Marriott and Sheraton brand differences?
#1
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 207
Marriott and Sheraton brand differences?
What differences can I expect between a Sheraton and a Marriott?
Specifically, I'm looking for an airport hotel at FRA. They split the Sheraton into two: One half is gonna remain as Sheraton, the other half will open as a Marriott in November. (By then, the entire complex will have been renovated.)
I'm new to the Marriott chain (hence the question). But I thought those two brands were in the same market segment. Wikipedia says they're both positioned as "premium classic." So I find their move a bit confusing.
Does Marriott have any brand book I could look at if I'm unsure about the positioning of their brands
Specifically, I'm looking for an airport hotel at FRA. They split the Sheraton into two: One half is gonna remain as Sheraton, the other half will open as a Marriott in November. (By then, the entire complex will have been renovated.)
I'm new to the Marriott chain (hence the question). But I thought those two brands were in the same market segment. Wikipedia says they're both positioned as "premium classic." So I find their move a bit confusing.
Does Marriott have any brand book I could look at if I'm unsure about the positioning of their brands
#2
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: In the air
Programs: Hyatt Globalist, Bonvoy LT Plat, Hilton Gold, GHA Tit, BA Gold, Turkish Elite
Posts: 8,720
Marginal difference really, especially given the FRA Sheraton looks quite a bit like the new brand of Marriott. You'll see some trends here and there and over time each brand had their own attributes (Sheraton had/ has a terrible Link Cafe in its middle aged branches), but generally they're two different sorts of out-dated poorly designed American style mid-level hotel. Both have lounges (the Sheraton FRA's lounge is/ was quite good).
#3
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: SLC/HEL/Anywhere with a Beach
Programs: Marriott Ambassador; AA EXP 3MM; AS MVP, Hilton Gold, CH-47/UH-60/C-23/C-130 VET
Posts: 5,234
There's two parts of the answer.
First, in Eastern Europe, South America, and Australia, there's not a lot of difference in the brand standard and in many cases, they aren't in the same countries.
I haven't stayed in Sheraton's in Western Europe or Asia, as the Marriott choices there are generally excellent.
)_
In the US, Marriott's are usually better than Sheraton's which are all over the place ranging from a dump to a perfectly acceptable business property. Having just spent a couple of days at a well-maintained Sheraton, one noticeable difference in the US is the lounge. The Marriott brand standard has the lounge open every S-Thursday night, that's not a Sheraton requirement. Also, the Marriott brand standard has a better breakfast standard than Sheraton (meat, not just eggs, more fruit and yogurt). The Sheraton standard doesn't seem much better than a Fairfield Inn, except for real plates and silverware. The evening snacks at the Sheraton lounge are also below the Marriott standard. I've probably stayed at 5-10 Sheraton's in the US and that's pretty consistent.
Bizarre though to split a building in Frankfurt between Sheraton and Marriott. Would be very interesting to understand the thought process.
First, in Eastern Europe, South America, and Australia, there's not a lot of difference in the brand standard and in many cases, they aren't in the same countries.
I haven't stayed in Sheraton's in Western Europe or Asia, as the Marriott choices there are generally excellent.
)_
In the US, Marriott's are usually better than Sheraton's which are all over the place ranging from a dump to a perfectly acceptable business property. Having just spent a couple of days at a well-maintained Sheraton, one noticeable difference in the US is the lounge. The Marriott brand standard has the lounge open every S-Thursday night, that's not a Sheraton requirement. Also, the Marriott brand standard has a better breakfast standard than Sheraton (meat, not just eggs, more fruit and yogurt). The Sheraton standard doesn't seem much better than a Fairfield Inn, except for real plates and silverware. The evening snacks at the Sheraton lounge are also below the Marriott standard. I've probably stayed at 5-10 Sheraton's in the US and that's pretty consistent.
Bizarre though to split a building in Frankfurt between Sheraton and Marriott. Would be very interesting to understand the thought process.
#4
Join Date: Apr 2015
Programs: Some
Posts: 5,252
There's two parts of the answer.
First, in Eastern Europe, South America, and Australia, there's not a lot of difference in the brand standard and in many cases, they aren't in the same countries.
I haven't stayed in Sheraton's in Western Europe or Asia, as the Marriott choices there are generally excellent.
