Questions on DONE5
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: NYC
Programs: AA PLT
Posts: 1,122
I am trying to take advantage of the current South African Rand exchange rate to book our second 20-segment DONE5 (first one was in 2006).
Last time, the entire trip was confirmed at booking (last flight was < 11 months from booking), but this time, only the first 3 flights are within 11 months of now, so I have a few questions about how some of the booking details work in that case.
Last time, the entire trip was confirmed at booking (last flight was < 11 months from booking), but this time, only the first 3 flights are within 11 months of now, so I have a few questions about how some of the booking details work in that case.
- First flight changes
Our desired first flight is CPT-LHR, but there is zero D availability from BA for the entire week we want (even on the daylight flight!). JNB-LHR is available that week. There is availability the following week for CPT-LHR. However, I have heard conflicting stories about changing the first flight on a DONE5 after issuing. One is that ANY change to the first segment requires a complete reissue at the current price (this is also what the AA RTW agent told me). The other is first hand experiences from people changing the dates on their MRU-LHR flights (first segment of an AONEx) without a reissue. From what I can see, the rules say:
If I can change the date of the first segment without reissue, then I would rather begin CPT-LHR on the "wrong" week to then change it to the right week when D becomes available.Code:5N PRIOR TO DEPARTURE 23N TRAVEL ORIGINATING AREA 2/3: 24N . 1. UNLIMITED CHANGES PERMITTED WITHOUT CHARGE. 25N . 2. DATE/TIME AND ONEWORLD CARRIER CHANGES ARE 26N . PERMITTED WITHOUT REISSUE PROVIDED ORIGIN, 27N . DESTINATION, CONNECTING POINTS AND INVENTORY 28N . REMAIN THE SAME.
If it requires a reissue, then I'd rather start JNB-LHR and pay for our way to JNB instead. - New Routes
We would like to fly ORD-PEK in mid/late 2009. However, since this route only begins in March 2009, there are no dates available for booking. Can we book an open segment for a route that's only being planned and not yet bookable? - Tentative Routing
Our preferred routing right now is:
CPT-xLHR-MCT-LHR-xLAX-GRU-LIM-UIO-EZE-xDFW-ANC-xDFW-SJO-LAX-MIA-xORD-PEK-NRT-DEL-HKG-JNB
Issues:
- ORD-PEK, but ORD-PVG-NRT could work as well.
- SJO-LAX is seasonal, and not the same season as ANC-DFW which precedes it. This year there is a one-stop SJO-LAX (through MIA), but who knows what will happen next year. Our alternatives are DFW-SAL-LAX, or DFW-SJD-LAX.
- Any others? - Open vs. Confirmed segments
Although only the first 3 segments are bookable on the dates we want them, we could in theory book CPT-xLHR-MCT-LHR-xLAX-GRU-LIM-UIO-EZE-xDFW Jan/Feb 2009 on any available date, rather than booking them "open". Does it make a difference either way?
I imagine it's not possible to only have DFW-ANC-DFW open and confirm everything else either. - E-Ticket vs paper ticket
On such a complex itinerary it's very likely we'll need a reissue, althought on the last 20-segment DONE5 we didn't have any. I would love to be able to issue this as an e-ticket, even with the re-issue fee, but I am a little uncomfortable booking only 16 segments now (with the intention of reissuing to 20), knowing that they're likely to set the limit to 16 sometime in the near future. I worry that if the 20 segment limit is changed to 16, after flying the first 4 segments on an e-ticket, I will have a hard time adding the extra 4 segments in 2009.
#2
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Madrid, Spain & Santiago, Chile
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 3,181
I don't think so, because even if it is open AA will still need to make a hidden dummy booking. I haven't tried, however, so I guess it is worth a try. Note that even trying to book a seasonal flight becomes a problem (it can be solved, but it is a hassle) when the schedule is not loaded at the time of booking; to book an ANC flight out of season I had to go through loops, and the supervisor made all kind of "if anything happens you are on your own" type of notes on the PNR.
#3
Moderator, OneWorld




Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: SEA
Programs: RAA RIP; AA ExEXP
Posts: 12,517
Will try to answer your points by number.
1. The rules changed a couple of years ago to add lines 24-28 in your star file reference, prior to which it just said "unlimited changes allowed" for tickets obtained in Regions II/III. So I would cite the rule (available on the Oneworld website in a .pdf file) and hang tough on your re-timing.
2. Edited. I had a long-winded version of "don't think so" written but have subsequently become unsure. Don't think so, but asking is free. I DO know they won't put it in a ticket issued today, but getting it added in a re-issue once the route has been inaugurated, maybe.
3. You're probably cruising for a re-issue sooner or later anyway, so I'd pick one of the less desirable but more reliable year-round route alternatives and go with it, then re-do it at re-issue. You can always try to be persuasive however. (This is in reference to DFW-ANC and LAX-SJO seasonal conflicts.) I wouldn't go to SJD but that's a personal preference (I can make big margaritas more cheaply at home.)
