Community
Wiki Posts
Search

EVA AIR 2018 Outlook/Future Fleet Plans

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 14, 2018, 10:58 am
  #241  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: SFO
Programs: BR Diamond, Dynasty Flyer Paragon, Marriott Lifetime Plat
Posts: 1,926
Originally Posted by someone0000
Interesting that 35K is under consideration as it seems at odds with their long term preference to partner with GE for engines. 35K only offers RR engines.

Not to mention the benefits of converting 77W pilots to 777X!
They would be doing the company and it’s shareholders a disservice if they did not consider everything that is available on the market.
hayzel7773 is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2018, 12:02 pm
  #242  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 75
Originally Posted by someone0000
Interesting that 35K is under consideration as it seems at odds with their long term preference to partner with GE for engines. 35K only offers RR engines.

Not to mention the benefits of converting 77W pilots to 777X!
Whats the benefit of saving money by having less transition costs for a new aircraft type when there is the possibility that you cant fill it?

There a re a lot of things which need to be considered when ordering new aircraft.
hayzel7773 likes this.
iamamadscientist is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2018, 4:57 pm
  #243  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: LAX
Programs: AA Plat, DL, AS, UA, IHG Plat
Posts: 2,409
When there are only 2 choices in the market, you have to consider them both. However unlikely for A35K to get the nod over 779 for BR, it seems silly to not at least have airbus pitch and make a case for it.

I don't think BR is in a hurry to place an order. They have lots of 787-10 still to come and I believe they can also opt to take more 787-9 instead of 787-10 so they can down gauge some routes as the older 77W exit the fleet.

I actually think it is more likely that BR will order 797 before they order 779. BR can certainly use something bigger than A321 but smaller than 787-10.
bzcat is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2018, 8:17 pm
  #244  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,974
Oh, how can a good Taiwanese bargainer not play 2 competitors against each other even if he/she knows who will be picked already

So, where did things go wrong with the incorrect projection of capacity needs? Was K Chang too ambitious (or, without him, BR could not grow as much)? Is the main problem the delay of transitting Mainland passengers (which neither KMT nor DPP government probably would have gotten)?

Last edited by username; Dec 14, 2018 at 8:45 pm
username is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2018, 8:52 pm
  #245  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: SFO
Programs: BR Diamond, Dynasty Flyer Paragon, Marriott Lifetime Plat
Posts: 1,926
Originally Posted by username
Oh, how can a good Taiwanese bargainer not play 2 competitors against each other even if he/she knows who will be picked already

So, where did things go wrong with the incorrect projection of capacity needs? Was K Chang too ambitious (or, without him, BR could not grow as much)? Is the main problem the delay of transitting Mainland passengers (which neither KMT nor DPP government probably would have gotten)?
It's the lack of transit pax and also the inability to grow out of TPE anymore. The previous promise of a 2020 Terminal 3 is no longer viable, straining the airports slots and BR's growth. KMT actually could've gotten transit deal; unfortunately, they ran out of time.

Last edited by hayzel7773; Dec 14, 2018 at 9:01 pm
hayzel7773 is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2018, 9:29 pm
  #246  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bay Area
Programs: UA 1k now; AA (no status); HY Diamond; SPG Platinum
Posts: 707
Originally Posted by hayzel7773
It's the lack of transit pax and also the inability to grow out of TPE anymore. The previous promise of a 2020 Terminal 3 is no longer viable, straining the airports slots and BR's growth. KMT actually could've gotten transit deal; unfortunately, they ran out of time.
transit deal is a farce at best.

1. There are tons of excess capacity from the Chinese carriers. Looks at prices they are charging. Why would any Chinese want to transit?

2. The transit agreement would end up hurting BR and CI more. As more Taiwanese will transit thru China.

krispykrme is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2018, 9:31 pm
  #247  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bay Area
Programs: UA 1k now; AA (no status); HY Diamond; SPG Platinum
Posts: 707
Originally Posted by username
Oh, how can a good Taiwanese bargainer not play 2 competitors against each other even if he/she knows who will be picked already

So, where did things go wrong with the incorrect projection of capacity needs? Was K Chang too ambitious (or, without him, BR could not grow as much)? Is the main problem the delay of transitting Mainland passengers (which neither KMT nor DPP government probably would have gotten)?
again any trade deal with China will simply back fire. Since everything is China government sponsored.

