Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > MilesBuzz
Reload this Page >

Are bloggers ruining Flyertalk????

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Are bloggers ruining Flyertalk????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 10, 2012 | 1:18 pm
  #346  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Menlo Park, CA, USA
Programs: UA: 1K, HH: Diamond
Posts: 1,330
Originally Posted by amolkold
Also, regardless of who you think "owns" information (no one does), I still find it hilarious that all the bloggers talked about the Discover America promos. How many Hyatt packages were there available ... 165 or so? How many blogs have readerships that are 10-25x this number?
I don't have a problem with that. I'm not collecting Hyatt points, and, while it was a good deal for other reasons, I happened to have better places to put my travel cash. Sure, some people could have afforded to spend money (and time) every single day on the promotions, but most of us picked 0-2 we'd like to try for.
deirdre is offline  
Old May 10, 2012 | 1:41 pm
  #347  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dallas, TX
Programs: AA EXP, Marriott LT Titanium, Avis Chairman
Posts: 1,286
Originally Posted by peachfront
I'm not picking on her to pick on her. I've already said I defend the right of bloggers to make money and share information. I certainly don't think MP is ruining flyertalk or that her blog is the terror of the internet. However, I do feel a need to use peer pressure to point out that travel with small children should be generally DIScouraged, not ENcouraged. If you have no common sense and really would drive 14 hours straight with a small child, if you have DUIs or use drugs, if Grandma lives across the pond, if there is a family emergency and for some reason air travel would actually save time rather than costing time with flight delays and security lines...by all means, FLY! But, much of the time, small children are put through a lot of unnecessary stress and hassle, and we've all of us frequent flyers seen how miserable they are. Yes, everybody on flyertalk has a genius child who doesn't act out on long plane trips, but I'm talking about the actual children I've seen at the airport and on the plane, not your child who I've only heard about on the internet. I'm going to have believe my own lyin' eyes on this one. Fair enough?
I get what you're saying. If you've seen a bunch of horribly behaved children then you're probably biased towards thinking that most traveling children are horribly behaved. My kid just turned one this past Monday. My wife and I took a trip to Hawaii when he was 6 months old. We're determined to take our children with us with us where we go as opposed to letting our children dictate our schedules. Some people believe (I'm not saying you do) that having children is a death sentence to your travel plans. I don't fall in that camp. On the Hawaii flights, did he cry for a portion? Yep. But then we got him to settle down pretty quickly. My wife and I both did our best to help those around us feel comfortable; there are even some incredibly sweet and thoughtful people who offer to help - to hold my kid while I need to get something out of the diaper bag, etc. I find that in general, those that have kids are more tolerant of those that have kids, and it is for those folks that I'm grateful.

But I do understand your point - if the choice is between driving and flying, and they're both relatively convenient, I'll drive. For instance, my parents live in Monterrey, MX right for the time being. We find it easier to meet them in Laredo than directly in Monterrey, and we usually end up driving there. Would it be incredibly easy to book a short flight from DFW-LRD, especially with the dynamite value Avios would bring to the table? Sure would! But we choose to drive that route because it's a little easier for us. We can take all we want without the hassle of security, weight restrictions and time constraints.

I disagree with your cause of trying to discourage families from traveling. Those moments (certainly not all of them, but we take the bad with the good) can really build a lot of good memories. I find it difficult to understand judging another for having a slant on her blog towards families, or for choosing to fly with their kids. If their kids are running all around without regard for anyone else, that's one thing. But if the kids are generally well behaved and the baby cries every once in a while, why, I find absolutely nothing wrong with that.
ramalama8 is offline  
Old May 10, 2012 | 1:47 pm
  #348  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: UA-1K, MM, Hilton-Diamond, Marriott-Titanium
Posts: 4,497
Originally Posted by LesBesTes
Interesting timing that this article touting the blogs just showed up on HuffPo:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-...comm_ref=false

Ready for the conspiracy theorists to jump in...
Cue the Twilight Zone theme song. That is too much of a coincidence.
cruisr is offline  
Old May 10, 2012 | 2:04 pm
  #349  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 6,458
It's amazing how long this has got. My two cents:

The question is concerning whether bloggers are ruining flyertalk. Not whether bloggers are bad/good, or whether they should be blacklisted, etc.

