![]() |
It makes good sense to be a free agent, unless you a receiving elite perks that effectively lower the comparative price of your room. I will happily pay for Hilton if the price/location/quality/value is right compared to other options. But I would not choose Hilton for the points, which are never more valuable than what I receive from competitors.
Originally Posted by smmrfld
(Post 36756683)
LOL and we see the exact same posts re other hotel programs any time someone doesn’t like something. Grass ain’t no greener.
|
Originally Posted by 777 global mile hound
(Post 36756833)
Kind of a cliche response that’s self defeating.
Ok to believe that but that’s what they want you to believe. I mean, great that they announce category changes but the end result is the same, the program is devalued for me, points get less useful. IHG and Marriott are fully dynamic such that (as an example) a luxury hotel in London will run me six digits a night in points (considerably more than comparable Hilton properties BTW, which are capped well below 100k). Hyatt pricing is better in sheer volume of points but I have to burn a boatload of Chase UR that I'd rather use on flights and the earn proposition for stays isn't amazing unless I want to commit to Globalist (I don't). I mean, that leaves you with what, Sonesta? Accor is flat rate "this point is worth this much a fraction of a euro" so that's not very lucrative.
Originally Posted by Boraxo
(Post 36756973)
It makes good sense to be a free agent, unless you a receiving elite perks that effectively lower the comparative price of your room. I will happily pay for Hilton if the price/location/quality/value is right compared to other options. But I would not choose Hilton for the points, which are never more valuable than what I receive from competitors.
|
Originally Posted by eponymous_coward
(Post 36758147)
No, that's my actual lived experience. Hyatt has routinely jacked up award pricing at hotels I've stayed at as an elite. I used a Cat 1-4 cert to stay in Manhattan a few years ago. Now, can't do that. Hyatt Places moving from Cat 1 or Cat 2 to Cat 3 or Cat 4, and so on.
I mean, great that they announce category changes but the end result is the same, the program is devalued for me, points get less useful. IHG and Marriott are fully dynamic such that (as an example) a luxury hotel in London will run me six digits a night in points (considerably more than comparable Hilton properties BTW, which are capped well below 100k). Hyatt pricing is better in sheer volume of points but I have to burn a boatload of Chase UR that I'd rather use on flights and the earn proposition for stays isn't amazing unless I want to commit to Globalist (I don't). I mean, that leaves you with what, Sonesta? Accor is flat rate "this point is worth this much a fraction of a euro" so that's not very lucrative. I've gotten 54x on Hilton stays and room charges with the Aspire when the stars align. I score that as a 27% rebate. There are times when I will choose Hilton for that kind of a rebate in free agency (and because the competition isn't running as lucrative a promo). |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:47 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.