Last edit by: starflyergold
WELCOME, MODERATOR GUIDELINES and SUMMARY
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING
If you are new to us, welcome to FlyerTalk!PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING
Who we are: FlyerTalk features discussions and chat boards that covers the most up-to-date traveler information; an interactive community dedicated to the topic of travel (not politics or arguments about politics or religion, etc.)
All travelers are welcome in the community. Just choose a forum: conversing about airlines and their programs, airports, destinations, dining and how to make the most of your miles and points, or visit our Information Desk to start.
We do have some Rules, and everyone agrees to abide by these when they are granted free membership privileges. On a topic that generates a lot of feelings and perspectives, please remember "welcoming, respectful" are key words on FlyerTalk.
As with previous accident threads, please observe the following in this thread:
1. The normal FT Rules apply. (Including not discussing moderation actions on-thread). And please be particularly attentive to "discussing the idea and not the poster" when you have a disagreement. Civility and mutual respect are still expected and are what we owe each other as a community.
2. You are expected to respect our diversity, and therefore refrain from posting inflammatory comments about race, religion, culture, politics, ethnicity, orientation, etc." Do not cite, copy, or report on such.
3. Please do continue to be attentive to the sensibilities of the families of those on the flight. Think about if you were them what you would and would not want to see posted. Reasonable speculation about what happened is permissible; please, though, do not indulge in inflammatory or overly-lurid descriptions or depictions (or links to same) that could well be hurtful.
4. Overly / extravagantly exaggerative posts such as conspiracy theories, posts beyond the realm of science and known facts, etc. as well as posts with information that has been posted several times previously may be summarily deleted. Moderator actions may not be discussed in posts on FlyerTalk.
5. FlyerTalk complies with international copyright agreements. Please do not post full copyrighted articles; summarize the salient points, cite properly and post links. Entire copyrighted articles will be summarily deleted.
6. In addition, those who repeatedly fail to comply with FlyerTalk Rules or the guidelines for this thread may be subjected to FlyerTalk disciplinary actions and have membership privileges suspended, forum masks, etc.
China Eastern MU5735 737-800 [not MAX] Crashed 21 March 2022, 132 onboard
#181
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Berkeley, CA USA
Programs: Piggly Wiggly "Shop the Pig!" Preferred Shopper
Posts: 57,078
That is inconsistent with my understanding of physics.
"g" is an acceleration; positive vs. negative is just the direction of the acceleration. To maintain a negative g-load, you have be accelerating downward the entire time. When you stop accelerating, you no longer at negative-g and objects are no longer pinned to the ceiling.
Additionally, you can't produce negative g-loads on the autopilot. It doesn't act that aggressively.
"g" is an acceleration; positive vs. negative is just the direction of the acceleration. To maintain a negative g-load, you have be accelerating downward the entire time. When you stop accelerating, you no longer at negative-g and objects are no longer pinned to the ceiling.
Additionally, you can't produce negative g-loads on the autopilot. It doesn't act that aggressively.
#182
Moderator: Budget Travel forum & Credit Card Programs, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: YYJ/YVR and back on Van Isle ....... for now
Programs: UA lifetime MM / *A Gold
Posts: 14,429
A Chinese aviation expert (Wang Lizhen) hypothesised if one of the pilots put the plane into a steep dive while the plane was on autopilot and the other two pilots are unprepared, the g-force could have pushed the other two pilots to the back of the cockpit, thus unable to intervene in the suicide attempt
Now from reading about aviation in China, it's .... er, different.
But I was under the impression that at least in western countries, pilots pretty much always wear a seatbelt unless taking a break (maybe our resident pilot can chime in).
#183
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: BNA
Programs: HH Gold. (Former) UA PP, DL PM, PC Plat
Posts: 8,184
I do not believe that the airplane can do with in normal flight. The wing would have to be stalled. That's not based on any calculations, just my experience flying the airplane.
Again, I don't understand why everyone is focusing on an intentional act. That's possible, but there's nothing in what we know so far which suggests it is likely.
We are required by regulation to use the seatbelt whenever we are seated in our control seat.
#184
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 5,867
#185
In memoriam
Join Date: Dec 2001
Programs: DL 2MM, AA MM, DL Sky Club Life, AA Admirals Club Life, Hilton Gold Life
Posts: 1,732
#186
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Berkeley, CA USA
Programs: Piggly Wiggly "Shop the Pig!" Preferred Shopper
Posts: 57,078
Regardless, I would imagine one of the two recorders will soon rule the above possibility in or out.
