Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Mileage Run Deals > Mileage Run Discussion
Reload this Page >

[PREM FARE GONE] UA: NCL-EWR 600 DKK (mistaken fare) DOT ruled; see wiki for link

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Feb 11, 2015, 11:49 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: drewguy
If you've never gone through this process read this before posting!
Note: Please consider that with high probability, United is monitoring this thread, so please pay attention on what you post!

DOT Investigation UpdatesNews Media Updates:

-------

According to USA Today, Ben Mutzabaugh:
United is voiding the bookings of several thousand individuals who were attempting to take advantage of an error a third-party software provider made when it applied an incorrect currency exchange rate, despite United having properly filed its fares. Most of these bookings were for travel originating in the United Kingdom, and the level of bookings made with Danish Kroner as the local currency was significantly higher than normal during the limited period that customers made these bookings.
Note that United has also accidentally cancelled "legitimate" tickets paid for in USD, purchased in USD from LHR... Please check your other tickets if purchased today to ensure they were not unilaterally cancelled.

However, there is no chance at all that you can have your tickets re-instated if you complain to DOT on the basis of DOT rule 399.88:
399.88 Prohibition on post-purchase price increase.

(a) It is an unfair and deceptive practice within the meaning of 49 U.S.C. 41712 for any seller of scheduled air transportation within, to or from the United States, or of a tour (i.e., a combination of air transportation and ground or cruise accommodations), or tour component (e.g., a hotel stay) that includes scheduled air transportation within, to or from the United States, to increase the price of that air transportation, tour or tour component to a consumer, including but not limited to an increase in the price of the seat, an increase in the price for the carriage of passenger baggage, or an increase in an applicable fuel surcharge, after the air transportation has been purchased by the consumer, except in the case of an increase in a government-imposed tax or fee. A purchase is deemed to have occurred when the full amount agreed upon has been paid by the consumer.
Form for filing DOT complaint. File complaint as soon as your ticket is cancelled.

Link to PDF of enforcement bodies for European customers affected. File complaint as soon as your ticket is cancelled.


Tips for DOT Complaint:
  • File on DOT for every ticket number affected.
  • If you have one reservation with four people traveling (four tickets) file 4 DOT complaints, one per ticket.
  • If you have separate reservations, file a DOT complaint for each.
  • The DOT complaint website may take several minutes to load, depending on demand.
  • When you go to upload a file, be careful as it will reset all your radio buttons. So, if you want a copy of the complaint, make sure you double check that "Yes" is still selected before submitting, especially if you upload a file.

Template For Complaint:
United has unilaterally cancelled my ticket without my consent.

Facts:
1. The ticket was ticketed (had a ticket number).
2. I received a confirmation number, ticket number, and emails stating both
3. The ticket was paid for and my credit card charged.

United must reinstate the ticket within its original cabin. This trip is for travel TO the United States.

At no time during the booking process was any other fare than the Danish Krone equivalent displayed. As a reasonable, prudent consumer, I believed I was paying the price displayed to me on the website. United never sent or displayed the equivalent fare in any other currency.

Trip Details
Ticket #: 016XXXXXXXXXX
PNR: XXXXXX
Routing: LHR-EWR-LAX-HNL

Attachments: Attached is a document showing the ticket, routing, and providing proof that the reservation was ticketed.

Filename: Cancelled - UA Reservation - LHR-EWR-LAX-HNL - XXXXXX - 016XXXXXXXXXX.pdf

+-------------------------------------------------------+
| Relevant Law |
| http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/14/399.88 |
+-------------------------------------------------------+
399.88 Prohibition on post-purchase price increase.

(a) It is an unfair and deceptive practice within the meaning of 49 U.S.C. 41712 for any seller of scheduled air transportation within, to or from the United States, or of a tour (i.e., a combination of air transportation and ground or cruise accommodations), or tour component (e.g., a hotel stay) that includes scheduled air transportation within, to or from the United States, to increase the price of that air transportation, tour or tour component to a consumer, including but not limited to an increase in the price of the seat, an increase in the price for the carriage of passenger baggage, or an increase in an applicable fuel surcharge, after the air transportation has been purchased by the consumer, except in the case of an increase in a government-imposed tax or fee. A purchase is deemed to have occurred when the full amount agreed upon has been paid by the consumer.

