![]() |
Originally Posted by 84fiero
(Post 29029687)
True, although it might be close to a toss-up between TPOL and "Renes Points"
|
Originally Posted by GUWonder
(Post 29031359)
Bloggers and credit card issuers in the US3 airline program space aren’t in the driver’s seat for the massive devaluation decision-making of any of the US3 airline programs.
I look forward to reading your comprehensive, definitive volume based on all your detailed insight on what has motivated changes in loyalty programs. Until then, Im going to stick by my well reasoned hypothesis regardless of your criticism. Thanks xoxohth. |
Originally Posted by nineworldseries
(Post 29031865)
Touche. The latter I've fully repressed from my memory and consciousness.
|
Originally Posted by Adam1222
(Post 29032700)
And given that those programs have been devaluing for 4 or 5 years and the number if garbage Boarding Area blogs has increased in that time, devaluation of loyalty programs isn't discouraging the proliferation of garbage blogs.
I look forward to reading your comprehensive, definitive volume based on all your detailed insight on what has motivated changes in loyalty programs. Until then, Im going to stick by my well reasoned hypothesis regardless of your criticism. Thanks xoxohth. I’d wager your LSAT score was killer |
Originally Posted by Adam1222
(Post 29029785)
Maybe. But maybe this has causation confused as it's not clear these garbage blogs ever had anything to do with high value mileage programs. Blogs proliferated because of the growth of credit card marketing profiteering, encouraged by people like Randy, with no relationship to the actual value of frequent flier programs. Quantity over quality, blogs by people who have never leftthe lower 48 except one time using miles from a credit card signup, etc.
The credit card marketing model and the blogs pushing it to the masses who will never be frequent fliers is a factor in the devaluation of mileage programs, not vice versa . Some bloggers have made a living off of selling credit cards and helped kill the benefits of frequent flying. |
Originally Posted by Adam1222
(Post 29032700)
And given that those programs have been devaluing for 4 or 5 years and the number if garbage Boarding Area blogs has increased in that time, devaluation of loyalty programs isn't discouraging the proliferation of garbage blogs.
I look forward to reading your comprehensive, definitive volume based on all your detailed insight on what has motivated changes in loyalty programs. Until then, Im going to stick by my well reasoned hypothesis regardless of your criticism. Thanks xoxohth. The bloggers and credit card issuers in this space jumped into the cart for the trip led by a horse and horse-rider/jockey/driver that were leading the program devaluation show. The owners/managers of the airlines/airline programs are the party with ultimate responsibility for the massive program devaluations which have repeatedly hit consumers in the airline loyalty program space. The US3 airlines' programs have been massively devalued in ways that bloggers and credit card issuers couldn't and didn't stop. And yet some want to scapegoat those coat-tail-/cart-riders for the actions of the bad horse/jockey. Go figure, but there doesn't seem to be anything well-reasoned about wanting to point the finger of blame for such massive devaluations at figures other than those most directly responsible for the massive program devaluations in the US. Unsound and invalid hypotheses and conclusions don't impress me. |
Originally Posted by RFDMinnesota
(Post 29034348)
Why are all of your posts so damn smart!? Your answers are always so well reasoned and logical, almost in a formal sense. It’s impressive.
I’d wager your LSAT score was killer |
Originally Posted by GUWonder
(Post 29034436)
Blaming bloggers and credit card issuers for airline management's decisions to massively devalue an airline loyalty program is anything but an example of a well-reasoned hypothesis or conclusion.
The bloggers and credit card issuers in this space jumped into the cart for the trip led by a horse and horse-rider/jockey/driver that were leading the program devaluation show. The owners/managers of the airlines/airline programs are the party with ultimate responsibility for the massive program devaluations which have repeatedly hit consumers in the airline loyalty program space. The US3 airlines' programs have been massively devalued in ways that bloggers and credit card issuers couldn't and didn't stop. And yet some want to scapegoat those coat-tail-/cart-riders for the actions of the bad horse/jockey. Go figure, but there doesn't seem to be anything well-reasoned about wanting to point the finger of blame for such massive devaluations at figures other than those most directly responsible for the massive program devaluations in the US. Unsound and invalid hypotheses and conclusions don't impress me. I think it's possible to have competing hypotheses without being belittling and derisive. <shrug> So you're Brad Pitt.... |
Originally Posted by Adam1222
(Post 29034670)
Cool. Now care to address the factual point that blogs have continued to grow though programs have been devaluing for at least 5 years?
I think it's possible to have competing hypotheses without being belittling and derisive. <shrug> So you're Brad Pitt.... The barriers to entry in the blogosphere are so low and the potential consumers for blogs and airline loyalty programs so numerous that blog growth taking place shouldn't be a surprise -- even for those blogs whose quality has declined over time. |
Originally Posted by GUWonder
(Post 29034704)
:rolleyes:
The barriers to entry in the blogosphere are so low and the potential consumers for blogs and airline loyalty programs so numerous that blog growth taking place shouldn't be a surprise -- even for those blogs whose quality has declined over time. Sounds like someone is blaming airlines for unscrupulous credit card marketers, House of Miles businessmen, and poor quality writing. Or something. I'm not sure if you're actually defending Boarding Area bloggers or just being disagreeable. That don't impress me much. Hope your eyes don't get stuck in the back of your head. :cool: :confused: :eek: |
Originally Posted by Adam1222
(Post 29034828)
I'm not sure if you're actually defending Boarding Area bloggers or just being disagreeable.
|
Originally Posted by GUWonder
(Post 29034839)
Great that you’re not sure, as for me it’s simply neither of the above.
|
Oh so you'll continue reading my posts on frequent miler then? Sorry, couldn't resist.
|
I'm not going to pretend that my food descriptions are real quality. They aren't intended to be. I blog while I'm traveling and hope the pictures tell the story. The point is to have a quick recap of what I drank and ate. I couldn't spend hours detailing the texture of the cheese. That's not the objective of the blog. It's a guide for people like me who go into a city for two days and don't want to read lonely planet. And if read chronologically to tell a story of the whole trip from cover to cover.
|
Originally Posted by thepointsoflife
(Post 29035701)
I'm not going to pretend that my food descriptions are real quality. They aren't intended to be. I blog while I'm traveling and hope the pictures tell the story. The point is to have a quick recap of what I drank and ate. I couldn't spend hours detailing the texture of the cheese. That's not the objective of the blog. It's a guide for people like me who go into a city for two days and don't want to read lonely planet. And if read chronologically to tell a story of the whole trip from cover to cover.
How is a guide for people? Explain this? I gave your blog an honest chance. Someone asked you if kids were free when going to Machu Picchu and you replied: "No idea but let me advise you of the terrible insect bites from going up there without bug spray. Itching for weeks so make sure the kids are covered up. " |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:23 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.