![]() |
Originally Posted by skywardhunter
(Post 29939510)
Why would OMAAT know anything? They probably just read it on here
|
Originally Posted by NWplatinum
(Post 29939742)
Because OMAAT published an article saying the new F was going to be going to MUC. See the link above. The best they could do is update it or write a new one. |
Originally Posted by QRC3288
(Post 29942947)
You realize a lot of the content published on that blog and others is sourced from FT right? (sometimes without attribution.) They'll read it here often, and confirm it with PR reps or an article, and cite that. But either way, if you're not tied in directly to the airline itself, FT remains a far better source for info IMO.
|
Originally Posted by NWplatinum
(Post 29943052)
You do realize that one of the reasons OMAAT is so successful, or for any blog that is successful for that matter is that the information they share is correct, right? |
Originally Posted by skywardhunter
(Post 29943101)
We're going off topic a bit here, but a lot of stuff OMAAT posts is poorly interpreted and misrepresented, though somewhat correct, a lot of it is entirely correct, almost none of it is exclusive or first posted there. It's a great aggregator, and a website I read daily, but they don't have some sort of inside scoop for most of their stories (they do occasionally it appears), and virtually every "article" is a rip-off from another site, usually TPG (*vomit*) or VFTW. Add to this the constant repetition with the 4-paragraph intros recapping the article on the same topic written the day before and it makes for painful reading sometimes, I honestly don't know why I keep going back to read it, it annoys me but equally as I said, it's a great aggregator (like the FT homepage but that's got such a terrible interface I stopped using it)
|
Originally Posted by NWplatinum
(Post 29943179)
I hundred percent agree, and I don’t want to get that off topic. But my point is they are not in the business of disseminating false information. And when they do they almost always correct it. In fact this is the first instance I have ever seen in reading the blog in five years of getting wrong information, and them not correcting it or putting out another post saying how things have changed. As a small correction, they're in the business of getting page views and eyeballs, and that traffic they attempt to monetize in various ways. While I agree in general that successful monetization shouldn't (hopefully doesn't) mean posting inaccurate info leads to making money, having a successful blog is by no means proof that posting inaccurate info is a BAD business model, either. Gossip columns everywhere and TMZ have very successful franchises doing this. And just for the record I enjoy the blog! But my heart is still with FT. |
Originally Posted by QRC3288
(Post 29943310)
And just for the record I enjoy the blog! But my heart is still with FT.
|
Originally Posted by NWplatinum
(Post 29943179)
But my point is they are not in the business of disseminating false information. And when they do they almost always correct it.
https://onemileatatime.boardingarea....xt-few-months/ |
Back to the topic of this thread, I booked MUC-DXB for December in paid F, so I could try out the new F. I just checked the seat map again and noticed it’s swtiched back to the old 8 seat F. Any chance that MUC will switch back to the new 77W for the winter? Do I have any legit complaint to get switched to FRA-DXB instead? I know booking so far in advance there’s always the risk of aircraft change, but I thought it would stick as they announced MUC as getting the new F. |
Originally Posted by S.R
(Post 29943937)
Back to the topic of this thread, I booked MUC-DXB for December in paid F, so I could try out the new F. I just checked the seat map again and noticed it’s swtiched back to the old 8 seat F. Any chance that MUC will switch back to the new 77W for the winter? Do I have any legit complaint to get switched to FRA-DXB instead? I know booking so far in advance there’s always the risk of aircraft change, but I thought it would stick as they announced MUC as getting the new F. |
Originally Posted by skywardhunter
(Post 29944242)
You may get the change fee waived, doubt they'd waive fare difference if there is one. Luckily MUC and FRA are relatively close, nothing a train ride can't fix
|
Originally Posted by S.R
(Post 29944320)
Yea let’s hope. What do you think the chances of them changing it back to MUC? Would they let me change back again to MUC-DXB if that happens? |
Originally Posted by Kölner
(Post 29944386)
I just called Emirates Germany and asked if they could change my flight from München to Frankfurt so I get the new First Class. I told them I booked the München Flight just because of the new First Class. Emirates said, I could change the flight to Frankfurt, but it would cost 400 Euro.
|
Originally Posted by skywardhunter
(Post 29944424)
Yes but is that the fare difference or the change fee?
|
Originally Posted by Kölner
(Post 29944386)
I just called Emirates Germany and asked if they could change my flight from München to Frankfurt so I get the new First Class. I told them I booked the München Flight just because of the new First Class. Emirates said, I could change the flight to Frankfurt, but it would cost 400 Euro.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 4:53 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.