UK apparently bans EK shower spa attendants
Nov 4, 2019, 7:16 am
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: New York
Programs: EK Platinum, AA EXP, Marriott Platinum, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 1,148
UK apparently bans EK shower spa attendants
Interesting article on OMAAT this morning regarding the UK banning EK shower attendants as they don't have the same licenses FA's do, and thus are not allowed the same visa privileges. Seems odd to bring this up years after EK started flying the A380 to the UK.
EK's solution in the interim is to staff another purser or F FA to clean the showers. Heres the link to the post: https://onemileatatime.com/uk-bans-e...er-attendants/
EK's solution in the interim is to staff another purser or F FA to clean the showers. Heres the link to the post: https://onemileatatime.com/uk-bans-e...er-attendants/
Nov 4, 2019, 12:14 pm
#2
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dubai
Programs: SPG, HHonors
Posts: 122
I wonder if some of the Cabin Service Attendants might have recently "overstayed" their visa, as happens on cruise ships, and hence the sudden backlash after so many years? On cruise ships, some countries refuse entry to certain nationalities unless they have some minimum number of years of service, ostensibly demonstrating by previous successful voyages that they do not intend to abscond after arrival.
Nov 4, 2019, 12:21 pm
#3
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,417
Presumably the shower attendants are less trained (and less educated) than FAs as well as being paid less. It's an interesting/creative way for EK to staff flights so as to save money and also avoid asking professional FAs to perform cleaning duties. Since EK uses more than the standard/required number of FAs, the shower attendants wouldn't need to be responsible for any safety related duties.
Nov 5, 2019, 12:33 am
#4
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere
Programs: AS MVP, EK Silver, Bonvoy Plat
Posts: 921
Don't they occupy jumpseats at UL1 and UR1? I always figured they're responsible for a door - maybe not primary responsibility, but at least some responsibility.
Nov 5, 2019, 2:43 am
#6
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Economy, mostly :(
Programs: Skywards Gold
Posts: 7,801
They 100% will, at least to LHR. The brand damage/dilution on their most premium route would he too severe. And they're saving on 2 spa attendants, and while they're paid much less 2 of them for 1 FA is probably palatable to EK. Also they could roster more junior FAs to be responsible for this
Nov 5, 2019, 3:19 am
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,750
Nov 5, 2019, 3:39 am
#9
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Economy, mostly :(
Programs: Skywards Gold
Posts: 7,801
You can't travel on a regular visa when you're part of an airline crew. And airline crew do require visas for some countries in some cases (based on their nationality), they can't just automatically travel anywhere because they're crew, OMAAT is wrong in that regard. The US certainly has specific restrictions and documentation requirements, I'd expect the UK to also likely have these.
Nov 5, 2019, 4:14 am
#10
Moderator, Emirates
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Where My Heart Is
Programs: BAEC Silver, FB Platinum, KQ Asante Gold, Shebamiles Blue, Emirates Blue
Posts: 3,386
You can't travel on a regular visa when you're part of an airline crew. And airline crew do require visas for some countries in some cases (based on their nationality), they can't just automatically travel anywhere because they're crew, OMAAT is wrong in that regard. The US certainly has specific restrictions and documentation requirements, I'd expect the UK to also likely have these.
I found out on a later flight that the crew had been admitted however could not be rostered on any LHR-Moscow flight for a considerable amount of time due to their immigration record in Russia.
Nov 5, 2019, 6:20 am
#11
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: DXB
Programs: EK, AA, DL, UA, SPG, HGP, Amex
Posts: 1,208
these bloggers are not known for their accuracy in reporting.
For one, I have never seen this:
They would spend their entire flight cleaning lavs on an A380!
For one, I have never seen this:
The shower attendants also clean all the bathrooms throughout the plane between cleaning showers
Nov 5, 2019, 7:13 am
#12
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: DUB / DXB
Programs: EK Gold, BA Gold
Posts: 2,471
This information is correct. The shower attendants are not flight safety trained. They occupy a passenger seat during takeoff/landing, You can spot them by their red aprons during flight. They are responsible for the showers and clean all bathrooms in all classes throughout the flight. They are paid considerably less than the cabin crew and must share hotel rooms down route.
Nov 5, 2019, 11:52 pm
#13
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 581
Nov 6, 2019, 12:03 am
#14
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 581
They 100% will, at least to LHR. The brand damage/dilution on their most premium route would he too severe. And they're saving on 2 spa attendants, and while they're paid much less 2 of them for 1 FA is probably palatable to EK. Also they could roster more junior FAs to be responsible for this
Nov 6, 2019, 2:02 am
#15
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: DXB
Programs: EK, AA, DL, UA, SPG, HGP, Amex
Posts: 1,208
This information is correct. The shower attendants are not flight safety trained. They occupy a passenger seat during takeoff/landing, You can spot them by their red aprons during flight. They are responsible for the showers and clean all bathrooms in all classes throughout the flight. They are paid considerably less than the cabin crew and must share hotel rooms down route.