Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Global Airline Alliances > oneworld
Reload this Page >

Am I crazy or is is it the Weekend AA rez staff?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Am I crazy or is is it the Weekend AA rez staff?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 30, 2007 | 9:38 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 12
Am I crazy or is is it the Weekend AA rez staff?

I just got off the phone with a conference call with an AA agent at the RTW desk who insists, no matter what, you can only have one entry and one exit from the U.S. She was unwilling to look at the star file, even when I quoted it to her and stated there was no supervisor on weekends. I need to ticket urgently to make the deadline.

My itinerary is
BNA-MIA-EZE
stop
EZE-SCL
stop
SCL-GRU
stop
GRU-MIA-LAX-HKG-SYD
stop
SYD-PER
stop
PER-HKG-LON
stop
LON-ORD
stop

They are insisting that I can not transit the U.S. from South America. I have done this several times, granted GRU-JFK-HKG, but that is not available.

Has something changed? Any recommendations? I am planing on trying to get BA to ticket it, but they are not open until Monday as well.

Thanks..
bnachip is offline  
Old Dec 30, 2007 | 10:39 am
  #2  
Moderator, OneWorld
40 Countries Visited
2M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: SEA
Programs: RAA RIP; AA ExEXP
Posts: 12,544
Two comments -

First, there are some new people at the RTW desk, so I would phone back and ask for a supervisor. I just talked to one yesterday (very nice person) who needed to check if a NA-Asia-SWP-Europe route wasn't "backtracking" between Asia and SWP.

But second, I'm not sure that I don't agree with them on your itinerary. Originating in NA, it would seem to me that the "second entry" exception, which limits one of the two entries to transit-without-stopover, is moot, given your proposed multi-segment plan once you return. The interpretation of the transit-without-stopover rule now appears to be firm in that only one NA touchdown is allowed; i.e. GRU-xJFK-HKG might be okay, but the 2-sector NA passage isn't.

If you get clarification on this through a phone-back, please post the results.
Gardyloo is offline  
Old Dec 30, 2007 | 12:55 pm
  #3  
Original Member
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Portland OR Double Emerald (QF and AA), DL PM/MM, Starwood Plat
Posts: 19,593
The agent is correct -- but for a different reason. Once you re-enter the country of origin, you cannot exit again (the RTW is over). You would have to originate in MEX or NAU etc. for this to be a valid itin (I think Canada/US are considered to be one country for purpose of routing, but not sure about that).

The easiest fix if you must originate in the US is to go east (BA flies GRU-LHR without touching US).
number_6 is offline  
Old Dec 30, 2007 | 1:00 pm
  #4  
Moderator, OneWorld
40 Countries Visited
2M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: SEA
Programs: RAA RIP; AA ExEXP
Posts: 12,544
Oops, number_6 is right. Must distinguish between country of origin and continent of origin.

I'm still pretty certain that a two-segment "transit without stopover" is now verboten, however.
Gardyloo is offline  
Old Dec 30, 2007 | 1:18 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Madrid, Spain & Santiago, Chile
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 3,181
Actually, I think number_6 is wrong. The OP's origin is USA and AFAIK OWEs starting in the US allow for two international departure/arrivals from/to the country of origin, as long as one of them is a transit without stopover.
Viajero is offline  
Old Dec 30, 2007 | 1:25 pm
  #6  
Moderator, OneWorld
40 Countries Visited
2M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: SEA
Programs: RAA RIP; AA ExEXP
Posts: 12,544
Originally Posted by Viajero
Actually, I think number_6 is wrong. The OP's origin is USA and AFAIK OWEs starting in the US allow for two international departure/arrivals from/to the country of origin, as long as one of them is a transit without stopover.
Sheesh, I'm going to go take a nap. Viajero's right.

49N . 7. 1 INTERNATIONAL DEPARTURE AND 1 INTERNATIONAL
50N . ARRIVAL
51N . FROM/TO THE COUNTRY OF ORIGIN PERMITTED.
52N . --------------------------------------------------
53N . -----
54N .
55N . EXCEPTION
56N . ORIGINATING USA - 2 PERMITTED WHEN 1 ARRIVAL-
57N . DEPARTURE
58N . IS A TRANSIT WITHOUT STOPOVER.
Gardyloo is offline  
Old Dec 30, 2007 | 3:06 pm
  #7  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 12
I am thinking about trying to get CX or BA to ticket it. I have done this multiple times with the one transit. The whole transit (with travel is less than 24 hours)- not that this matters. But I am still really upset that the person refused to refer to any rules, just wanted to discuss this off the top of her head. I am going to try for a supervisor in the A.M. (but who knows if there will be one on New Years eve).