)_
In the US, Marriott's are usually better than Sheraton's which are all over the place ranging from a dump to a perfectly acceptable business property. Having just spent a couple of days at a well-maintained Sheraton, one noticeable difference in the US is the lounge. The Marriott brand standard has the lounge open every S-Thursday night, that's not a Sheraton requirement. Also, the Marriott brand standard has a better breakfast standard than Sheraton (meat, not just eggs, more fruit and yogurt). The Sheraton standard doesn't seem much better than a Fairfield Inn, except for real plates and silverware. The evening snacks at the Sheraton lounge are also below the Marriott standard. I've probably stayed at 5-10 Sheraton's in the US and that's pretty consistent.
Bizarre though to split a building in Frankfurt between Sheraton and Marriott. Would be very interesting to understand the thought process.
First, in Eastern Europe, South America, and Australia, there's not a lot of difference in the brand standard and in many cases, they aren't in the same countries.
I haven't stayed in Sheraton's in Western Europe or Asia, as the Marriott choices there are generally excellent.
)_
In the US, Marriott's are usually better than Sheraton's which are all over the place ranging from a dump to a perfectly acceptable business property. Having just spent a couple of days at a well-maintained Sheraton, one noticeable difference in the US is the lounge. The Marriott brand standard has the lounge open every S-Thursday night, that's not a Sheraton requirement. Also, the Marriott brand standard has a better breakfast standard than Sheraton (meat, not just eggs, more fruit and yogurt). The Sheraton standard doesn't seem much better than a Fairfield Inn, except for real plates and silverware. The evening snacks at the Sheraton lounge are also below the Marriott standard. I've probably stayed at 5-10 Sheraton's in the US and that's pretty consistent.
Bizarre though to split a building in Frankfurt between Sheraton and Marriott. Would be very interesting to understand the thought process.
#5
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,413
There's two parts of the answer.
First, in Eastern Europe, South America, and Australia, there's not a lot of difference in the brand standard and in many cases, they aren't in the same countries.
I haven't stayed in Sheraton's in Western Europe or Asia, as the Marriott choices there are generally excellent.
)_
In the US, Marriott's are usually better than Sheraton's which are all over the place ranging from a dump to a perfectly acceptable business property. Having just spent a couple of days at a well-maintained Sheraton, one noticeable difference in the US is the lounge. The Marriott brand standard has the lounge open every S-Thursday night, that's not a Sheraton requirement. Also, the Marriott brand standard has a better breakfast standard than Sheraton (meat, not just eggs, more fruit and yogurt). The Sheraton standard doesn't seem much better than a Fairfield Inn, except for real plates and silverware. The evening snacks at the Sheraton lounge are also below the Marriott standard. I've probably stayed at 5-10 Sheraton's in the US and that's pretty consistent.
Bizarre though to split a building in Frankfurt between Sheraton and Marriott. Would be very interesting to understand the thought process.
First, in Eastern Europe, South America, and Australia, there's not a lot of difference in the brand standard and in many cases, they aren't in the same countries.
I haven't stayed in Sheraton's in Western Europe or Asia, as the Marriott choices there are generally excellent.
)_
In the US, Marriott's are usually better than Sheraton's which are all over the place ranging from a dump to a perfectly acceptable business property. Having just spent a couple of days at a well-maintained Sheraton, one noticeable difference in the US is the lounge. The Marriott brand standard has the lounge open every S-Thursday night, that's not a Sheraton requirement. Also, the Marriott brand standard has a better breakfast standard than Sheraton (meat, not just eggs, more fruit and yogurt). The Sheraton standard doesn't seem much better than a Fairfield Inn, except for real plates and silverware. The evening snacks at the Sheraton lounge are also below the Marriott standard. I've probably stayed at 5-10 Sheraton's in the US and that's pretty consistent.
Bizarre though to split a building in Frankfurt between Sheraton and Marriott. Would be very interesting to understand the thought process.
The Sheraton at FRA is indeed nice and has a good lounge. I'm also puzzled by the division and partial rebranding.
#7
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
The Frankfurt airport Sheraton is one of the largest hotels in Europe. It has something like 1,000 rooms. I can easily see a benefit to splitting this into two brand to differentiate customers, even though most of them won't care what bed they sleep in for one night.
#8
Join Date: Apr 2015
Programs: Some
Posts: 5,252
The Frankfurt airport Sheraton is one of the largest hotels in Europe. It has something like 1,000 rooms. I can easily see a benefit to splitting this into two brand to differentiate customers, even though most of them won't care what bed they sleep in for one night.
#9
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Southern California, USA
Programs: Marriott Ambassador and LTT, UA Plat/LT Gold, AA Gold
Posts: 8,764
Outside the USA, Sheraton is considered a very good brand that is just below luxury; outside the USA, Marriott is much less known and isn’t known to be as good. In the USA, Marriott is considered more reliably solid than Sheraton, though in recent years there has been a massive renovation program for many Sheratons.
