I can state unequivocally that the proposed repatriation flights by Etihad and Emirates carry significant operational risk due to the highly volatile and contested nature of the regional airspace. Even with planned rerouting via Saudi Arabian corridors, departure and initial climb-out phases from Abu Dhabi and Dubai would occur within or immediately adjacent to airspace classified as an active conflict zone—characterized by ongoing missile threats, drone activity, aerial interceptions, and potential for rapid escalation involving ballistic threats or debris hazards.

[...]

Civilian airline crews and widebody aircraft lack the requisite training, defensive systems (LAIRCM, chaff/flares), or authorization to penetrate or operate in such high-threat airspace. The safety case for these flights would be extremely challenging to justify under current ICAO risk assessment paradigms ( SMS hazard identification, ALARP principles) given the demonstrated kinetic activity near both major hubs—including direct impacts, debris events, and partial airspace closures reported in recent days. this is not a routine repositioning or humanitarian airlift in permissive airspace; it borders on conducting commercial passenger operations in what is effectively a near-warzone environment without the doctrinal, equipment, or procedural safeguards afforded to dedicated military evacuation platforms. Extreme caution is warranted.