Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Aloha's future?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 28, 2005 | 12:07 pm
  #16  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Suburbia :rolleyes:
Programs: UA, HA, CO
Posts: 975
Originally Posted by 808
Aq's first big hurdle will be when their credit card debt comes due in I think Oct. I think it was 65 mil at something alittle above 10% interest. Seeing as how they are losing money during the peak season it will be interesting to see who will cough up the money.
Will they be paying interest-only or payments to principal?
I'm also interested to see how they will cough up the money for this.
asu-ua772 is offline  
Old Jul 28, 2005 | 5:33 pm
  #17  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Community Builder
Community Influencer
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Berkeley, CA USA
Programs: Piggly Wiggly "Shop the Pig!" Preferred Shopper
Posts: 60,677
Originally Posted by asu-ua772
...as of recent, most of the interisland flights (both AQ and HA) have had astonishing load factors (Summer, perhaps), and if that trend continues into the low season, and AQ suddenly goes belly-up, some major disruptions can be seen in the islands....asu-ua772
I doubt any disruptions would last long. There are surprisingly low barriers to entry in commercial avaition. If the demand is there, the planes will come pretty quickly.
dhuey is offline  
Old Jul 29, 2005 | 10:14 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Suburbia :rolleyes:
Programs: UA, HA, CO
Posts: 975
Originally Posted by dhuey
I doubt any disruptions would last long. There are surprisingly low barriers to entry in commercial avaition. If the demand is there, the planes will come pretty quickly.
True, but which existing airline would even bring a dedicated fleet of mainline aircraft to the islands to pick up AQ's slack? Doubt any airline will want to keep 10+ mainline jets that active for long. Maybe some CRJs or FlyHawaii could do the trick.

P.S.---Any news about them lately?
asu-ua772 is offline  
Old Jul 31, 2005 | 9:34 am
  #19  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Community Builder
Community Influencer
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Berkeley, CA USA
Programs: Piggly Wiggly "Shop the Pig!" Preferred Shopper
Posts: 60,677
Originally Posted by asu-ua772
...Maybe some CRJs or FlyHawaii could do the trick....
That's what I would expect. It wouldn't take that much capital to put together a fleet of CRJs.
dhuey is offline  
Old Jul 31, 2005 | 2:01 pm
  #20  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi [+MKK4 EBBER R577 EDSEL R577 ELKEY EXERT]
Posts: 15,915
Originally Posted by asu-ua772
P.S.---Any news about them lately?
Sometime in early 2006 is the latest news.
slippahs is offline  
Old Aug 1, 2005 | 12:39 am
  #21  
808
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 20
The RJ factor brings up some interesting things. I culled this out of Aviation Week (leak) and their data showed that it was actually more expensive to operate Rj's per revenue seat mile than it was to operate 737-200's. I'm not sure if that factored in maintenance costs for maintaining the older aircraft and pilot pay scales. I've only flown on an RJ once (embraer) and the space was pretty tight. I'm not sure that would go over for this market unless the price was right. What I like about the 717 is that you can fit a medium size roller luggage in the overhead. I think Island Air may be on the right track with their order of the Q400 I think it's called. Again according to Aviation Leak they can't be beat in the 200 mile market and save 30-40% on fuel. Who knows, I'd have to compare prices and actually fly the aircraft to figure out if I'd switch. Hawaiian's online check in and drive in baggage check makes it pretty persuasive for me to stay there.
808 is offline  
Old Aug 1, 2005 | 9:19 am
  #22  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Suburbia :rolleyes:
Programs: UA, HA, CO
Posts: 975
Originally Posted by 808
The RJ factor brings up some interesting things. I culled this out of Aviation Week (leak) and their data showed that it was actually more expensive to operate Rj's per revenue seat mile than it was to operate 737-200's. I'm not sure if that factored in maintenance costs for maintaining the older aircraft and pilot pay scales.
Interesting stats there. Should look into this more for myself.

Originally Posted by 808
I've only flown on an RJ once (embraer) and the space was pretty tight. I'm not sure that would go over for this market unless the price was right.
Agreed. RJ space (both CRJ and ERJ) are tight and will not go over very well in the Hawai'i market unless the price is right. In a market where people want regular sized jets for interisland travel, the RJ could be hard to promote.

