![]() |
Can OW survive without BA?
Just a little conjecture for a Sunday. With all the talk going on at the moment about the fragility of BA, coupled with all the negativity on various boards towards BA, let's just say that BA was to fold. Would OW remain effective as an alliance without it? Are IB and AY in a strong enough position to hold the alliance together as the European link. IMHO AA/BA/CX are the true base of the alliance. QF, LA, IB are the 2 strongest second tiers, with RJ, AY, JL, MA bringing up the rear in that order (again only my personal opinion). Take one of the "base" players out, will the alliance survive? Any thoughts?
|
Originally Posted by wijibintheair
(Post 12787376)
... let's just say that BA was to fold. ... Any thoughts?
|
Her Majesty has more than enough money to keep BA aloft. :D
Chances of BA going under are about the same as Goldman Sachs doing the same. |
Originally Posted by biggestbopper
(Post 12789802)
...
Chances of BA going under are about the same as Goldman Sachs doing the same. BA is a pension deficit with wings. However if they were to fold, there would surely be a "NewBA" taking over. |
Not sure IB, AY and MA would be strong enough to hold the alliance together in Europe.
However based the financial state of some of the OW carriers, the question could just as easily be either: - "Can OW survive without AA?" or - "Can OW survive without JL?" |
And add IB,
revenue taken a big hit since the MAD-BCN route got competition from the train |
Originally Posted by Supersonic Swinger
(Post 12790091)
Not sure IB, AY and MA would be strong enough to hold the alliance together in Europe.
However based the financial state of some of the OW carriers, the question could just as easily be either: - "Can OW survive without AA?" or - "Can OW survive without JL?" JL - well it would be a blow, but not the end of the world or the alliance as such. |
I can't see BA to go under in the near future. Pension liabilities can be dealt with externally, the state might bail them out. And BA usually is quite profitable.
|
Originally Posted by DownUnderFlyer
(Post 12790360)
I can't see BA to go under in the near future. Pension liabilities can be dealt with externally, the state might bail them out. And BA usually is quite profitable.
|
If Alitalia can survive, in any form, then surely BA can too.
|
Originally Posted by wijibintheair
(Post 12791855)
Don't get me wrong - I sure hope BA survives, and am a believe that if something did happen a "NewBA" would rise quickly. as stated above this is just conjecture.
|
Originally Posted by Supersonic Swinger
(Post 12792333)
The same would be unlikely though if AA didn't survive, speculation is that the next airline to fall will have to file for Ch.7 not Ch. 11. That would leave a big hole in OW to fill. US Airways perhaps enticed over from *A? *shudder*
|
Originally Posted by wijibintheair
(Post 12790291)
JL - well it would be a blow, but not the end of the world or the alliance as such.
|
Slightly OT, but some interesting analysis of BA's current situation:
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1321032755&play=1 |
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:28 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.