"Sky Miles... will be the surviving program"
#16


Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SEA
Programs: AA CK; BA Gold; Hyatt Globalist; Bonvoy LTT; IHG Plat; Hilton Gold
Posts: 3,220
First of all, I love WorldPerks. And this thread made me rather sad. As a result, I am now going to American AAdvantage forum to see how their program works, I never thought I would even consider AA, but it may have to be the case.
#17
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SEA
Programs: UA Silver, BA Gold, DL Gold
Posts: 9,779
Pluses:
- Better award availability
- EXPs are treated exceptionally well
- MM status counts all earned miles, not just EQMs/MQMs
- Int'l lounge access at mid-tier
- Lots of partners and redemption options
Minues:
- No elite bonuses on several OW partners
- Upgrade coupons for all below EXP (though some view this is not a big deal)
- No earning or burning (yet) on BA TATL flights
- OW is a minefield of partial credit fares
- 25% elite bonus at lowest tier, 100% bonus at top tier
#18
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lewis & Clark
Programs: ADL, ACLU, NRA, HRC, NCLR, WBCA
Posts: 5,121
So.... I guess I have to decide....
I am non-hub. Currently have in the neighborhood of 20-25 flights a day outbound from MSO, on NWA, DL, UA, AS.
I have UA status because I have to fly to Denver. Other than that, I maintained my NW status by flying on NW & AS. Should I switch over to AS at this point? Ideas? Suggestions?
I am non-hub. Currently have in the neighborhood of 20-25 flights a day outbound from MSO, on NWA, DL, UA, AS.
I have UA status because I have to fly to Denver. Other than that, I maintained my NW status by flying on NW & AS. Should I switch over to AS at this point? Ideas? Suggestions?
#19


Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SEA
Programs: AA CK; BA Gold; Hyatt Globalist; Bonvoy LTT; IHG Plat; Hilton Gold
Posts: 3,220
I looked at AA, but ultimately decided against it, though mostly due to scheduling more than anything else. My impression is that, if you can make EXP, then AA is easily the best program.
Pluses:
- Better award availability
- EXPs are treated exceptionally well
- MM status counts all earned miles, not just EQMs/MQMs
- Int'l lounge access at mid-tier
- Lots of partners and redemption options
Minues:
- No elite bonuses on several OW partners
- Upgrade coupons for all below EXP (though some view this is not a big deal)
- No earning or burning (yet) on BA TATL flights
- OW is a minefield of partial credit fares
- 25% elite bonus at lowest tier, 100% bonus at top tier
Pluses:
- Better award availability
- EXPs are treated exceptionally well
- MM status counts all earned miles, not just EQMs/MQMs
- Int'l lounge access at mid-tier
- Lots of partners and redemption options
Minues:
- No elite bonuses on several OW partners
- Upgrade coupons for all below EXP (though some view this is not a big deal)
- No earning or burning (yet) on BA TATL flights
- OW is a minefield of partial credit fares
- 25% elite bonus at lowest tier, 100% bonus at top tier
#20
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SEA
Posts: 12,485
So.... I guess I have to decide....
I am non-hub. Currently have in the neighborhood of 20-25 flights a day outbound from MSO, on NWA, DL, UA, AS.
I have UA status because I have to fly to Denver. Other than that, I maintained my NW status by flying on NW & AS. Should I switch over to AS at this point? Ideas? Suggestions?
I am non-hub. Currently have in the neighborhood of 20-25 flights a day outbound from MSO, on NWA, DL, UA, AS.
I have UA status because I have to fly to Denver. Other than that, I maintained my NW status by flying on NW & AS. Should I switch over to AS at this point? Ideas? Suggestions?
#21
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: FNT, Michigan
Programs: DL DM (PMNW), occasional AMTK, National Exec Elite and IHG Spire
Posts: 751
I highly doubt that DL is undertaking some sort of nefarious plot to ensure that there are more DL elites than NW elites entering the merger. It is just too ridiculous to be true. Besides, one can't have it both ways. Everyone here seems to think that DL treats their elites like garbage, but they are going to go out of their way to protect them?
The much more realistic rationale is that DL is seeking to increase bookings during a period of softening demand. It is a marketing gambit, pure and simple. And it has the added benefit of not really costing DL that much, as many of the perks of being elite have fixed costs.
The much more realistic rationale is that DL is seeking to increase bookings during a period of softening demand. It is a marketing gambit, pure and simple. And it has the added benefit of not really costing DL that much, as many of the perks of being elite have fixed costs.
