![]() |
Originally Posted by robyng
(Post 20713366)
FWIW - the only things I really miss when it comes to Japanese food are great bread and extravagant desserts. Which is where a French restaurant comes into play :).
One kind of restaurant I would be interested in trying (if one existed - and it doesn't seem to) is a "southern US" restaurant - "Japanese style". Because the Japanese seem to eat things like okra (we do fried - pickled - stewed - whatever) and sweet potatoes - they are wonderful at frying things (we fry everything from chicken to fish to green tomatoes) - and they have terrific seafood (fish/shrimp/crabs/etc. - we eat a lot of those things). About the only ingredient that's missing is grits (which doesn't have to be "fresh and local"). I'd love to see a Japanese take on shrimp and grits :D. Robyn On the "southern style", that's a bit harder, although if you must insist, there's White Smoke in Azabu Juban. I think it is terribly overpriced for what they serve, and it caters mostly to rich expats who just have to have their fix. But kind of like eating sushi in NY: "did I just pay how much for what?" |
Originally Posted by Pickles
(Post 20713572)
Narisawa is the quintessential food-porn star-fecker restaurant. Go there if you want to be surrounded by a bunch of people from all over the world who read that Narisawa was one of the top 50 restaurants in the world according to the "Pellegrino" list, whatever that means, and just had to go.
The food is vastly over-rated, and in some instances, just plain weird. Restaurants in the same flavor, but ones I would certainly recommend over Narisawa are Ryugin, Takazawa, and Emun. Not that FL is a bad restaurant by any means. Some of the dishes are really great. But others are just so-so. Sometimes it seems to me that these newer restaurants don't know how to edit their menus - and serve the 5 or 6 things they make that are their absolute best (which is why they have 20+ course tasting menus). As someone who tends to run out of steam quickly when working my way through a long tasting menu - I would much appreciate some editing ("if I had more time - I'd write a shorter letter" kind of thing). And at FL - 80+% of the diners were from Stockholm. Stockholm wasn't - as of last year - a popular "food destination" yet. At the 2 starred Michelin restaurants at our hotel - everyone except us was from Sweden - mostly locals and Swedish dentists (there was a national dental meeting in the hotel that week :)). I'd rather be surrounded by Swedish dentists than New York "foodies" :D. Still - the proof of the pudding is in the eating - not the website :D. When it comes to Narisawa - does anyone here have a different opinion of this restaurant? Of the 3 restaurants you recommended - only Emun is open for lunch. I will have to try to read a little about it. Robyn |
Originally Posted by Pickles
(Post 20713620)
San Francisco and Vancouver have some fine Chinese restaurants, so if you've had the good stuff there, I wouldn't try to repeat the experience in Japan. You went to Chef Chin Kenichi's restaurant in Japan, and you thought it wasn't all that. Now imagine a more refined setting, much higher price point, and a more "accomplished" presentation and execution. But you'll still come out of there wondering what the hell you were thinking in going there in the first place. That pretty much describes the vast majority of high-end Chinese restaurants in Japan. It's not "authentic", it's generally tasteless, and it's the last thing I'd eat if I was in a culinary trip of Japan.
Now, if you must insist (and I sense you won't, but just in case), there are places in Japan that turn "Chinese" food into something truly different. It isn't "Chinese" food, but it is eminently edible and a new experience. In that vein, my favorite is Wakiya in Akasaka. Have also dined a lot in New York. But - recently (like last decade) - I've found the Chinese food there inferior to that on the west coast. OTOH - I had my first dim sum ever at a pretty dumpy place in Chinatown NYC perhaps 40 years ago. This place: http://nomwah.com/ Judging from the new website though - this place is probably now in the 21st century! FWIW - your sense is correct. And it is not meant as an offense to anyone here who travels to Japan and enjoys some Chinese meals there. I just have a different "shopping list" on this trip. Robyn |
Originally Posted by Pickles
(Post 20713680)
Oooh the Japanese make some killer bread, although they tend to go for the French style stuff. So you may have a harder time finding a good schwarzbrot, but you can certainly find an excellent baguette. Places to hit include Maison Kaiser, Dalloyau, and Viron (all three "branches" of French bakeries), but there are many others.
On the "southern style", that's a bit harder, although if you must insist, there's White Smoke in Azabu Juban. I think it is terribly overpriced for what they serve, and it caters mostly to rich expats who just have to have their fix. But kind of like eating sushi in NY: "did I just pay how much for what?" I feel competent to judge French food. French food and I go way back (to Robuchon's Jamin in Paris when it had one Michelin star - and all 3 incarnations of Senderens' restaurants). Do you or anyone else here have a favorite in Tokyo? I looked up White Smoke. And it's not our SE United States food. It's Texas BBQ. A very distinct kind of BBQ in the US. Beef (fatty brisket the best) cooked low and slow over long brick smokers. I'm not sure how how anyone could do smokers like this in Tokyo (and didn't find any pictures). Here's some of what I had to say about Texas BBQ: http://mouthfulsfood.com/forums/inde...art-texas-bbq/ Robyn |
Originally Posted by 5khours
(Post 20710826)
So what... you're only going to eat Italian at Enoteca Pinchiorri and swear off all other Italian food as sub-par... and can we further assume that any Pinot shy of Romanee-Conti (which BTW you can buy in a Japanese super-market) is sub-par?
