2 Questions
#16




Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Formerly of SacTown, Cali
Posts: 1,279
Totally off topic you mention Knoxville. I arrived late into Knoxville about 15 years ago (definitely pre 9/11). Went to the rental car counter by baggage claim, did the paperwork, and they told me my car would waiting out front for me with the keys in it. Sure enough. Just parked out front, at the curb, not a soul in sight. Loved that!
#17
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Aug 2002
Programs: UALifetimePremierGold, Marriott LifetimeTitanium
Posts: 74,167
Cheers.
#18




Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: IAD
Programs: UA Gold, Marriott Rewards - LTPP
Posts: 4,242
Slightly off topic but this is where I think Marriott really shows they do not care about frequent guests. They are just the Sears or JC Penny's of hotels. If you called a Nordstrom level hotel they show some love. This is really a shame in my opinion. Here's a potential customer who could, obviously, be a VERY good customer. Yet they don't even make him feel good. I have ranted on this before but here's yet another example. Also, to the OP, other than free internet or more Marriott Rewards pesos you don't get much with gold (or plat). This is why I am trying a couple of competitors this year... not that Marriott will care about losing another plat customer.
Totally off topic you mention Knoxville. I arrived late into Knoxville about 15 years ago (definitely pre 9/11). Went to the rental car counter by baggage claim, did the paperwork, and they told me my car would waiting out front for me with the keys in it. Sure enough. Just parked out front, at the curb, not a soul in sight. Loved that!
Totally off topic you mention Knoxville. I arrived late into Knoxville about 15 years ago (definitely pre 9/11). Went to the rental car counter by baggage claim, did the paperwork, and they told me my car would waiting out front for me with the keys in it. Sure enough. Just parked out front, at the curb, not a soul in sight. Loved that!
Business travel is up so travel companies are less dependent on any one particular person. I personally think Marriott does care a lot about me, nearly every time I've had to call customer service the issue was resolved to my satisfaction. I'd hardly compare Marriott to Sears or JC Penny, especially when I stay at FS, Ren or JWs. But again, YMMV. Marriott has a huge, diverse array of properties all over the world.
I've said this ad nauseam in the United forum, but you need to decide for yourself why you value a particular chain. United worked for me because I was a hub captive and I preferred direct flights. Some people were wronged on a particular incident, didn't get much out of MP, decreased upgrade percentage, etc. Some people left for good, others thought the grass wasn't so green on the other side.
#19
FlyerTalk Evangelist


Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: CPH
Programs: UAMP S, TK M&S E (*G), Marriott LTP, IHG P, SK EBG
Posts: 12,781
I agree that Marriott has better CS is not bad - they are very nice in general (with one or two exceptions). IHG on the other hand, is totally hopeless - their CS has no power whatsoever, and they can't resolve issues between customers and hotels.
#20
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 827
buying non-CXL rates, either by Adv Pay or allowing the new CXL policy to lapse carries inherent losses just like buying a non-CXLable seat on an airline.
in both cases the hotel room, or airline seat, is taken off the market and made non-available to others. The flip side is liability onto the hotel/airline for oversells.
the protection for both is to have travel insurance.
I don't see why the hotel should lose out of a non-CXL due to the personal situation of the OP which the hotel has not had any part in creating.
sometimes you just must take some responsibility.
at least that's my opinion which others are more then free to agree or disagree with in whole or in part as isn't that the purpose of this open forum (besides having the same questions repeatedly asked and answered and bragging how this or that OP "beat" the rules)?
in both cases the hotel room, or airline seat, is taken off the market and made non-available to others. The flip side is liability onto the hotel/airline for oversells.
the protection for both is to have travel insurance.
I don't see why the hotel should lose out of a non-CXL due to the personal situation of the OP which the hotel has not had any part in creating.
sometimes you just must take some responsibility.
at least that's my opinion which others are more then free to agree or disagree with in whole or in part as isn't that the purpose of this open forum (besides having the same questions repeatedly asked and answered and bragging how this or that OP "beat" the rules)?
However, until the new (as of beginning of this year) policy of having to cancel 1 day in advance, most properties would allow someone to cancel in an IRROPS situation. Now there are reports that some properties are sticking to the no-waiver on cancel even in IRROPs, which (if the OP had not done a prepaid) would seem to be the case here.
Cheers.
Cheers.
Last edited by leeky; Apr 21, 2015 at 4:38 am
#21
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Aug 2002
Programs: UALifetimePremierGold, Marriott LifetimeTitanium
Posts: 74,167
Actually in the case of a hotel room it still is available to others/can be rebooked, so the hotel "double dips".
In IRROPs (vs. just changing one's mind) it's not unreasonable to expect/hope the hotel would waive the cancellation fee. Marriott brands have traditionally done that - and many are still doing it even with the new policy. However, some properties are doing the hard line thing. Those are usually (anecdotal here) the properties that lack in cust service in other ways/do only the minimum according to reports.
Perhaps we should start a thread on which properties are waiving the 1-day cancel in IRROPS vs. sticking to it.
I'm sure the OP would have preferred to actually stay at the Lex per his ressie rather than get stuck in Knoxville w/ a flight cancellation.
Cheers.
In IRROPs (vs. just changing one's mind) it's not unreasonable to expect/hope the hotel would waive the cancellation fee. Marriott brands have traditionally done that - and many are still doing it even with the new policy. However, some properties are doing the hard line thing. Those are usually (anecdotal here) the properties that lack in cust service in other ways/do only the minimum according to reports.
Perhaps we should start a thread on which properties are waiving the 1-day cancel in IRROPS vs. sticking to it.
I'm sure the OP would have preferred to actually stay at the Lex per his ressie rather than get stuck in Knoxville w/ a flight cancellation.
Cheers.
#22
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: DL PM, MM, NR; HH Diamond, Bonvoy LT Gold, Hyatt Explorist, IHG Diamond, others
Posts: 12,163
#23
FlyerTalk Evangelist


Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: CPH
Programs: UAMP S, TK M&S E (*G), Marriott LTP, IHG P, SK EBG
Posts: 12,781
Originally Posted by Hipps78 View Post
I must have terrible luck, called MR and stated I just completed my 50th night and asked if my account could be updated to show as a gold member before my arrival tonight and all I got was no, it will take 7 days to post.
I must have terrible luck, called MR and stated I just completed my 50th night and asked if my account could be updated to show as a gold member before my arrival tonight and all I got was no, it will take 7 days to post.
#24
Join Date: Dec 2014
Programs: Marriott Gold, SPG Gold, Hilton Gold, Best Western Diamond
Posts: 364
What credit card did you use to pay for the hotel? Did it have travel insurance? See if a flight cancellation is covered in the policy, and then you may be able to get your hotel cancellation fees reimbursed from the insurance.
#25
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: LA
Posts: 1,281
However, until the new (as of beginning of this year) policy of having to cancel 1 day in advance, most properties would allow someone to cancel in an IRROPS situation. Now there are reports that some properties are sticking to the no-waiver on cancel even in IRROPs, which (if the OP had not done a prepaid) would seem to be the case here.
Cheers.
Cheers.

