First new security filter operational at AMS
#377
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: San Francisco, CA
Programs: Flying Blue Platinum, JetBlue Mosaic, Hyatt Globalist, Alaska MVP Gold.
Posts: 1,962
Next time I'll keep my mouth shut
For what it's worth arjen05, it is indeed an explosives residue test, not a drug test of any sort. They'd return positive a bit too often at AMS I am guessing...
#378
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Barcelona, Catalunya
Posts: 2,108
Why would they even bother with a drugs test at airport security screening?
So you believed they were testing for drugs, and you were OK with it? People really will accept anything these days...
BTW, it's not only at AMS that they do these swabs. At BCN it's standard whenever you get the "random" beep at the metal detector.
So you believed they were testing for drugs, and you were OK with it? People really will accept anything these days...
BTW, it's not only at AMS that they do these swabs. At BCN it's standard whenever you get the "random" beep at the metal detector.
#379
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: CW
Programs: Marriott titanium, KL/AF FB Ulti
Posts: 644
I just thought it was a drugs scan - never thought about explosives. Would you suggest that if security check recognises a package of cocaine in your suitcase at their scanner, they'll wish you a pleasant flight and let you fly?
#380
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: CPT,AMS
Posts: 4,412
yes strictly speaking cocaine is not a concern for airport security, it is for customs and/or the police.
#381
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,757
I'm just back from a long trip through various different airports in the US and Europe.
The only one where my carry-on was problematic was Schiphol. Two trays were taken for secondary, for reasons that were not clear.
Every where else, the same assortment of carry-on (I had a lot) was not a problem...
It is true that AMS has gone a bit mental with security screening
The only one where my carry-on was problematic was Schiphol. Two trays were taken for secondary, for reasons that were not clear.
Every where else, the same assortment of carry-on (I had a lot) was not a problem...
It is true that AMS has gone a bit mental with security screening
#382
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,757
#383
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: San Francisco, CA
Programs: Flying Blue Platinum, JetBlue Mosaic, Hyatt Globalist, Alaska MVP Gold.
Posts: 1,962
If you have contraband, whether it be drugs, alcohol (in some countries) monetary instruments, plants, seeds, etc. -- the customs authority in the receiving county concerns itself about this. Of course, if you flaunt illegal substances at airport security, they're likely to get the police. Let's say you show up with two bricks of cocaine and a live endangered parrot, yes, sure, they'll get you arrested.
Outside of that, it's just not what they are there to check for.
#384
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 14,352
Privium News Flash
"The border passage at Departures 2 will be under construction until mid April. The Privium gate on the right side remains open but the entrance might be crowded. Please take this into account when preparing your trip."
Johan
Johan
#385
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 14,352
Oh boy, you just gotta love 'm.
A few weeks ago I went through Terminal 1 priority security with an ice cream maker (don't ask) in a backpack. Needless to see, the bag was sent to secondary, where it was x-rayed a second time. The machine was removed from the bag, all the bits and pieces inspected, and I was then asked to take apart the motor assembly. I could not and would not, so a supervisor was called. After swiping for explosives, and after some hesitation, I was allowed to keep the machine. Fortunately I had planned ahead and allowed an extra 15 minutes.
I'm obviously not capable of learning from experiece, so this afternoon I took an identical ice cream maker (again, don't ask) through Terminal 1 security, in the very same backpack. This time it sailed right through, without even going to secondary. Go figure!
Schiphol security gets full marks for logic and consistency, that's for sure.
Johan
A few weeks ago I went through Terminal 1 priority security with an ice cream maker (don't ask) in a backpack. Needless to see, the bag was sent to secondary, where it was x-rayed a second time. The machine was removed from the bag, all the bits and pieces inspected, and I was then asked to take apart the motor assembly. I could not and would not, so a supervisor was called. After swiping for explosives, and after some hesitation, I was allowed to keep the machine. Fortunately I had planned ahead and allowed an extra 15 minutes.