To expand...... I will and do happily eat Italian food as offered in Japan but realize that it is an adaptation of what I eat when in Italy. There is nothing wrong with that. But if I were seeking Italian food that equaled that found in Italy, yes, I would be accepting sub-par food. Chinese food adapted as it has been in Jaapn is often quite pleasing also. It is not equal in any way to the food I ate for the three years I lived in Shanghai though. As for Pinot, that is perhaps my area of greatest expertise, yielding on the food front in large part to Pickles. Romanée-Conti is indeed great wine and Burgundy is the hands down standard for the wine made from Pinot Noir. I do however relish the wines of the Macedon Ranges, those of Tasmania, those of Oregon, and of course the various offerings from the various AVA in CA. All except those from Burgundy are trying to be Burgundy. Bit if one accepts that other expressions of the same fruit can create wine pleasingly similar yet different, one can enjoy the permutations without believing they are replicating the original. As for the Supermarket point, to equate the supermarkets of Japan and their product range and role in a typical shopper's life to those found in America is simply an attempt to be argumentative as it is both inaccurate and inappropriate. Perhaps that answers your question? |
Originally Posted by Pickles
(Post 20711216)
Speaking of bad Mole in Tokyo, it is all bad, except for the prune Mole at La Fonda de la Madrugada I had a long time ago. I haven't been in years, so don't know if it has gone to pot. Wouldn't surprise me if it had, but during the bubble era it was definitely excellent. By the way, and surprisingly, one can find some pretty decent tacos in Hong Kong. Good enough to repeat the experience.
|
Originally Posted by mjm
(Post 20714662)
Now, now, deep breaths. a re-read of what I posted would seem to clarify the point for you.
To expand...... I will and do happily eat Italian food as offered in Japan but realize that it is an adaptation of what I eat when in Italy. There is nothing wrong with that. But if I were seeking Italian food that equaled that found in Italy, yes, I would be accepting sub-par food. Chinese food adapted as it has been in Jaapn is often quite pleasing also. It is not equal in any way to the food I ate for the three years I lived in Shanghai though. Perhaps that answers your question? And what do you mean by "not equal in any way?" Do you mean inferior? Do you mean less good? Do you mean you personally don't like it as much? I think you would be very hard pressed to reliably distinguish between Italian food cooked by an Italian and Italian food cooked by a skilled Japanese chef. Same for French. Same for Chinese. This is not to say that there are not some distinctive Japanese adaptations to various cuisines, but to somehow relegate all food cooked out of it's home country (particularly in Japan) as being un-authentic and sub-par is IMHO just way off the mark. |
Originally Posted by 5khours
(Post 20710911)
The post was a little confusing.
Karubi is ribs (usually without the bone) served at Korean restaurants in Japan. Not exactly steak. If you want authentic Korean, there are quite a few restaurants in the Akasaka area. If you want Japanized Korean, Sankoen and Juju are popular spots. If on the other hand the poster actually wants wagyu (literally Japanese beef.. but it actually refers to specific breeds) steak, there are quite a few choices. Steakhouse Hama is maybe the most well known... but very pricey ($4k for 6) last time I went. With regards to Karubi, I find the way it is served in Japan is distinctive enough to differentiate it with the way Korean restaurants serve it. And in Korea it is known as Gahl-bi. In Japan, the Karubi is grilled and served with sesame or ponzu dipping sauces, while in Korea they are served with bean sauces. Even the cut of the beef varies to a certain extent. |
Originally Posted by 5khours
(Post 20714946)
No it doesn't. Define what you mean by an adaptation. Does this just mean it's different? Is it an adaptation if the chef chooses to make a dish differently on a random Friday night. Is it an adaptation if a chef in Firenze makes a Genovesan dish using the same recipe and ingredients. What about if an Italian chef makes the dish in Tokyo. Etc. Etc. Ultimately your argument boils down to a tautology... if it's not made in Italy, it's not Italian.
