Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Global Airline Alliances > oneworld
Reload this Page >

Circle Pacific Question

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Circle Pacific Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 5, 2009 | 6:06 am
  #1  
Original Poster
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Programs: BA DL
Posts: 194
Circle Pacific Question

Is the following routing OK for a 22K circle pacific ticket:

YVR-NRT-SYD-JFK

This clocks in at 19,499 miles using Mileage Monkey. Two questions

1. Can I begin in Canada and end in the US?
2. How will the mileage SYD-JFK be calculated? This is a Qantas one-stop in LAX (single flight number) Will they use SYD-JFK or SYD-LAX-JFK?

The circle pacific fare out of Canada is a real deal right now, especially compared to a DONE4. In D class:

ex-us ex-ca
(USD) (CAD)

22K CP 8,370 7,290 (or $5,905 USD)
DONE4 8,190 9,090 (or $7,363 USD)

Strange that a 22k circle pacific costs more than the DONE4 in the US.
wingzing is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2009 | 10:48 am
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Juneau, Alaska.
Programs: AS 75K;BA Silver;AA G;HH Dia;HY Glob
Posts: 16,676
Originally Posted by wingzing
Is the following routing OK for a 22K circle pacific ticket:

YVR-NRT-SYD-JFK

This clocks in at 19,499 miles using Mileage Monkey. Two questions

1. Can I begin in Canada and end in the US?
2. How will the mileage SYD-JFK be calculated? This is a Qantas one-stop in LAX (single flight number) Will they use SYD-JFK or SYD-LAX-JFK?

The circle pacific fare out of Canada is a real deal right now, especially compared to a DONE4. In D class:

ex-us ex-ca
(USD) (CAD)

22K CP 8,370 7,290 (or $5,905 USD)
DONE4 8,190 9,090 (or $7,363 USD)

Strange that a 22k circle pacific costs more than the DONE4 in the US.
A quick check of the circle pacific rules reveals:
F. Travel may originate at any point for which fares are published and must terminate at the same point, except that origin-destination surface segments are permitted as follows:
(a) within country of origin
(b) between USA and Canada
http://www.oneworld.com/ow/air-trave...e-pacific-fare
jerry a. laska is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2009 | 12:01 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Programs: QFF
Posts: 5,304
Originally Posted by wingzing
2. How will the mileage SYD-JFK be calculated? This is a Qantas one-stop in LAX (single flight number) Will they use SYD-JFK or SYD-LAX-JFK?
Don't know if this helps, but I flew QF107 the whole way last year. QF gave me the following:
06 AUG 08 QF 107 ECONOMY 05AUG08 SYDNEY/NEW YORK (JFK) 9,947 - - 9,947 60
Himeno is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2009 | 12:42 pm
  #4  
Original Poster
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Programs: BA DL
Posts: 194
Thanks to both of you the quick responses.

Mileage Monkey lists SYD-JFK at 9961 miles and SYD-LAX-JFK as 9974 miles so the question is really moot. Hard to say which routing the last poster earned. I guess the non-stop flight path between SYD and JFK is directly over LAX.
wingzing is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2009 | 1:19 pm
  #5  
30 Countries Visited
50 Countries Visited
3M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: DCA, EGE, IAD
Programs: MR LTT, BA Gold, AA LTP, UA Silver
Posts: 6,093
FWIW, on Nov 26 2008 JFK-SYD was 9853 miles earned per AA 7366 (codeshare - QF 108).
aaupgrade is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2009 | 1:29 pm
  #6  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: MEL
Programs: QF WP, LTG, QP on hold
Posts: 718
I flew QF 108 yesterday. Qantas gave me 9947 base miles. I earned 22,381 miles with the cabin bonus (D class, actually flew up front [yayy!]) and status bonus.

Audrey
falconea is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2009 | 3:16 pm
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
40 Nights
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Melbourne
Programs: ►QFWP/LTG►VA WP►HyattDisc.►HiltonGold►ALL Plat.
Posts: 22,326
If booked on QF107 or QF108 between SYD and JFK the distance employed shall be the GC distance between SYD and JFK. GCM indicates 9950mi (Qantas dock you 3 miles for some reason).

There is one major problem in this case, the distance between your YVR and JFK must be included in the distance calculation as it's considered a "Surface Segment" (to complete the "circle").

The excerpt from the rules in post #2 refers to "origin-destination surface segments".

