Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Practical Travel Safety and Security Issues
Reload this Page >

Alex Jones / Infowars Video on Assaultive TSA Patdowns

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Alex Jones / Infowars Video on Assaultive TSA Patdowns

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 6, 2010, 7:02 pm
  #61  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by sbrower
What is the basis for the assumption that there is a problem with opposite sex patdown?
That -- outside of jails/prison -- most sexual assault in the US is committed by persons of the opposite sex?
GUWonder is offline  
Old Nov 6, 2010, 7:33 pm
  #62  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Orange County, CA, USA
Programs: AA (Life Plat), Marriott (Life Titanium) and every other US program
Posts: 6,411
Originally Posted by GUWonder
That -- outside of jails/prison -- most sexual assault in the US is committed by persons of the opposite sex?
Actually, outside of jails, I think it is probably 99% by males? So maybe all patdowns should be done by females?
sbrower is offline  
Old Nov 6, 2010, 7:43 pm
  #63  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: STL
Posts: 132
Woah

6 years ago? Your testimony is doubtful unless you took notes.
Eyecue, your comments are foolhardy, pure and simple.

If you'd ask me to describe the kind of shoes this TSA guy was wearing or some inane detail such as that, yeah, I might have some trouble with that. But it was a man. That's a rock-solid memory. If I am "mis-remembering" this event - that I was frisked by a male TSO - then I shouldn't be wondering around in public alone.

Yeesh.
RosemaryT is offline  
Old Nov 6, 2010, 7:53 pm
  #64  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by sbrower
Actually, outside of jails, I think it is probably 99% by males? So maybe all patdowns should be done by females?
Will that lead to more happy endings?
GUWonder is offline  
Old Nov 6, 2010, 7:57 pm
  #65  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SEA/YVR/BLI
Programs: UA "Lifetime" Gold, AS MVPG100K, OW Emerald, HH Lifetime Diamond, IC Plat, Marriott Gold, Hertz Gold
Posts: 9,490
Originally Posted by GUWonder
Will they give passengers a happy ending?
^ ^ With 55,840 posts, even so often the odds are that you'll come up with a gem.
Fredd is offline  
Old Nov 7, 2010, 12:29 am
  #66  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 464
Originally Posted by BearX220
The Infowars / Alex Jones subculture is a little extreme for me most of the time, but a lot of people pay attention to him and this video is worth watching. It will get a lot of exposure, and it crucifies TSA.

http://www.infowars.com/tsa-fondles-...body-scanners/
I thought that only same sex will conduct the pat down.

And I recall from one our or more rational resident TSO clerks that the patdown will NOT be palm but back of the hand only.
oldjonesy is offline  
Old Nov 7, 2010, 12:36 am
  #67  
LAX
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA; Philadelphia, PA
Programs: OZ Diamond
Posts: 6,139
Originally Posted by oldjonesy
I thought that only same sex will conduct the pat down.

And I recall from one our or more rational resident TSO clerks that the patdown will NOT be palm but back of the hand only.
That pat-down has apparently been "enhanced" recently, which is what really infuriates me. Touching someone's private parts even with back of hand is inappropriate, can you imagine with palm?

LAX
LAX is offline  
Old Nov 7, 2010, 12:56 am
  #68  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,719
Originally Posted by oldjonesy
And I recall from one our or more rational resident TSO clerks that the patdown will NOT be palm but back of the hand only.
Take five minutes to scan this forum and you'll see that there is a LOT of front-of-the-hand, deliberately assaultive and humiliating patdown action going on. The stated goal of the new patdowns is to be so disturbing and invasive, passengers will opt for the Nude-o-Scopes in spite of the medical risks. Invasive front-of-the-hand explorations of your genitals have no security benefit. They are performed to upset and sicken you.
BearX220 is offline  
Old Nov 7, 2010, 1:14 am
  #69  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Programs: AA Plat/1MM
Posts: 546
Originally Posted by eyecue
6 years ago? Your testimony is doubtful unless you took notes.
B.S. on that! Most women who have been sexually assaulted, and I do consider this sexual assault, remember the details for a very long time. Pray to God that no woman in your family is ever sexually assaulted.
VonS is offline  
Old Nov 7, 2010, 8:05 am
  #70  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: here and there
Programs: EB*G, UA ex1K
Posts: 570
Originally Posted by eyecue
Nothing about the statute of limitations. I am speaking to the integrity of the witnesses memory after that long.
Umm, that is exactly what the statute of limitations does: It defines the date after which a person cannot be charged with a crime, because the passage of time has made it impossible to ensure a fair trial. Before that date, a person may be charged with a crime and stand trial, during which witnesses may testify under oath.

