![]() |
QF 744s on SYD-NRT & SIN-FRA routes now show "jpy" (no F)
BA E70 & E90 are now "jy" (all routes) KA 773 is now "fjy" (all routes) The Great Circle map no longer has a "Click here to open in a separate window" message. Just click on the GC map to do this now. New feature - create your own customized oneworld route map - when using the "OWE Planner" section, enter an airport in the "From" location and hit "Go". The GCMap shows all the destinations served from that location. Works with the distance/To modifiers also, but not yet with the cabin selection (e.g. only F) - that will come but I need to rewrite the code a little. Useful for working out where you can fly from a location, when you don't know all the airport codes. |
Just noticed the link to the xONEx rules .pdf at the bottom of the page is outdated.
Correct link is: |
Originally Posted by vecta
(Post 16215704)
Just noticed the link to the xONEx rules .pdf at the bottom of the page is outdated.
Correct link is: |
Originally Posted by SLF
(Post 16202955)
New feature - create your own customized oneworld route map - when using the "OWE Planner" section, enter an airport in the "From" location and hit "Go". The GCMap shows all the destinations served from that location. Works with the distance/To modifiers also, but not yet with the cabin selection (e.g. only F) - that will come but I need to rewrite the code a little. Useful for working out where you can fly from a location, when you don't know all the airport codes.
Note also I've moved the URL and set up some redirects - hopefully any access will now end up at the URL shown in my signature now. I've noticed a "%2C" problem with URLs, it's fairly easy to change the "%2C" to a comma "," and then all works OK. Previously the URLs had a version number in them (e.g. 0.95024), I want to simplify this and make it easier to use - the new URL (with "mm" in it) is intended to remain fixed when MM is updated. |
Now on Twitter
|
|
Originally Posted by SLF
(Post 16202955)
Works with the distance/To modifiers also, but not yet with the cabin selection (e.g. only F) - that will come but I need to rewrite the code a little. Useful for working out where you can fly from a location, when you don't know all the airport codes.
|
Just put in my plans for later in the year, one sector, ATL-ORD, shows as only Y (AA CR7). AA is installing first class on their CR7s. AA website and oneworld booking tool both show the sector I entered as having first class.
|
Originally Posted by Himeno
(Post 16307239)
Just put in my plans for later in the year, one sector, ATL-ORD, shows as only Y (AA CR7). AA is installing first class on their CR7s. AA website and oneworld booking tool both show the sector I entered as having first class.
|
Cx888: Hkg-yvr-jfk
SLF,
Great tool! Thanks. Q: Is the tool showing accurate mileage for CX888? However, when plug in HKG-YVR-JFK, tool counts YVR as one additional segment, hence invalidates an otherwise legit 16-segment RTW itin. |
Originally Posted by allset2travel
(Post 16310789)
Q: Is the tool showing accurate mileage for CX888? However, when plug in HKG-YVR-JFK, tool counts YVR as one additional segment, hence invalidates an otherwise legit 16-segment RTW itin.
If you are ticketed HKG-JFK (I.e. You are just transiting at YVR) then this is how you need to enter it in MM if you want your route validated. If you are trying to determine how many miles you are credited, then it will depend how your FF program determines the distance; I'd have thought they are more likely to be GC HKG-JFK based than to factor in the stop at YVR. |
Thanks for the clarification.
|
0.95026 posted. Just force a reload to get the new bits.
See change log for details, rule updates added for Australia trans-cons, affected are CBR, BNE, KTA. MM is now also available on a mirror site, details online. |
AY to start flying HEL-SIN on 30-May-2011
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/onewo...ay-2011-a.html
Originally Posted by pandaperth
(Post 16387795)
AY starts flying HEL-SIN on 30-May-2011
So for those of us in the SWP, the quickest way to HEL will be via SIN but wasn't that always the case;) |
Thanks ... that's up there now with 0.95027 |
Hi SLF
been meaning to give you the feedback that I do really like the feature to see what OW flights there are from a given airport/country/continent to an airport/country/continent. Seeing ti visually is much better than the list of to/from airports. I was playing with the tool and realised that it does not flag violations of rule 4(i) (i) The same city pairs/sectors cannot be flown more than once in the same direction |
Originally Posted by pandaperth
(Post 16428327)
Hi SLF
been meaning to give you the feedback that I do really like the feature to see what OW flights there are from a given airport/country/continent to an airport/country/continent. Seeing ti visually is much better than the list of to/from airports.