This is fact, not fiction. WP elites are not happy right now, especially considering the larger DL elite pool that existed before the promo started. Combine that with the promo, cut enough capacity post-merger and a GM (GE) will be lucky to ever see an UG. Even many PMs (PEs) will find themselves in Y quite often.
Artificially inflating the elite ranks is bad enough, skewing the results in favor of one merger "partner's" elites is quite another. I stand by my
.
#22
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SEA
Programs: UA Silver, BA Gold, DL Gold
Posts: 9,779
No need for hyperbole - DL is doing this to WP members by their actions, call it unintended consequences, collateral damage or some other description. 2xMQM disadvantages WP members come merger day (or earlier, if reciprocal UGs happen sooner) by stacking the elite merger deck in DL's favor - PM and GM-lites get easy status when WP members are having to earn their BIS status at a 1x rate.
This is fact, not fiction. WP elites are not happy right now, especially considering the larger DL elite pool that existed before the promo started. Combine that with the promo, cut enough capacity post-merger and a GM (GE) will be lucky to ever see an UG. Even many PMs (PEs) will find themselves in Y quite often.
Artificially inflating the elite ranks is bad enough, skewing the results in favor of one merger "partner's" elites is quite another. I stand by my
.
This is fact, not fiction. WP elites are not happy right now, especially considering the larger DL elite pool that existed before the promo started. Combine that with the promo, cut enough capacity post-merger and a GM (GE) will be lucky to ever see an UG. Even many PMs (PEs) will find themselves in Y quite often.
Artificially inflating the elite ranks is bad enough, skewing the results in favor of one merger "partner's" elites is quite another. I stand by my
.
#23
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: FNT, Michigan
Programs: DL DM (PMNW), occasional AMTK, National Exec Elite and IHG Spire
Posts: 751
Fair enough. But why are you angry at Delta? Shouldn't you be angry at NW? It is the vaunted WorldPerks that is not protecting you, not Delta that is disadvantaging you. NW could have chosen to match this marketing promotion, much as DL competitors UA and AA did. They did not. That is not DL's fault.
I guess I just need to accept that thru February of 2010 I'll be seeing more Y than not on the new Delta.
#24
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SEA
Programs: UA Silver, BA Gold, DL Gold
Posts: 9,779
I don't know about that. For the promo to have a major impact on the elite ranks would require that enough people knew about the promo, cared enough to take advantage, were not bound to booking elsewhere than DL.com, and flew enough to get status. Moreover, for it to have a major impact on upgrade availability, those same people would need to fly enough after they had status to actually take away any upgrades. I'm not convinced that both are going to happen.
#25
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: CLT
Programs: AA EP, AA AC
Posts: 4,268
I don't know about that. For the promo to have a major impact on the elite ranks would require that enough people knew about the promo, cared enough to take advantage, were not bound to booking elsewhere than DL.com, and flew enough to get status. Moreover, for it to have a major impact on upgrade availability, those same people would need to fly enough after they had status to actually take away any upgrades. I'm not convinced that both are going to happen.
#26
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,679
Want to Really Get Some Action?
Alright, a bunch of Elite's sending in TTUs isn't going to yield a whole lot. I would guess executives at NW have a lot more pressing matters on their minds than to deal with the complaints of the FT community at large. In particular when most NW Elites will never really figure it out until well after the merger.
What will get their attention is executives from the fortune 500 companies writing them. When the merger was first announced a collection of execs from Minneapolis wrote an open letter to NW and DL. The jist was "don't mess with our non-stop routes". NW and DL got the message and made public statements in regards to the letter. If you work at one of the following companies I would suggest organizing a letter from your executives sent to CEO Steenland and Chairman Bostock indicating your displeasure with being placed at a disadvantage in the proposed merged airline. Polite, to the point, and firm.
MSP
UnitedHealth Group
Target
Supervalu
Best Buy
Travelers Cos.
