Community
Wiki Posts
Search

air marshals at work

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 5:39 pm
  #46  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,704
Originally Posted by Superguy
The link was here on FT awhile back. Unfortunately, it was really hard to find on Cafepress's site, and it doesn't show me what I ordered previously other than a custom t-shirt.

Underneath his pic is says: "The bill of rights still applies at airport checkpoints despite TSA's assertion to the contrary."

On the back it has one of those WW2 style propaganda posters on the back that says:

Take the Homeland Pledge!

1. I promise never to bring up rights.

2. I promise to never question authority.

*Brought to you by the Ministry of Homeland Security.

Always a conversation piece at the airport.
THAT is ballsy!
law dawg is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 5:39 pm
  #47  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,704
Originally Posted by mmartin4600
Superguy, do you have a website for the T-shirt, or should I just google Cafepress? I want to wear this T-shirt on one of my training days.
LMAO!!!

^
law dawg is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 5:47 pm
  #48  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,034
Originally Posted by law dawg
Have the courage of their convictions. If they think flying with ID is a civil liberties violation then fly without it. Go through the hassle. If the TSA is a criminal organization then don't fly.

Convenience doesn't negate principle. If one only has principles when it's easy and convenient for them then I don't really think they're principles. Some people have taken these stands. Most, unless they're keeping them secret, have not.

If the principle is so strong (and anyone who states the TSA is made up of traitors/headed by, etc. obviously feels strongly about it) then why don't their actions match their words?

Thought is not action. Go do something about it, commensurate with what one believes the problem is. B!tching on a forum ain't it.

And therein lies your problem. You have stereotyped everyone who participates in this forum to your own personal classification.

Not everybody here cries civil liberties about the ID issue. If you would actually read what people have to say, you would see that most people, including myself, feel that producing ID does very little, if anything, to enhance security.

People have been told here by TSAers (and in person at checkpoints by TSAers) that if they don't like it, they don't have to fly.

Go ahead, do a search....you might see something that might supersede your preconceived notions.

I don't care what you think about convenience and principles. I simply asked what else that people can do that hasn't been mentioned in this forum already, and you brought nothing new to the table.

Maybe it's more convenient for you to do a broad-based character assassination of people here than to simply produce an answer to a relatively simple question.
LessO2 is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 5:51 pm
  #49  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited500k30 Nights20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Originally Posted by mmartin4600
Superguy, do you have a website for the T-shirt, or should I just google Cafepress? I want to wear this T-shirt on one of my training days.
My bad. I forgot to post the link as my son had distracted me.

http://www.cafepress.com/buy/kip%20h...rchBox/x_0/y_0

Tried finding one for "Do You Want to Fly Today?" but one hasn't been made yet.
Superguy is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 6:00 pm
  #50  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited500k30 Nights20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Originally Posted by law dawg
THAT is ballsy!
BWI: didn't say anything.

DCA: TSO at WTMD stopped me, wanted to read it, and laughed hysterically.

IAD: 3 striper took a picture with his camera phone as he liked it. Got a real laugh at the checkpoint from several TSO's and supervisors.

SLC: Never commented directly to me in line. Last trip thru I was standing in line at the BK and some screeners saw it, laughed and agreed.

Come to think of it, I don't know of a TSO that I've talked to disagree yet. So maybe there's some hope.

I met dcstudent at DCA thru that. First question when he saw that shirt was "Are you an FT'er?"

A lot of DL and UA crew have commented about it, ranging from Who is Kip? to "I can't comment" (but with a smile), and one DL agent that said "I completely agree."

Think I even got the attention of a FAM at BWI. Couldn't confirm he was a FAM, but he had "the look" and sat in F.