And what do you mean by "not equal in any way?" Do you mean inferior? Do you mean less good? Do you mean you personally don't like it as much? I think you would be very hard pressed to reliably distinguish between Italian food cooked by an Italian and Italian food cooked by a skilled Japanese chef. Same for French. Same for Chinese. This is not to say that there are not some distinctive Japanese adaptations to various cuisines, but to somehow relegate all food cooked out of it's home country (particularly in Japan) as being un-authentic and sub-par is IMHO just way off the mark. Taking your questions one by one: “Define what you mean by an adaptation” I mean adaptation. Something based on the original that is different in execution due to individual tastes, ingredients, methods etc. You are incorrect in assuming however that there is an argument made to the tautology you cite. There is a statement of opinion that food seeking to be identical to the original is different enough that it is either taken on its merits as an adaptation (or perhaps evolution of a dish is an easier way to look at it) or it is a sub-par version of what would be better prepared in its place of origin. “And what do you mean by "not equal in any way?" Do you mean inferior? Do you mean less good? Do you mean you personally don't like it as much?” I mean it is less than the original. i.e, “not equal". Does that make it less appealing to any given individual? Well I would have to poll all people to discern that. I simply state the opinion that, as mentioned in the preceding paragraph, “it is a sub-par version of what would be better prepared in its place of origin”. It is my contention that Chinese food prepared in China is in every way (except in terms of purity or quality of ingredients) superior to that sold in Japan. Just an opinion based on empirical evidence. Agree or not it is my contention. The following two points remind me of an often held discussion about wine. “I think you would be very hard pressed to reliably distinguish between Italian food cooked by an Italian and Italian food cooked by a skilled Japanese chef. Same for French. Same for Chinese. “ I or my peers would in many cases be able to discern a difference. IS that the rare case and not the norm? Sure it is. I would even go so far as to say try it all. Like what you like and dismiss the rest. Rely on your palate and not borders. and ”This is not to say that there are not some distinctive Japanese adaptations to various cuisines, but to somehow relegate all food cooked out of it's home country (particularly in Japan) as being un-authentic and sub-par is IMHO just way off the mark.” We could be discussing Champagne vs. Sparkling Wine here. The same concept applies. If it is not from Champagne it can only ever be sparkling wine. Is it sub-par? That is a value judgment. Is it authentic Champagne? No it most certainly is not. The facts are incontrovertible. |
MJM. So basically, if I eat Italian food in Japan, it's either not real Italian or it's inferior to Italian food prepared in Italy?
As for Champagne, that's simply a legal definition. You can make up a definition for Italian food which defines it as food prepared in Italy and then by your definition, there is no such thing as authentic Italian food in Japan, but that doesn't tell you anything about how it tastes. (And I'm not disputing that the terroir can have an impact on taste, but I don't think it's a very useful criteria for making broad generalizations about the entirety of the cuisine of a particular county. And I'd be curious as to what your hypothesis is for the inferior quality of food prepared in Japan when attempting to be authentic. Does this just apply to Japanese chefs or does it also apply to Italian chefs working in Japan. Perhaps it's the cooking implements. Or maybe it's the purity and quality of ingredients (oh no you already said that wasn't the problem). Maybe it's the ether. I'm not trying to be argumentative or pedantic. I just think you're wrong. Sure the best Italian restaurant is in Italy. Maybe the 10 best are in Italy. But there are loads of Italian restaurants in Tokyo that are better than 99.9% of all restaurants in Italy. |
Originally Posted by 5khours
(Post 20715754)
MJM. So basically, if I eat Italian food in Japan, it's either not real Italian or it's inferior to Italian food prepared in Italy?