Originally Posted by pandaperth
(Post 16428327)
I was playing with the tool and realised that it does not flag violations of rule 4(i)
|
Originally Posted by SLF
(Post 16428449)
Thanks - it's great to get this feedback! Godod to know it was worth doing!
|
0.95028 is released
0.95028 is released
Huge update from hauteboy with many fixes done to the award calculation side to bring them up to date. An area I had neglected :( Many thanks for this! Updated flight data loaded. New destinations: OKI, ROR, CTG, GBE, HLA, MPM, KUT, MRV, NKM. Point-point calculations now work again (accidentally broken at some point). S7 services are now marked as all having business class, an educated guess - better than before when they were all showing as Y only. |
.. and hot on it's heels, we're at 0.95029
Now you can Tweet, send to Facebook etc. an itinerary created either from the Point-Point section, or the Oneworld Explorer Validator section.
|
0.95032 is out
hauteboy has updated AA,BA & QF award tables; updated flights data also
Note that all releases are notified with Tweets, only some are here. |
Originally Posted by pandaperth
(Post 16428327)
I was playing with the tool and realised that it does not flag violations of rule 4(i)
|
0.95034
Updated; 0.95034 is out. TIP & BEN are reachable again, via AMM. Wonder how the fares will work out ;)
|
Originally Posted by SLF
(Post 17245541)
Updated; 0.95034 is out. TIP & BEN are reachable again, via AMM. Wonder how the fares will work out ;)
|
0.95037 is out
I don't announce all releases here - follow MM on Twitter if you want to see them all.
v0.95037 (2011/12/29):
|
0.95040 is available
Originally Posted by SLF
(Post 17708235)
I don't announce all releases here - follow MM on Twitter if you want to see them all.
|
Thanks for a terrific tool
MM marks the following itinerary as valid, but doesn't it violate the stopover rule by having three stopovers in London?
1: CAI-LHR: 1st of 4 (Europe) 2: LHR-ARN: 2nd of 4 (Europe) 3: ARN-LHR: 3rd of 4 (Europe) 4: LHR-MIA: 1st of 1 (intercontinental entry to North America without immediate transit & departure) 5: MIA-GCM: 1st of 6 (North America) 6: GCM-MIA: 2nd of 6 (North America) 7: MIA-LAX: 1st of 1 (North America Transcon) *7: MIA-LAX: 3rd of 6 (North America) 8: LAX-SAN: 4th of 6 (North America) 9: SAN-LAX: 5th of 6 (North America) 10: LAX-HKG: 1st of 1 (intercontinental entry to Asia without immediate transit & departure) 11: HKG-SIN: 1st of 4 (Asia) 12: SIN-HKG: 2nd of 4 (Asia) 13: HKG-HND: 3rd of 4 (Asia) 14: HND-HKG: 4th of 4 (Asia) 15: HKG-LHR: intercontinental 16: LHR-DOH: 4th of 4 (Europe) |
IIRC, you can go though LHR three times (one stopover and two transits). Without actual flights I don't think that any tool can validate stopovers vs. transits
|
Originally Posted by Full Score
(Post 18272119)
MM marks the following itinerary as valid, but doesn't it violate the stopover rule by having three stopovers in London?
1: CAI-LHR: 1st of 4 (Europe) 2: LHR-ARN: 2nd of 4 (Europe) 3: ARN-LHR: 3rd of 4 (Europe) 4: LHR-MIA: 1st of 1 (intercontinental entry to North America without immediate transit & departure) 5: MIA-GCM: 1st of 6 (North America) 6: GCM-MIA: 2nd of 6 (North America) 7: MIA-LAX: 1st of 1 (North America Transcon) *7: MIA-LAX: 3rd of 6 (North America) 8: LAX-SAN: 4th of 6 (North America) 9: SAN-LAX: 5th of 6 (North America) 10: LAX-HKG: 1st of 1 (intercontinental entry to Asia without immediate transit & departure) 11: HKG-SIN: 1st of 4 (Asia) 12: SIN-HKG: 2nd of 4 (Asia) 13: HKG-HND: 3rd of 4 (Asia) 14: HND-HKG: 4th of 4 (Asia) 15: HKG-LHR: intercontinental 16: LHR-DOH: 4th of 4 (Europe)
Originally Posted by Sagy
(Post 18272160)
IIRC, you can go though LHR three times (one stopover and two transits). Without actual flights I don't think that any tool can validate stopovers vs. transits
|
Originally Posted by Gardyloo
(Post 18272481)
I'm not aware of any stopover limit with the Oneworld Explorer. The one stop/two transit rule applies, IIRC, to AA's "Oneworld" award (now called the "Explorer" award, to make matters less/more confusing.) The only restriction that applies in the case of the OWE is that you can't fly the same segment twice, and also the rules regarding transiting the point of origin, etc.
|
Originally Posted by Gardyloo
(Post 18272481)
I'm not aware of any stopover limit with the Oneworld Explorer.....The only restriction that applies in the case of the OWE is that you can't fly the same segment twice, and also the rules regarding transiting the point of origin, etc.
