Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Washington Post: "The Intolerable TSA"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 10:45 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Programs: SSSSS
Posts: 867
Washington Post: "The Intolerable TSA"

A Washington Post opinion writer takes note of the TSA's latest gaf after noting while traveling that the TSOs have unwrapped checked Christmas presents, taken peanut butter crackers from babies...

Washington Post Partison: December 9, 2000; Armao, J:The Intolerable TSA

I was distraught to open a suitcase – that I had checked! – only to discover that the Christmas presents my mother carefully wrapped had been torn open in a search by Transportation Security Administration (TSA) workers.
federal security officials at the Orlando airport confiscated some peanut butter snacks from the family ahead of me
Normally, I would not even think to complain about these events. I understand that a new world exists after 9/11 and that when it comes to ensuring public safety, what’s a little inconvenience?
My equanimity, though, evaporated upon reading today how the TSA posted online a 93-page manual detailing some if its most closely guarded security secrets.
And therein likes the biggest danger. All along we have been told that there is a reason for all these silly things we are asked to do. Trust us, has been the implicit command of the TSA. Not likely.
Nothing more need be said.
greentips is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 12:30 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: SLC or DUB
Programs: The program formerly know as WorldPerks
Posts: 330
Nice to see that the media is starting to wake up. It seems every couple days, there is an anti-TSA article out there.


There are some good comments, but unfortunately there are a couple cool-aid drinkers too.
lobster7 is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 12:57 am
  #3  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: All over
Programs: AA-LTP, HH-DIA, Marriott-LT+AMB, Hyatt-Globalist, Hertz-PC, UA-GS, BA-Gold
Posts: 6,863
Thanks for the post. Its about time there's more exposure from the media.
chanp is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 5:39 am
  #4  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
1M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 72,188
I routinely send a "best of FT" e-mail to a friend inside DHS, especially when TSA has been, for them, even more egregious than normal.

Not once has he responded with a defense of that sorry excuse for a government agency.
halls120 is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 6:15 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: FrostByte Falls, Mn
Programs: Holiday Inn Plat NW gold AA gold
Posts: 2,157
Originally Posted by halls120
I routinely send a "best of FT" e-mail to a friend inside DHS, especially when TSA has been, for them, even more egregious than normal.

Not once has he responded with a defense of that sorry excuse for a government agency.
Hard to defend evil, incompetence, dereliction of duty, and behavior bordering on criminal negligence on the part of their senior managers.
AngryMiller is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 6:30 am
  #6  
30 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sydney (for now), GVA (only in my memories)
Programs: QF Lifetime Silver (big whoop)
Posts: 9,304
Originally Posted by AngryMiller
Hard to defend evil, incompetence, dereliction of duty, and behavior bordering on criminal negligence on the part of their senior managers.
No it's not. Exhibit A: Propaganda Village.
RadioGirl is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 6:51 am
  #7  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,953
From the Comments:

Remember: Subjecting average citizens to uncalled for scrutiny does not mean these people are really doing a fine job. It means exactly the opposite. Every resource that is being expended harassing that average citizen is a resource that is NOT being spent finding the real threats. That is the ultimate and frightening irony of the corrupt TSA.
'Nuf said.
doober is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 7:04 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,004
Is incompetence mandatory at TSA?
IslandBased is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 7:06 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,006
Originally Posted by IslandBased
Is incompetence mandatory at TSA?
No but it does smooth the career path.
Trollkiller is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 7:23 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,004
Originally Posted by Trollkiller
No but it does smooth the career path.
So "You don't have to be incompetent to work at TSA, but it helps?"
IslandBased is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 7:32 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: FrostByte Falls, Mn
Programs: Holiday Inn Plat NW gold AA gold
Posts: 2,157
Originally Posted by IslandBased
So "You don't have to be incompetent to work at TSA, but it helps?"
Why should we believe anything that anyone from DHS/TSA says? They've lost nearly all of their credibility.
AngryMiller is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 7:34 am
  #12  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,971
Originally Posted by IslandBased
So "You don't have to be incompetent to work at TSA, but it helps?"
The evidence is quiet clear!
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 8:06 am
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Finally back in Boston after escaping from New York
Posts: 13,684
Originally Posted by AngryMiller
Why should we believe anything that anyone from DHS/TSA says? They've lost nearly all of their credibility.
That's what scares me about this whole organization. It's almost as if the public has reached an unspoken agreement with the agency, saying, "We know you're incompetent. You know you're incompetent. But we have to pretend to be doing something, and if there are no terrorist attacks, we'll pretend it worked. If there is a terrorist attack, we'll address the issue at that time. As long as no one says anything out loud, we'll let it slide."

The TSA sounds increasingly like the mortgage crisis. The banks knew the loans were no good. The debtors knew they couldn't pay back what they borrowed. But as long as the system didn't crash around everyone, the system continued. And look at how that one ended...

Mike
mikeef is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 9:36 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: CLT
Programs: Choice Hotels/FFOCUS
Posts: 7,259
Originally Posted by halls120
I routinely send a "best of FT" e-mail to a friend inside DHS, especially when TSA has been, for them, even more egregious than normal.

Not once has he responded with a defense of that sorry excuse for a government agency.
That's because they can't defend. I've asked 2 of the spots here that I actually talk to why Starbucks purchased before security is dangerous & Starbucks purchased AFTER security is NOT dangerous. They had no answer & agreed it was just another stupid gvt. rule.
coachrowsey is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 9:53 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,004
Originally Posted by coachrowsey
That's because they can't defend. I've asked 2 of the spots here that I actually talk to why Starbucks purchased before security is dangerous & Starbucks purchased AFTER security is NOT dangerous. They had no answer & agreed it was just another stupid gvt. rule.
I guess they can't "wake up and smell the coffee".
IslandBased is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.