Last edit by: starflyergold
WELCOME, MODERATOR GUIDELINES and SUMMARY
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING
If you are new to us, welcome to FlyerTalk!PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING
Who we are: FlyerTalk features discussions and chat boards that covers the most up-to-date traveler information; an interactive community dedicated to the topic of travel (not politics or arguments about politics or religion, etc.)
All travelers are welcome in the community. Just choose a forum: conversing about airlines and their programs, airports, destinations, dining and how to make the most of your miles and points, or visit our Information Desk to start.
We do have some Rules, and everyone agrees to abide by these when they are granted free membership privileges. On a topic that generates a lot of feelings and perspectives, please remember "welcoming, respectful" are key words on FlyerTalk.
As with previous accident threads, please observe the following in this thread:
1. The normal FT Rules apply. (Including not discussing moderation actions on-thread). And please be particularly attentive to "discussing the idea and not the poster" when you have a disagreement. Civility and mutual respect are still expected and are what we owe each other as a community.
2. You are expected to respect our diversity, and therefore refrain from posting inflammatory comments about race, religion, culture, politics, ethnicity, orientation, etc." Do not cite, copy, or report on such.
3. Please do continue to be attentive to the sensibilities of the families of those on the flight. Think about if you were them what you would and would not want to see posted. Reasonable speculation about what happened is permissible; please, though, do not indulge in inflammatory or overly-lurid descriptions or depictions (or links to same) that could well be hurtful.
4. Overly / extravagantly exaggerative posts such as conspiracy theories, posts beyond the realm of science and known facts, etc. as well as posts with information that has been posted several times previously may be summarily deleted. Moderator actions may not be discussed in posts on FlyerTalk.
5. FlyerTalk complies with international copyright agreements. Please do not post full copyrighted articles; summarize the salient points, cite properly and post links. Entire copyrighted articles will be summarily deleted.
6. In addition, those who repeatedly fail to comply with FlyerTalk Rules or the guidelines for this thread may be subjected to FlyerTalk disciplinary actions and have membership privileges suspended, forum masks, etc.
China Eastern MU5735 737-800 [not MAX] Crashed 21 March 2022, 132 onboard
#211
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Danville, CA, USA;
Programs: UA 1MM, WN CP, Marriott LT Plat, Hilton Gold, IC Plat
Posts: 15,722
The longer this takes I would suspect human error, which the chicoms are loathe to admit.
If it the working theory a Boeing part or system or metal fatigue it would come out quickly as they would need to inspect other planes.
If it the working theory a Boeing part or system or metal fatigue it would come out quickly as they would need to inspect other planes.
#212
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany
Programs: Miles & More, Amex
Posts: 678
I would say, quite the contrary is true. Human error usually can be found rather quickly by going through the flight voice recorder and flight data recorder. The longer it takes to get results, the lower the likelihood for a human error.
Last edited by Scrooge McDuck; May 9, 2022 at 8:47 am
#213
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 5,867
A thorough investigation just takes time. There are plenty of examples in past history in which human error was not the cause and yet it took quite some time to analyze. Don't forget that the first step is getting the data from the flight data recorder and listen to the flight voice recorder and then to map these two. This takes some time. For non-human reasons, this gives usually some hints which needs a deeper look into, i.e searching any parts of what has been left.
I would say, quite the contrary is true. Human error usually can be found rather quickly by going through the flight voice recorder and flight data recorder. The longer it takes to get results, the lower the likelihood for a human error.
I would say, quite the contrary is true. Human error usually can be found rather quickly by going through the flight voice recorder and flight data recorder. The longer it takes to get results, the lower the likelihood for a human error.
#214
In memoriam
Join Date: Dec 2001
Programs: DL 2MM, AA MM, DL Sky Club Life, AA Admirals Club Life, Hilton Gold Life
Posts: 1,732
They will always find an issue, but the interaction with the crew requires subjective judgements which don't quite make it into the report.
At least the rest of the world's safety departments get to make their own responses to the event. Most of the public want everything in black and white so they have something to blame
#215
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 5,867
Again, while those other possibilities can't be entirely eliminated, mechanical failures don't often result in planes straight nose-diving to the ground. Regardless, this is a thread for speculation since none of us here actually know what happened. My speculation, FWIW, is this was pilot suicide.
As I said all along! "China Eastern Black Box Points to Intentional Nosedive"
https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-e...ts_pos1&page=1
LarryJ maybe now you understand?
Last edited by Sandeep1; May 17, 2022 at 10:45 am
#216
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Blue Ridge, GA
Posts: 5,512
“The plane did what it was told to do by someone in the cockpit,” said a person who is familiar with American officials’ preliminary assessment, which includes an analysis of information extracted from the plane’s damaged flight-data recorder.