As a 'noob' member according to some, I'd say no. Yes, even though the bloggers do post the deals, it's not always ruined. Would the RGN fare (which I brought onto the main premium fare deals thread) be worse off if matthew@upgrd hadn't posted about it? No. Would the any of the points packages not have sold out if the bloggers didn't talk about it? No.

Maybe some Fter's think that the content of the blogs are junk, but that's their problem. The bloggers have the right to post whatever they want. If you think that they are ruining flyertalk, then move somewhere else. What's the need of hundred's of posts on a dumb topic? Spend your time finding fd's!
yerffej201 is offline  
Old May 10, 2012 | 4:33 pm
  #350  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: IAD
Programs: Chase Million Miler, SPG Gold, HHonors Gold, Hyatt Platinum
Posts: 2,729
As an 11-year member of Flyertalk (!), I have to say, I like the bloggers. I don't have the time or the desire to read through pages and pages of off topic commentary. I like having all of the good stuff distilled in an easy to read format. Saves me the trouble.

I don't care too much about deals that get killed. My preference is for deals that survive in perpetuity -- I've got little to no interest in taking advantage of companies who made a mistake.
DHAST is offline  
Old May 10, 2012 | 6:04 pm
  #351  
50 Countries Visited
80 Nights
5M
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Programs: You Know Me... I Do Everything.
Posts: 1,482
What an entertaining thread this was to read through.
rajuabju is offline  
Old May 10, 2012 | 7:51 pm
  #352  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Programs: AA, UA, SQ, VA, QF, AF, BA
Posts: 2,885
Originally Posted by peachfront
I'm not picking on her to pick on her. I've already said I defend the right of bloggers to make money and share information. I certainly don't think MP is ruining flyertalk or that her blog is the terror of the internet. However, I do feel a need to use peer pressure to point out that travel with small children should be generally DIScouraged, not ENcouraged. If you have no common sense and really would drive 14 hours straight with a small child, if you have DUIs or use drugs, if Grandma lives across the pond, if there is a family emergency and for some reason air travel would actually save time rather than costing time with flight delays and security lines...by all means, FLY! But, much of the time, small children are put through a lot of unnecessary stress and hassle, and we've all of us frequent flyers seen how miserable they are. Yes, everybody on flyertalk has a genius child who doesn't act out on long plane trips, but I'm talking about the actual children I've seen at the airport and on the plane, not your child who I've only heard about on the internet. I'm going to have believe my own lyin' eyes on this one. Fair enough?
Originally Posted by LowFlyOver
If you think that a 26-hour drive with children to Orange County, CA, or a 20-hour drive to Orange/Seminole/Osceola County, FL, even if broken up with multiple days of travel, is better for a small child than a direct 2.5-3.5 hour flight from ORD, DSM, CID, or MLI (or even a flight with a reasonable layover), you are clueless...absolutely clueless. Didn't you just recommend trips to Disney several pages back? If I ever need advice on caged birds, I'll ask for it. Until then, we will try our best to avoid you in the skies and at the airport.
Originally Posted by DavidAL
I guess we may have to agree to disagree. Have you thought that you only notice the kids that are crying, and not the other dozens that aren't in the airport? I don't think it's any "unnecessary stress and hassle" for my kids to fly. What's not to love about seeing all the big planes take off? I guess what we could do is post where we're going with our kids to make sure you avoid our routes. And again, I'm assuming you don't have kids. So, if you're an AA/AS person, don't get mad when you see my wife and kids in FC going to PVR in a couple weeks. They didn't take your upgrade, nor will they be screaming and crying. They might even let you watch their movie on their iPods if you ask nicely. Just make sure to avoid DFW and PVR on the 22nd, and PVR, SFO, and DFW on the 29th.
My 2 cents on flying with kids: Although I have no doubt that the FTers who post in this thread do travel with their kids and manage to control their behaviour, you have to admit that Flyertalkers are not representative of the traveling public overall. It is extremely irresponsible to go out encouraging every Ma & Pa Kettle to take their kids on long flights when the majority of parents do not know how to keep their kids under control. So I have to chime in on the side of Peachfront here. I realize it is probably also a miserable experience to drag small kids on a long road trip as well but either way the travel is going to be uncomfortable and small kids are going to start cryinging and throwing tantrums so at least with the road trip the misery is confined to the car containing aforementioned kids and parents, not shared amongst 330 people on a plane.