A lot of pax, concession workers, etc, ask about it. If nothing else, it gets the wheels spinning.
Superguy is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 6:01 pm
  #51  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 53
Air Marshal

What in the heck is wrong with you guys? Is every one pissed off? Who is happy at work? I would rather be at home spending time with my family after winning 100 million on the lottery. I go to work, do my job the best I can, insure that I get home alive to see my three kids, get off the aircraft and forget about work until the next day. The job is what it is. I fly all the time and sit were I am told to sit. I can give rats AS_ if I sit in coach, 1st class or the lavatory. I get paid the big bucks for the one second I may have to draw my weapon in 20 years as a FAM. I really don’t care what any of you negative people have to say. I am in the process of completing my master’s degree and laughing all the way to the deans list. I like the job and some times dislike it because of all the airline delays. There are thousands of people who are in line for my job and I know that. I am proud to be one of the true working FAMs who have been doing it for close to six years. I took this job because I was mad as hell after 9/11. I was a deputy sheriff and wanted to do my part in fighting these idiots who attacked us on 9/11. I dealt with the scum of the earth when I was on road patrol and have no interest in doing that again. You guys read too much into my last posting and I guess I should have read it again before I posted it. I was in a rush but I am not asking for anyone’s apology. Get a life and remember I pay taxes also. I served my county prodly 3 years active duty in the Navy anf then 4 years active duty in the Army as a MP. I am now serving my country to insure these idiots do not try and hijake the aircraft I am working on. If any of you think I am just sitting on my rear all day just sucking up the airline peanuts then you are wrong. I work out 4 times week , attend ground fighting school, run 3 miles every other day, and eat healthy. I not only do this for me but for all of you so that I am ready for that idiot who pops up on a plane with a weapon and yells “This is a hijacking!”. We can argue all day long about if this will every happen but I will be ready. I am a true American to the bone and am proud of my job.
intheaircop is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 6:02 pm
  #52  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited500k30 Nights20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Originally Posted by LessO2
I don't care what you think about convenience and principles. I simply asked what else that people can do that hasn't been mentioned in this forum already, and you brought nothing new to the table.
I think his view comes from (and he's stated this in discussion previously) the fact that he thinks air travel is a convenience period (ie don't like it, take the bus), while others view air travel as part of their right to free movement.

Super
Superguy is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 6:15 pm
  #53  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Programs: UA, SWA, HA, Qantas
Posts: 660
Originally Posted by intheaircop
What in the heck is wrong with you guys? Is every one pissed off? Who is happy at work?
Dude,

Chill...Most of us who do this job would agree with many of your points. Most of us have the same kind of work "pedigree" that you do, or "more".

But, it seems as if you are relating that you are only in it for the "stable job", and "the money". I base that on comparing your posts in this thread. Thats ok if that is what floats your boat. Just please realize that many people, even if they find frustrations within their employment, take an outlook different than yours. A highly educated, trained, and experienced person does not generally have to just "put up with" a job.

I read your post, and while it does not bother me, I can tell you that many would have a hard time believing you are a masters student who doesn't take the time to proof read a post on a subject that you are obviously passionate about. I mean, how about a break for a new paragraph at the very least.

I'm sorry, but you may have very clear and concise thoughts, but they have not been transmitted onto the forum in that manner.

Last edited by bbc1969; Sep 13, 2007 at 6:46 pm
bbc1969 is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 7:11 pm
  #54  
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
1M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 29,078
Originally Posted by bocastephen
I think we should avoid posts which ridicule FAMs on a personal level or suggest their jobs are worthless, which is also somewhat of a personal jibe.

Our beef is not with *most* of the individual FAMs (although many of us have run into some, seen some or heard about some who should be seeking alternate employment) - our beef is with FAM management and their work rules and procedures which turned the program from a stealthy safetynet into a rather bad joke. Leave it to DHS to take something that was working fine and mess it up.

I still think the best course of action is to remove the FAM program from DHS control, return it to the FAA and it's rules/procedures, root out the cowboys and other unprofessionals/yahoos, and most of our complaints about FAMs and their working procedures would probably diminish substantially.
emphasis mine: yup, exactly what i was trying to say but you did a better job (complete with you saying Leave it to DHS to take something that was working fine and mess it up as i would simply say that dhs could ..... up a free lunch .



