Koninklijke Marechaussee Prefer to Turn off Automated Passport Gates
#16
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 14,352
Johan
#17
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,748
I assume if the passport is ineligible, you would get blocked and the gate would not open to allow you into the area where it does the facial scan.
#18
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: mostly not far from AMS, otherwise NUE
Programs: FB Silver, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 2,381
#19
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,748
Sorry - I mis-spoke, you are correct. If memory serves the epassport gates have two barriers - the first one to get in, the second to get out. However, you do not need to use your passport to get in, only to get out.
#20
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CDG/AMS
Programs: FB Plat for life, FB PC, M&M FT, Hertz President (+ many low tier cards)
Posts: 2,777
It seems to me that you are talking of a different kind of supervision here than in your earlier post. This one is numpty supervision, viz. having somebody holding the hand of the less experienced passengers. This does not need to be an officer but can be just any Schiphol member of staff. Supervision by an officer is supervision from the other side to ensure that nothing untoward is taking place and/or acting as a secondary border screening safety mechanism. I am not sure that all automated border gate systems require this but it is at least not uncommon. I think that it is the case both in the UK and France, for instance.
In CDG it's sheer chaos, and somewhat discriminating too. Often they are off, and when they work some airport staff is trying to let only French passport holders through, and they insult your intelligence with stupid made up excuses when you point at the EU flag at the entrance of the lane.
#21
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: London, UK and Southern France
Posts: 18,367
In CDG it's sheer chaos, and somewhat discriminating too. Often they are off, and when they work some airport staff is trying to let only French passport holders through, and they insult your intelligence with stupid made up excuses when you point at the EU flag at the entrance of the lane.
#22
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CDG/AMS
Programs: FB Plat for life, FB PC, M&M FT, Hertz President (+ many low tier cards)
Posts: 2,777
To be honest, I do not think that this is deliberate discrimination or insulting your intelligence. It is just that many are not especially bright or well-informed. I have to say, though, that I have never had anybody stand in the way or question me when heading towards parafes gates. If you stride on confidently, IME, you will be ignored. It is only for Acces No1 that they insist on credentials.
Indeed, striding on without saying a word, or blatantly saying yes when they ask "French?" (This is how they do the filtering) does reportedly work fine.
Anyway, this part of the discussion can be continued here: Have New Parafe Facial Recognition Gates Speeded up Things at CDG Arrival/Departures?
#23
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,417
To me, this sounds like airport staff trying to protect their jobs.
#24
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 14,352
Walked in to the KMar office in the Privium lounge today and asked the officer on duty who decided whether to open the e-gates or not. "That's me", she replied.
Bottom line is that the decision is a judgment call by the supervisor on duty, based on a host of factors, such as manning levels, pax numbers, etc. etc.
It also turns out that those e-gates are not quite as automatic as they appear to be. They are constantly monitored by an officer for every six gates. He has a screen for each one, which displays the passport data of all pax passing through, as well as any results that various database searches throw up. Based on this information, he or one of his colleagues may have to intervene in any number of ways.
There are apparently also plans afoot to change the physical layout of the passport checkpoints, but this is currently a bone of contention between the airport and the KMar.
Johan
Bottom line is that the decision is a judgment call by the supervisor on duty, based on a host of factors, such as manning levels, pax numbers, etc. etc.
It also turns out that those e-gates are not quite as automatic as they appear to be. They are constantly monitored by an officer for every six gates. He has a screen for each one, which displays the passport data of all pax passing through, as well as any results that various database searches throw up. Based on this information, he or one of his colleagues may have to intervene in any number of ways.
There are apparently also plans afoot to change the physical layout of the passport checkpoints, but this is currently a bone of contention between the airport and the KMar.
Johan
#25
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: mostly not far from AMS, otherwise NUE
Programs: FB Silver, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 2,381
If they just put up stanchions to form a single queue for all machines that would go such a long way already.
#27
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Programs: KL Gold, SQ KF Gold, CX Green
Posts: 9,422
On departure, Americans, Japanese, Australians, Canadians, Kiwis, Singaporeans, HK passport holders and one or two other nationalities can also use the automated gates and an officer is needed to stamp their passports.