I am not a parent, nor do I ever wish to be one. Nor am I a forensic scientist (but I watch those kinds of shows on TV), but in this day and age of internet predators, is it considered prudent to be posting pics of an attractive blonde toddler and one's travel plans/speaking engagements online for all to see? Not something I would be doing if I did have a kid.

Originally Posted by LesBesTes
Interesting timing that this article touting the blogs just showed up on HuffPo:
The article seems to extol all the virtues of the credit cards without the caveats as to responsible management of credit. People who can't pay their bills in full every month and don't have the discipline to stick to a budget are NOT going to get "free" travel, they will pay for it in interest charges which is exactly why the credit card companies bribe us with these deals in the first place.
Tiki is offline  
Old May 10, 2012 | 8:28 pm
  #353  
 
2M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Upcountry Maui, HI
Posts: 13,722
Could we please drop the comments about flying with kids from this thread? It's really off topic for this thread. It's not about one blogger.

Just stop replying to that individuals posts in this thread. Thank you.

-David
LIH Prem is offline  
Old May 10, 2012 | 8:47 pm
  #354  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Programs: AA, UA, SQ, VA, QF, AF, BA
Posts: 2,885
Originally Posted by LIH Prem
Could we please drop the comments about flying with kids from this thread? It's really off topic for this thread. It's not about one blogger.

Just stop replying to that individuals posts in this thread. Thank you.

-David
I disagree. Most Flyertalkers are interested in redeeming for J or F class awards. We look forward to a relaxing, luxurious experience (as opposed to going in economy). If the incidence of kids in J and F increases due to bloggers, it detracts from the flying experience we hope to achieve so it is pertinent to the topic.
Tiki is offline  
Old May 10, 2012 | 8:55 pm
  #355  
 
2M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Upcountry Maui, HI
Posts: 13,722
Originally Posted by Tiki
I disagree. Most Flyertalkers are interested in redeeming for J or F class awards. We look forward to a relaxing, luxurious experience (as opposed to going in economy). If the incidence of kids in J and F increases due to bloggers, it detracts from the flying experience we hope to achieve so it is pertinent to the topic.
Amazing, because Mommypoints and other family oriented bloggers aren't usually interested in redeeming premium cabin awards. For the most part they are interested in family travel for free.

So like I said earlier, FTers are ruining FT a lot more than the bloggers are with the constant bickering, inflammatory posts, like peachfront's in this thread, and the ensuing arguments that detract from having a reasonable topical conversation between intelligent individuals.

And what's even more ridiculous to me is the belief that kids shouldn't be traveling in whatever cabin you are in. My daughter traveled in her own seat from almost the day she was born, and never caused a problem. So if you want to talk about kids being a problem for you, this is not that thread. It's a completely different topic. Nothing you say is going to get rid of kids traveling in F, J or any class for that matter, so it's really futile IMO and ridiculous to think there's anything you can do to change it.

So again, how about taking that sub-topic somewhere else where those that are interested in the debate can join in, those that are not, can just not bother to read it? Isn't that the reasonable thing to do?

-David

Last edited by LIH Prem; May 10, 2012 at 9:06 pm
LIH Prem is offline  
Old May 10, 2012 | 9:46 pm
  #356  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Programs: AA, UA, SQ, VA, QF, AF, BA
Posts: 2,885
I can't speak for others in this thread but if anyone doesn't want to read my posts, they can add me to their Ignore list. http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/faq.p...l&titlesonly=0

I do however think I have shown a valid co-relation between my posts (Does the presence of children detract from the flying experience most commonly sought after on FT and do bloggers contribute to increasing the probability of finding more children on your flight?) and the topic of the thread so it's really a matter of do you agree or disagree.......and that is really the purpose of a discussion forum. I am not invalidating your right to your opinion, I am merely disagreeing with you and voicing my own opinion which is well within my rights.
Tiki is offline  
Old May 10, 2012 | 9:54 pm
  #357  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 20
Agree 100% with the OP