+-------------------------------------------------------+
| Relevant FAQ |
| http://airconsumer.ost.dot.gov/rules/EAPP_2_FAQ.pdf |
+-------------------------------------------------------+
Does the prohibition on post-purchase price increases in section 399.88(a) apply in the situation where a carrier mistakenly offers an airfare due to a computer problem or human error and a consumer purchases the ticket at that fare before the carrier is able to fix the mistake?

Section 399.88(a) states that it is an unfair and deceptive practice for any seller of scheduled air transportation within, to, or from the United States, or of a tour or tour component that includes scheduled air transportation within, to, or from the United States, to increase the price of that air transportation to a consumer after the air transportation has been purchased by the consumer, except in the case of a government-imposed tax or fee and only if the passenger is advised of a possible increase before purchasing a ticket. A purchase occurs when the full amount agreed upon has been paid by the consumer. Therefore, if a consumer purchases a fare and that consumer receives confirmation (such as a confirmation email and/or the purchase appears on their credit card statement or online account summary) of their purchase, then the seller of air transportation cannot increase the price of that air transportation to that consumer, even when the fare is a mistake.
-----
Tips for retrieving your ticket number:
  1. paste(right click copy link location first) following link into your web browser
  2. change XXXXXX next to COPNR= for your reservation number and LASTNAME next to LN= for you SURNAME
  3. go to the webpage address you have just created

https://www.united.com/web/en-US/app...NRCD=2/11/2015


Originally Posted by MatthewLAX
Originally Posted by MatthewLAX View Post
R E L A X

Breathe deep.

Congrats on all who got in.

Now comes the fun part.

1. Discovery - mistake fare is posted on FT. Novices frantically checks how much vacation time they have and if the dates of availability mesh with their schedules. Experienced FTers just book it and worry about contacting spouses or their boss later. Word spreads like wildfire.

2. Excitement - Tickets purchased, confirmation emails received and dates of travel shared with other FTers. Discussions of what to see and do and where to stay crop up in other threads. Novices contact source to change seats or inquire about upgrades, Seasoned FTers sit back and enjoy reading the discussion threads.

3. Stress Stage 1 - Concern over paper ticket delivery - Novices Frantically check otheFedEx website every few hours, constant monitoring of driveway for FedEx truck. Seasoned FT veterans sit back and relax.

4. Glee and happiness - Paper tickets in hand, vacation request submitted, spouses finally informed, hotel reservations made and bragging to friends and co-workers begins. Both novices and experts get very excited.

5. Stress Stage 2 - Rumors of fare not being honored, discussion threads about the airline and ticketing agency ensue. Rumors crop up like crabgrass at this stage. Many FTers begin to worry excessively about whether or not the trip will happen. Novices make non-refundable and financial committments to their trip. Seasoned FTers make mixed drinks (and maybe a sandwich) and is patient.

6. Reality Check - Accurate information is obtained - usually takes place a week to 10 days after mistake fare is published. Confirmed information from the source as to whether or not tickets will be honored.

7a. Pure Joy (Icelandair style- Fare is Honored) - Lots of happy people, FT threads on shared information regarding hotels, restaurants, tours, etc. Jealousy from others sets in. First "FT guinea pigs" embark, post confirmation threads that all is ok.


7b Hostile Feelings (Copa Airlines Style - fare is not honored) - Many angry and disappointed FTers. Refunds are issued. Novices have multiple discussion threads of lawsuits and hostile correspondence, FT pros mutter "c'est la vie" and look for the next fare mistake.

8a Success (Honored) - Trip Report thread becomes very active


Freedom of Information Act Request
File #2015-147, Office of the Secretary of Transportation - Receipt acknowledged 3/13/15

http://www.dot.gov/individuals/foia/office-secretary-foia-information

Relevant excerpt from my request on 2/24/15. There no need for multiple requests for the same thing, though feel free to request more or different information obviously. I'll post any updates as I get them.

