![]() |
Originally Posted by bambi47
No one I ever worked with thought it was funny to inconvience passengers. But what you have to understand is that the screeners don't make the rules. You will never see the ones that do make the rules at the airport.
But here's what we don't understand: Why would any of our fellow citizens want to play these games for a living? Just for the paycheck or is there some other lure for taking such a job? If the impetus to take such a job is based on the honest belief of "catching bad guys" then I will do my damnedest to persuade them of the fallacies of that belief. If the impetus to take such a job is simply the need for a paycheck then I will do my damnedest to persuade them of the inherent dishonesty about taking such a job. If the impetus is for attaining a sense of self-inflation ... then there's little that persuasion can achieve at that point. Evasive tactics become a much higher motivation for me. |
Originally Posted by bambi47
A joke as in their doing things that are totally unnecessary.
|
Originally Posted by Points Scrounger
No, this was not at the gate. The idea of "trying again" confounds me? I would stand a chance of getting the exact same person running the X ray machine, as well as the same person who went through my bag.
|
Originally Posted by bambi47
But what you have to understand is that the screeners don't make the rules. You will never see the ones that do make the rules at the airport.
|
Originally Posted by Gargoyle
Chertoff and Hawley should be required to fly coach without any special notification to screeners of who they are.
|
Deleted
|
Originally Posted by bocastephen
I would't be so sure. When two screeners found my travel size half empty toothpaste at FLL last week, they even held it up in the air to show their colleagues they made the big catch - you would think they caught a grand slam homerun ball at Game 7 of the World Series. It was pretty pathetic.
I have a ton of them and they each come with eyeshades, a toothbrush, and a small "one or two" use toothpaste. The thing of toothpaste is so small that I doubt many screeners would find it. I was handed one everytime I've taken a Qantas domestic redeye, but would always use my toothbrush and toothpaste. I would just toss the overnight kits in my carry-on. The business class ammenity kits has a full toothbrush and proper sample size tube of toothpaste (along with lotions and hydrating gels, etc ... all big security threats :rolleyes: ) I'll be using those small toothpaste things for my travels. I'll probably seperate the toothpaste from the QF toothbrush which it is pre-packaged in. Once I run out of these, I wonder where I can get more of these small toothpaste one (or two) use tubes? SDF_Traveler |
Originally Posted by essxjay
I think nearly all of us here understand the conundrum -- to put it charitably -- all too well.
But here's what we don't understand: Why would any of our fellow citizens want to play these games for a living? Just for the paycheck or is there some other lure for taking such a job? If the impetus to take such a job is based on the honest belief of "catching bad guys" then I will do my damnedest to persuade them of the fallacies of that belief. If the impetus to take such a job is simply the need for a paycheck then I will do my damnedest to persuade them of the inherent dishonesty about taking such a job. If the impetus is for attaining a sense of self-inflation ... then there's little that persuasion can achieve at that point. Evasive tactics become a much higher motivation for me. |
Good gracious, you mean to say the X-rays aren't made to detect small vials of perfume, or hotel sized shampoo?
Much like razorblades, the ban is nigh useless... Just tape a colostomy bag to your thigh and you're home free. But here's what we don't understand: Why would any of our fellow citizens want to play these games for a living? Just for the paycheck or is there some other lure for taking such a job? For alot of people at the TSA a government job that pays 15 bucks an hour is fantastic... At my airport, we're right next to the college, so quite honestly, this is a good college job, got my retirement fund going already... |
Originally Posted by SJCFlyerLG
The whole screening process is a facade to make the public feel safe, to show that the government is doing something.
|
In going thru my dopp bag before my current trip, I found some matches and a tube of moisturizer that were missed by the last screener who confiscated the neosporin. Classic. He pulled about 10 things out of the kit and STILL missed banned items. (Yes, I have now removed them myself as I don't need to temp fate). ;)
|
Originally Posted by Boraxo
Anybody else planning to use their pockets to carry-on toothpaste, sanitizers and other items that pose no threat to safety?
|
Originally Posted by MileageAddict
I fly every week and have been stuffing my pockets. :D Screw Hawley and his fantasy of security.
|
Originally Posted by Boraxo
In going thru my dopp bag before my current trip, I found some matches and a tube of moisturizer that were missed by the last screener who confiscated the neosporin. Classic. He pulled about 10 things out of the kit and STILL missed banned items. (Yes, I have now removed them myself as I don't need to temp fate). ;)
|
Originally Posted by n5667
Matches aren't banned, only lighters.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:15 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.