Can OW survive without BA?
Nov 15, 2009 | 7:29 am
#18
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA Gold(OWE), QF LTG, MR Plat, IHG Spire, Hertz PC
Posts: 8,156
This I would disagree with.
I would suggest that AA, BA and QF is the core of the alliance. CX whilst very important does not have the breadth of ties with the other alliance members in comparison with QF. There is no JSA between CX and BA for example, nor is there as much codesharing as can be found between AA, BA and QF.
I would suggest that AA, BA and QF is the core of the alliance. CX whilst very important does not have the breadth of ties with the other alliance members in comparison with QF. There is no JSA between CX and BA for example, nor is there as much codesharing as can be found between AA, BA and QF.
Nov 15, 2009 | 4:55 pm
#19
Moderator: Asiana & Qantas Frequent Flyer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: STR/SYD/SMF
Programs: QF LTG / P1 , LH LT SEN / HON, OZ LT Diamond +, Marriott LT PT, HH Diamond,
Posts: 15,149
This I would disagree with.
I would suggest that AA, BA and QF is the core of the alliance. CX whilst very important does not have the breadth of ties with the other alliance members in comparison with QF. There is no JSA between CX and BA for example, nor is there as much codesharing as can be found between AA, BA and QF.
I would suggest that AA, BA and QF is the core of the alliance. CX whilst very important does not have the breadth of ties with the other alliance members in comparison with QF. There is no JSA between CX and BA for example, nor is there as much codesharing as can be found between AA, BA and QF.
Nov 22, 2009 | 10:43 pm
#21
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SYD
Programs: |QF LTG|DL Gold|
Posts: 1,784
The prospect of a tie-up with Qantas is being trotted out again:
http://www.smh.com.au/business/ba-ma...1123-iudm.html
http://www.smh.com.au/business/ba-ma...1123-iudm.html