Originally Posted by highlanderfil
(Post 34275929)
Honestly, I'd rather spend the money and switch from the Sheraton to Yotelair for the privilege of getting an extra couple hours of shut-eye... As long as we don't end up bringing checked luggage (apparently the hotel won't allow it and we'd need to keep it in a locker airside, which would defeat the purpose). Given our trip is a week long, I think we can get away with it.
|
Originally Posted by Maestro Ramen
(Post 34275698)
|
Originally Posted by jongesander
(Post 34275605)
we are heading to Lombok tomorrow. Flying QR J .
Looking forward reading your impressions on your blog. |
Got to Schiphol around 14:30 today, so around 2.5h before my Schengen KLM cityhopper flight. No checked luggage, so straight to security. Maybe I got lucky or it had eased up today because the queue really wasn't that bad, I waited maybe 10 minutes. Then the flight ended up being delayed by over an hour.
|
Originally Posted by BubbaX
(Post 34276030)
And yet somehow still above BA, LH, LX, SAS, and the rest. I'd blame the Verstappen effect, but AF is even higher. Very weird system.
https://www.trustpilot.com/review/www.schiphol.nl (Switch to Dutch and you will see that even the locals are getting desperate) And picked up by national news: https://nos.nl/artikel/2430047-probl...erug-uit-davos |
Originally Posted by johan rebel
(Post 34266543)
According to Luchtvaartnieuws KLM is blaming airport congestion, the weather, and staff shortages.
No matter, 90 minute delay on departure was pulled to about 60, giving me enough time to grab a quick drink of champagne in the Paris lounge, though not the dinner I hoped for. AF still didn't manage to load my bag, though in the end they did me a favor, as it arrived the next day, and was delivered straight to my cabin on the ship I was boarding, so I was saved from having to carry it around Barcelona.
Originally Posted by malmostoso
(Post 34268480)
Precisely like this.
Until the airlines stop flying to AMS what are passengers going to do?.
Originally Posted by BobTL
(Post 34274043)
They will have to cut flights immediately and move them to RTM or EIN, even BRU or DUS if necessary.
There is no other option the coming few months.
Originally Posted by HadesNL
(Post 34275572)
And i know see the Privium lounges have become pay4use for non members:
https://www.schiphol.nl/en/privium/a...r-journey/Even if you are not a Privium member, you can enjoy all the convenience and comfort of one of the Privium Lounges. Costs:
I certainly had guests in the old NS lounge previously, and also paid way less than even the 40 per pax, though vouchers were involved for at least one of the guests...
Originally Posted by johan rebel
(Post 34275627)
Eeks! Eeks! Eeks!
Thats a slippery slope. Let's hope the ridiculous prices will deter most prospective guests. Johan |
Originally Posted by Fabo.sk
(Post 34276127)
Captain blamed weather delaying previous flights.
No matter, 90 minute delay on departure was pulled to about 60, giving me enough time to grab a quick drink of champagne in the Paris lounge, though not the dinner I hoped for. AF still didn't manage to load my bag, though in the end they did me a favor, as it arrived the next day, and was delivered straight to my cabin on the ship I was boarding, so I was saved from having to carry it around Barcelona. I understand Corendon is planning to do just that. What makes you think RTM, EIN, BRU or DUS would be any better suited to deal with sudden uptick in capacity? They are better at dealing with what they have now, but growth will be similarly stunted, especially sudden and immediate. I thought that was already an option? Or was it only for guests of Privium users? I certainly had guests in the old NS lounge previously, and also paid way less than even the 40 per pax, though vouchers were involved for at least one of the guests... At 40 for the express lounge, I sure expect so. I will ask staff in the departures lounge this Friday before my Hamburg flight if they took on a new catering company.Not worth 40 EUR |
Originally Posted by Fabo.sk
(Post 34276127)
Captain blamed weather delaying previous flights.
No matter, 90 minute delay on departure was pulled to about 60, giving me enough time to grab a quick drink of champagne in the Paris lounge, though not the dinner I hoped for. AF still didn't manage to load my bag, though in the end they did me a favor, as it arrived the next day, and was delivered straight to my cabin on the ship I was boarding, so I was saved from having to carry it around Barcelona. I understand Corendon is planning to do just that. What makes you think RTM, EIN, BRU or DUS would be any better suited to deal with sudden uptick in capacity? They are better at dealing with what they have now, but growth will be similarly stunted, especially sudden and immediate. I thought that was already an option? Or was it only for guests of Privium users? I certainly had guests in the old NS lounge previously, and also paid way less than even the 40 per pax, though vouchers were involved for at least one of the guests... At 40 for the express lounge, I sure expect so. There is not just one simple solution for this problem. Maybe the conclusion is that a part just has to be canceled. That would be a shame but the safety of employees and other pax is most important. |
I had an EU to EU connecting flight today via AMS. My luggage did not make the connection. Would you be kind to direct me or give advice where and how to claim the expnces of the esential items. I did really small shopping today. Hope that my bag will appear tomorrow or day after tomorrow. So, I intend to buy day by day esential items only. I mean, bought ony a toothbrush and a new shirt today.
|
Originally Posted by Netherlines
(Post 34276171)
The catering at the Privium lounges is all of a sudden pretty poor.
Johan. |
Originally Posted by malmostoso
(Post 34275166)
I'm not sure you'd be able to go airside with a BP for the following day.
Johan |
Originally Posted by Fabo.sk
(Post 34276127)
Captain blamed weather delaying previous flights.
Johan |
Originally Posted by BobTL
(Post 34276206)
Also, KLM can look at using bigger aircraft but fewer departures for example.
Johan |
Originally Posted by johan rebel
(Post 34277413)
How would that reduce the number of passengers? Also, does KLM have a bunch of bigger aircraft lying around in some drawer somewhere? And the pilots to fly them?
Johan |
Originally Posted by JeffersonCampervan
(Post 34277443)
They could dust off the 747
Johan |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:17 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.