4. I haven't had any trouble increasing the total segments to 20 after starting out as an e-ticket, but it's anybody's guess how "smoothly" the transition from 20 > 16 will go. If it were me I'd bite the bullet and have it done as a paper ticket, then have it re-done as an e-ticket once you've burned 4 segments, if they'll let you. Note a paper ticket re-issue by anybody but AA will probably result in a machine-printed ticket, but one that AA may not be able to see an image of in their system.
One thing about open dating is that the tariff people assume every possible stopover point is one, so the full fury of airport taxes etc. is added. Getting them stricken later when a re-issue eliminates the justification for the taxes is rather more rare (but I have had it happen.) Set against future fuel surcharges, though, I'd be happier paying todays taxes and YQs rather than next years. YMMV. Myself, I'd just do dummy dates for the whole thing and avoid the pain later.
1. The rules changed a couple of years ago to add lines 24-28 in your star file reference, prior to which it just said "unlimited changes allowed" for tickets obtained in Regions II/III. So I would cite the rule (available on the Oneworld website in a .pdf file) and hang tough on your re-timing.
2. Edited. I had a long-winded version of "don't think so" written but have subsequently become unsure. Don't think so, but asking is free. I DO know they won't put it in a ticket issued today, but getting it added in a re-issue once the route has been inaugurated, maybe.
3. You're probably cruising for a re-issue sooner or later anyway, so I'd pick one of the less desirable but more reliable year-round route alternatives and go with it, then re-do it at re-issue. You can always try to be persuasive however. (This is in reference to DFW-ANC and LAX-SJO seasonal conflicts.) I wouldn't go to SJD but that's a personal preference (I can make big margaritas more cheaply at home.)
4. I haven't had any trouble increasing the total segments to 20 after starting out as an e-ticket, but it's anybody's guess how "smoothly" the transition from 20 > 16 will go. If it were me I'd bite the bullet and have it done as a paper ticket, then have it re-done as an e-ticket once you've burned 4 segments, if they'll let you. Note a paper ticket re-issue by anybody but AA will probably result in a machine-printed ticket, but one that AA may not be able to see an image of in their system.
One thing about open dating is that the tariff people assume every possible stopover point is one, so the full fury of airport taxes etc. is added. Getting them stricken later when a re-issue eliminates the justification for the taxes is rather more rare (but I have had it happen.) Set against future fuel surcharges, though, I'd be happier paying todays taxes and YQs rather than next years. YMMV. Myself, I'd just do dummy dates for the whole thing and avoid the pain later.
#4
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Madrid, Spain & Santiago, Chile
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 3,181
If memory serves it's been quite a while since it was possible to have SJO and ANC in the same season; personally I would not gamble on that one.
#5
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Madrid, Spain & Santiago, Chile
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 3,181
Originally Posted by Note: obsolete
31N BEFORE DEPARTURE:
32N .
33N . * UNLIMITED CHANGES PERMITTED WITHOUT CHARGE.
34N AFTER DEPARTURE:
35N .
36N . * CHANGES TO THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL FLIGHT AND
37N . TO PRECEDING FLIGHTS ARE NOT PERMITTED.
32N .
33N . * UNLIMITED CHANGES PERMITTED WITHOUT CHARGE.
34N AFTER DEPARTURE:
35N .
36N . * CHANGES TO THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL FLIGHT AND
37N . TO PRECEDING FLIGHTS ARE NOT PERMITTED.
#6
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: NYC
Programs: AA PLT
Posts: 1,122
Wow. HUGE thanks to both Viajero and Gardyloo for the great help! ^ ^ ^
After reading your replies and thinking about this a bit more, this is what I think we'll do:
One final question, can I confirm space in the DFW-ANC-DFW flights (or any other routing changes) when they become bookable, but not do the physical reissue until after the 4th flight?
Thanks again!
After reading your replies and thinking about this a bit more, this is what I think we'll do:
- Resign ourselves to one reissue (hopefully just one).
- Latest bookable date for AA flights today is 31JAN2009. Assuming it takes us a couple of weeks to get everything set, we'll ticket the itinerary with all segments confirmed, which means everything fits in a 30 day span.
- Book itinerary as:
CPT-xLHR-MCT-LHR-xLAX-GRU-LIM-UIO-EZE-DFW-SEA-DFW-SJO-LAX-MIA-ORD-PVG-NRT-DEL-HKG-JNB
SEA is just a placeholder for ANC. - Issue ticket.
- After ticketing continue spreading the dates, confirming space on flights on desired dates.
- Try to change date of CPT-LHR without reissue.
- Decide on SJO or alternatives depending on what's available in 2009.
- Change PVG to PEK.
- After flying the first 4-8 segments, reissue ticket. I am guessing that LAX would be a better place to do this than GRU, LIM, UIO or EZE.
One final question, can I confirm space in the DFW-ANC-DFW flights (or any other routing changes) when they become bookable, but not do the physical reissue until after the 4th flight?
Thanks again!
