FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Practical Travel Safety and Security Issues (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/practical-travel-safety-security-issues-686/)
-   -   Why tsa sop has failed (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/practical-travel-safety-security-issues/1096390-why-tsa-sop-has-failed.html)

eyecue Jun 19, 2010 7:36 pm


Originally Posted by Tom M. (Post 14162810)
Which speaks volumes itself....




So you agree it doesn't "plug the hole"



Ahh yes, the company line excuse for "inconsistancy " :rolleyes:




And yet you belive that you are effective and that Americans giving up their rights and privacy is "the cost of doing business" . To me that is pretty cold and heartless

Tom,
We have been down the road on this so many times. No one has a "right to fly." It is just a preferred mode of transportation that is quick. It is a give and take. IF you as a customer of the airline want to get somewhere fast, you have to give up some things (for about 5 or ten minutes.) IF you want to keep your privacy and 4th amendments right then you can take another mode of transportation.
I am going to stand on the line that I took about layers of security and that is all. I am not going to admit anything about holes (other than it was a good movie.) I learned that from the CIA "Admit nothing, deny everything."

Boggie Dog Jun 19, 2010 7:36 pm



Originally Posted by TSORon (Post 14162411)
Gate screenings are designed to plug the hole in screening that has been complained about here and at the TSA blog by folks just like yourself. The hole? The ability of some unknown airport employee or TSA member to pass unauthorized items to a passenger post-checkpoint.


Then screen those who haven't been screened.



Selectee screening harms no one and catches quite a bit.
Catches quite a bit of what?

For someone who thinks taking $10,000 out of the country is illegal I would prefer someone who is competent.



Why bother a LEO if there is no need? We are not talking about criminals, just someone who left something at the checkpoint. Nothing criminal in that, so no LEO support needed. I have returned quite a few things to passengers in the terminals as well, it’s a part of the job. After all, its more likely that I saw the person who left it behind than a LEO we would have to ball down to the checkpoint.
How about because it ain't your job. Call the LEO's.


The theft’s at the gate are usually reported to us first. We are there, LEO’s are not usually (at least at my airport), and at some CAT III’s and IV’s they do not have a LEO presence at the airport.
Do they have telephones and radios at your airport? Call the LEO's.

eyecue Jun 19, 2010 7:41 pm


Originally Posted by Boggie Dog (Post 14162824)
A buch of TSA employees standing around a checkpoint confiscating water and looking at people with Strip Search Machines and such is evidence of failure.

Gate checks are proof of failure.

Is this clear enough for ya?

Gotcha! I just want to know where there are "a bunch of" TSA employees standing around and looking at people with strip search machines. TSA does not cofiscate anything, the preferred term is "surrendered under duress."
I also dont see that as a sign of failure.
How is checking your bag at the gate a sign of failure?

Tom M. Jun 19, 2010 7:44 pm


Originally Posted by eyecue (Post 14162848)
Tom,
We have been down the road on this so many times. No one has a "right to fly." It is just a preferred mode of transportation that is quick. It is a give and take. IF you as a customer of the airline want to get somewhere fast, you have to give up some things (for about 5 or ten minutes.) IF you want to keep your privacy and 4th amendments right then you can take another mode of transportation.

And then someone decides it you want to drive a car, fly in a plane, get a job your house must be searched and you and your family must be photographed naked. I mean you can always walk... :rolleyes:


Originally Posted by eyecue (Post 14162848)
I am going to stand on the line that I took about layers of security and that is all.

Unwilling to take a stand I see...


Originally Posted by eyecue (Post 14162848)
I am not going to admit anything about holes (other than it was a good movie.) I learned that from the CIA "Admit nothing, deny everything."

Maybe you should change your screen name to Sgt. Schultz....

:rolleyes:

Scubatooth Jun 19, 2010 7:46 pm


Originally Posted by eyecue (Post 14162799)
OMG!!! I can tell you that TSA DEN has the best relationship with one of the most respected law enforcement agencies in the USA. You cannot classify all of TSA as idiots. You are one of the few, the proud, the TSA haters and there is nothing that I can do to change that. Just to set the record straight though, I have been a LEO, Firefighter and EMT. My duty lies in a higher cause than defending TSA for some of the huge mistakes that have been made. I just look through all the murky water for the light at the end of the tunnel.

Considering the benefits(which long-term are better then what TSA offers) and such why did you ever leave the respectable positions of a LEO, FF or EMT to work for TSA. Or was it that you were asked to leave or be fired?

ah yes DEN the baston of TSA corruption and do as we say not as we do. ala Alvin Crabtree who willing brought a loaded firearm to work and was never charged, but yet TSA still parades that stat every week in the body count.