Maximum two stopovers permitted in the continent of origin of which a maximum of one stopover is permitted in each direction in the country of origin. In my example, CAI, my starting point, is in the same continent as LHR. Therefore aren't three stops in London disallowed? |
Originally Posted by Full Score
(Post 18279349)
From the rules:
Maximum two stopovers permitted in the continent of origin of which a maximum of one stopover is permitted in each direction in the country of origin. In my example, CAI, my starting point, is in the same continent as LHR. Therefore aren't three stops in London disallowed? |
Originally Posted by Full Score
(Post 18279349)
From the rules:
Maximum two stopovers permitted in the continent of origin of which a maximum of one stopover is permitted in each direction in the country of origin. In my example, CAI, my starting point, is in the same continent as LHR. Therefore aren't three stops in London disallowed? As MM does not hande dates/times of your flights, it does not know if you are intending transit or stopover at each location. MM will help you determine the optimal routing, but it has some limitations - e.g. this stopover/transit one, no checking if seats are available on any specific flights, no checking whether a service operates on the days/seasons you are planning. All of these are better done in the next stage of your planning, I.e.by selecting flights and dates in the online OW tool. |
lol
I am not sure did I do the right thing or not What I was trying is to arrive in LHR and want a LCY flight to JFK since it yield me 70 TP extra, however the validator count my inter-London transit as a segment. I would want to know whether it really does count or not in the itinerary. Same thing happened to me in the NRT-HND transits. please advice |
Originally Posted by kenkido
(Post 18287738)
lol
I am not sure did I do the right thing or not What I was trying is to arrive in LHR and want a LCY flight to JFK since it yield me 70 TP extra, however the validator count my inter-London transit as a segment. I would want to know whether it really does count or not in the itinerary. Same thing happened to me in the NRT-HND transits. please advice |
I'm considering starting an xONEx at RUH, getting there through LHR on BA 263, then turning immediately and starting the xONEx on 262 returning to LHR. Not technically a transit, I know. Has anyone here ever done this? What was it like? Easy? Any problems?
|
Originally Posted by Dr. HFH
(Post 18314020)
I'm considering starting an xONEx at RUH, getting there through LHR on BA 263, then turning immediately and starting the xONEx on 262 returning to LHR. Not technically a transit, I know. Has anyone here ever done this? What was it like? Easy? Any problems?
Both times I alighted the BA flight and was marched off to an office to speak to an immigration officer. The first time it happened, I explained that I didn't want to enter the country and therefore didn't have a visa, but wished to turn right round to depart on the same aircraft on which I'd arrived. Half an hour later I was in the BA departure lounge. However, the second time I tried it I was travelling with Mrs Full Score. This was completely different. FIVE army officers got involved, all wielding automatic rifles. My wife was treated as if she came from another planet - they wouldn't recognize her existence. For two hours I pleaded with them - only one spoke English - the BA staff were impotent to do anything, and the immigration officials simply shrugged their shoulders even though I['d explained the reason for starting my RTW at RUH. Eventually, we made the departure lounge with ten minutes to spare. But it was SCARY. I envisaged that we might be held in custody overnight since we had no entry visas and the BA flight is the only one each day. DON'T DO IT. At the very least, have the proper entry visas - there's just enough time to enter the country and then check-in for the return BA flight - with luck, you can print your boarding pass online before leaving LHR. Or spend a night at the airport hotel. Since RUH is the cheapest AONEx starting point, the extra cost would be negligible and you'll have peace of mind. |
Originally Posted by Dr. HFH
(Post 18314020)
I'm considering starting an xONEx at RUH, getting there through LHR on BA 263, then turning immediately and starting the xONEx on 262 returning to LHR. Not technically a transit, I know. Has anyone here ever done this? What was it like? Easy? Any problems?
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/onewo...-arabia-2.html |
Anyone ever start one in SAH?
|
Originally Posted by Dr. HFH
(Post 18326059)
Anyone ever start one in SAH?
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:15 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.