Clause I of the xCIRnn rules indicates the following: (My bolding)
Surface travel and use of other carriers between intermediate points along the circle which are not operated by AA/BA/CX/JC/JL/JO/KA/ LA/LP/NU/QF/XL/4M is permitted at the passenger's expense and must be ticketed separately. Mileage must be included in the MPM calculation.

Last edited by serfty; Feb 5, 2009 at 3:26 pm
serfty is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2009 | 11:43 pm
  #8  
tt7
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: MEL
Posts: 2,441
Originally Posted by serfty
There is one major problem in this case, the distance between your YVR and JFK must be included in the distance calculation as it's considered a "Surface Segment" (to complete the "circle").
serfty, isn't that open jaw covered by this rule: -

F. Travel may originate at any point for which fares are published and must terminate at the same point, except that origin-destination surface segments are permitted as follows:
(a) within country of origin
(b) between USA and Canada

- so you're saying that although starting at YVR and ending at JFK would be permitted, the mileage must still be included? Is that a change or did I get lucky before? I know I've done DCIR22s before where I started in one place in the U.S. and ended somewhere else in the U.S., simply because there wasn't enough mileage to get back to where I started. For example, you can't do TPA-DFW-NRT-MEL-LAX-DFW-TPA as it's 22,501 miles, so you drop the last leg (which is 929 miles and therefore gets you under the limit). We've done that a couple of times but maybe the rules have changed or we just got lucky.

I can understand if you did TPA-DFW-NRT // HKG-MEL-LAX etc. that you'd have to include the NRT-HKG mileage in the calculation but once you're back in the U.S., doesn't the above rule kick in?
tt7 is offline  
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 1:02 am
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
40 Nights
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Melbourne
Programs: ►QFWP/LTG►VA WP►HyattDisc.►HiltonGold►ALL Plat.
Posts: 22,326
You may have got lucky.

However that very rule you quote has the phrase, "origin-destination surface segments". This signifies this should be considered as part of the route and treated as mentioned in Clause I.

If the booking entity does not do this, then more power to the traveller!
serfty is offline  
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 4:12 am
  #10  
tt7
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: MEL
Posts: 2,441
Originally Posted by serfty
You may have got lucky.

However that very rule you quote has the phrase, "origin-destination surface segments". This signifies this should be considered as part of the route and treated as mentioned in Clause I.

If the booking entity does not do this, then more power to the traveller!
You may well be right but I wouldn't agree that saying that travel must terminate at the same point and then saying that origin-destination surface segments are permitted means that that surface segment at the end must be counted in the mileage. It's not a surface segment "between intermediate points". By definition, a segment between the ending point and the starting point is not an "intermediate segment" if not returning to the starting point is permitted.

You may be right that we got lucky, but we've done these several times with AA without issue.
tt7 is offline  
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 5:11 am
  #11  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
40 Nights
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Melbourne
Programs: ►QFWP/LTG►VA WP►HyattDisc.►HiltonGold►ALL Plat.
Posts: 22,326
Originally Posted by tt7
... I wouldn't agree that saying that travel must terminate at the same point and then saying that origin-destination surface segments are permitted means that that surface segment at the end must be counted in the mileage ...
I would ... a "surface segment" is a "surface segment"!
Originally Posted by tt7
... You may be right that we got lucky, but we've done these several times with AA without issue.
OK, you've been flying "Arc Pacifics". (Don't stop on my account )

I really don't have an issue; to me the rules are there, the rules could be considered confusing and if such confusion benefits the traveller all the better!

I guess YMMV on this one ...
serfty is offline  
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 5:52 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Japan
Programs: NH Diamond, JL JGC Diamond, BA Gold Guest List(Gold for life), CX Diamond
Posts: 1,580
Oneworld.com's planner permits 17th segment for origin-destination.
Luckily our side

According to the xONEx rule:
Travel may originate at any point for which fares are published and must terminate at the same point,
except that origin-destination surface segments are permitted as follows
(a) within the country of origin

A minimum of 3 and maximum of 16 segments, including surface segments between any 2 airports,
are permitted for the entire journey.

However, 17th segments as an origin-destinaion surface segment is not counted for 16 segments maximum.

At least, oneworld explorer planner treats an origin-destination surface segement differ from surface segments.
Wasabi Tofu is offline  
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 2:03 pm
  #13  
tt7
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: MEL
Posts: 2,441
Originally Posted by serfty
OK, you've been flying "Arc Pacifics". (Don't stop on my account )
That's ok, we already stopped thanks to QF A DCIR22 at $5,300 or $5,500 was good .... at $9,300, forget it, our business now goes elsewhere.
tt7 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.