Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Mileage Run Deals > Mileage Run Discussion
Reload this Page >

[PREM FARE GONE] RGN First class comes back again!!!!

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Jun 19, 2013, 9:45 pm
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: fti
People, please edit/use the wiki so same questions are not always asked.

The current CTA decision on the Yangon deal is only for tickets canceled by SWISS Airlines for the seven merged complaints/companions and tickets canceled by Jet Airways for one complainant and companions
- It's not about other carriers because each carrier submits different tariffs.
- If you are not one of the complainants or their companions above who were mentioned in the respective cases, you need to submit a case yourself for hearing.
- There's currently one person who is on Iberia for CTA decision, one can either wait for results or submit a complaint to CTA.

Result of the current case for LX in brief is:
- CTA found 5(F) in the tariff used to be unclear for canceling tickets on erroneously quoted fares.
- 5(F) is unjust and unreasonable and must be revised or taken down by July 9, 2013 (or SWISS can appeal by then)
- SWISS did not use its tariff correctly to cancel the tickets.
- SWISS must compensate one complainant's First Class ticket and any related expenses by July 18, 2013 provided with evidence.
- SWISS must transport other complainants (and their companions) in the original price charged with same booking class and routing by June 18, 2014.

Result of the current case for 9W in brief is:
- Tariff on file had no clauses for "erroneous fares" and was updated subsequently, which means it is not relevant to this event
- Therefore, 9W is to reinstate the tickets with a 1-year validity for transport between the same points and the same booking class.


CTA official news can be read here for general overview of the case.

Actual CTA case review can be found here for reference should you wish to file a complaint.

If you have a similar case that's with SWISS, you need to file with CTA to get a result through informal process first before it gets to formal process. The entire procedure can take up to 3 months for each and the result may not be same cause it's case-by-base and the reviewer of the case can be different.

To file an informal complaint with CTA, see here. Click through all of the pages to get to the online form for the informal complaint. Or click here.

To file a formal complaint after informal complaint has been closed, see here. Continue on to the next page to see the address or email address for the formal complaint.

The July 17th and 18th responses from LX can be found here:
Other Letters:


Feel free to add dates, flights, etc., in order to plan DOs, etc.

Aug 4: SFO-ICN (UA893)
Jason8612

Aug 5: ICN-SFO (UA892)
Jason8612

Aug 7: SFO-ICN (UA893)
Jason8612

Aug 11: ICN-NRT-ORD (UA78, UA882)
Jason8612

Aug 14: BOS-IAD-NRT-ICN (UA285, UA803, UA79)
Deltspygt

Aug 19: ICN-NRT-IAD-BOS (UA78, UA804, UA352)
Deltspygt

Oct 1: UA433-UA893
JeredF +1

Oct 8: UA892-UA242
JeredF +1

Oct 9: BOS-SFO-ICN (UA433, UA893)
BigJC

Oct 13: ICN-NRT-ORD-BOS (UA78, UA882, UA744)
BigJC

Oct 21: BOS-SFO UA433 to SFO-ICN UA893
Sterndogg +1
flyerdude88 (SFO - ICN portion only)

Oct 23: ICN - SFO UA 892
flyerdude88

Oct 27: ICN-SFO UA892 to SFO-BOS UA286
Sterndogg +1

Nov 05: BOS-ORD UA521, ORD-NRT UA881
kokonutz, I012609, BingoSF +1

Nov 11: ICN-SFO UA892, SFO-IAD UA727
kokonutz, I012609, BingoSF +1

Nov 26: BOS-SFO UA433, SFO-NRT UA837, NRT-ICN UA79
thepla

Nov 27: BOS-ORD-NRT-ICN (UA501, UA881, UA196)
BigJC+1

Nov 29: Planning 2 days in TPE, been to ICN
thepla

Dec 1: ICN-SFO UA892, SFO-ORD UA698, ORD-BOS UA961
thepla

Dec 1: ICN-NRT-IAD-BOS (UA78, UA804, UA822)
BigJC+1

Dec 15: BOS-SFO UA433, SFO-ICN UA893
songzm

Dec 25: BOS-IAD UA285, IAD-NRT UA803, NRT-ICN UA79
Dinoscool3 +2

Dec 30: ICN-SFO UA892, SFO-BOS UA444
songzm

Dec 31: ICN-SFO UA892, SFO-BOS UA770
Dinoscool3 +2

Jan 11: BOS-SFO UA1523, Jan 12: SFO-ICN UA893
margarita girl

Jan 12: BOS-SFO UA433, SFO-ICN UA893
Zebranz

14 Jan: BOS-SFO UA433 to SFO-ICN UA893
ORDOGG

19 Jan: ICN-SFO UA892 to SFO-ORD UA698 to ORD-BOS UA961
ORDOGG

Jan 22: ICN-SFO UA892 SFO-BOS UA500
margarita girl

Feb 5: ICN-SFO UA892 SFO-BOS UA242
Zebranz



CMB-DFW EY F

FARE IS GONE

FARE RULES (thanks to SQ421)
FRTLK Fare Rules (RT)
FOWLK Fare Rules (OW)