I really appreciated reading what the OP's perspective. For a long time I have been thinking the very same thing. The oldschool bloggers who have been blogging for the past 5-10 years are who I have been following. These brand new bloggers who are repeating verbatim from flyertalk are the ones who are ruining things for us. SO many things have changed for the worse in terms of deals: AAdvantage is no longer churnable, Chase is blacklisting people right and left, AMEX stopped matching bonus's etc (and the list goes on and on) My guess is that things will continue to go downward due to the 100's of bloggers.


Funny Story:
I was corresponding with one of these small time bloggers (I think the blog is less than a year old) and suddenly he wrote "I hope you are using my links! i'm glad to help you, but if your not using my links please let me know"
PS:
I knew MUCH more than him and ended up teaching him a few tricks of the trade
waterbottle is offline  
Old May 10, 2012 | 10:33 pm
  #358  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,443
Originally Posted by LIH Prem
Amazing, because Mommypoints and other family oriented bloggers aren't usually interested in redeeming premium cabin awards. For the most part they are interested in family travel for free.

So like I said earlier, FTers are ruining FT a lot more than the bloggers are with the constant bickering, inflammatory posts, like peachfront's in this thread, and the ensuing arguments that detract from having a reasonable topical conversation between intelligent individuals.

And what's even more ridiculous to me is the belief that kids shouldn't be traveling in whatever cabin you are in. My daughter traveled in her own seat from almost the day she was born, and never caused a problem. So if you want to talk about kids being a problem for you, this is not that thread. It's a completely different topic. Nothing you say is going to get rid of kids traveling in F, J or any class for that matter, so it's really futile IMO and ridiculous to think there's anything you can do to change it.

So again, how about taking that sub-topic somewhere else where those that are interested in the debate can join in, those that are not, can just not bother to read it? Isn't that the reasonable thing to do?

-David
And of course the "free" is in inverted commas, because as any economics/commerce student with a basic knowledge of opportunity cost would tell you, nothing is free. So that wonderful trip for 4 to Orlando in coach might not be so great once you realise you could have flow business class to Asia for the same cost, if not less...
belfordrocks is offline  
Old May 10, 2012 | 10:44 pm
  #359  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,758
Originally Posted by Tiki
I can't speak for others in this thread but if anyone doesn't want to read my posts, they can add me to their Ignore list. http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/faq.p...l&titlesonly=0

I do however think I have shown a valid co-relation between my posts (Does the presence of children detract from the flying experience most commonly sought after on FT and do bloggers contribute to increasing the probability of finding more children on your flight?) and the topic of the thread so it's really a matter of do you agree or disagree.......and that is really the purpose of a discussion forum. I am not invalidating your right to your opinion, I am merely disagreeing with you and voicing my own opinion which is well within my rights.
Nobody is saying you or anyone else does not have a right to their opinion. The point is what you are talking about though valid has absolutely nothing to do with this thread. Read the OP.
QL_714 is offline  
Old May 10, 2012 | 10:47 pm
  #360  
 
2M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Upcountry Maui, HI
Posts: 13,722
Originally Posted by Tiki
I do however think I have shown a valid co-relation between my posts (Does the presence of children detract from the flying experience most commonly sought after on FT and do bloggers contribute to increasing the probability of finding more children on your flight?) and the topic of the thread so it's really a matter of do you agree or disagree.......and that is really the purpose of a discussion forum. I am not invalidating your right to your opinion, I am merely disagreeing with you and voicing my own opinion which is well within my rights.
IMO, and this is the point I was trying to make, not to you personally, but to those discussing peachfront's rather inflamatory posts, the discussion moved away from the original topic towards complaining about kids in general, with a relatively minor tie in to bloggers helping more families travel. I'm sure you will disagree with that, which is fine by me. Do whatever you think is right.

That's all I have to say about that sub-topic. I really don't want to promote that discussion in this thread any more than I already have.

-David
LIH Prem is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.