I'm obviously not capable of learning from experiece, so this afternoon I took an identical ice cream maker (again, don't ask) through Terminal 1 security, in the very same backpack. This time it sailed right through, without even going to secondary. Go figure!
Schiphol security gets full marks for logic and consistency, that's for sure.
Johan
#386
#387
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: UK/FR
Programs: FlyingBlue Platinum, Hertz PC
Posts: 886
Oh boy, you just gotta love 'm.
A few weeks ago I went through Terminal 1 priority security with an ice cream maker (don't ask) in a backpack. Needless to see, the bag was sent to secondary, where it was x-rayed a second time. The machine was removed from the bag, all the bits and pieces inspected, and I was then asked to take apart the motor assembly. I could not and would not, so a supervisor was called. After swiping for explosives, and after some hesitation, I was allowed to keep the machine. Fortunately I had planned ahead and allowed an extra 15 minutes.
I'm obviously not capable of learning from experiece, so this afternoon I took an identical ice cream maker (again, don't ask) through Terminal 1 security, in the very same backpack. This time it sailed right through, without even going to secondary. Go figure!
Schiphol security gets full marks for logic and consistency, that's for sure.
Johan
A few weeks ago I went through Terminal 1 priority security with an ice cream maker (don't ask) in a backpack. Needless to see, the bag was sent to secondary, where it was x-rayed a second time. The machine was removed from the bag, all the bits and pieces inspected, and I was then asked to take apart the motor assembly. I could not and would not, so a supervisor was called. After swiping for explosives, and after some hesitation, I was allowed to keep the machine. Fortunately I had planned ahead and allowed an extra 15 minutes.
I'm obviously not capable of learning from experiece, so this afternoon I took an identical ice cream maker (again, don't ask) through Terminal 1 security, in the very same backpack. This time it sailed right through, without even going to secondary. Go figure!
Schiphol security gets full marks for logic and consistency, that's for sure.
Johan
#388
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: AMS
Programs: FB Platinum PA; IHG Diamond Ambassador
Posts: 307
Oh boy, you just gotta love 'm.
A few weeks ago I went through Terminal 1 priority security with an ice cream maker (don't ask) in a backpack. Needless to see, the bag was sent to secondary, where it was x-rayed a second time. The machine was removed from the bag, all the bits and pieces inspected, and I was then asked to take apart the motor assembly. I could not and would not, so a supervisor was called. After swiping for explosives, and after some hesitation, I was allowed to keep the machine. Fortunately I had planned ahead and allowed an extra 15 minutes.
I'm obviously not capable of learning from experiece, so this afternoon I took an identical ice cream maker (again, don't ask) through Terminal 1 security, in the very same backpack. This time it sailed right through, without even going to secondary. Go figure!
Schiphol security gets full marks for logic and consistency, that's for sure.
Johan
A few weeks ago I went through Terminal 1 priority security with an ice cream maker (don't ask) in a backpack. Needless to see, the bag was sent to secondary, where it was x-rayed a second time. The machine was removed from the bag, all the bits and pieces inspected, and I was then asked to take apart the motor assembly. I could not and would not, so a supervisor was called. After swiping for explosives, and after some hesitation, I was allowed to keep the machine. Fortunately I had planned ahead and allowed an extra 15 minutes.
I'm obviously not capable of learning from experiece, so this afternoon I took an identical ice cream maker (again, don't ask) through Terminal 1 security, in the very same backpack. This time it sailed right through, without even going to secondary. Go figure!
Schiphol security gets full marks for logic and consistency, that's for sure.
Johan
#389
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: CPT,AMS
Posts: 4,412
I'm having this inconsistency all the time, I carry the same back pack with the same items, packed in the exact same way, it sails through all other airports with no issues, and in Schiphol it goes from sailing right though (happened once, I was shocked!) to where they take apart everything, checking my electric toothbrush, spare battery pack, sun glasses, etc. etc.