Aloha's future?
#16
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Suburbia :rolleyes:
Programs: UA, HA, CO
Posts: 975
Originally Posted by 808
Aq's first big hurdle will be when their credit card debt comes due in I think Oct. I think it was 65 mil at something alittle above 10% interest. Seeing as how they are losing money during the peak season it will be interesting to see who will cough up the money.
I'm also interested to see how they will cough up the money for this.
#17
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Berkeley, CA USA
Programs: Piggly Wiggly "Shop the Pig!" Preferred Shopper
Posts: 60,677
Originally Posted by asu-ua772
...as of recent, most of the interisland flights (both AQ and HA) have had astonishing load factors (Summer, perhaps), and if that trend continues into the low season, and AQ suddenly goes belly-up, some major disruptions can be seen in the islands....asu-ua772
#18
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Suburbia :rolleyes:
Programs: UA, HA, CO
Posts: 975
Originally Posted by dhuey
I doubt any disruptions would last long. There are surprisingly low barriers to entry in commercial avaition. If the demand is there, the planes will come pretty quickly.
P.S.---Any news about them lately?
#19
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Berkeley, CA USA
Programs: Piggly Wiggly "Shop the Pig!" Preferred Shopper
Posts: 60,677
Originally Posted by asu-ua772
...Maybe some CRJs or FlyHawaii could do the trick....
#21
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 20
The RJ factor brings up some interesting things. I culled this out of Aviation Week (leak) and their data showed that it was actually more expensive to operate Rj's per revenue seat mile than it was to operate 737-200's. I'm not sure if that factored in maintenance costs for maintaining the older aircraft and pilot pay scales. I've only flown on an RJ once (embraer) and the space was pretty tight. I'm not sure that would go over for this market unless the price was right. What I like about the 717 is that you can fit a medium size roller luggage in the overhead. I think Island Air may be on the right track with their order of the Q400 I think it's called. Again according to Aviation Leak they can't be beat in the 200 mile market and save 30-40% on fuel. Who knows, I'd have to compare prices and actually fly the aircraft to figure out if I'd switch. Hawaiian's online check in and drive in baggage check makes it pretty persuasive for me to stay there.
#22
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Suburbia :rolleyes:
Programs: UA, HA, CO
Posts: 975
Originally Posted by 808
The RJ factor brings up some interesting things. I culled this out of Aviation Week (leak) and their data showed that it was actually more expensive to operate Rj's per revenue seat mile than it was to operate 737-200's. I'm not sure if that factored in maintenance costs for maintaining the older aircraft and pilot pay scales.
Originally Posted by 808
I've only flown on an RJ once (embraer) and the space was pretty tight. I'm not sure that would go over for this market unless the price was right.
Originally Posted by 808
What I like about the 717 is that you can fit a medium size roller luggage in the overhead.
Originally Posted by 808
I think Island Air may be on the right track with their order of the Q400 I think it's called. Again according to Aviation Leak they can't be beat in the 200 mile market and save 30-40% on fuel.
#23

Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: duh
Programs: AA, UA, HH, *wood
Posts: 605
Are people just trying to avoid AQ?
I've been pricing an inter-island itinerary for the past couple of weeks. Both HA and AQ looked about the same in terms of pricing and availability until today.
It looks like AQ just opened up availability and is pricing about $30-40 less than HA. I'm not planning a trip next month...but rather this week actually.
Is it just me? I was considering using points, but at this rate (and based on other discussions) the cost is pretty good.
I've been pricing an inter-island itinerary for the past couple of weeks. Both HA and AQ looked about the same in terms of pricing and availability until today.
It looks like AQ just opened up availability and is pricing about $30-40 less than HA. I'm not planning a trip next month...but rather this week actually.
Is it just me? I was considering using points, but at this rate (and based on other discussions) the cost is pretty good.
#24
Moderator: Hawaii-based airlines & Hawai'i forums


Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ka ʻĀpala Nui, Nuioka
Programs: NEXUS/Global Entry, Delta, United, Hyatt, IHG, Marriott, and Hertz
Posts: 18,721
Originally Posted by LAX Gambit
Are people just trying to avoid AQ?
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/showp...07&postcount=7
#28
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Suburbia :rolleyes:
Programs: UA, HA, CO
Posts: 975
Try fly late-morning or early-evening and watch those flights fill to capacity! My most recent HNL-ITO trip (09:35 depart, and 13:40 return) were both overbooked! Same trend has happened to me in the past, but it must be my luck in selecting flights.
#29
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Jose, CA
Programs: UAL1K 2MM UGS, Hilton Gold
Posts: 1,004
RJ ramblings
Wow - I was incognito for a few days and this thread really took off!
Some fascinating comments here which got my mind to thinking. . .
Regarding RJ's - here's the problem I see. Since using the current model EVERY flight has to go to HNL. And since HNL is gate limited. And since AQ never has a free gate for even 15 minutes all day long. A move to RJ's would in effect cut their daily capacity (and I presume revenue) by 30% - which makes no sense.
But then my mind started to wander a little wider. For example WHY does every friggen flight have to land in HNL? Maybe there is a workable RJ model based on flights from LIH - OGG, OGG - ITO, KOA - HNL? I'm certainly not saying don't fly to HNL, only that there might be enough neighbor island business to keep a small fleet of RJ's busy many cycles per day. Throw in a few stops on Oahu and perhaps the pressure cycles per days would be cut by 20 or 30% greatly reducing maintanance costs.
Let the mind wander even further. If you extended operating hours and flew a few early morning / late evening flights you might also pick up fares that otherwise go unserved.
Of course doing any of these things requires breaking out of the "me too" mode in which both AQ and HA operate.
Aloha,
Lihu'e 1k
Some fascinating comments here which got my mind to thinking. . .
Regarding RJ's - here's the problem I see. Since using the current model EVERY flight has to go to HNL. And since HNL is gate limited. And since AQ never has a free gate for even 15 minutes all day long. A move to RJ's would in effect cut their daily capacity (and I presume revenue) by 30% - which makes no sense.
But then my mind started to wander a little wider. For example WHY does every friggen flight have to land in HNL? Maybe there is a workable RJ model based on flights from LIH - OGG, OGG - ITO, KOA - HNL? I'm certainly not saying don't fly to HNL, only that there might be enough neighbor island business to keep a small fleet of RJ's busy many cycles per day. Throw in a few stops on Oahu and perhaps the pressure cycles per days would be cut by 20 or 30% greatly reducing maintanance costs.
Let the mind wander even further. If you extended operating hours and flew a few early morning / late evening flights you might also pick up fares that otherwise go unserved.
Of course doing any of these things requires breaking out of the "me too" mode in which both AQ and HA operate.
Aloha,
Lihu'e 1k

