call unless your life is in jeopardy or the lives of somebody else.
Paolo01 is offline  
Old Jan 23, 2009 | 9:13 pm
  #23  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: PDX,PHX,LON
Programs: too many of the few that are left
Posts: 627
Originally Posted by law dawg
I believe you two are confusing medical shock with the common vernacular of "being in shock", which is generally being under the influence of adrenaline.

Or maybe I'm 100% wrong here. That happens a lot.
Nah, not wrong. Not 100% anyway.

Medical shock and crisis-reaction "shock" can overlap. I find Paolo01's account of combat injury behavior entirely credible. Trained responses or priorities can be virtually automatic in extreme stress.

Someone carrying an object may be head-injured, responding in crisis mode, OR being a self-important PIA. If they're not impeding the evac, let it go. If they are, redirect them nonconfrontationally. Sparking a brawl in the aisle can kill, too. That's my 2.
YCTTSFM is offline  
Old Jan 23, 2009 | 10:05 pm
  #24  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,449
Originally Posted by GoGiants
Bolding mine.

3 extra seconds X 150 pax = 7.5 minutes!! I don't want to be on the end of that line in a burning plane.
Yeah -- if I recall correctly, a burning plane will be filled with toxic fumes in about 90 seconds, so a full evac needs to happen in that time. No time for dinking around with luggage for heaven's sake. Pull heads out of me-first land and think of those behind you dead. Simple conclusion: Exit the plane and don't screw around. What's to discuss? Lead, follow, or get out of the way.
Telfes is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2009 | 9:50 am
  #25  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: ORD
Programs: UA *G
Posts: 1,720
I gotta agree a $10k fine is justified for them. Or whatever the federal maximum is in this case. How else are you going to teach pax to actually take emergency instructions seriously, and not be selfish .....es? What if the plane had blown up while Ms. My stuff is so important was obstructing the exit?
JBLUA320 is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2009 | 2:32 pm
  #26  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 684
Originally Posted by JBLUA320
I gotta agree a $10k fine is justified for them. Or whatever the federal maximum is in this case. How else are you going to teach pax to actually take emergency instructions seriously, and not be selfish .....es? What if the plane had blown up while Ms. My stuff is so important was obstructing the exit?
Until you have actually survived and escaped from a large airplane crash you are in no position to second guess how people are going to react when this happens. I can't think of anything more vindictive than to fine someone who survives one for not reacting in the appropriate matter. If the FAA even tried to levy such a fine the uproar form the media and the American public would stop any such stupidity.
magellan315 is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2009 | 2:50 pm
  #27  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 340
Two instances of aircraft emergency that occurred to me come to mind...............well three actually.

The first was when I was on a USAF MAC flight in a C-130 from Incirlik to Izmir, Turkey. The cabin suffered explosive decompression and the flight crew initiated a screaming dive to 10,000 feet. No oxygen masks hence the over rapid descent. It took two weeks for my sinuses to catch up.

The second was when I was flying a friends Cessna 210 Centurion from Wichita where it had been re-engined to Manassas, VA. At 8,000 feet while descending and ten miles from my destination, the engine seized. I dead sticked it to my destination. Then suffered a case of the uncontrollable shakes for hours afterwards. The owner had a new oil Phillips X/C II oil that was later recalled because it was turning to sludge and locking engines. Phillips paid for a new engine.

The third was while departing McCarren International Airport in Vegas following the SHOT Show, the right engine in my T-310 suffered catastrophic failure at rotation. Turns out the crank, which I had replaced by Continental, was from a bad batch. The metallurgy was goofed up. Continental replaced the engine under warranty. Another bad case of the shakes.
Centurion210 is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2009 | 2:55 pm
  #28  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 684
Originally Posted by Centurion210
Two instances of aircraft emergency that occurred to me come to mind...............well three actually.

The first was when I was on a USAF MAC flight in a C-130 from Incirlik to Izmir, Turkey. The cabin suffered explosive decompression and the flight crew initiated a screaming dive to 10,000 feet. No oxygen masks hence the over rapid descent. It took two weeks for my sinuses to catch up.

The second was when I was flying a friends Cessna 210 Centurion from Wichita where it had been re-engined to Manassas, VA. At 8,000 feet while descending and ten miles from my destination, the engine seized. I dead sticked it to my destination. Then suffered a case of the uncontrollable shakes for hours afterwards. The owner had a new oil Phillips X/C II oil that was later recalled because it was turning to sludge and locking engines. Phillips paid for a new engine.

The third was while departing McCarren International Airport in Vegas following the SHOT Show, the right engine in my T-310 suffered catastrophic failure at rotation. Turns out the crank, which I had replaced by Continental, was from a bad batch. The metallurgy was goofed up. Continental replaced the engine under warranty. Another bad case of the shakes.
You are clearly a professional pilot with years of experience and you had direct control of the aircraft. Think about it from the perspective of a passenger on a commercial aircraft who may only fly a few times a year and has NEVER had this happen to them.
magellan315 is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2009 | 3:06 pm
  #29  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 340
Originally Posted by magellan315
You are clearly a professional pilot with years of experience and you had direct control of the aircraft. Think about it from the perspective of a passenger on a commercial aircraft who may only fly a few times a year and has NEVER had this happen to them.
I only fly myself and my family. We eschew the airlines. I shouldered the expense of getting my license and ratings back in the late 70's. The only expense I didn't have was that I inherited my plane. So I have better than 1500 hours total time.

But I am not a professional pilot. I am licensed as a Commercial Pilot, Instrument, Airplane Multi/Single engine land with King Air 200 and B-25 Type Ratings.

And I agree with the emergency type situations. People will not know how they will react until it happens to them.
Centurion210 is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2009 | 4:43 pm
  #30  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Programs: UA/CO(1K-PLT), AA(PLT), QR, EK, Marriott(PLT), Hilton(DMND)
Posts: 9,538
Originally Posted by Paolo01
I think that we are making much ado about nothing. What got those pax safely onto their rescue ships was the calm and orderly egress without hysteria, after a controlled landing in the HUDSON river. If upon all violent motion stopping and the overwing doors being opened and the FA announcing that it was time to start deplaning, I really have no issue with someone pulling there bag stored underneath their seat out or even an overhead if it does not incite a riot or hinder deplaning.
A colleague of mine was on that flight and seated in the rear of the aircraft. Before she was able to get up from her seat the water was already up to her knees. Behind her, it was already over the seat cushions! By the time the people in the back were able to exit, the water level in the rear of the aircraft was very high, and these folks didn't get to stand on a nice dry wing either. They had to chute into a raft that alrady had a good deal of water in it too. So... if you are in the very last row, inching forward with water steadily rising, and 3 or 4 people ahead of you decide to take even 30 seconds each (unrealistically conservative i know) to pull their luggage out of the overhead, your analysis that much ado is being made of nothing may undergo a drastic alteration and it is entirely plausible that you may, what with freezing water making its way up your body be compelled to riot.

I generally don't like obeying rules and consider myself a virtual cottage industry with regards to breaking every u.s. immigration, customs, and TSA regulation out there, but I hope I would not hold things up while deplaning in an emergency, and if I did, I would expect to be held accountable for endangering someone else's life.
PhlyingRPh is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.