"Under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S. C. subsection 552, I am requesting access to any and all records of correspondence, including electronic, between anyone working for, or on the behalf of, United Airlines and its subsidiaries, and with anyone working for, or on the behalf of, the Department of Transportation; specifically this would include only the date range beginning on February 11th, 2015 through and including February 24th, 2015.

In addition, I am requesting access to any and all internal records and correspondence in relation to coming to the decision made on February 23rd, 2015 regarding the Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings Determination Regarding United Airlines Mistaken Fare, with the exception of any of the consumer submitted complaints via phone, email, website, or letter. Specifically, this would be any records beginning on February 11th, 2015 through and including February 24th, 2015."
Print Wikipost

[PREM FARE GONE] UA: NCL-EWR 600 DKK (mistaken fare) DOT ruled; see wiki for link

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 20, 2015, 5:05 pm
  #4801  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 11
How many times does it need to be posted up here -
The fare was available using any address, any country both as contact address or billing address, you could have stuck the moon down and still got the fare.
You could go on UA today book any flight u want with same address details and not have a problem so why should it be a problem regarding this deal!

Last edited by Pat89339; Feb 22, 2015 at 11:46 pm Reason: Remove deleted post
nonamethanks is offline  
Old Feb 20, 2015, 5:07 pm
  #4802  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by UA Apologist
Every EU citizen is legally entitled to a seat in F for free???
UA advertised seats for real money in DKK at a price that customers paid; and in exchange for accepting customer payment, UA issued tickets.

None of these tickets were free for customers; all the customers who purchased these tickets paid money for them.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Feb 20, 2015, 5:18 pm
  #4803  
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Programs: Star Alliance Gold, AS MVP
Posts: 990
I always use Lufthansa's German website when I buy a ticket to Germany because sometimes it's cheaper than the Dutch website. And when I buy a domestic ticket in China I use China Eastern's Chinese website because it's also a bit cheaper than the European/English version. I buy these tickets IN China on a Chinese website and I pay with a Dutch creditcard and my billing address is in The Netherlands because that is my home country even though I live in Shanghai.

Last edited by Pat89339; Feb 22, 2015 at 11:47 pm Reason: Remove deleted quote
Granite64 is offline  
Old Feb 20, 2015, 5:25 pm
  #4804  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Norway
Posts: 12
Originally Posted by cruisr
Just wait until the DOT decides. No matter what they decide we will probably have the same amount of new posts/pages.
True true

I have my F ticket to SFO in F this summer, if its honored its great, if not, well, its up to DOT. Nothing we discuss here will ever change that 4 now.

I have only one remark to UA: Computers do NOT make mistakes, its the people feeding it with numbers and data :P
maxmix is offline  
Old Feb 20, 2015, 6:10 pm
  #4805  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SAT
Programs: AA EXP BA Gold, TK Gold, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Diamond, AS 100K, QR PLT, SAS Gold, IHG Spire, AMR
Posts: 5,899
Originally Posted by DC777Fan
And, I would argue, the more likely they rule for United.

For one, the longer it takes, the more people whose travel dates will have passed, which would make a ruling in pax favor very difficult to adjudicate (would they have to fine UA and/or tell UA that if they don't offer satisfactory compensation such that pax drops complaint, they will be fined?)

Also, IMO, a ruling in pax favor would be very simple: "rules say no post purchase price increase & United is trying to do it" whereas a ruling in favor of United is likely to be more nuanced due to contradictions it would bring up.
This is your conjecture and is not based at all on past events.

If you recall there were numerous passengers whose (non-LX) tickets were cancelled and then ordered by the CTA to be reinstated after the travel date had passed. Those passengers were able to select new travel dates and in same cases even new routings. Very easy for the DOT and UA to execute.