You can can get a business class seat from west coast US to Asia around $1400 on CZ or CE. BR and CI wouldn’t be able to survive.
krispykrme is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2018, 9:36 pm
  #248  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: SFO
Programs: BR Diamond, Dynasty Flyer Paragon, Marriott Lifetime Plat
Posts: 1,926
In the next few years, we will begin to see how well EVP Albert Liao of Corporate Planning and President Clay Sun are at their job as BR deals with the influx of planes into their fleet. if their good, the airline will grow significantly while maintaining decent profits. If not, they need to find someone quick.

The Chairman Steve Lin is a very hands off guy and is mainly there as a representative to ensure shareholder and Evergreen group compliance and relations. He isn't even there most of the time.
hayzel7773 is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2018, 10:05 pm
  #249  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,974
Originally Posted by krispykrme
transit deal is a farce at best.

1. There are tons of excess capacity from the Chinese carriers. Looks at prices they are charging. Why would any Chinese want to transit?

2. The transit agreement would end up hurting BR and CI more. As more Taiwanese will transit thru China.


I would think people who appreciate BR and CI over the Mainland carriers would pay the extra for better service? Why do people from mainland take OZ/NH/JL/KE/CX? BR/CI have the advantage of language.

There are plenty of people in Taiwan already transitting through Mainland to save money. Why would any deal make even more people transit through Mainland?
username is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2018, 11:42 pm
  #250  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bay Area
Programs: UA 1k now; AA (no status); HY Diamond; SPG Platinum
Posts: 707
Originally Posted by username
I would think people who appreciate BR and CI over the Mainland carriers would pay the extra for better service? Why do people from mainland take OZ/NH/JL/KE/CX? BR/CI have the advantage of language.

There are plenty of people in Taiwan already transitting through Mainland to save money. Why would any deal make even more people transit through Mainland?
1. CX has already came out and say that Chinese and ME3 are impacting their bottom line

"The airline attributed its performance to a number of adverse factors. A Cathay spokeswoman cited the growth in number of direct flights between mainland China and international destinations, as well as competition from global airlines in the region."

This was part of new article just in late 2017.

2. You do realize one the concession was for Taiwan to accept one china policy with each side have interpretation.

3. Under the previously discussed transit agreement- both side will no longer need check each side document (China will not check Taiwanese citizen card issue by them, and reverse it true). In other words- it became similar to a domestic to domestic transfer. This would means that Taiwanese citizen would not need to apply for China issued Taiwan resident card and can transit through china unchecked.

4. When the transit agreement was proposed- Chinese carriers was going to operate 15 out of 20 flights from 3 cities that will pilot the transit program. Taiwanese carrier was allocated 5.

The proposal was extremely onside.
krispykrme is offline  
Old Dec 15, 2018, 1:58 am
  #251  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Programs: DL Gold, QF, VA, CI
Posts: 99
Originally Posted by username
Oh, how can a good Taiwanese bargainer not play 2 competitors against each other even if he/she knows who will be picked already
The problem is people also underestimate how much suppliers already know! ;-)
someone0000 is offline  
Old Dec 15, 2018, 11:07 am
  #252  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,974
Originally Posted by krispykrme
1. CX has already came out and say that Chinese and ME3 are impacting their bottom line

"The airline attributed its performance to a number of adverse factors. A Cathay spokeswoman cited the growth in number of direct flights between mainland China and international destinations, as well as competition from global airlines in the region."

This was part of new article just in late 2017.

2. You do realize one the concession was for Taiwan to accept one china policy with each side have interpretation.

3. Under the previously discussed transit agreement- both side will no longer need check each side document (China will not check Taiwanese citizen card issue by them, and reverse it true). In other words- it became similar to a domestic to domestic transfer. This would means that Taiwanese citizen would not need to apply for China issued Taiwan resident card and can transit through china unchecked.