#187
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 5,867
Your guess is probably going to prove better than mine, but I'm struck by the nearly straight-down trajectory, and so suddenly. A momentary leveling off, and then straight down again. Of course I don't know anything about these things, but it all seems like one pilot (or someone else at one of the controls) pointing the plane straight down, and a struggle for control in the cockpit.
Regardless, I would imagine one of the two recorders will soon rule the above possibility in or out.
Regardless, I would imagine one of the two recorders will soon rule the above possibility in or out.
Maybe but not at the moment given that nothing is known. These planes are still in the air flying as if nothing happened.
#188
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: BNA
Programs: HH Gold. (Former) UA PP, DL PM, PC Plat
Posts: 8,184
I have a few theories of my own but they, similarly, do not have anything yet to back them up so I keep them to myself.
What little we know of the flight profile is consistent with a high-altitude upset, followed by a recovery attempt which induced a secondary stall. The question is, what caused the upset? It could be many things including mechanical failure, human factors, or an intentional act and probably some others. Speculation of sensational theories is not productive.
#189
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: BNA
Programs: HH Gold. (Former) UA PP, DL PM, PC Plat
Posts: 8,184
The 737 NG line has been flying for 25 years with over 7,100 airplanes delivered. It is part of the 737 line which has been in service for over 50 years with around 11,000 airplanes delivered. The accident airplane was relatively new, built in 2015. There is no evidence at this time that there is anything wrong with the design that was a causal factor in this accident.
Why would you expect the fleet to be grounded?
Why would you expect the fleet to be grounded?
#190
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 5,867
What little we know of the flight profile is consistent with a high-altitude upset, followed by a recovery attempt which induced a secondary stall. The question is, what caused the upset? It could be many things including mechanical failure, human factors, or an intentional act and probably some others. Speculation of sensational theories is not productive.
The 737 NG line has been flying for 25 years with over 7,100 airplanes delivered. It is part of the 737 line which has been in service for over 50 years with around 11,000 airplanes delivered. The accident airplane was relatively new, built in 2015. There is no evidence at this time that there is anything wrong with the design that was a causal factor in this accident.
Why would you expect the fleet to be grounded?
Why would you expect the fleet to be grounded?
#191
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Berkeley, CA USA
Programs: Piggly Wiggly "Shop the Pig!" Preferred Shopper
Posts: 57,078
The "nearly straight down" final attitude is not consistent with an intentional act. Airplanes don't respond to control inputs in the way you imagine. Pushing the nose over doesn't produce the fastest descent rate.
What little we know of the flight profile is consistent with a high-altitude upset, followed by a recovery attempt which induced a secondary stall. The question is, what caused the upset? It could be many things including mechanical failure, human factors, or an intentional act and probably some others. Speculation of sensational theories is not productive.
What little we know of the flight profile is consistent with a high-altitude upset, followed by a recovery attempt which induced a secondary stall. The question is, what caused the upset? It could be many things including mechanical failure, human factors, or an intentional act and probably some others. Speculation of sensational theories is not productive.
#192
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Berkeley, CA USA
Programs: Piggly Wiggly "Shop the Pig!" Preferred Shopper
Posts: 57,078
Isn't the sudden dive, brief recovery, and dive to the water/ground very similar to that of this China Eastern flight?
#193
In memoriam
Join Date: Dec 2001
Programs: DL 2MM, AA MM, DL Sky Club Life, AA Admirals Club Life, Hilton Gold Life
Posts: 1,732
Egypt air is interesting but premature in its support for only a theory about this accident. I hesitate to assume the same profile in this B737 event without more investigative facts which I am sure they are sitting on.
#194
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Berkeley, CA USA
Programs: Piggly Wiggly "Shop the Pig!" Preferred Shopper
Posts: 57,078
To be clear, I'm not assuming the same profile for both flights. They seem to have similarities, but I have no expertise in this area, and I might be overlooking important differences.
#195
In memoriam
Join Date: Dec 2001
Programs: DL 2MM, AA MM, DL Sky Club Life, AA Admirals Club Life, Hilton Gold Life
Posts: 1,732
But the major job of the investigators is to resolve any possible difference with or without the black boxes. This is what Tin-kicking is all about