Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Global Airline Alliances > oneworld
Reload this Page >

Long Rumored MIA-NRT ???????

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Long Rumored MIA-NRT ???????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 13, 2012 | 12:28 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Miami 7-Million Miler EXP
Posts: 829
Long Rumored MIA-NRT ???????

I was fiddling around with the OneWorld Online planning tool and found the following flight on 2/20/2013:
AA 61 MIA-NRT Duration: 18h 10m Aircraft: Equipment varies

Is this the long rumored 777-ER????

Sorry - I'm guessing it's a thru flight. Confusing from planner....

Last edited by MiamiPrep; Oct 13, 2012 at 12:33 pm Reason: error
MiamiPrep is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2012 | 12:34 pm
  #2  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: All over
Programs: AA-LTP, HH-DIA, Marriott-LT+AMB, Hyatt-Globalist, Hertz-PC, UA-GS, BA-Gold
Posts: 6,863
That's a long flight. Can the 773 do 18 hrs? I think 61 connects thru dfw
chanp is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2012 | 12:36 pm
  #3  
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Amsterdam
Programs: A3, BA, OZ,
Posts: 1,169
It stops in DFW, but is one flight number. 18h 10m would be a bit too long for nonstop. (It can be done in less with stops)
AlwaysFlyStar is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2012 | 5:08 pm
  #4  
100 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: used to be PER, now it's nowhere/eveywhere
Programs: QFF NB, AA GLD
Posts: 3,687
Looking in KVS is seems to a direct flight, with an equipment change at the intermediate stop in DFW


[KVS Availability Tool 7.0.7/Diamond - Amadeus: Timetable/NL-BCDF]
Code:
MIA  Miami Intl FL US [KMIA]
DFW  Dallas Metro / Dallas/Fort Worth TX US = DFW DAL [KDFW]
TUE  29 Jan 2013 - 05 Feb 2013

Carrier    Flight  From  Depart    To    Arrive    A/C  St  Frequency | Dur'n | Dep T | Arr T | Effect | Ending | Exceptions
---------  ------  ----  --------  ----  --------  ---  --  ----------------------------------------------------------------
AA         61      MIA   08:05     DFW   10:25     738  0   1234567     03:20       -       -   08 Jan   13 Feb
[KVS Availability Tool 7.0.7/Diamond - Amadeus: Timetable/NL-BCDF]
Code:
DFW  Dallas Metro / Dallas/Fort Worth TX US = DFW DAL [KDFW]
NRT  Tokyo Narita JP [RJAA]
TUE  29 Jan 2013 - 05 Feb 2013

Carrier    Flight  From  Depart    To    Arrive    A/C  St  Frequency | Dur'n | Dep T | Arr T | Effect | Ending | Exceptions
---------  ------  ----  --------  ----  --------  ---  --  ----------------------------------------------------------------
AA         61      DFW   11:40     NRT   16:15 +1  777  0   1234567     13:35       D       2   08 Jan   13 Feb
Could be useful for Oneworld explorer itineraries

Hopefully the MIA-DFW flight will arrive at the same terminal as the DFW-NRT departs from
pandaperth is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2012 | 5:52 pm
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 12,097
It's effective 28OCT12.

Also effective that date are through flight numbers from/to DCA via DFW (AA175/176), from/to LAS via LAX (AA169/170), and from/to MCO via ORD (AA153/154)
hillrider is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2012 | 6:03 pm
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
3M
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: BOS/UTH
Programs: AA LT PLT; QRPC PLT/OW EMD; Bonvoy LT Titanium
Posts: 14,571
Originally Posted by pandaperth
Could be useful for Oneworld explorer itineraries.
Well, it would save a segment, but I'd fly CX F if I'm in F on that route, connecting in JFK or ORD, even at the cost of an extra segment unless I absolutely needed it. For winter departures, I'd do LAX or SFO, of course. Not interested in AA F TPAC when I can have CX for the same price.

Last edited by Dr. HFH; Oct 13, 2012 at 10:50 pm
Dr. HFH is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2012 | 1:27 am
  #7  
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: australia
Posts: 5,961
Originally Posted by Dr. HFH
Well, it would save a segment, but I'd fly CX F if I'm in F on that route, connecting in JFK or ORD, even at the cost of an extra segment unless I absolutely needed it. For winter departures, I'd do LAX or SFO, of course. Not interested in AA F TPAC when I can have CX for the same price.
It would cost 2 more segments to fly CX on the routes being discussed MIA/DCA/LAS-NRT on CX transpac would require 3 segments and on JL 2 segments compared to one for AA.

This also opens up more NA gateways for AA Award tickets eg you should now be able to do Asia-(LAX)-LAS-other point in NA with stopover in LAS or use MIA as a gateway stopover from Asia enroute to the Caribbean
3544quebec is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2012 | 5:06 am
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
3M
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: BOS/UTH
Programs: AA LT PLT; QRPC PLT/OW EMD; Bonvoy LT Titanium
Posts: 14,571
Originally Posted by 3544quebec
It would cost 2 more segments to fly CX on the routes being discussed MIA/DCA/LAS-NRT on CX transpac would require 3 segments and on JL 2 segments compared to one for AA.
If NRT/HND is your final Asian destination, yes. If not, I'd much rather do MIA(AA)-JFK(CX)-HKG(CX)-xxx (3 segments) than MIA(AA)-DFW(AA)-NRT(JL)-xxx (2 segments).
Dr. HFH is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.