More Benefits for Ambassadors and Titaniums By Devaluing Platinum Benefits?
#91
Join Date: Apr 2015
Programs: Some
Posts: 5,252
That is a fair point, but surely an upgrade to a suite is then worth more to that family that the breakfast given the space / saving? I suppose I worded it badly, my point wasn't that I don't see any value at all in breakfast, it was more I struggle a bit with people here preferring $50 of free breakfast as a benefit to a suite upgrade worth multiple times that.
#92
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2010
Programs: DL, OZ, AC, AS, AA, BA, Hilton, Hyatt, Marriott, IHG
Posts: 19,901
Ehhh.. maybe try a intellectually stimulating exercise by thinking a little beyond your own situation... some of us actually pay for breakfast for a whole family out of our own pocket ....or maybe you can expense your personal travel as well, then that is an interesting corporate travel policy
#93
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2010
Programs: DL, OZ, AC, AS, AA, BA, Hilton, Hyatt, Marriott, IHG
Posts: 19,901
That is a fair point, but surely an upgrade to a suite is then worth more to that family that the breakfast given the space / saving? I suppose I worded it badly, my point wasn't that I don't see any value at all in breakfast, it was more I struggle a bit with people here preferring $50 of free breakfast as a benefit to a suite upgrade worth multiple times that.
#94
Join Date: Apr 2015
Programs: Some
Posts: 5,252
I understand the logistical constraints on offering a suite upgrade for all eligible members at many hotels, but why does this impact whether a loyalty scheme member would prefer a suite upgrade or free breakfast? The fact that not everyone can get a suite all the time is exactly why I posted SNAs should start clearing at a date based on status a few posts ago.
#95
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 816
If for arguments sake everyone got a suite upgrade when eligible then it will increase its desirability as a benefit. Since this is never going to happen free breakfast seems more desirable as it is guaranteed and has less variability in terms of its value.
#96
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 17
Given the downturn in travel PLUS the tact that many companies now realize that there is no need for all that travel as the job still gets done AND by eliminating a good portion of corporate travel the companies save a lot of money, THE MORE LIKELY SCENARIO is that a good number of hotels will close permanently, those that stay open will not have the conferences, meetings etc as well as not sell out and there will be lots of space in the lounges. I don't think Marriott would be giving out all the 50% night benefit if they thought that business would continue as before. As an example I travel more than 100 nights a year (or at least I did until Covid-19). This year I will have less than 20 nights and not many more in the future until Covid either disappears or there is a vaccine. I don't think that I am the exception but rather more the way of the future.
I'd also love to know how many of the Titanium's and Ambassador's here are complaining b/c they achieve status on their own dime or b/c of company travel. Wanting the "little people" to get less just b/c your company puts you in an airplane and hotel for an ungodly number of days/year...no. Tell Marriott you want more (by taking biz elsewhere if need be), don't screw the people who happen to have a better work/life balance!
#97
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 17
Originally Posted by bocastephen View Post
The entire hotel experience in Asia for SPG (Marriott) was night and day different from the same branded hotel in the USA - for example, Sheraton Taipei, Taiwan, the lounge has a check-in desk, only authorized guests are permitted in the lounge (additional guests have a very steep entry fee), countless beverages, ample snacks and full meal service for breakfast and dinner, lots of available seats, a clean, well maintained space, proper use of buffet (no hands, no reusing dirty dishes), no children, no noise.
Contrast with Sheraton Garden Grove or the Sheraton LAX, no entry requirements, unauthorized people door crashing behind others who refuse to block them, lounge attendants don't care, no seating, food mess everywhere, children running around like animals, people carting off towers of food to bring to family waiting in their room, dirty hands digging into food bowls, reuse of dirty plates, noisy, chaotic and stressful. In other locations, long after the lounge was closed, I've stumbled on private parties guests seem entitled to use the lounge for until I can get security to throw them out.
The root cause is at the hotel level with a complete lack of policies and procedures, staff who don't give a crap, and guests allowed to run amok like animals. If we want the lounges to be a clean, comfortable, orderly place, there are simple changes that need to occur at the hotel management level, not changes at the loyalty level, aside from excluding members who are not full members due to some airline, credit card or car rental affiliation.