As for Champagne, that's simply a legal definition. You can make up a definition for Italian food which defines it as food prepared in Italy and then by your definition, there is no such thing as authentic Italian food in Japan, but that doesn't tell you anything about how it tastes. (And I'm not disputing that the terroir can have an impact on taste, but I don't think it's a very useful criteria for making broad generalizations about the entirety of the cuisine of a particular county. And I'd be curious as to what your hypothesis is for the inferior quality of food prepared in Japan when attempting to be authentic. Does this just apply to Japanese chefs or does it also apply to Italian chefs working in Japan. Perhaps it's the cooking implements. Or maybe it's the purity and quality of ingredients (oh no you already said that wasn't the problem). Maybe it's the ether. I'm not trying to be argumentative or pedantic. I just think you're wrong. Sure the best Italian restaurant is in Italy. Maybe the 10 best are in Italy. But there are loads of Italian restaurants in Tokyo that are better than 99.9% of all restaurants in Italy. MJM. So basically, if I eat Italian food in Japan, it's either not real Italian or it's inferior to Italian food prepared in Italy? It is substitute. No value judgment involved. Now the same question has been asked and answered a few times, let us move on. The thread is not simply for you ask again and again what this or that means. As for Champagne, that's simply a legal definition. You can make up a definition for Italian food which defines it as food prepared in Italy and then by your definition, there is no such thing as authentic Italian food in Japan, but that doesn't tell you anything about how it tastes. (And I'm not disputing that the terroir can have an impact on taste, but I don't think it's a very useful criteria for making broad generalizations about the entirety of the cuisine of a particular county. The argument that food of a style originating elsewhere tastes less good is not the point I have made or addressed. Your new point raised here is valid and I accept that much food which by its strictest definition is not authentic in terms of its origin elsewhere, is very very good indeed. And I'd be curious as to what your hypothesis is for the inferior quality of food prepared in Japan when attempting to be authentic. Does this just apply to Japanese chefs or does it also apply to Italian chefs working in Japan. Perhaps it's the cooking implements. Or maybe it's the purity and quality of ingredients (oh no you already said that wasn't the problem). Maybe it's the ether. I make no such statement. You do, unnecessarily sarcastically too. I state that sub-par is applied to trying to duplicate overseas items, not with respect to the taste of what is produced as an adaptation. In fact in many cases due to the vegetables, spices, oils, or main ingredient used I prefer the version produced here. That still does not make it more than an adaptation. I'm not trying to be argumentative or pedantic. I just think you're wrong. Sure the best Italian restaurant is in Italy. Maybe the 10 best are in Italy. But there are loads of Italian restaurants in Tokyo that are better than 99.9% of all restaurants in Italy. You seek not to be but have achieved being both. We are all entitled to our own value judgments and opinions. Mine happen to rather stricter in definition than yours it would seem from what I have read. Try the concept of live and let live. Not all people share your opinions or tastes. I would suggest that that very fact, when discussed without sarcasm and in a more civilized manner, makes the whole spectrum of possibilities so much fun to discuss and enjoy. :) |
Originally Posted by robyng
(Post 20714003)
Stockholm wasn't - as of last year - a popular "food destination" yet.
|
Originally Posted by quirrow
(Post 20715457)
Sorry for not being very clear in my post. But I was specifically looking for Wagyu Beef Steak, and I noticed from my Google search that Steakhouse Hama is a Teppanyaki restaurant? I was looking more for a steakhouse experience rather than the Wagyu Beef being served in Teppanyaki form.
With regards to Karubi, I find the way it is served in Japan is distinctive enough to differentiate it with the way Korean restaurants serve it. And in Korea it is known as Gahl-bi. In Japan, the Karubi is grilled and served with sesame or ponzu dipping sauces, while in Korea they are served with bean sauces. Even the cut of the beef varies to a certain extent. For Japanese style Korean, I almost always go to Sankoen in the Juban....mostly out of habit and the kids like it. |
Originally Posted by mjm
(Post 20715783)
And for one last time:
MJM. So basically, if I eat Italian food in Japan, it's either not real Italian or it's inferior to Italian food prepared in Italy? It is substitute. No value judgment involved. Now the same question has been asked and answered a few times, let us move on. The thread is not simply for you ask again and again what this or that means. As for Champagne, that's simply a legal definition. You can make up a definition for Italian food which defines it as food prepared in Italy and then by your definition, there is no such thing as authentic Italian food in Japan, but that doesn't tell you anything about how it tastes. (And I'm not disputing that the terroir can have an impact on taste, but I don't think it's a very useful criteria for making broad generalizations about the entirety of the cuisine of a particular county. The argument that food of a style originating elsewhere tastes less good is not the point I have made or addressed. Your new point raised here is valid and I accept that much food which by its strictest definition is not authentic in terms of its origin elsewhere, is very very good indeed. And I'd be curious as to what your hypothesis is for the inferior quality of food prepared in Japan when attempting to be authentic. Does this just apply to Japanese chefs or does it also apply to Italian chefs working in Japan. Perhaps it's the cooking implements. Or maybe it's the purity and quality of ingredients (oh no you already said that wasn't the problem). Maybe it's the ether. I make no such statement. You do, unnecessarily sarcastically too. I state that sub-par is applied to trying to duplicate overseas items, not with respect to the taste of what is produced as an adaptation. In fact in many cases due to the vegetables, spices, oils, or main ingredient used I prefer the version produced here. That still does not make it more than an adaptation. I'm not trying to be argumentative or pedantic. I just think you're wrong. Sure the best Italian restaurant is in Italy. Maybe the 10 best are in Italy. But there are loads of Italian restaurants in Tokyo that are better than 99.9% of all restaurants in Italy. You seek not to be but have achieved being both. We are all entitled to our own value judgments and opinions. Mine happen to rather stricter in definition than yours it would seem from what I have read. Try the concept of live and let live. Not all people share your opinions or tastes. I would suggest that that very fact, when discussed without sarcasm and in a more civilized manner, makes the whole spectrum of possibilities so much fun to discuss and enjoy. :) |
ONLY ITALIAN FOOD IS ITALIAN!!!!!
There, we said it. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 4:47 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.