Where to sit on the Boeing 747-400 [merged B744 experience reports]
#226
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: IAD/ARN
Programs: UA Plat/*G, Marriott LT Gold, Global Entry
Posts: 164
Considering just keeping D/G and hoping the middle stays open although I don't know what our odds are on that. I really could care less about the upper deck (I've flown it before on a 748), more interested in having enough space.
Last edited by chleonard; Feb 8, 2023 at 2:51 am
#227
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: my heart is on the shores of the north Italian lakes
Programs: LX Senator Lifetime, Relais&Chateaux Club5C, ex ! "Amanjunkie", ex LHW LC, hate chain hotels
Posts: 2,515
This is a thread to discuss seat selection, if you have a problem with pet travel I would recommend taking it elsewhere. "Shove cat in closet" is precisely the kind of rhetoric I was trying to keep out of this thread, pets have literally been killed this way.
I guess you wanting to lecture me regarding the topic of the thread is out of a misunderstanding.
#228
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: IAD/ARN
Programs: UA Plat/*G, Marriott LT Gold, Global Entry
Posts: 164
Dear chleonard, I have no issues with pet travel and tried to be helpful. In LH C you can NOT stove anything under the seat in front. So the suggestion with the upper deck last row was made with best intentions because the space behind is very open and not about "showing the cat in the closet". You will remember my post when having trouble with your D / G seats, planes are nowadays packed.
I guess you wanting to lecture me regarding the topic of the thread is out of a misunderstanding.
I guess you wanting to lecture me regarding the topic of the thread is out of a misunderstanding.
I do have to disagree on your other point, see what I posted earlier (this is LH's official guidance): "If this is not possible, it must be attached to your safety belt by a lead while remaining in the container". This is how carriers are handled in F and C (or are supposed to be handled) as there is no proper under-seat storage - they attach a yellow leash-like lead (I have not done this myself but I have seen photos of others with the same setup online). So the carrier would still have to be adjacent to your seat, space in other parts of the plane aren't an option.
EDIT: This video (about 0:50 mark) shows the lead I'm talking about:
Last edited by chleonard; Feb 8, 2023 at 5:08 am
#229
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: MSP
Programs: DL PM, UA Gold, WN, Global Entry; +others wherever miles/points are found
Posts: 14,424
"If this is not possible, it must be attached to your safety belt by a lead while remaining in the container". This is how carriers are handled in F and C (or are supposed to be handled) as there is no proper under-seat storage - they attach a yellow leash-like lead (I have not done this myself but I have seen photos of others with the same setup online). So the carrier would still have to be adjacent to your seat, space in other parts of the plane aren't an option.
#230
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: MUC/RJK
Programs: SQ G, LH FTL, UA S, Marriott Plat, Hertz PC
Posts: 1,442
I flew pets in both LH and LX C/F (also work relocation), and there is absolutely no enforcement of "no underseat stowage" when it comes to pet carriers. I think LX has dedicated C seats for PETC, but you will find out as soon as you try to book it I would agree on others' suggestions of upper deck, as it's much quieter and much less foot traffic than lower deck.
#231
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: IAD/ARN
Programs: UA Plat/*G, Marriott LT Gold, Global Entry
Posts: 164
I flew pets in both LH and LX C/F (also work relocation), and there is absolutely no enforcement of "no underseat stowage" when it comes to pet carriers. I think LX has dedicated C seats for PETC, but you will find out as soon as you try to book it I would agree on others' suggestions of upper deck, as it's much quieter and much less foot traffic than lower deck.
#232
Join Date: May 2018
Location: FRA
Programs: LH SEN
Posts: 1,506
I'm not familiar with flying with pets, but don't forget that the UD has a bunch of space on the window side. Not approved stowage, but there would probably be space to comfortably set the carrier on the window ledge during level flight. (Don't know if this is technically allowed, etc. but if okay it seems like a nice setup. I keep my bedding and effects there normally.)
There is a gap next to 86K that can be used for stowage, but probably not wide enough for a pet carrier.
#233
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: YQR
Posts: 2,743
We will be on the 744, FRA-YVR, in a few weeks and I wonder if 86AC are good choices for upper deck seating? We will be on the lower deck on our outbound so wanted to try out the upper deck to see how that was different. People seem split on whether or not it is better or worse... In any case, 86AC or 81AC are the only pairs available. I wonder about the galley and/or stairs and whether these will be a bother. Otherwise, 11-14 AC and HK are open on the lower deck so we can pick something in there.
Thanks for your thoughts.
Thanks for your thoughts.
#235
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Eurozone
Programs: LH SEN, HH Gold
Posts: 3,002
Everyone has their own preferences and lots of it makes little difference, all said. We do like 81 upstairs for the "airplane all to ourselves" feeling. No eye contact with anyone else except when they head back from the lav. Also first to be served and thus, more importantly, first to have dishes and such cleared away. I'll forever hate that tiny cubby hole for the feet regardless of where in biz I end up sitting.
#236
Join Date: May 2018
Location: FRA
Programs: LH SEN
Posts: 1,506
#237
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Stoke on Trent, UK (MAN ), BUE, BKK, DBV
Programs: LH HON***,UA,BA.EK Gold,AV.
Posts: 11,662
#238
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: YQR
Posts: 2,743
Curiously, on the LH website I cannot do the seat selection but on AC's website I can.
#239
Join Date: May 2018
Location: FRA
Programs: LH SEN
Posts: 1,506
There will be a bit of traffic from the galley but the FAs tend to stage the meal service from the area in the middle of the cabin between the emergency exits.
Once the meal service is over there will be very little foot traffic, unlike the bulkhead where you have the whole cabin going past on their way to toilet.
#240
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: YQR
Posts: 2,743
I'm one of those folks who prefer the back of the upper deck. The seats are plenty roomy.
There will be a bit of traffic from the galley but the FAs tend to stage the meal service from the area in the middle of the cabin between the emergency exits.
Once the meal service is over there will be very little foot traffic, unlike the bulkhead where you have the whole cabin going past on their way to toilet.
There will be a bit of traffic from the galley but the FAs tend to stage the meal service from the area in the middle of the cabin between the emergency exits.
Once the meal service is over there will be very little foot traffic, unlike the bulkhead where you have the whole cabin going past on their way to toilet.