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist


Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: MEL CHC
Posts: 22,909
Comes out as Valid itinerary!!! - (68090 miles) in Mileage Monkey
Easter Island (IPC) is worth visiting in my opinion (SCl-IPC-SCL)
Easter Island (IPC) is worth visiting in my opinion (SCl-IPC-SCL)
#8
Ambassador: Finnair




Join Date: May 2003
Location: HEL
Programs: AY/OW Emerald (AY LT Gold)
Posts: 4,326
I fully agree with Gardyloo about open dates at original ticket issue. I really see no reason why leave the dates open as carrier/date changes are FOC in any case.
If issued as paper ticket I'd recommend doing the reissue with the same carrier as originally issued the ticket, if possible. This is especially true for >16 segment hand written tickets but as you're issueing with BA this is likely not the case for you.
If issued as paper ticket I'd recommend doing the reissue with the same carrier as originally issued the ticket, if possible. This is especially true for >16 segment hand written tickets but as you're issueing with BA this is likely not the case for you.
#9
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Madrid, Spain & Santiago, Chile
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 3,181
Edit: why not just go for ANC and leave it open? The schedule will be loaded circa November, before you leave, so that would be one less problem to deal with further down the line.
Last edited by Viajero; Mar 7, 2008 at 5:58 am
#10
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Madrid, Spain & Santiago, Chile
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 3,181
Pity you are not going to SCL, where AA has one of the best, if not the best true city ticket office in the system: walking distance from most hotels, extremely pleasant agents, OWEs welcome, seats to wait, reissues done with a smile, uncrowded,... what more can one ask for?
#11
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: NYC
Programs: AA PLT
Posts: 1,122
Easter Island (IPC) is worth visiting in my opinion (SCl-IPC-SCL)
I fully agree with Gardyloo about open dates at original ticket issue. I really see no reason why leave the dates open as carrier/date changes are FOC in any case.
If issued as paper ticket I'd recommend doing the reissue with the same carrier as originally issued the ticket, if possible. This is especially true for >16 segment hand written tickets but as you're issueing with BA this is likely not the case for you.
If issued as paper ticket I'd recommend doing the reissue with the same carrier as originally issued the ticket, if possible. This is especially true for >16 segment hand written tickets but as you're issueing with BA this is likely not the case for you.
One thing I don't understand about your comment on open segments is... Let's say I book a segment on UIO-EZE, confirm a date in FEB2009 now, but the service is discontinued starting in APR2009, and I really want to fly in MAY2009. In that case having a confirmed segment is absolutely no help to me right?
Also, what happens if I book UIO-EZE as open for now, then in 4 months I end up confirming for a particular date in MAY2009, then in SEP2008 LAN discontinues the service. Am I still protected?This I don't understand. What are the steps one needs to take in order to re-issue an AA issued DONEx then? I thought you would:
- Make the booking changes with the AA RTW desk.
- They would reprice (or send to Dublin for re-price).
- If e-ticket they can take care of it, but paper ticket you need to present the paper ticket at a ticket office and exchange for new paper ticket or e-ticket (which can take HOURS).
Then again, if they can book a "fake" DFW-ANC segment as open (with the notations that I am all on my own, etc. etc.), it should be the same process to book ORD-PEK as open, since I have no doubt that AA intends to start this route next year.
Sorry about all the questions, but I am very unfamiliar with open tickets. I will try calling the AA RTW desk later today and ask for the agent that helped me last time I was doing it and see how far I get.
Thanks again! ^
#12
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Madrid, Spain & Santiago, Chile
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 3,181
It can be a pain, but a) it is not insurmountable and b) the benefits of early booking outweigh the possible hassles (which, if lucky, might not even be).
#13
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Madrid, Spain & Santiago, Chile
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 3,181
Virtually, yes. AA will accept your bookings for a non existing ticket but only as part of the reissue process. I got the impression you wanted to book these new city pairs well in advance of the reissue, so that's why I said that it could not be done.
Last edited by Viajero; Mar 7, 2008 at 7:43 am
#14
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Madrid, Spain & Santiago, Chile
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 3,181
...One thing I don't understand about your comment on open segments is... Let's say I book a segment on UIO-EZE, confirm a date in FEB2009 now, but the service is discontinued starting in APR2009, and I really want to fly in MAY2009. In that case having a confirmed segment is absolutely no help to me right?
Also, what happens if I book UIO-EZE as open for now, then in 4 months I end up confirming for a particular date in MAY2009, then in SEP2008 LAN discontinues the service. Am I still protected?...
Also, what happens if I book UIO-EZE as open for now, then in 4 months I end up confirming for a particular date in MAY2009, then in SEP2008 LAN discontinues the service. Am I still protected?...
AFAIK the only way to be fully protected is if your ticket is dated from the start. If you leave a segment open dated at time of issue it does not became automagically protected by virtue of a later booking. This, however, I have not run into, so you should wait for others to confirm/correct.
#15
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Valencia, Spain
Posts: 816
Happy Travels