4. When the transit agreement was proposed- Chinese carriers was going to operate 15 out of 20 flights from 3 cities that will pilot the transit program. Taiwanese carrier was allocated 5.

The proposal was extremely onside.
This discussion is obviously getting very political and it seems there is the "blame China on everything" attitude.

Some of the old discussions are here: Mainland China Considering Allowing Citizens to Transit Through Taiwan

This was in negotiations before the DPP government took over and the KMT government could not get it done either. Back then, the reports said that it was the Mainland carriers who objected this.

For #2 , many in Taiwan do consider the "one China, self-expression" arrangement THE standing agreement between the two sides since 1992, right? The "concession" is only in the mind of those who do not recognize this agreement, such as the current DPP government and some of their supporters.

Yes, there is a lot of unfair advantages on the Mainland carriers' side. Opening up transit passengers will help CI and BR chip away some of that, right?

I can argue all I want with you but I don't have the numbers CI and BR have. Taiwan's internal market is small. Intra-Asia yields are dropping due to LCCs. They have to rely on transit passengers - that is how they have grown the last 20+ years. With ULH planes and carriers like VN get stronger, CI and BR have to find new passenger / cargo sources.

The fact that BR and CI want this and have planned for this tell you they think it will work for them, right?
username is offline  
Old Dec 15, 2018, 11:45 am
  #253  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,974
Originally Posted by someone0000
The problem is people also underestimate how much suppliers already know! ;-)
Of course, a good sales person is always full of hopes and dreams and will play along
username is offline  
Old Dec 15, 2018, 9:37 pm
  #254  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bay Area
Programs: UA 1k now; AA (no status); HY Diamond; SPG Platinum
Posts: 707
Originally Posted by username
This discussion is obviously getting very political and it seems there is the "blame China on everything" attitude.

Some of the old discussions are here: Mainland China Considering Allowing Citizens to Transit Through Taiwan

This was in negotiations before the DPP government took over and the KMT government could not get it done either. Back then, the reports said that it was the Mainland carriers who objected this.

For #2 , many in Taiwan do consider the "one China, self-expression" arrangement THE standing agreement between the two sides since 1992, right? The "concession" is only in the mind of those who do not recognize this agreement, such as the current DPP government and some of their supporters.

Yes, there is a lot of unfair advantages on the Mainland carriers' side. Opening up transit passengers will help CI and BR chip away some of that, right?

I can argue all I want with you but I don't have the numbers CI and BR have. Taiwan's internal market is small. Intra-Asia yields are dropping due to LCCs. They have to rely on transit passengers - that is how they have grown the last 20+ years. With ULH planes and carriers like VN get stronger, CI and BR have to find new passenger / cargo sources.

The fact that BR and CI want this and have planned for this tell you they think it will work for them, right?
No. In fact many are opposed so called one China policy. If that is accepted, there wouldn’t be any green or blue fight every 2 years.

CI and BR wanted this back in 2014 under a blue government. Right now the focus is not even on China market. China and Taiwan is a political agenda. To rely on Chinese market is a suicide. Because once the situation from Chinese government changes, there will be no Chinese citizen coming to Taiwan.

i think you really need to see what has happened last two years before saying that CI and BR want this.

TPE has actually grown and the transit passenger BR carried actually grew in 2018.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ett...ews_id=1234698



Last edited by NWIFlyer; Dec 15, 2018 at 11:13 pm Reason: Remove OMNI material
krispykrme is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2018, 11:01 pm
  #255  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,974
Originally Posted by krispykrme


No. In fact many are opposed so called one China policy. If that is accepted, there wouldn’t be any green or blue fight every 2 years.

CI and BR wanted this back in 2014 under a blue government. Right now the focus is not even on China market. China and Taiwan is a political agenda. To rely on Chinese market is a suicide. Because once the situation from Chinese government changes, there will be no Chinese citizen coming to Taiwan.

i think you really need to see what has happened last two years before saying that CI and BR want this.

TPE has actually grown and the transit passenger BR carried actually grew in 2018.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ett...ews_id=1234698


The discussions are getting very political. I can't change your view and you can't change mine. So, we should just stop here.
username is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.