In the US it's our constitutional right to not follow rules. It's like the 33rd amendment or something. Right before not having to wear a mask.
The entire hotel experience in Asia for SPG (Marriott) was night and day different from the same branded hotel in the USA - for example, Sheraton Taipei, Taiwan, the lounge has a check-in desk, only authorized guests are permitted in the lounge (additional guests have a very steep entry fee), countless beverages, ample snacks and full meal service for breakfast and dinner, lots of available seats, a clean, well maintained space, proper use of buffet (no hands, no reusing dirty dishes), no children, no noise.
Contrast with Sheraton Garden Grove or the Sheraton LAX, no entry requirements, unauthorized people door crashing behind others who refuse to block them, lounge attendants don't care, no seating, food mess everywhere, children running around like animals, people carting off towers of food to bring to family waiting in their room, dirty hands digging into food bowls, reuse of dirty plates, noisy, chaotic and stressful. In other locations, long after the lounge was closed, I've stumbled on private parties guests seem entitled to use the lounge for until I can get security to throw them out.
The root cause is at the hotel level with a complete lack of policies and procedures, staff who don't give a crap, and guests allowed to run amok like animals. If we want the lounges to be a clean, comfortable, orderly place, there are simple changes that need to occur at the hotel management level, not changes at the loyalty level, aside from excluding members who are not full members due to some airline, credit card or car rental affiliation.
In the US it's our constitutional right to not follow rules. It's like the 33rd amendment or something. Right before not having to wear a mask.
#98
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2010
Programs: DL, OZ, AC, AS, AA, BA, Hilton, Hyatt, Marriott, IHG
Posts: 19,901
But it is the logistical constraints that make suite upgrades less desirable.
If for arguments sake everyone got a suite upgrade when eligible then it will increase its desirability as a benefit. Since this is never going to happen free breakfast seems more desirable as it is guaranteed and has less variability in terms of its value.
If for arguments sake everyone got a suite upgrade when eligible then it will increase its desirability as a benefit. Since this is never going to happen free breakfast seems more desirable as it is guaranteed and has less variability in terms of its value.
#99
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: British Columbia
Programs: AS MVPG100K, Marriott Marriott Titanium Elite, Hilton Gold
Posts: 7,263
Prior to Bonvoy, RewardsPlus was a partnership between Marriott Rewards & MileagePlus. UA Elites who attained Premier Gold or higher were "granted" a complimentary Marriott Rewards Gold Membership which included lounge access in the Marriott Rewards program.
When Marriott Rewards was rolled into Bonvoy with SPG & Ritz Carlton, UA Premier Gold Members and higher were "granted" a complimentary membership in Bonvoy Gold. The RewardsPlus partnership, now between Marriott Bonvoy and MileagePlus, was a clear "devaluation" for UA Elites. That was likely a conscious business decision between Marriott & UA to not only reduced the number of Bonvoy members that were "granted" lounge access but to also level the disparity of benefits between MileagePlus Premiere Gold+ Elites & Marriott Bonvoy Titanium+ Elites.
James
#100
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Saipan, MP 96950 USA (Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands = the CNMI)
Programs: UA Silver, Hilton Silver. Life: UA .57 MM, United & Admirals Clubs (spousal), Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,051
Marriott Rewards Gold Elite required 50-74 nights. (It is now called Marriott Bonv°y Platinum Elite.)
Marriott Bonv°y Gold Elite requires 25-49 nights. This intermediate status did not exist under Marriott Rewards. (It was formerly encompassed by Marriott Rewards Silver Elite, at 10-49 nights.)
#101
Join Date: May 2003
Location: LCY
Programs: SQ Krisflyer, QR Privilege Club, MB LT Plt (1K+ nights thx MB)
Posts: 1,038
Where is the confusion? Marriott Rewards is defunct. Therefore, comparing anything to Marriott Rewards Gold, which no longer exists, doesn't make any sense. Marriott is the company, Bonvoy is the Loyalty Program of which all SPG, Ritz Carlton & Marriott's Loyalty Program Members became a member of.