WHEN ARE YOU FLYING?
Feel free to add any additional cities you're leaving from!
Please slot yourselves in!!!

ex-CMB
Feb

Mar
8 - Darmajaya
12 - Thaidai
22 - Deadinabsentia

Apr
21 - SQ421, penegal, jozdemir
26 - tahsir21

May
28 - Upperdeck744
29 - bonsaisai (positioning flights SIN-CMB, DFW-ORD)

Jun
12 - lelee

Jul
7 - HansGolden +6
8 - arcticbull + 1
11 - bonsaisai's friend (positioning flights: SIN-CMB, DFW-MCI)
25 - Tycosiao
30 - bonsaisai's friend (positioning flights: MCI-DFW, CMB-SIN)

Aug
17 - DC777Fan
26 - Yi Yang
31 - dcas

Sep

Oct

Nov
8 - harryhv
29 - stephem+4

Dec
6 - roastpuff and (soon) Mrs. roastpuff , JFKEZE (UL Code-share)
7 - DWFI
10 - jlisi984 + dad (CMB-AUH-DFW)
21 - bonsaisai (positioning flights SIN-CMB, DFW-ORD)

ex-AUH
Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr
27 - RICHKLHS

May


Jun
29 - yerffej201

Jul
9 - HansGolden +6
27 - Tycosiao

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov
30 - stephem+4 (to JFK)

Dec
7 - JFKEZE, DWFI [EY161 nonstop]
9 - roastpuff and (soon) Mrs. Roastpuff

ex-DFW
Jan

Feb

Mar
14 - Thaidai
15 - zainman +1

Apr
25 - SQ421, penegal, jozdemir

May

Jun

Jul

Aug
22 - arcticbull + 1

Sep
22 - bonsaisai (positioning flights ORD-DFW, CMB-SIN)


Oct

Nov
19 - harryhv->Paris

Dec
19 - Yi Yang, jona970318
24 - DWFI (EY160 nonstop)
26 - HansGolden +6 (CDG), LwoodY2K (AUH)
Print Wikipost

[PREM FARE GONE] RGN First class comes back again!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 8, 2013, 12:48 am
  #7381  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Berlin
Posts: 1,768
Originally Posted by st1575
Through the magic of the RECAP project, I have made the filings in this case (except some proofs of service and cover sheets) freely available to everyone:

http://archive.recapthelaw.org/cacd/533936/
http://archive.org/details/gov.uscourts.cacd.533936

The show cause order is #12 on the docket list. My interest was especially piqued by the exhibits attached to Lufthansa's response to that order (#14).

Enjoy.
I liked this part from #14---Prague, Czechoslovakia.

Or that immediately is 9 days later.

How did this case end up anyways?
largeeyes is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2013, 12:50 am
  #7382  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Seat 2A
Programs: AA EXP LT GLD 1MM, BA GLD, NH/UA*G, Hyatt Dia, Marr Tit LT PLT, IHG Spire,HH Dia, MGM NOIR,Hertz PC
Posts: 10,571
Originally Posted by largeeyes
I liked this part from #14---Prague, Czechoslovakia.

Or that immediately is 9 days later.

How did this case end up anyways?
I did not win the case. Judge decided that I had no immediate damages so there is nothing to be replaced.

Unfortunately the original judge was not available on my court date because of absence, she was initially interested in the case. The new guy was a 'temporary judge' that couldn't be bothered. But I don't want to seek excuses. I fought and lost. And I'm happy LH had to spend some money along the way.
skywalkerLAX is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2013, 12:55 am
  #7383  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 612
Originally Posted by st1575
Through the magic of the RECAP project, I have made the filings in this case (except some proofs of service and cover sheets) freely available to everyone:

http://archive.recapthelaw.org/cacd/533936/
http://archive.org/details/gov.uscourts.cacd.533936

The show cause order is #12 on the docket list. My interest was especially piqued by the exhibits attached to Lufthansa's response to that order (#14).

Enjoy.
Wonderful to see. Keep us informed as to proceedings and final result. Thanks.
tangoll is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2013, 1:03 am
  #7384  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: BHX
Programs: BA GGL CCR GfL, SQ Gold, Hyatt Glob, HH Diamond, Marriott Plat, Cafe Nero Loyalty Card (7 Stamps)
Posts: 7,379
Originally Posted by skywalkerLAX
Legally not relevant but as so often there are different point of views.

Base is on a simple fact situation like booking 2 separate tickets and having a misconnect on ticket one. The airline is not obliged to do anything for you because their contract starts and ends with the first and last cupon of the individual tickets. It is the OPs problem (and our all since we often like to play this game).

I had booked this ticket as well and it got cxl. But never in this world would I have purchased my feeder flights for money if I wasn't absolutely sure this would fly. Lesson learned.
As I've said before, I think it often comes down to where you're filing. There are bound to be different rules in different juristictions.