Why the Frankfurt hotel went with both brands is curious and not likely to be known any time soon, but I would expect a bit more personality with the Sheraton and a bit more of the solid but reliable quality with the Marriott. Perhaps Marriott corporate wants to showcase Marriott being related to the better perceived Sheraton Internation brand? Perhaps the owner wanted two premium brands for their own marketing or corporate/group business ends? Who cares really?
Why the Frankfurt hotel went with both brands is curious and not likely to be known any time soon, but I would expect a bit more personality with the Sheraton and a bit more of the solid but reliable quality with the Marriott. Perhaps Marriott corporate wants to showcase Marriott being related to the better perceived Sheraton Internation brand? Perhaps the owner wanted two premium brands for their own marketing or corporate/group business ends? Who cares really?
#10
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
Possibly, but then again you see a Hilton Garden Inn next to a Hilton or a Ritz Carlton next to a Marriott. Perhaps management perceives greater brand differentiation than the users do?
#11
Join Date: Apr 2015
Programs: Some
Posts: 5,252
Can't name an RC/Marriott joint development off the top of my head but there are quite a few places where e.g. an RC is next to a JWM such as Orlando and LA, so surely a Sheraton / Westin or Sheraton / Four Points could work.
#12
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: In the air
Programs: Hyatt Globalist, Bonvoy LT Plat, Hilton Gold, GHA Tit, BA Gold, Turkish Elite
Posts: 8,720
On FRA specifically, it sounds odd, but I don't know how many people here have spent any amount of time walking between the Frankfurt Airport terminals? There is a never-ending stream of people who look exactly like the people who stay in airport Sheratons and Marriotts on a Tuesday night and not many other sorts of people. There's little opportunity to go upmarket and precious little benefit in offering something further below a corporate max spend.
I wonder if there is some kind of corporate deal play here where having two brands of the same hotel brings some weird form of advantage. At the very least, I'm pretty sure that having two mediocre airport hotels will pick up more of the market than one mediocre airport hotel.
I wonder if there is some kind of corporate deal play here where having two brands of the same hotel brings some weird form of advantage. At the very least, I'm pretty sure that having two mediocre airport hotels will pick up more of the market than one mediocre airport hotel.
#13
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,413
Ren/RI in Minneapolis (at the Depot), aloft/Westin at SFO, Marriott/Courtyard in Center City Philadelphia, Marriott/Westin in Boston across from Prudential Center (also connected to a Sheraton on the other side of Prudentail Center), Marriott (Marquis?)/Sheraton in San Diego (near convention hall along the water) are some examples in the USA are examples of some hotels that are connected or share facilities. The W and Westin in Atlanta Buckhead are next to each other but seem to be separate as are a Marriott and something else (Westin?) at ATL on the little train line that goes to the rental car place or the Sheraton and Westin (???) convention hotels in downtown Seattle.
Overseas we have the Sheraton/LC in Buenos Aires and the Pine Cliffs resort development in southern Portugal. In the Denpasar area of Bali, the Sheraton and Laguna (LC) are next to each other but seem to be separate.
Overseas we have the Sheraton/LC in Buenos Aires and the Pine Cliffs resort development in southern Portugal. In the Denpasar area of Bali, the Sheraton and Laguna (LC) are next to each other but seem to be separate.
#14
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 42,033
Outside the USA, Sheraton is considered a very good brand that is just below luxury; outside the USA, Marriott is much less known and isn’t known to be as good. In the USA, Marriott is considered more reliably solid than Sheraton, though in recent years there has been a massive renovation program for many Sheratons.
Meanwhile, Marriotts in China don't get reflagged with nearly as much frequency. They are kind of boring (e.g. on the off chance they care about the coveted "millennial" market, they certainly don't show it), but I often pick them in favor of nearby Rens or Westins, and the brand standard is fairly consistent.
#15
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
IHG increasingly do it - Crowne Plaza/HIX at LHR T4, Manchester Crowne Plaza/Staybridge Suites, etc.
Can't name an RC/Marriott joint development off the top of my head but there are quite a few places where e.g. an RC is next to a JWM such as Orlando and LA, so surely a Sheraton / Westin or Sheraton / Four Points could work.
Can't name an RC/Marriott joint development off the top of my head but there are quite a few places where e.g. an RC is next to a JWM such as Orlando and LA, so surely a Sheraton / Westin or Sheraton / Four Points could work.