Originally Posted by mmartin4600
I want to know what purpose this obvious PR ploy is going to serve. I have sent an e-mail to my supervisor and the FAMS Ombudsman asking this question. Ive also sent an e-mail to the News station asking if they would consider removing the video from their web-site. These types of propaganda films jeopardize officer safety. As you all well know, we can only operate in anonymity. Unfortunately our management, who have never flown as FAM's, make up the rules. That is why most of us have given up following policy when it jeopardizes our safety. We still notify who we have to, but, I haven't pre-boarded an aircraft in 18 months. I would like to thank bocastephen and goalie for their comments, I appreciate it. FWAAA, I get your point. To intheaircop, brother try spell check. Youll get no mercy for grammatical or factual errors on this forum. .
thank you and it goes both ways.....you've got a very tough job....managed by morons (sorry just mho) who don't spend time in the trenches to know the oerpational ins and outs, have operationally inefficient rules to follow and then add to that, the pressure that if you screw up just once, the schitt hits the fan in a big way and you know who's gonna be hanging out to dry...not your boss or their boss, right?


Originally Posted by mmartin4600
I'm still looking for the "Kip Hawley is an Idiot" T-shirt. When someone finally makes one, put me down for a size Large.
awwwww, man....don't do that.....i'll never be able to say "i saw a fam on my flight today" cuz your are truly gonna blend in <ok, i'll go to my room/the penalty box now but i just couldn't resist>
goalie is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 8:14 pm
  #55  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,704
Originally Posted by LessO2
And therein lies your problem. You have stereotyped everyone who participates in this forum to your own personal classification.

Not everybody here cries civil liberties about the ID issue. If you would actually read what people have to say, you would see that most people, including myself, feel that producing ID does very little, if anything, to enhance security.

People have been told here by TSAers (and in person at checkpoints by TSAers) that if they don't like it, they don't have to fly.

Go ahead, do a search....you might see something that might supersede your preconceived notions.

I don't care what you think about convenience and principles. I simply asked what else that people can do that hasn't been mentioned in this forum already, and you brought nothing new to the table.

Maybe it's more convenient for you to do a broad-based character assassination of people here than to simply produce an answer to a relatively simple question.
First, I never painted with a broad brush. Read my first post on this subject. Notice the use of the words "some."

Second, even if I had lumped everyone into one bucket, welcome to FlyerTalk. That seems to be the MO here - at least to TSA employees. What's good for the goose.......

Third, I can't give you a panacea. You have to take the stand that best represents your issue. If you think X is a problem, you have to take the steps that best address that issue. Another method might not work. There is no one size fits all.

Myself, I have used official channels (letters), personal meetings with officials and the media. You take the tack that addresses the issue(s), whatever that or those might be to you.
law dawg is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 8:16 pm
  #56  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,704
Originally Posted by Superguy
I think his view comes from (and he's stated this in discussion previously) the fact that he thinks air travel is a convenience period (ie don't like it, take the bus), while others view air travel as part of their right to free movement.

Super
If it was a right you wouldn't have to pay for it.

You have the right to travel, but not the right to a conveyance. IMO. YMMV.
law dawg is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 8:23 pm
  #57  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,788
Originally Posted by law dawg
You have the right to travel, but not the right to a conveyance. IMO. YMMV.
I can't believe you said that, law dawg.

That will cost you one "get out of corner free" passes!
birdstrike is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 8:30 pm
  #58  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,704
Originally Posted by birdstrike
I can't believe you said that, law dawg.

That will cost you one "get out of corner free" passes!
Oh no! Can I take it back? Please?

Or at least let me keep clam!

law dawg is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 8:57 pm
  #59  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited500k30 Nights20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Originally Posted by law dawg
If it was a right you wouldn't have to pay for it.
Were that so, I wouldn't have to pay taxes. That implies I have no rights period because I have to pay the organization that "guarantees" those rights. Don't pay, I go the pokey and lose my rights.
Superguy is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2007 | 9:06 pm
  #60  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,704
Originally Posted by Superguy
Were that so, I wouldn't have to pay taxes. That implies I have no rights period because I have to pay the organization that "guarantees" those rights. Don't pay, I go the pokey and lose my rights.
You lost me here.

Name me one right that you have to pay to have. I can't think of one, although there may be one out there I'm missing.
law dawg is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.