FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Practical Travel Safety and Security Issues (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/practical-travel-safety-security-issues-686/)
-   -   Behavior of Passengers on 1549 (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/practical-travel-safety-security-issues/912167-behavior-passengers-1549-a.html)

NoClu Jan 19, 2009 3:18 pm

Behavior of Passengers on 1549
 
The comment below is from someone responding to a USA Today story. I'm wondering if anyone else out there has heard these type of comments, observed anything like it in picures from the crash, etc.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/...terstitialskip


ToniSuzanne wrote: 7h 35m ago
Want to see the FAs interviewed, wish I'd seen Sully this morning on Today. But the people I REALLY want to see interviewed are these:
Lady in fur coat, standing on wing, who asked another passenger (complete stranger) to return to the plane and fetch her purse for her.
Lady who insisted, DESPITE COMMANDS FROM A 38-YEAR VETERAN FA, on opening rear exit.
Lady who left her very large "handbag" dangling from an armrest (where it snagged), blocking the egress of a man named McDonald.
Lady who, with people in LIFE VESTS standing behind her, opened overhead bins, pulled down her suitcases and totes, dragged them down the aisle, got to the door, wanted to jump into a raft with them, begged others to throw them to her in the raft, when they refused she wouldn't leave, was picked up and THROWN toward a raft, ended up in the water. Then the people who had THROWN her threw her bags into the river because they were then blocking the exit. AND ALL THE WHILE SHE WAS SCREAMING ABOUT HER BAGS.
The guy who stood on the wing with a garment bag on his shoulder.
The lady who stood near the tip of the wing with a HUGE bag on her shoulder.
ETC.
Each and every single one of them ought to be:
Fined $10,0000.
Charged with interfering with a flight crew.
Forbidden from all commercial airline travel in the US for one year.
Forbidden from USAirways FOR LIFE.
Punished with 10 days in jail.
There was a bit more to the comment, but it was mostly in all caps, so I left it out.

Elsewhere in the comments section there was one that said a female passenger had, despite instruction of the FA, opened the back door of the plane. That, apparently, is why it sunk from the rear, and more quickly that it would have otherwise.

CABNcrew Jan 19, 2009 4:37 pm

Fined 10K each? I think that's a little extreme but I wish they'd get a stern talking to from someone in the FAA or NTSB.

You know, most people don't know this, but the FAA expects the FA's to "write up" any pax who is noncompliant. This would be people who don't stow bags, don't turn off their PED as/when instructed, argue or challenge the FA's in the performance of their duties, are UP during turbulence after being explicitly instructed to return to their seats.... the list goes on.

Suffices to say in my tenure as a FA I've only ever written ONE person up to the FAA for FAR violation. If I did as expected by the FAA we'd never even leave the gate on most days. I DO wish we could all do it just for a week, I bet people would stop arguing and start following the rules once they realize there ARE consequences... it's just that for our own sanity, in an effor to be on time and for the benefit of ALL other pax we never/rarely take action.

FlyingHoustonian Jan 19, 2009 4:40 pm

As I understand it from reading some "private" (meaning not open to the public) pilot boards I frequent the story about the lady opening the rear door is correct. The flight crew also didn't throw the "ditch switch" which helps seal up some doors and input holes in the fuselage to make it more airtight (I don't know much about the A-320, as I am qual'd on other airplanes, so I can't say how more effective such an action would be).

So yes it seems the lady did not listen to the FA in back.

There were similar stories from the Continental Denver to Houston flight in Dec, about pax pulling down bags, all the while the plane was on fire...

Ciao,
FH

oneofthosepeopleyouloveto hate Jan 19, 2009 6:01 pm

Having seen the way passengers behave in airports (i.e., "every man for himself" attitude, lack of consideration for others), I can totally believe this. :mad:

MikeMpls Jan 19, 2009 7:09 pm

That kind of behavior is par for the course. You're dealing with human beings, many of whom are quite self-centered.

At MSP when an Airbus ran over a DC-9 at a gate & fuel was leaking into the front of the plane from the Airbus' wing tanks, the only safe exit for everyone was single file out the rear. Yet I read reports of people stopping to grab their luggage. At least nobody stopped for a cigarette.

The subject is covered in just about every pre-flight safety talk I've paid attention to, but some people just don't get it.