Executing a ruling either way is simple. It all depends on how the DOT interprets the rules
Deltahater is offline  
Old Feb 20, 2015, 7:00 pm
  #4806  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Anywhere I need to be.
Programs: OW Emerald, *A Gold, NEXUS, GE, ABTC/APEC, South Korea SES, eIACS, PP, Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 16,046
Originally Posted by dr58
Second, on the topic of mitigation and UA's use of "big data" (see a bunch of earlier posts), let's all remember that if UA had some very simple, common sense checks built into their ticketing engine, this all could have been avoided. Imagine, for example, a simple rule that said that any international RT first class ticket sold for less than $250 USD would need to be confirmed by an actual human before being confirmed/ticketed.
In this case, would all international O class awards also need to go through this/these human(s)?
AA_EXP09 is offline  
Old Feb 20, 2015, 7:29 pm
  #4807  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 51
Originally Posted by AA_EXP09
In this case, would all international O class awards also need to go through this/these human(s)?
Sure, you could run awards through the filters, too. Why not?

I'm not trying to do the airlines' work for them -- though I'll gladly accept airline consulting offers via PM! -- or suggesting that an agent should have to approve every revenue or award ticket, but running bookings through a set of a dozen simple rules could probably detect and prevent 99.9% of these extreme cases while adding fractions of a second to the ticketing process.
dr58 is offline  
Old Feb 21, 2015, 2:54 am
  #4808  
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 261
Guys and girls lets all chill and wait for dot to provide there ruling.
Oliveredmunds is offline  
Old Feb 21, 2015, 6:35 am
  #4809  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Programs: AA EXP, Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 273
Inducement isn't really valid when it is something readily accessible through their website without manipulation. As has been stated several times, a lot of people book from different POS's, especially international travelers, and it is completely reasonable to book the best deal available regardless of the POS

Last edited by Pat89339; Feb 22, 2015 at 11:30 pm Reason: Remove deleted quote
dlandz is offline  
Old Feb 21, 2015, 8:21 am
  #4810  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: UA-1K, MM, Hilton-Diamond, Marriott-Titanium
Posts: 4,438
Originally Posted by Oliveredmunds
Guys and girls lets all chill and wait for dot to provide there ruling.
Wouldn't that be nice. I check this thread only twice a day now as its pages and pages of the same blah blah blah. Maybe I'll go down to checking once a day.
cruisr is offline  
Old Feb 21, 2015, 8:56 am
  #4811  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: UK
Programs: ROP *G, BAEC Gold, HH Lifetime Diamond
Posts: 969
Just to share- For the past 3 years, every time I booked on UA's UK website. I have to "change" the city I live in to "London" because I actually live in a small town in N. Wales (Wrexham) that UA would not allow when paid by a UK credit card. So my billing address is wrong- Wrexham is not in London. London is the Capital of England and I live in Wales. UA so far has not seen any problem with me by "tricking" the system to get my payment processed through.
kinchai is offline  
Old Feb 21, 2015, 8:57 am
  #4812  
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 261
Originally Posted by cruisr
Wouldn't that be nice. I check this thread only twice a day now as its pages and pages of the same blah blah blah. Maybe I'll go down to checking once a day.
I think you are the same as me.
I don't understand why the arguments are still happening as nothing will happen until DOT make a ruling.
Oliveredmunds is offline  
Old Feb 21, 2015, 9:53 am
  #4813  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 11
Consumer books flight on Danish site or opts to pay in DKK and is offered a fare which they book in a normal fashion.

Its all a matter of some facts and numerous opinions, its a fair mess to get yourself into as an international airline.

Last edited by Pat89339; Feb 22, 2015 at 11:32 pm Reason: Remove deleted quote
nonamethanks is offline  
Old Feb 21, 2015, 9:55 am
  #4814  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: NYC
Programs: QF LTG
Posts: 1,200
Gathering my travel documents today getting ready for a trip from the USA back home to Australia on monday in business class which I booked ages ago and I found my e-ticket. The one way cost me a grand total of $70.58, $45 of which was a date change fee.

Oh I love unannounced extreme sales.
PbodyPhoto is offline  
Old Feb 21, 2015, 10:08 am
  #4815  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 60137
Posts: 10,498
Originally Posted by PbodyPhoto
Gathering my travel documents today getting ready for a trip from the USA back home to Australia on monday in business class which I booked ages ago and I found my e-ticket. The one way cost me a grand total of $70.58, $45 of which was a date change fee.

Oh I love unannounced extreme sales.
V. nice deal. ^

Care to share the carrier? @:-)
sonofzeus is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.