Of course, a prosecutor or jury can decide that delay has made evidence too weak to charge or convict someone; but until the statute of limitations expires, this is not assumed to be the case.
neko is offline  
Old Nov 7, 2010, 8:12 am
  #71  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,953
Originally Posted by VonS
B.S. on that! Most women who have been sexually assaulted, and I do consider this sexual assault, remember the details for a very long time. Pray to God that no woman in your family is ever sexually assaulted.
As well, that assault impacts many areas of their psychological and physical well-being, often for the remainder of their lives.
doober is offline  
Old Nov 7, 2010, 8:54 am
  #72  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: LAS
Posts: 1,279
Two simple questions for eyecue:

1) Is it possible that a huge governmental agency has employees that sometimes do not follow procedures?

2) Given that EVERY other governmental agency has had employees who are busted for porn, sexual misconduct/assault, theft, harassment, and similar events, isn't it likely that TSA has employees that would also do this?

Originally Posted by eyecue
I can tell you right now that this did not happen.
Were you there? It seems your standard answer to every issue posed by anyone, anyplace, regarding anything is it did not happen. You offer nothing more than some sad BS about TSA procedures. Do you seriously expect us to believe that nobody is the TSA would EVER deviate from a procedure?

Originally Posted by eyecue
There are over 40 cameras on the checkpoints.
Originally Posted by eyecue
They are all working and they are all available to be viewed in ALOT of different places.
Originally Posted by eyecue
Oh yeah ! They installed new less than a year ago. There are 40 plus cameras on each cp. Each CP can see there own and they are watched and displayed in the office 24/7. They can see the other cameras and the central monitoring station is in CMF and DOCC. So yeah I am sure.
Please explain how any person can watch 40 cameras. Are these cameras connected to a digital video recorder? Do the people monitoring these cameras write down everything they see?

Originally Posted by eyecue
Nothing about the statute of limitations. I am speaking to the integrity of the witnesses memory after that long.
According to you, recollection of an event is impossible for the complainers (who only have to recall one event), but the TSA, on the other hand, is perfectly capable of recalling any event. In this case, they can recall something that happened to flash across one of 40 monitors in some office.
ScatterX is offline  
Old Nov 7, 2010, 9:59 am
  #73  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,953
Originally Posted by eyecue
Nothing about the statute of limitations. I am speaking to the integrity of the witnesses memory after that long.
If "the integrity of the witnesses (sic) memory after that long", how come there is no statute of limitations on murder charges? Here is just one example

http://wiki.ocregister.com/Orange_Co...y_James_Alcala

of a man who was convicted of murder 30 years prior based, in part on the testimony of a woman who was 12 years old at the time.
doober is offline  
Old Nov 7, 2010, 10:48 am
  #74  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: Fallen Plats, ex-WN CP, DYKWIW; still a Hilton Diamond & Club Cholula™ R.I.P. Super Plats
Posts: 25,415
Originally Posted by ScatterX
2) Given that EVERY other governmental agency has had employees who are busted for porn, sexual misconduct/assault, theft, harassment, and similar events...
And that's without advertising on gas pumps & pizza boxes!
MikeMpls is offline  
Old Nov 7, 2010, 11:18 am
  #75  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Wherever liberty is threatened
Programs: TSA Disparager Silver
Posts: 314
Originally Posted by tsadude1
Alex Jones has produced so much BS over the YEARS, he is considered a joke. At 3:35 of the film clip he stated that he watched male TSOs touching 3 year old girls. Those are his words. He said nothing? He did nothing? This individual is a big ball buster and yet he did nothing?
What would you have him do?

Ask anyone who has ever studied the topic of police abuse (and abuse by wanna-be police like the TSA has) to tell you what happens the instant one of us mundanes touches the sacred body of a government enforcement agent.

Originally Posted by eyecue
She is being called into doubt because she relates a patdown that is not part of our program. We have specific order of coverage and steps. Either the interviewee has a huge memory problem or she is making this up. There is also no chance that it was opposite gender screening.
So your defense is ... *drumroll* ... that TSOs always follow procedure!
Ayn R Key is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.