In the UK I'm perfectly entitled to claim for reasonable associated costs in SCC.
Wozza2404 is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2013, 1:07 am
  #7385  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Seat 2A
Programs: AA EXP LT GLD 1MM, BA GLD, NH/UA*G, Hyatt Dia, Marr Tit LT PLT, IHG Spire,HH Dia, MGM NOIR,Hertz PC
Posts: 10,571
Originally Posted by tangoll
Wonderful to see. Keep us informed as to proceedings and final result. Thanks.
Case is closed. Court hearing was held as originally assigned and the judge decided. No damages to be paid.
skywalkerLAX is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2013, 1:10 am
  #7386  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Seat 2A
Programs: AA EXP LT GLD 1MM, BA GLD, NH/UA*G, Hyatt Dia, Marr Tit LT PLT, IHG Spire,HH Dia, MGM NOIR,Hertz PC
Posts: 10,571
Originally Posted by Wozza2404
As I've said before, I think it often comes down to where you're filing. There are bound to be different rules in different juristictions.

In the UK I'm perfectly entitled to claim for reasonable associated costs in SCC.
Of course, especially if we speak about filing in totally different countries based on a different type of law.

Even within the U.S. the practices of SCC are very different depending on the state you are filing in.
skywalkerLAX is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2013, 1:24 am
  #7387  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denmark
Programs: TK Elite
Posts: 12,030
True. Tort law in civil law countries: No loss/damage = no compensation. Forget about punitive damages.
SK AAR is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2013, 1:47 am
  #7388  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: TLL
Programs: QR Platinum
Posts: 37
Just planning my 2nd r3 positioning flight.
Has anyone managed to do RGN turnaround with MH?
mmkk is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2013, 1:49 am
  #7389  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 989
need advice fellow flyertalkers, I received the dreaded email from TL that my UL ticketed stock RGN-KUL-SIN-LHR-YUL has a schedule change that will make me mis-connected. When i logged in to check, it seems that the KUL-SIN leg has been dropped off. I went to MH website to look for an alternative flight and it shows that my original flight was still flying. Who should I call? MH or TL? is this a sign that my R3 booking is in trouble?
babypuwet is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2013, 1:56 am
  #7390  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: AU
Programs: former Olympic Airways Gold (yeah - still proud of that!)
Posts: 14,411
Originally Posted by SK AAR
True. Tort law in civil law countries: No loss/damage = no compensation. Forget about punitive damages.
although we are talking about contract law here. And for contract law there is also anticipatory breach. Which it would seem to be a prima facie case of here if you haven't already travelled. Whether or not you are successful would depend on arguments around contract law.
LHR/MEL/Europe FF is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2013, 2:10 am
  #7391  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denmark
Programs: TK Elite
Posts: 12,030
My mistake. Yes, this is contract law. Nevertheless, even for anticipatory breach of contract, you need to establish a loss to be able to recover under civil law. No judge will award compensation if there is no loss/damage.
SK AAR is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2013, 2:25 am
  #7392  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: AU
Programs: former Olympic Airways Gold (yeah - still proud of that!)
Posts: 14,411
Originally Posted by SK AAR
My mistake. Yes, this is contract law. Nevertheless, even for anticipatory breach of contract, you need to establish a loss to be able to recover under civil law. No judge will award compensation if there is no loss/damage.
although courts are sometimes reluctant to order specific performance, I'm wondering if this might actually be a prime example of where it would be an appropriate remedy.
LHR/MEL/Europe FF is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2013, 2:30 am
  #7393  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denmark
Programs: TK Elite
Posts: 12,030
Yes, an appropriate remedy/solution but no civil law judge would order specifik performance. How would you enforce such judgment/order?
SK AAR is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2013, 3:03 am
  #7394  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: BHX
Programs: BA GGL CCR GfL, SQ Gold, Hyatt Glob, HH Diamond, Marriott Plat, Cafe Nero Loyalty Card (7 Stamps)
Posts: 7,379
Originally Posted by SK AAR
My mistake. Yes, this is contract law. Nevertheless, even for anticipatory breach of contract, you need to establish a loss to be able to recover under civil law. No judge will award compensation if there is no loss/damage.
The argument is that you've "lost" the right to travel from XXX-YYY in Z cabin. A right for which you paid.

Your claim is therefore the replacement cost of that ticket.

This is assuming you haven't started the journey. The procedure would be a little different for those who were stranded and/or downgraded en route.
Wozza2404 is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2013, 3:19 am
  #7395  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Seat 2A
Programs: AA EXP LT GLD 1MM, BA GLD, NH/UA*G, Hyatt Dia, Marr Tit LT PLT, IHG Spire,HH Dia, MGM NOIR,Hertz PC
Posts: 10,571
Originally Posted by LHR/MEL/Europe FF
although courts are sometimes reluctant to order specific performance, I'm wondering if this might actually be a prime example of where it would be an appropriate remedy.
I agree with this. However then you would have to probably sue in civil court and not the Small Claims Division. This would require extensive arguments and litigation from both sides for which SCC is not set up, at least not in the U.S.
skywalkerLAX is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.