Another thread mentions similar issues in Asia. I will let you know what happens.

Thanks for all your help and discussion...
bnachip is offline  
Old Dec 30, 2007 | 4:01 pm
  #8  
Moderator: Asiana & Qantas Frequent Flyer
50 Countries Visited
3M
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: STR/SYD/SMF
Programs: QF LTG / P1 , LH LT SEN / HON, OZ LT Diamond +, Marriott LT PT, HH Diamond,
Posts: 15,153
Just as a reference, here are the rules for international departures and intercontinental departures:

(e) Only one intercontinental departure and one intercontinental arrival permitted in each continent except as follows:
1. Two permitted in North America. when one is a transfer without stopover.
2. Two permitted in Asia when one is a transfer without stopover or on direct single plane service between the Southwest Pacific and Europe.
3. For travel to/from or via Ghana, Nigeria, Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania two permitted in Europe when one is a transfer without stopover between
Ghana/Nigeria/Kenya/Uganda/Tanzania and another continent.
(f) Only one international departure and one international arrival from/to the country of origin permitted
EXCEPTION: Two permitted for origin USA when one arrival-departure is a transfer without stopover.
NOTE - travel between USA and Canada is not counted as international.
DownUnderFlyer is offline  
Old Dec 30, 2007 | 9:14 pm
  #9  
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 2,904
AA RTW now enforces the transit w/o stopover as entry/exit to the continent must be same city. Adding in a segment to get a better connection was permitted in the past, but no more. From one of the very experineced agents on that desk.
headinclouds is offline  
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 7:15 am
  #10  
Original Member
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Portland OR Double Emerald (QF and AA), DL PM/MM, Starwood Plat
Posts: 19,593
Originally Posted by headinclouds
AA RTW now enforces the transit w/o stopover as entry/exit to the continent must be same city. Adding in a segment to get a better connection was permitted in the past, but no more. From one of the very experineced agents on that desk.
That makes sense and is in the spirit of the rule as well as in the letter (a transit is defined as a single city, so AA is 100% right on this one); the OP would have to route ...SCL-LAX-HKG instead of GRU-MIA-LAX and AA will be happy. Still salvagable. OWE has always had rules that are inscrutable and at times annoying.
number_6 is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 6:24 am
  #11  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 12
The SCL-AKL-SYD flight ended up being available. I realized I could change to a circle pacific and save $3k over an AONE5, so I avoided the confrontation. I hope Miami gets a flight to somewhere in Asia soon, so I can avoid this mess when the GRU-JFK flights are sold out.

Thanks for all your help..
bnachip is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 7:16 am
  #12  
Original Member
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Portland OR Double Emerald (QF and AA), DL PM/MM, Starwood Plat
Posts: 19,593
Originally Posted by bnachip
... I hope Miami gets a flight to somewhere in Asia soon, so I can avoid this mess when the GRU-JFK flights are sold out....
MIA already has MIA-ORD-NRT (or has AA discontinued that?). I hate the way AA does tag ends for international flights (usually with a change of aircraft at the real gateway, so you don't get a 777 for MIA-ORD). So MIA already offers flights to 3 continents on AA (and to 4 continents if you count non-AA); just like JFK, fwiw.
number_6 is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 11:05 am
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Programs: AA EXP 3 MM; Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium Elite
Posts: 18,588
Don't forget to explore the JAL option if desireing to route GRU-JFK-Another Continent. Sure, you get screwed on the bonus mileage if you are an AA elite, but it is another option. Personally, FWIW, I'd chose AA over JL on this route.
PresRDC is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 3:00 pm
  #14  
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Austin
Posts: 4,635
Originally Posted by bnachip
I hope Miami gets a flight to somewhere in Asia soon.
Highly unlikely.
millionmiler is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2008 | 3:35 pm
  #15  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Programs: Starwood Gold ne Platinum; AA Plat.
Posts: 483
Originally Posted by headinclouds
AA RTW now enforces the transit w/o stopover as entry/exit to the continent must be same city. Adding in a segment to get a better connection was permitted in the past, but no more. From one of the very experineced agents on that desk.
I'm not sure if I'm misreading this. Are you saying that that if I begin my RTW at JFK, then fly down to South America, and then want to connect to Asia (via the U.S.), I have to connect through JFK? But I thought that under the new ONE rules, I can't pass my point of origin. Does that mean I can never leave the U.S. for South America on the initial leg of an RTW, but instead have to begin in, say, BOS, and then connect to JFK?
jgold is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.