I have a duty to serve others in need, but TSA is the last place i would work. I would take a job at mcdonalds before taking a job with TSA

coachrowsey Jun 19, 2010 7:47 pm


Originally Posted by coachrowsey (Post 14162818)
eyecue:


I'm also a former leo, so I've got to ask you a question how can any former leo work for the TSA ?

I'm still waiting for an answer ?

Boggie Dog Jun 19, 2010 7:49 pm


Originally Posted by eyecue (Post 14162732)
Thomas, Thomas, Thomas. I could say that there has not been anyone lost in a terrorist event on airplane since TSA took over, that speaks volumes for itself.

No, what would speak volumes is how many terrorist TSA has identified, referred to Law Enforcment and have been brought to trial.

Care to tell us how many people TSA has so identified?

coachrowsey Jun 19, 2010 7:50 pm


Originally Posted by Scubatooth (Post 14162878)


I have a duty to serve others in need, but TSA is the last place i would work. I would take a job at mcdonalds before taking a job with TSA

Or collecting the garbage, at least that's respectable.

Boggie Dog Jun 19, 2010 7:54 pm


Originally Posted by eyecue (Post 14162860)
Gotcha! I just want to know where there are "a bunch of" TSA employees standing around and looking at people with strip search machines. TSA does not cofiscate anything, the preferred term is "surrendered under duress."
I also dont see that as a sign of failure.
How is checking your bag at the gate a sign of failure?

My preferred term is confiscated.

I do.

Because it has already been checked by TSA!

VH-RMD Jun 19, 2010 7:55 pm


Originally Posted by eyecue (Post 14162860)
TSA does not cofiscate anything, the preferred term is "surrendered under duress."

in most civilised places, that's called 'theft'...

Wimpie Jun 19, 2010 7:59 pm

Eyecue says it all
 
"IF you want to keep your privacy and 4th amendments right then you can take another mode of transportation. "

With this attitude, we can expect more airlines to go bust, as people DO take another mode of transportation.

I hope it causes lots of layoffs of the Smurfs with their tin badges!

eyecue Jun 19, 2010 8:00 pm


Originally Posted by Tom M. (Post 14162872)
And then someone decides it you want to drive a car, fly in a plane, get a job your house must be searched and you and your family must be photographed naked. I mean you can always walk... :rolleyes:

THat is another matter entirely, please stick to the flight plan.




Unwilling to take a stand I see...
No just unwilling to further a disagreement. No matter what I say, someone will disagree.





Maybe you should change your screen name to Sgt. Schultz....

:rolleyes:
Have I insulted you in this exchange? Why does it always have to come down to that?


Originally Posted by coachrowsey (Post 14162818)
eyecue:
Let me make it clear. It's not personal. I have a couple friends here who work for TSA & they are good people. Just very brainwashed.

I'm also a former leo, so I've got to ask you a question how can any former leo work for the TSA ?

There are so many people on here that take it to a name calling level. THis exchange has resorted to that with others on here.
As far as why I am not a LEO anymore, career choice mistake. It happens, if I had it to do all over again, I would have stayed a LEO. I went to work at a fire department. Then the IT field and now look at me.

LV702 Jun 19, 2010 8:06 pm


Originally Posted by Wimpie (Post 14162933)
"IF you want to keep your privacy and 4th amendments right then you can take another mode of transportation. "

With this attitude, we can expect more airlines to go bust, as people DO take another mode of transportation.

I hope it causes lots of layoffs of the Smurfs with their tin badges!

Is that an admission you give up your 4th amendment rights when you fly?

/cry

eyecue Jun 19, 2010 8:15 pm


Originally Posted by VH-RMD (Post 14162918)
in most civilised places, that's called 'theft'...

No, You do have choices, You can keep the items that you have, you just cant go into the secure area with them. That means that you have to decide if a liter of water for instance is worth the price of an airline ticket. The majority of things that are not allowed are known by everyone. The liquid ban has been in effect for almost 5 years now and that still is the leading cause of slow downs and bag searches. There are signs and announcements and more signs and video and more signs about liquids restrictions and yet it still goes on and on.

LV702 Jun 19, 2010 8:18 pm

I still want to know if liquids are dangerous why certain people can bring them through. I also want to know why they throw them out at the checkpoint, instead of disposing of them in a blast proof container.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:35 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.