Kudos to whoever threw her stuff in the river. ^ If she were ahead me pulling that garbage, I'd probably throw her in, too.

MikeMpls Jan 19, 2009 7:12 pm


Originally Posted by FlyingHoustonian (Post 11105525)
There were similar stories from the Continental Denver to Houston flight in Dec, about pax pulling down bags, all the while the plane was on fire...

Ciao,
FH

I was thinking maybe the prospect of being the main course in a barbecue would squelch that kind of behavior, but I guess not.

sunnyjl Jan 20, 2009 6:25 pm

I think I would have said, to the lady retrieving her luggage, "Hey lady, there's nothing in your bag that's worth my life. So move your effin' arse."

AllanJ Jan 20, 2009 6:39 pm

(copied from another forum)
Passengers were debriefed after getting off the ferries. At this time those who had baggage with them could be cited for disobeying flight crew and/or endangering the lives of others.

KyRoamer Jan 20, 2009 6:39 pm

People in a state of shock do strange things. We were not there and ought not judge so harshly.

sunnyjl Jan 20, 2009 6:46 pm


Originally Posted by mshaikun (Post 11112629)
People in a state of shock do strange things. We were not there and ought not judge so harshly.

Sorry, but if someone does that on my crashed plane, I'm knockin' 'em out.

PhlyingRPh Jan 20, 2009 7:06 pm


Originally Posted by sunnyjl (Post 11112658)
Sorry, but if someone does that on my crashed plane, I'm knockin' 'em out.

That's OK. I won't judge you harshly.:D

trilinearmipmap Jan 20, 2009 9:01 pm

Since most of us have never been a passenger during a crash landing, I am not sure how I or others on this board would have responded had we been on this flight.

It seems obvious on calm reflection that opening the rear door could flood and sink the plane. After a crash landing, with adrenaline rushing and people panicking, it is understandable why a frightened woman tried to open the rear emergency exit.

I could see myself doing the same. Nice to have the benefit of hindsight in criticizing others.

You want to go where? Jan 21, 2009 7:33 am


Originally Posted by trilinearmipmap (Post 11113256)
Since most of us have never been a passenger during a crash landing, I am not sure how I or others on this board would have responded had we been on this flight.

It seems obvious on calm reflection that opening the rear door could flood and sink the plane. After a crash landing, with adrenaline rushing and people panicking, it is understandable why a frightened woman tried to open the rear emergency exit.

I could see myself doing the same. Nice to have the benefit of hindsight in criticizing others.

While I agree that it is appropriate to be temperate in our use of language when we criticize others with the benefit of hindsight, it is still important that we criticize. This is how we learn from others' mistakes and may avoid the same mistake if we are in a similar situation. Adrenaline and shock will make people do strange things. The only way to overcome that is by thinking things through before they happen, so that one has a chance of letting one's brain think rather than one's adrenaline.

N965VJ Jan 21, 2009 9:22 am


Originally Posted by sunnyjl (Post 11112568)
I think I would have said, to the lady retrieving her luggage, "Hey lady, there's nothing in your bag that's worth my life. So move your effin' arse."

LOL, said with a thick Brooklyn accent.

Paolo01 Jan 21, 2009 9:45 am

I think that we are making much ado about nothing. What got those pax safely onto their rescue ships was the calm and orderly egress without hysteria, after a controlled landing in the HUDSON river. If upon all violent motion stopping and the overwing doors being opened and the FA announcing that it was time to start deplaning, I really have no issue with someone pulling there bag stored underneath their seat out or even an overhead if it does not incite a riot or hinder deplaning. Now that bag may not make it all the way to rescue, but if having a carry on bag deflect the hysteria that could easily come with shock and being separated from one belongings, then I would say the seconds it would take to reach under your seat and grab your laptop bag is well worth it.

People do strange things when they are in shock. How you treat a person in shock is OFTEN the difference between life and death in traumatic situations. Sorry, but if some obnoxions lady went for the rear door, was stopped by the FA's. redirected up front and she grabbed her bag along the way, that is small potatos. If that is going to calm her down and get her safely off of the aircraft then YOU would be the idiot to try and spout some FAA reg at her and endanger all of the other PAX. Once on the liferaft or whatever, if there is on other room for additional PAX, then you may need to toss a carry on overboard, but until then, big deal. Get on with the business of helping others.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 7:55 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.