#217
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Danville, CA, USA;
Programs: UA 1MM, WN CP, Marriott LT Plat, Hilton Gold, IC Plat
Posts: 15,722
As I said all along! "China Eastern Black Box Points to Intentional Nosedive"
https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-e...ts_pos1&page=1
LarryJ maybe now you understand?
As I said all along! "China Eastern Black Box Points to Intentional Nosedive"
https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-e...ts_pos1&page=1
LarryJ maybe now you understand?
And unfortunately is not without precedent.
#218
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 5,867
Indeed. I have no issue with spirited debates. I have an issue with people being condescending and using their "job" to be dismissive of others. Guessing these folks won't be chiming in from this point on.
#219
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2020
Programs: Delta Gold Medallion, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 1,010
Terrifying news all around. 3 pilots (main, co-, and shadowing) in the same cockpit, no sign of terrorism/no one attempted to break into the cockpit, no emergency code spoken on the recording, and yet with 3 people in the same pit, the plane nosedived in a almost 90 degree angle. Flight recording data has enough evidence showing the 3 of them had an agreement/intended allowing this to happen.
Not a single peep from the Chinese media.
Not a single peep from the Chinese media.
#220
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 5,867
Terrifying news all around. 3 pilots (main, co-, and shadowing) in the same cockpit, no sign of terrorism/no one attempted to break into the cockpit, no emergency code spoken on the recording, and yet with 3 people in the same pit, the plane nosedived in a almost 90 degree angle. Flight recording data has enough evidence showing the 3 of them had an agreement/intended allowing this to happen.
Not a single peep from the Chinese media.
Not a single peep from the Chinese media.
#221
In memoriam
Join Date: Dec 2001
Programs: DL 2MM, AA MM, DL Sky Club Life, AA Admirals Club Life, Hilton Gold Life
Posts: 1,732
Of course your speculation won the race, but there were many other competing theories as well still looking for evidence
#222
#223
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2014
Programs: Top Tier with all 3 alliances
Posts: 11,669
The ‘lying flat’ movement standing in the way of China’s innovation drive
#224
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Anywhere
Posts: 6,576
Well somewhat unsurprisingly, China is never transparent to its own people. According to Reuters report:
"Screenshots of the Wall Street Journal story appeared to be censored both on China’s Twitter-like platform Weibo and messaging app Wechat on Wednesday morning.
The hashtag topics “China Eastern” and “China Eastern black boxes” are banned on Weibo, which cited a breach of relevant laws, and users are unable to share the story in group chats on Wechat.
The CAAC [had previously] said on April 11 in response to rumours on the Internet of a deliberate crash that the speculation had “gravely misled the public” and “interfered with the accident investigation work.”"
"Screenshots of the Wall Street Journal story appeared to be censored both on China’s Twitter-like platform Weibo and messaging app Wechat on Wednesday morning.
The hashtag topics “China Eastern” and “China Eastern black boxes” are banned on Weibo, which cited a breach of relevant laws, and users are unable to share the story in group chats on Wechat.
The CAAC [had previously] said on April 11 in response to rumours on the Internet of a deliberate crash that the speculation had “gravely misled the public” and “interfered with the accident investigation work.”"
#225
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 2,280
As I said all along! "China Eastern Black Box Points to Intentional Nosedive"
https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-e...ts_pos1&page=1
LarryJ maybe now you understand?
As I said all along! "China Eastern Black Box Points to Intentional Nosedive"
https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-e...ts_pos1&page=1
LarryJ maybe now you understand?
Ever heard of confirmation bias? If you go into it
The known information is consistent with a high-altitude upset. It's also consistent with an intentional act. It's also consistent with an unknown mechanical failure. It's likely also consistent with possibilities that we haven't thought of yet.
We aren't going to be able to start eliminating possibilities until we get the information from the flight recorders. I wouldn't be surprised if some information from them comes out within the next week.
We aren't going to be able to start eliminating possibilities until we get the information from the flight recorders. I wouldn't be surprised if some information from them comes out within the next week.
I do not believe that the airplane can do with in normal flight. The wing would have to be stalled. That's not based on any calculations, just my experience flying the airplane.
Again, I don't understand why everyone is focusing on an intentional act. That's possible, but there's nothing in what we know so far which suggests it is likely.
Again, I don't understand why everyone is focusing on an intentional act. That's possible, but there's nothing in what we know so far which suggests it is likely.
The lack of comfort with the alternatives does not increase the likelihood of your preferred explanation. Look at the data. As of today, there isn't enough information to draw conclusions.
I have a few theories of my own but they, similarly, do not have anything yet to back them up so I keep them to myself.
I have a few theories of my own but they, similarly, do not have anything yet to back them up so I keep them to myself.