Community
Wiki Posts
Search

WP: banned items fly past security

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 10:54 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: OAK
Programs: UA Gold MM / AS MVP Gold
Posts: 2,504
WP: banned items fly past security

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14807713/
amartin1979 is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 11:03 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: soaking up the sun
Programs: unemployment
Posts: 687
I believe that the TSA screeners also believe that this ban is ridiculous and are ignoring the fact that people have hand cream, shampoo, etc in their bags. Unless a supervisor was doing the search with you, they dont' know if you've ignored something. This is only my opinion, but I really believe that they do see the prohibited items, but are ignoring them.
bambi47 is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 11:04 pm
  #3  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
40 Countries Visited
3M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Living the dream in Antigua and the nightmare in Florida
Programs: AA PLAT 2MM, *A Gold, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 56,624
This about says it all

"Gary Boettcher, a pilot and president of the Coalition for Airline Pilots Association, a trade group that closely tracks security issues, said he constantly sees people drinking from illicit bottles of water or putting on lip gloss when he walks through the passenger cabin. Most of the time, he said, it doesn't bother him.

"They are just doing their routines like they always did," Boettcher said. "An old woman drinking a bottle of water doesn't concern me. . . . The whole screening process is a facade to make the public feel safe, to show that the government is doing something."
SJCFlyerLG is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 11:18 pm
  #4  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
50 Countries Visited
5M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 58,133
"Others, however, say they're simply not going to tolerate the new rules. They admit that they ignore the restrictions, slipping expensive cologne, perfume, lip gloss, lotion and other ointments into their carry-on bags or into their pockets in hopes of sneaking them past security. Some of the items get flagged by screeners, others do not."

That's right, Comrade Hawley. Screw you, you incompetent hack.

"Travelers must realize this isn't a game," Howe said. "The threat is real and it continues, and we appreciate the public's cooperation. Is it the perfect system? No. But does it make it right to sneak things through security? No, it doesn't."

It is a game and a stupid one at that. You can take your cooperation and cram it where the sun don't shine.

"They are just doing their routines like they always did," Boettcher said. "An old woman drinking a bottle of water doesn't concern me. . . . The whole screening process is a facade to make the public feel safe, to show that the government is doing something."

^

Last edited by Spiff; Sep 12, 2006 at 11:23 pm
Spiff is online now  
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 11:20 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: AA PLT; UA Gold
Posts: 5,378
The fact that the screeners take the "banned items" out of pax bags and toss them all together into a trash can right next to them, pretty much speaks for itself.
justageek is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 11:28 pm
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited500k30 Nights20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
"Travelers must realize this isn't a game," Howe said. "The threat is real and it continues, and we appreciate the public's cooperation. Is it the perfect system? No. But does it make it right to sneak things through security? No, it doesn't."
If it's only a 20% increase, I would tend to think that people aren't necessarily checking stuff. They could very easily still pack it on. The Kettles might be checking their bags though.

And at least with what this story says, a lot of people don't seem to care either. ^
Superguy is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 11:35 pm
  #7  
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2005
Programs: AA, United
Posts: 280
Originally Posted by bambi47
I believe that the TSA screeners also believe that this ban is ridiculous and are ignoring the fact that people have hand cream, shampoo, etc in their bags. Unless a supervisor was doing the search with you, they dont' know if you've ignored something. This is only my opinion, but I really believe that they do see the prohibited items, but are ignoring them.
The guy in front of me this morning at OAK, lost his shampoo, shave cream, toothpaste and they may have had a 4th item just to be punative. He just looked at me and said I forgot and haven't travelled since 8/10.

2 weeks ago at DFW one of my teammates lost her eye-color makeup. She said she was tired of it anyway. the screener said "We find eveything at DFW we run a tight station".


I have a warm, fuzzy, secure womb like feeling (NOT!)
brentley is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 11:40 pm
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
Originally Posted by Article
"Travelers must realize this isn't a game," Howe said. "The threat is real and it continues, and we appreciate the public's cooperation. Is it the perfect system? No. But does it make it right to sneak things through security? No, it doesn't."
Baghdad Bob has had a sex change. Or is it gender reassignment?

Sorry, Ms Howe - your boss, Half-Wit Hawley, is an inhumane sack of crap. So is his boss, Comrade Chertoff. Banning water during mid-August is an atrocity, not part of an effective security plan.
FWAAA is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 12:22 am
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
1M
2M
50 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Danville, CA, USA;
Programs: UA 1MM, WN CP, Marriott LT Plat, Hilton Gold, IC Plat
Posts: 18,130
Fantastic story. WP is one of the few papers that is not afraid to take on the government generally and the TSA in particular, unlike the chicken-**** New York Times and USA Today (see other recent threads).

Many good quotes including the following: Metal detectors at security checkpoints cannot sense plastic items that may contain liquids or gels.

As I thought. Anybody else planning to use their pockets to carry-on toothpaste, sanitizers and other items that pose no threat to safety?
Boraxo is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 2:17 am
  #10  
Original Member
10 Countries Visited
500k
Community Influencer
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: PDX
Programs: TSA Refusenik charter member
Posts: 16,127
Originally Posted by Boraxo
Anybody else planning to use their pockets to carry-on toothpaste, sanitizers and other items that pose no threat to safety?
Yes, and hell yes!

El Comrade and his half-a-wit sidekick, Hawley, severely underestimate the concealment ops available to wearers of feminine undergarments. Garters, thigh highs and decolletage'-enchacing items are replete with strategic hiding places.

Last edited by essxjay; Sep 13, 2006 at 2:28 am
essxjay is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 2:20 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: IAH
Posts: 2,674
Now Spiff watch the vitriol, as we wouldn't want you to get banned
Martinis at 8 is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 5:10 am
  #12  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,953
Poll

Did any of you click on the "poll" in the link asking if you'd sneak items on board? I'd suggest you do so and respond to it.

According to the poll results, at the time I clicked, over 60% of responders thought that the ban was proper as it was for our safety.
doober is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 5:20 am
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Miami, FL
Programs: AA EXP/Marriott Plat/Hertz PC
Posts: 12,724
I'm starting to think that the liquid ban is really a positive development. It's impossible to enforce, and people actively circumvent it. It also contributes to a growing recognition that the TSA is clueless and that we, in fact, are subject to "security theater."

At this point, I hope they keep it up.
whirledtraveler is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 6:41 am
  #14  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: BDL
Programs: NWA Platinum, HHonors Diamond, SPG, YX, AA
Posts: 5,354
Originally Posted by Boraxo
Anybody else planning to use their pockets to carry-on toothpaste, sanitizers and other items that pose no threat to safety?
Yes. I've carried a "banned" item in my pocket almost every trip through security since 8/10.

Great article. I loved the pilot's comments ^
MKEbound is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 6:51 am
  #15  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Winter Garden, FL
Programs: Delta DM-3MM United Gold-MM Marriott Lifetime Titanium Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 13,498
Same here. I carry a small travel-size toothpaste tube. Nobody will ever find it.

Bruce
bdschobel is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.