Community
Wiki Posts
Search

?? Interfering with the screening process??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 5, 2011 | 11:39 am
  #31  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 24
Originally Posted by bluenotesro
I show up at the airport. Will I be interferring with the screening process?

Give it time....
You are definitely delaying the process for all the people who have to wait in the queue behind you.

How about this one? I book a flight at a busy time of day, instead of a slow time of day.

I thought about a police officer who issues a traffic ticket to a TSO driving to work, but this one would seem to be okay by the stated characterisation, as it doesn't involve a person going through the checkpoint.

If I say "I hate the TSA", and it upsets some of the TSOs, making them less able to work effectively, would that be actionable?
Nigel G is offline  
Old Apr 5, 2011 | 12:27 pm
  #32  
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 230
Originally Posted by eyecue
You are making it more difficult than it is. I am searching a bag, you keep reaching into the bag and intentionally impede me. I am on the x-ray and you come in screaming and yelling obscene remarks and I look to see what the commotion is about, you distracted me. I am patting you down and you begin to berate me with personal insults and tell me that I am sexually assaulting you, you have delayed me from performing a patdown.
And we thank you for clarifying what YOUR viewpoint is, now the question is what is the viewpoint of the 59,999 others screeners?

Do you see our point in bringing this up?
rgfloor is offline  
Old Apr 5, 2011 | 12:34 pm
  #33  
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 230
Originally Posted by eyecue
SOME ARE AND SOME ARE NOT. To test your questions ask yourself are you keeping someone from doing something that is part of their job?
And in most cases if you are keeping someone from doing their job it is because of "trying to get them to do their job correctly". eg. asking for new gloves, asking them to accept the NEXXUS ID, requesting to be able to see your belongings, refusing to answer questions about money which are inappropriate, etc.
rgfloor is offline  
Old Apr 5, 2011 | 2:52 pm
  #34  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,972
Originally Posted by eyecue
I am searching a bag, you keep reaching into the bag and intentionally impede me.
Agreed.

I am on the x-ray and you come in screaming and yelling obscene remarks and I look to see what the commotion is about, you distracted me.
Unclear. Obscene remarks may or may not be protected speech, but yelling can can indeed cross the line.

I am patting you down and you begin to berate me with personal insults and tell me that I am sexually assaulting you, you have delayed me from performing a patdown.
Definitely not against the law! Verbally protesting a governmental act is the most protected of all speech!
RichardKenner is offline  
Old Apr 5, 2011 | 3:18 pm
  #35  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 240
Originally Posted by goalie
And you never will as the TSA will use "SSI" as a catch all for what they don't want to tell you/what they don't want you to know-even if the information has absolutely no impact on or is absolutely no threat to nash'nul skewrity whatsoever

Bolding mine: Yup ^ and I can't wait for a pax to be arrested for interfering with the screening process because they gave a middle digit salute while in the NoS.
I know someone who has done the middle finger salute while in the scanner. Let's hope that they are not on the no-fly list now!!!

I like the idea of the poster (I forgot what thread it was in) but he only nods or shakes his head, he doesn't even talk to any of the TSO's but he looks into their eyes.
average_passenger is offline  
Old Apr 5, 2011 | 3:38 pm
  #36  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
40 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,543
Originally Posted by eyecue
SOME ARE AND SOME ARE NOT. To test your questions ask yourself are you keeping someone from doing something that is part of their job?
You should have answered the separate questions.
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old Apr 5, 2011 | 5:54 pm
  #37  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,725
Originally Posted by eyecue
SOME ARE AND SOME ARE NOT. To test your questions ask yourself are you keeping someone from doing something that is part of their job?
Stop avoiding the question.
n4zhg is offline  
Old Apr 5, 2011 | 6:46 pm
  #38  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 55
Originally Posted by eyecue
I see that no one took any hints from your last sentence.
Anyway as a person that is traveling through a checkpoint if YOU do ANYTHING that intentionally delays, impedes or distracts a TSO from executing their assigned duties, you are interfering with the screening process.
If a deaf person goes thru the WTMD and it either alarms or they can't hear instructions, is THAT "interfering with the screening process"?

Deafness is a handicap that can't be seen.

It drives some normal-hearing folks bonkers to have to deal with it.

---
yautjalady
yautjalady is offline  
Old Apr 5, 2011 | 6:50 pm
  #39  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: GFK, YWG, GLA, PRG
Posts: 69
could refusal to speak english with the smurfs be construed as interference, or if the dialect of english i choose to speak isnt understood by the smurfs, would that be interference?
scraidin is offline  
Old Apr 5, 2011 | 7:55 pm
  #40  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 319
If I object to any part of the enhanced screening because it is causing me pain (either from a condition/disability or because the screener is too rough), is that interfering with the screening process?
phoebepontiac is offline  
Old Apr 5, 2011 | 7:59 pm
  #41  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,964
Originally Posted by phoebepontiac
If I object to any part of the enhanced screening because it is causing me pain (either from a condition/disability or because the screener is too rough), is that interfering with the screening process?
I have been told that the answer is yes, and according to what eyecue has posted I take it that he agrees?

For instance, when I am selected for a secondary screening I always tell the screener that I am unable to do XYZ. Several times the screener almost immediately tells me to do XYZ. I repeat calmly and slowly that I am physically unable to do XYZ.

This has caused several screeners to become very angry with me and I have been told that I am interfering with the screening process.

It is just one more example of many, many TSOs being unable to understand the variables of dealing with passengers (gender, nationality, physical limitations, cognitive limitations, etc)
exbayern is offline  
Old Apr 5, 2011 | 9:57 pm
  #42  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Programs: WN Nothing and spending the half million points from too many flights, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 8,043
Originally Posted by eyecue
SOME ARE AND SOME ARE NOT. To test your questions ask yourself are you keeping someone from doing something that is part of their job?
I truly do not know. That is why I asked. If you do not know or can not tell me, we are in worse shape than I thought. These are specific areas where there are questions and you either refuse to answer on can not answer. Simple yes or no or it depends will suffice.
InkUnderNails is offline  
Old Apr 6, 2011 | 8:14 am
  #43  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,972
Originally Posted by InkUnderNails
These are specific areas where there are questions and you either refuse to answer on can not answer. Simple yes or no or it depends will suffice.
I think his 'answer' was that it depends.

On what it depends you can surmise for yourself.
Day of the week
'R' in the month
what the checkpoint worker had for breakfast
the weather
phase of the moon
Broncos lost
etc...
Wally Bird is offline  
Old Apr 6, 2011 | 8:25 am
  #44  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: RDU
Programs: OnePass
Posts: 772
Originally Posted by eyecue
SOME ARE AND SOME ARE NOT. To test your questions ask yourself are you keeping someone from doing something that is part of their job?
Answer the damned questions and knock off the double speak.

They're straightforward and easy questions.
mikemey is offline  
Old Apr 6, 2011 | 8:37 am
  #45  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,952
Originally Posted by mikemey
Answer the damned questions and knock off the double speak.

They're straightforward and easy questions.
Not for people who refuse to engage in honest discussion.
Boggie Dog is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.