How to dump Marriott
#31


Join Date: Dec 2018
Programs: $9 Fare Club
Posts: 1,654
I think the bigger issue is that the program isn't really delivering on promised benefits. For example, I am regularly denied a 4PM check-out unless I go through the whole "I'm guaranteed this benefit" song and dance. To me, "over entitled" mean asking for more than you're supposed to get, i.e. free breakfast for Golds or RC suite upgrades for Plats. If Marriott thinks its footprint is all people care about, why bother guaranteeing benefits they aren't going to deliver?
Be it vacation or business, I want to waste neither the time nor energy to remedy situations where the published benefits should accrue without question.
But as noted; Capuano views loyalty as an irritation evidently. He'll reap what he sows there I'd posit, and not before long.
#32
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AA EXP; UA 1MM & PP; Marriott AMB; Hyatt Globalist; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 62,274
The comments just confirm what we've known for a while, that Marriott's C Suite now views elite benefits as primarily a marketing gimmick, and doesn't really care that much whether they're actually delivered.
That said, there is still value in the Marriott program, though it depends more than ever on the business philosophy of individual hotel ownership, as opposed to corporate-enforced standards.
The critical point for me was when CY Solana Beach downgraded my paid room assignment and put me in one of the worst rooms on the property (as an ambassador). I walked, and rebooked at HR Mission Bay on points, where they upgraded me (as an explorist) to a corner marina view suite. Game, set, match Hyatt.
That said, there is still value in the Marriott program, though it depends more than ever on the business philosophy of individual hotel ownership, as opposed to corporate-enforced standards.
Agreed, I am measly gold with Marriot and no Status with Hyatt(Husband is discoverist though) . We have gotten better service at Hyatt on the last 2 trips than at Marriot. The issue for me is not even the benefits , the main issue is the way they've treated us the past few stays.
#33




Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: SDF/TLV/ATL
Programs: AA EXP, UA LT Ag, Marriott LT Ti, Hyatt Glob, Avis PC, Busted-Knuckles Club.
Posts: 3,021
I have Hyatt Globalist status which tbh has been a little overhyped here. I've found it and Marriott Ti to be about the same. Obvs the former's small footprint is a barrier, but if there's two reasonably-equivalent and -priced properties in question it'll come down to which one is the newest build, has free parking, and has a real shower not a gross old bathtub. I don't eat breakfast so any freebies there are wasted on me. Just coffee pls.
#34


Join Date: Oct 2009
Programs: Marriott Bonvoy, World of Hyatt, CX Asia Miles, ANA, AS, and several other FFP
Posts: 426
One factor lost when talking about the Bonvoy loyalty program is how mediocre, at best, the point earning and redemption opportunities are. Sure, Plats can earn a 50% Bonus, and Titanium/Ambassadors can earn a 75% bonus on stays. Credit Card Bonvoy points earning is pitiful. Even at Hilton, with their inflated points totals for earnings and award redemptions, there are often promotions like earning triple points recently. There are some occasional values when redeeming Hilton points at 60000 levels per night, or 95000 levels, with 5th night free. I would rather earn and burn Hilton Honors points for award redemptions, than with Bonvoy. For Bonvoy, it is rare to hear about an awesome point redemption for an aspirational property. Hyatt is also decent sometimes for point award redemption opportunities, although it is often overrated. World of Hyatt is still better than Bonvoy for point redemptions. Maybe Bonvoy enthusiasts can hang their hat that Bonvoy earn and burn is better than IHG, and I won't argue. Congrats for not winning the race to the bottom; Bonvoy will merely place or show.
The Marriott CEO has conceded that Bonvoy is not supposed to be competitive. Not a good way to sell potential guests.
The Marriott CEO has conceded that Bonvoy is not supposed to be competitive. Not a good way to sell potential guests.
#35
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,439
Or you can just stay in whichever hotel you prefer in a given city and not give a toss about status at all. For example, if Im in Bangkok Ill stay at the MO. If Im in Zurich I might stay at the Baur au Lac. If Im in NY Ill stay at the Mark. I could not care less about points or night credits. I cate about the fact that local staff recognize me and treat me as a repeat guest.
#36


Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Everywhere
Programs: AA EXP - 4MM, Bonv LIFETIME Titan, HH Dmd, Hyatt Glob., Priority Clb Dmd, Ntnl Exec El., Sixt PLT
Posts: 1,771
- Bonvoy is getting less and less competitive because there is no promo in sight. Another issue is the Elite recognition which went downhill even in the former SPG properties, Right now I have a business trip to Atlanta where I will be staying in downtown for 5 nights. Plenty of choices between Bonvoy, Hilton, and Hyatt. I was in Atlanta in June as an Explorist was given a nice corner room at Hyatt Regency, With the triple point promo + AA promo I will likely to go with the same Hyatt and become the Globalist for the following stays this year. I would still stay in Bonvoy properties because of location but the advantages of the largest hotel chain are not universal. There are locations where I would go with Bonvoy or Hilton but there several locations where IHG and Hyatt would be my primarily choices. In the past I always though about Marriott as a competitor to Hilton but not SPG or Hyatt. Hilton has a good footprint in the USA and there is not much difference in the minimal service or Elite recognition. However, right now Hilton wins because of continuing promos and strong CC (Aspire). This is why I did not see a point of staying with Marriott in the past (i.e., pre-SPG acquisition). Just jump to Hilton and you will not see much difference except a better kickback.
#38




Join Date: May 2003
Location: 1 hour from Khao Yai, Thailand. No longer Bangkok, China, Taiwan , Palm Coast, FL, LA, or Chicago though still exiled, again, from the Bay Area.
Programs: Only the good ones
Posts: 5,574
Normally I'd agree with you but when you have the CEO of Marriott all but admit he doesn't care about the guest and only cares about the billionaire owners and mgmt companies that to me takes it to a different level. I spend lots of money with this company. To read this guy's uncaring remarks has for the first time really opened my eyes to giving another chain my 60k a year that would appreciate it.
#39




Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: South Korea
Posts: 1,219
For someone like me who travels mostly to luxury locations for holidays on my own dime, getting Elite status has become all but meaningless when you have Virtuoso + Amex FHR... ESPECIALLY when considering the benefits being diluted.
I still have lifetime plat though, but had I known in my 20s that there'd be FHR & Virtuoso and that the elite benefits would be watered down like this I probably wouldn't have been so loyal.
I still have lifetime plat though, but had I known in my 20s that there'd be FHR & Virtuoso and that the elite benefits would be watered down like this I probably wouldn't have been so loyal.
Last edited by jaejaez; Jul 23, 2021 at 2:21 am
#40




Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: DCA
Posts: 7,777
Or you can just stay in whichever hotel you prefer in a given city and not give a toss about status at all. For example, if Im in Bangkok Ill stay at the MO. If Im in Zurich I might stay at the Baur au Lac. If Im in NY Ill stay at the Mark. I could not care less about points or night credits. I cate about the fact that local staff recognize me and treat me as a repeat guest.
#41
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,439
I'm just telling you my travel preferences. You can replace any of those names with other places that are far more interesting to stay in than a Marriott or Hilton.
#42




Join Date: May 2003
Location: 1 hour from Khao Yai, Thailand. No longer Bangkok, China, Taiwan , Palm Coast, FL, LA, or Chicago though still exiled, again, from the Bay Area.
Programs: Only the good ones
Posts: 5,574
#43




Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: IAD
Programs: Free Agent
Posts: 1,959
Or you can just stay in whichever hotel you prefer in a given city and not give a toss about status at all. For example, if Im in Bangkok Ill stay at the MO. If Im in Zurich I might stay at the Baur au Lac. If Im in NY Ill stay at the Mark. I could not care less about points or night credits. I cate about the fact that local staff recognize me and treat me as a repeat guest.
#44
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AA EXP; UA 1MM & PP; Marriott AMB; Hyatt Globalist; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 62,274
#45
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Manhattan, Palm Beach Island, San Francisco, Boston, & Hong Kong
Programs: Lifetime United Global Services, Delta Plat, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Ambassador, & Hilton Diamond
Posts: 3,165
- Bonvoy is getting less and less competitive because there is no promo in sight. Another issue is the Elite recognition which went downhill even in the former SPG properties, Right now I have a business trip to Atlanta where I will be staying in downtown for 5 nights. Plenty of choices between Bonvoy, Hilton, and Hyatt. I was in Atlanta in June as an Explorist was given a nice corner room at Hyatt Regency, With the triple point promo + AA promo I will likely to go with the same Hyatt and become the Globalist for the following stays this year. I would still stay in Bonvoy properties because of location but the advantages of the largest hotel chain are not universal. There are locations where I would go with Bonvoy or Hilton but there several locations where IHG and Hyatt would be my primarily choices. In the past I always though about Marriott as a competitor to Hilton but not SPG or Hyatt. Hilton has a good footprint in the USA and there is not much difference in the minimal service or Elite recognition. However, right now Hilton wins because of continuing promos and strong CC (Aspire). This is why I did not see a point of staying with Marriott in the past (i.e., pre-SPG acquisition). Just jump to Hilton and you will not see much difference except a better kickback.
I agree 100%. Love the hotels but dislike the program.