Originally Posted by 808
What I like about the 717 is that you can fit a medium size roller luggage in the overhead.
Yes. The overhead bins on 717 are some of the largest in the industry. I believe they are 777 sized. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Originally Posted by 808
I think Island Air may be on the right track with their order of the Q400 I think it's called. Again according to Aviation Leak they can't be beat in the 200 mile market and save 30-40% on fuel.
Yes. Island Air has ordered 2(???) Q400s that are putting them in the right direction for the future. They can be utilized across Island Air's more busier segments.
asu-ua772 is offline  
Old Aug 1, 2005 | 10:53 am
  #23  
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: duh
Programs: AA, UA, HH, *wood
Posts: 605
Are people just trying to avoid AQ?

I've been pricing an inter-island itinerary for the past couple of weeks. Both HA and AQ looked about the same in terms of pricing and availability until today.

It looks like AQ just opened up availability and is pricing about $30-40 less than HA. I'm not planning a trip next month...but rather this week actually.

Is it just me? I was considering using points, but at this rate (and based on other discussions) the cost is pretty good.
LAX Gambit is offline  
Old Aug 1, 2005 | 11:44 am
  #24  
Moderator: Hawaii-based airlines & Hawai'i forums
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ka ʻĀpala Nui, Nuioka
Programs: NEXUS/Global Entry, Delta, United, Hyatt, IHG, Marriott, and Hertz
Posts: 18,721
Originally Posted by LAX Gambit
Are people just trying to avoid AQ?
It pains me to say it, but AQ is no longer my first choice for inter-island travel.

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/showp...07&postcount=7
FlyinHawaiian is offline  
Old Aug 1, 2005 | 12:23 pm
  #25  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: PDX/HND
Programs: UA GS 4MM
Posts: 558
Originally Posted by LAX Gambit
Are people just trying to avoid AQ?
flew aq koa-hnl a week ago to connect to nrt, and came back aq hnl-koa this past weekend. on timel, friendly, and great pog :-)
randyqx is offline  
Old Aug 1, 2005 | 2:51 pm
  #26  
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: duh
Programs: AA, UA, HH, *wood
Posts: 605
Originally Posted by randyqx
flew aq koa-hnl a week ago to connect to nrt, and came back aq hnl-koa this past weekend. on timel, friendly, and great pog :-)
Was the flight full? Or, wide open?
LAX Gambit is offline  
Old Aug 1, 2005 | 2:58 pm
  #27  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: PDX/HND
Programs: UA GS 4MM
Posts: 558
koa-hnl at 06:55 on a sunday was maybe half full. hnl-koa at 08:30 saturday was a bit less. inter-island, both aloha and hawaiian seem to run half full at the times i fly.
randyqx is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2005 | 5:11 pm
  #28  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Suburbia :rolleyes:
Programs: UA, HA, CO
Posts: 975
Try fly late-morning or early-evening and watch those flights fill to capacity! My most recent HNL-ITO trip (09:35 depart, and 13:40 return) were both overbooked! Same trend has happened to me in the past, but it must be my luck in selecting flights.
asu-ua772 is offline  
Old Aug 4, 2005 | 8:51 am
  #29  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Jose, CA
Programs: UAL1K 2MM UGS, Hilton Gold
Posts: 1,004
RJ ramblings

Wow - I was incognito for a few days and this thread really took off!

Some fascinating comments here which got my mind to thinking. . .

Regarding RJ's - here's the problem I see. Since using the current model EVERY flight has to go to HNL. And since HNL is gate limited. And since AQ never has a free gate for even 15 minutes all day long. A move to RJ's would in effect cut their daily capacity (and I presume revenue) by 30% - which makes no sense.

But then my mind started to wander a little wider. For example WHY does every friggen flight have to land in HNL? Maybe there is a workable RJ model based on flights from LIH - OGG, OGG - ITO, KOA - HNL? I'm certainly not saying don't fly to HNL, only that there might be enough neighbor island business to keep a small fleet of RJ's busy many cycles per day. Throw in a few stops on Oahu and perhaps the pressure cycles per days would be cut by 20 or 30% greatly reducing maintanance costs.

Let the mind wander even further. If you extended operating hours and flew a few early morning / late evening flights you might also pick up fares that otherwise go unserved.

Of course doing any of these things requires breaking out of the "me too" mode in which both AQ and HA operate.

Aloha,

Lihu'e 1k
lihue1k is offline  
Old Aug 4, 2005 | 11:52 pm
  #30  
808
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 20
Good points 1K, maybe with an RJ the skip HNL flights could work. I also like the late night flights. I know they would miss the connecting mainland traffic but who knows could work with the late workers.
808 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.