Prior to Bonvoy, RewardsPlus was a partnership between Marriott Rewards & MileagePlus. UA Elites who attained Premier Gold or higher were "granted" a complimentary Marriott Rewards Gold Membership which included lounge access in the Marriott Rewards program.
When Marriott Rewards was rolled into Bonvoy with SPG & Ritz Carlton, UA Premier Gold Members and higher were "granted" a complimentary membership in Bonvoy Gold. The RewardsPlus partnership, now between Marriott Bonvoy and MileagePlus, was a clear "devaluation" for UA Elites. That was likely a conscious business decision between Marriott & UA to not only reduced the number of Bonvoy members that were "granted" lounge access but to also level the disparity of benefits between MileagePlus Premiere Gold+ Elites & Marriott Bonvoy Titanium+ Elites.
James
Prior to Bonvoy, RewardsPlus was a partnership between Marriott Rewards & MileagePlus. UA Elites who attained Premier Gold or higher were "granted" a complimentary Marriott Rewards Gold Membership which included lounge access in the Marriott Rewards program.
When Marriott Rewards was rolled into Bonvoy with SPG & Ritz Carlton, UA Premier Gold Members and higher were "granted" a complimentary membership in Bonvoy Gold. The RewardsPlus partnership, now between Marriott Bonvoy and MileagePlus, was a clear "devaluation" for UA Elites. That was likely a conscious business decision between Marriott & UA to not only reduced the number of Bonvoy members that were "granted" lounge access but to also level the disparity of benefits between MileagePlus Premiere Gold+ Elites & Marriott Bonvoy Titanium+ Elites.
James
#102
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: British Columbia
Programs: AS MVPG100K, Marriott Marriott Titanium Elite, Hilton Gold
Posts: 7,263
Actually, the creation of a new, lower level status, with the same name as a former higher level one, is what caused the confusion.
Marriott Rewards Gold Elite required 50-74 nights. (It is now called Marriott Bonv°y Platinum Elite.)
Marriott Bonv°y Gold Elite requires 25-49 nights. This intermediate status did not exist under Marriott Rewards. (It was formerly encompassed by Marriott Rewards Silver Elite, at 10-49 nights.)
Marriott Rewards Gold Elite required 50-74 nights. (It is now called Marriott Bonv°y Platinum Elite.)
Marriott Bonv°y Gold Elite requires 25-49 nights. This intermediate status did not exist under Marriott Rewards. (It was formerly encompassed by Marriott Rewards Silver Elite, at 10-49 nights.)
James
Last edited by Flying for Fun; Jun 20, 2020 at 12:51 pm
#103
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: British Columbia
Programs: AS MVPG100K, Marriott Marriott Titanium Elite, Hilton Gold
Posts: 7,263
That is why I highlighted in red that Marriott Rewards Gold is not the same as Marriott Bonvoy Gold. Rewards Gold became Bonvoy Platinum, Rewards Platinum became Bonvoy Titanium & a new officially "recognized" Bonvoy Ambassador Elite status with 100+ EQNs "&" $20K spend requirement was added.
James
James
#104
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: SFO
Posts: 4,914
That is why I highlighted in red that Marriott Rewards Gold is not the same as Marriott Bonvoy Gold. Rewards Gold became Bonvoy Platinum, Rewards Platinum became Bonvoy Titanium & a new officially "recognized" Bonvoy Ambassador Elite status with 100+ EQNs "&" $20K spend requirement was added.
James
James
Unfortunately the new program has higher levels than what was combined from SPG, and to that, all I can say is, it is what it is at this point 2 years later. All those are staying are staying. All those that are leaving only leave until you need to come back for a quickie to use your (LT) benefits. All the kicking and screaming ones are still secretly staying .
#105
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: British Columbia
Programs: AS MVPG100K, Marriott Marriott Titanium Elite, Hilton Gold
Posts: 7,263
And we wonder why Lounge Crowding was an issue at that time? S(ome) P(ossible) G(uesses).
James