solid deoderants - kosher or need to be 3 ounces or less?
#1
Original Poster
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC (formerly BOS/DCA)
Programs: UA 1K, IC RA
Posts: 60,745
solid deoderants - kosher or need to be 3 ounces or less?
I rarely travel with a solid deodorant, but I think I might start. Does this need to be of the < 3 ounces variety or does that just apply to gels and aerosols? The TSA website does not list solid as an option for deodorant. 
http://www.tsa.dhs.gov/travelers/air...ted-items.shtm

http://www.tsa.dhs.gov/travelers/air...ted-items.shtm
#3
Original Poster
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC (formerly BOS/DCA)
Programs: UA 1K, IC RA
Posts: 60,745
#4




Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,386
Gimme a break. It's allowed.
#6




Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: TPA
Programs: UA Global Services 3MM, Hyatt Lifetime Globalist
Posts: 2,948
The only time that I was questioned about this was August 12 last year, and after consultation the full-sized product was allowed through in my carry-on luggage (non-baggie)...
#8
Moderator, Omni, Omni/PR, Omni/Games, FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Between DCA and IAD
Programs: UA 1K MM; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 72,570
The TSA confiscated my wife's solid deodorant crystal, which can in no way, shape, or form be construed as a liquid or even a gel. They then denied her claim for reimbursement, stating that the loss has to be the fault of an error on the TSA's part.
I've traveled with the same without problem many times, and through the same airports, so it's clear that the TSA is as consistently inconsistent as usual.
I've traveled with the same without problem many times, and through the same airports, so it's clear that the TSA is as consistently inconsistent as usual.
#9
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 398
A simple way of clearing up this confusion would be to make the rules and guidelines more specific. I have in prior posts suggested rewritting the guidelines to define an acceptable limit on viscosity (including standard conditions for temperature, humidity and atmospheric pressure). This would eliminate the subjectivity that appears to be practiced.
Now once some of the TSO's can master this simple concept we can then go to work on the more elusive and much more technically challenging concept of the difference between a liquid ounce and a weight ounce. And yes Virginia, "ml" in 100 ml does stand for something!
#10
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,034
Clearly what is a liquid, gel or whatever continues to be beyond the comprehension of the frequent flyer who reads the TSA rules and guidelines, and the TSO who is charged with enforcing them.
A simple way of clearing up this confusion would be to make the rules and guidelines more specific. I have in prior posts suggested rewritting the guidelines to define an acceptable limit on viscosity (including standard conditions for temperature, humidity and atmospheric pressure). This would eliminate the subjectivity that appears to be practiced.
Now once some of the TSO's can master this simple concept we can then go to work on the more elusive and much more technically challenging concept of the difference between a liquid ounce and a weight ounce. And yes Virginia, "ml" in 100 ml does stand for something!
A simple way of clearing up this confusion would be to make the rules and guidelines more specific. I have in prior posts suggested rewritting the guidelines to define an acceptable limit on viscosity (including standard conditions for temperature, humidity and atmospheric pressure). This would eliminate the subjectivity that appears to be practiced.
Now once some of the TSO's can master this simple concept we can then go to work on the more elusive and much more technically challenging concept of the difference between a liquid ounce and a weight ounce. And yes Virginia, "ml" in 100 ml does stand for something!
Folks, start collecting names and badge numbers of those hero TSAers who protect us from stick deodorant.
TSAers do NOT like "extra attention" they would get through written complaints when they violate their own SOP.
Give those TSAers the extra attention they richly deserve when warranted.
#11
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 398
Folks, start collecting names and badge numbers of those hero TSAers who protect us from stick deodorant.
TSAers do NOT like "extra attention" they would get through written complaints when they violate their own SOP.
Give those TSAers the extra attention they richly deserve when warranted.
TSAers do NOT like "extra attention" they would get through written complaints when they violate their own SOP.
Give those TSAers the extra attention they richly deserve when warranted.
#12
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Somewhere near BWI
Programs: DL DM, HH Dia, SPG Gold, MR Plat, Hertz PC
Posts: 3,654
How do you propose collecting this information? My experience has been entirely unsucessful, and on one ocassion ending in arrest. I should point out that on this ocassion I was the one that was arrested. I realize the military has lowered their standards concerning arrests and convictions in order to qualifying for service, but I wouldn't want to unknowingly disqualify myself from service.
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,034
How do you propose collecting this information? My experience has been entirely unsucessful, and on one ocassion ending in arrest. I should point out that on this ocassion I was the one that was arrested. I realize the military has lowered their standards concerning arrests and convictions in order to qualifying for service, but I wouldn't want to unknowingly disqualify myself from service.
I have experienced several occasions when TSAers will walk away or angle their body in a way when I look at their nameplate.
Ask ONCE to see it. If they refuse or make it difficult, ask for a supervisor. He or she will likely tell you they will not give it to you because it will interfere with the screener's duties. If so, get the supervisor's name and badge number and be sure to mention the supervisor refused access to the information (in addition to any screener interference).
If you are unable to get the information, get as much information as you can. Such as a physical description of the screener (don't say "the fat slob with a mullet" or something like that), the time of the incident, the lane number, the terminal, etc. As much information as you can.
Send a copy to the local FSD and the local reps with the airline at the airport.
#15
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist



Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 29,074
Folks, start collecting names and badge numbers of those hero TSAers who protect us from stick deodorant.
TSAers do NOT like "extra attention" they would get through written complaints when they violate their own SOP.
Give those TSAers the extra attention they richly deserve when warranted.
TSAers do NOT like "extra attention" they would get through written complaints when they violate their own SOP.
Give those TSAers the extra attention they richly deserve when warranted.
How do you propose collecting this information? My experience has been entirely unsucessful, and on one ocassion ending in arrest. I should point out that on this ocassion I was the one that was arrested. I realize the military has lowered their standards concerning arrests and convictions in order to qualifying for service, but I wouldn't want to unknowingly disqualify myself from service.
) along with a brief (n.b. brief) description of what happened? just a thought....

