9W Perfume
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 397
9W Perfume
Just took a recent international Premiere class trip on 9W, and was surprised when I was given a nice 100mL bottle of BlackXS by Paco Rabanne! Very nice and classy touch, I have to say! Is this one of the new amenities? It was given separately from the usual kit, which had the regular Bvlgari perfumes (which I am now stockpiling).
#5


Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: BOM-WAW-EWR
Programs: UA*G (1K again), Sixt Plat, AC*G, LH FTL, AI*G *was*: SQ QPP01 & SK EBS/EBG, LH SEN, AA EXP, 9wPlat
Posts: 8,751
Just took a recent international Premiere class trip on 9W, and was surprised when I was given a nice 100mL bottle of BlackXS by Paco Rabanne! Very nice and classy touch, I have to say! Is this one of the new amenities? It was given separately from the usual kit, which had the regular Bvlgari perfumes (which I am now stockpiling). 

Thus the treatment.
Did any other pax receive the same on board?
The above would be interesting data points for further analysis.
#6
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 397
@superflyboy - that's what intrigued me. You'd think that I'd get better treatment due to the aforementioned by you, but interestingly enough, this Paco cologne and perfume was given to the people around me as well. Now, I cannot confirm whether the entire Premiere cabin got it, but from what I saw, that was the case. As I mentioned earlier, it could have just been a marketing gimmick aimed at premium customers. After all, even if you don't like it for yourself, who's going to refuse a $50 bottle of perfume? 
I agree that trending passenger treatment based on characteristics such as those mentioned might be an interesting project for some of us. If someone is doing such a thing, I'd be happy to help!
And finally, on the ex-JFK routes, they are running the A330's and not the 77W's, right?

I agree that trending passenger treatment based on characteristics such as those mentioned might be an interesting project for some of us. If someone is doing such a thing, I'd be happy to help!
And finally, on the ex-JFK routes, they are running the A330's and not the 77W's, right?
#7


Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: BOM-WAW-EWR
Programs: UA*G (1K again), Sixt Plat, AC*G, LH FTL, AI*G *was*: SQ QPP01 & SK EBS/EBG, LH SEN, AA EXP, 9wPlat
Posts: 8,751
@superflyboy - that's what intrigued me. You'd think that I'd get better treatment due to the aforementioned by you, but interestingly enough, this Paco cologne and perfume was given to the people around me as well. Now, I cannot confirm whether the entire Premiere cabin got it, but from what I saw, that was the case. As I mentioned earlier, it could have just been a marketing gimmick aimed at premium customers. After all, even if you don't like it for yourself, who's going to refuse a $50 bottle of perfume? 
I agree that trending passenger treatment based on characteristics such as those mentioned might be an interesting project for some of us. If someone is doing such a thing, I'd be happy to help!
And finally, on the ex-JFK routes, they are running the A330's and not the 77W's, right?

I agree that trending passenger treatment based on characteristics such as those mentioned might be an interesting project for some of us. If someone is doing such a thing, I'd be happy to help!
And finally, on the ex-JFK routes, they are running the A330's and not the 77W's, right?
I wish I was on board too!

However, Jet has a tradition of rewarding their premium/elite pax occasionally, and they *are* charging a premium to fly on this routing, at least ex-India, BOM-EWR, as compared to LH, with whom I have been flying.
I have tried to make changes to their product as well, and it works some of the time...oh well!
I wonder if other FT'ers flying on 9w will be able to chime in as well, in order for us to further analyze this behavior!
Yes, as I understand, all North American routes are being served by A332.
However, if GF has wet-leased some aircraft in the past, and if Jet is forced to accept them back (without turning them around with another airline), I would gather that they would have to put them back on their heaviest trafficked routings - not sure if it would be the NA routes!
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist


Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,413
Yes, as I understand, all North American routes are being served by A332.
However, if GF has wet-leased some aircraft in the past, and if Jet is forced to accept them back (without turning them around with another airline), I would gather that they would have to put them back on their heaviest trafficked routings - not sure if it would be the NA routes!
However, if GF has wet-leased some aircraft in the past, and if Jet is forced to accept them back (without turning them around with another airline), I would gather that they would have to put them back on their heaviest trafficked routings - not sure if it would be the NA routes!
Not sure where the others are going. I would assume on the NA route as LHR will be covered by 77W's from DEL & BOM. Unless they have found alternative wet lease partners it will be interesting to see what happens.
I think they will put them on the NA route and move the A332 to DXB and SIN which are served by 737's right now. these were served by A332's before Jet leased the 77W's out.