3M
U.S. Bancorp
CHS
General Mills
Medtronic
Xcel Energy
Land O'Lakes
Ameriprise Financial
C.H. Robinson Worldwide
Hormel Foods
Thrivent Financial for Lutherans
Mosaic
Ecolab
Nash-Finch
PepsiAmericas
St. Jude Medical
Alliant Techsystems
Pentair
Valspar
Securian Financial Group
Patterson
Regis
Imation
Fastenal
Donaldson
Toro
Polaris Industries
DTW
General Motors
Ford Motor
Dow Chemical
GMAC
Delphi
Whirlpool
Lear
TRW Automotive Holdings
Penske Automotive Group
Masco
Kellogg
Visteon
DTE Energy
Pulte Homes
ArvinMeritor
Federal-Mogul
Autoliv
CMS Energy
Stryker
Kelly Services
BorgWarner
Auto-Owners Insurance
Borders Group
American Axle & Manufacturing
Steelcase
Universal Forest Products
Cooper-Standard Holdings
Spartan Stores
Valassis Communications
Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings
Hayes Lemmerz
Herman Miller
La-Z-Boy
What will get their attention is executives from the fortune 500 companies writing them. When the merger was first announced a collection of execs from Minneapolis wrote an open letter to NW and DL. The jist was "don't mess with our non-stop routes". NW and DL got the message and made public statements in regards to the letter. If you work at one of the following companies I would suggest organizing a letter from your executives sent to CEO Steenland and Chairman Bostock indicating your displeasure with being placed at a disadvantage in the proposed merged airline. Polite, to the point, and firm.
MSP
UnitedHealth Group
Target
Supervalu
Best Buy
Travelers Cos.
3M
U.S. Bancorp
CHS
General Mills
Medtronic
Xcel Energy
Land O'Lakes
Ameriprise Financial
C.H. Robinson Worldwide
Hormel Foods
Thrivent Financial for Lutherans
Mosaic
Ecolab
Nash-Finch
PepsiAmericas
St. Jude Medical
Alliant Techsystems
Pentair
Valspar
Securian Financial Group
Patterson
Regis
Imation
Fastenal
Donaldson
Toro
Polaris Industries
DTW
General Motors
Ford Motor
Dow Chemical
GMAC
Delphi
Whirlpool
Lear
TRW Automotive Holdings
Penske Automotive Group
Masco
Kellogg
Visteon
DTE Energy
Pulte Homes
ArvinMeritor
Federal-Mogul
Autoliv
CMS Energy
Stryker
Kelly Services
BorgWarner
Auto-Owners Insurance
Borders Group
American Axle & Manufacturing
Steelcase
Universal Forest Products
Cooper-Standard Holdings
Spartan Stores
Valassis Communications
Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings
Hayes Lemmerz
Herman Miller
La-Z-Boy
#27
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SEA or EYW
Posts: 467
I really haven't seen SM going downhill or changing that much personally. If you really feel that is sliding- easy to fix- don't fly them.
You weren't by chance in 1B MSP-SEA Saturday before last were you?
#28
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: FNT, Michigan
Programs: DL DM (PMNW), occasional AMTK, National Exec Elite and IHG Spire
Posts: 751
I fly both and am Gold on both. Each has their plusses and minuses- overall it's pretty much a toss up for me. Met a guy on NW a few weeks ago that absolutely loathed DL- turned out after talking that he had built up over 200,000 miles and decided to dump some of them by selling them. Yes he got caught and lost everything. He blamed DL for giving him the shaft. I asked him if that wasn't like blaming the cop that arrests you for robbing the bank. He found no humor or similarity in my comparison (and was pretty quiet from that point on). THe F/A heard the exchange and got a good laugh though.
I really haven't seen SM going downhill or changing that much personally. If you really feel that is sliding- easy to fix- don't fly them.
You weren't by chance in 1B MSP-SEA Saturday before last were you?
I really haven't seen SM going downhill or changing that much personally. If you really feel that is sliding- easy to fix- don't fly them.
You weren't by chance in 1B MSP-SEA Saturday before last were you?

He'd better be careful and consider burning his remaining WP miles. DL may re-make the connection to past events post-merger and flush his newly transferred account. I wonder if DL still has him on a SM blacklist?
#29
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 447
Fair enough. But why are you angry at Delta? Shouldn't you be angry at NW? It is the vaunted WorldPerks that is not protecting you, not Delta that is disadvantaging you. NW could have chosen to match this marketing promotion, much as DL competitors UA and AA did. They did not. That is not DL's fault.
#30
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SEA or EYW
Posts: 467
Has anyone given thought that NW my have decided not to match this to avoid even further diluting the ranks? From what I've seen the DL promo was very specific a general "double EQM for all". I remember a few years ago when NW offered it to all- everyone screamed "never do that again"- maybe someone listened.

